Search

In a recent paper titled Expert range maps of global mammal distributions harmonised to three taxonomic authorities , Marsh et al. (2022) introduced a series of new geographic range maps for all extant species of mammals and made these maps available on the Map of Life (MoL) website (www.mol.org). The title of the paper and inclusion of over 140 prominent mammalogists and biogeographers as coauthors strongly suggested that these new range maps were carefully vetted. However, when examining the maps of Marsh et al. (2022) on the MoL web platform, we found a variety of serious problems, including, but not limited to: range exaggerations (inclusion of substantial geographic areas not represented by specimen records or verified observations); range maps that are geographically shifted so that species are shown as occurring in areas in which they do not, and not occurring in areas in which they do (and in some cases, these new maps do not even encompass the type locality of a species); range maps that simply omit peripheral populations of conservation concern; and range maps for fully marine mammals (i.e. those that do not spend any time on land) that include large swaths of both insular and continental landmasses. Overall, we evaluated the new "expert" mammal range maps on the MoL platform for 78 species (retrieved between 31 March 2022 and 1 April 2023) and show that there are serious, systemic problems with these maps, and that these problems are both geographically and taxonomically widespread. As such, we caution researchers to carefully review and evaluate the range maps of Marsh et al. (2022) on the MoL before using them for any research purpose—including conservation, biogeographical, and macroecological analyses of mammals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preserving biodiversity in remaining old-growth forests is a high priority for many land managers. To this end, we inventoried the diversity, abundance, and distribution of epiphyte species in one 318-year-old, 86 m tall Picea sitchensis tree on the north coast of California. In 39 plots, we recorded species present and mean percent cover for each species. Our findings include the following: 1) 68 epiphyte species were found in this one tree; 2) epiphyte diversity increased with height; 3) lichens had the highest diversity of all epiphyte classes; and 4) mosses had the highest percent cover of all epiphyte classes. These findings highlight the capacity for old trees to serve as reservoirs of biodiversity in younger forests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oregon white oak (Quercus garryana) woodlands are threatened by conifer encroachment established during decades of fire exclusion. Widespread restoration efforts are underway to remove conifers from many oak woodlands in California, Oregon, and Washington. Using water potential, stomatal conductance, stable isotopes, and three metrics of biodiversity, we investigated the effects of Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) encroachment and removal at the ecosystem scale across 3 years in a northern California woodland. We found that heavily encroached stands had the highest water potential and often the lowest stomatal conductance, compared to moderately encroached and open stands. Xylem water stable isotopes indicated that oaks and Douglas‐firs were likely not directly competing for water, as oaks appeared to use a relatively deeper water source. Under certain climatic conditions, heavily encroached oaks were more vulnerable to water stress than oaks in open or moderately encroached stands. Following low‐intensity conifer removal, thinned stands had slightly lower predawn water potential and higher gas exchange compared to unthinned stands, particularly under dry conditions. For ecosystem biodiversity, understory plant and bird diversity did not meaningfully vary with encroachment or thinning, but mammal diversity was greater in encroached stands compared to open stands. Findings from this work demonstrate that negative impacts of conifer encroachment on oaks are not due to increased competition for water, conifer removal is physiologically beneficial for shaded oaks, and that heavier thinning treatments are likely needed to yield long‐term responses and influence biodiversity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]