Search

Supplementary Table S20 shows the marker genes of the different clusters in the fibroblast-enriched KPC analysis

Supplemental Figures

Table S3

Supplementary Table S1 shows patient information, Supplementary Table S2 shows cell numbers analyzed from each human PDAC sample, Supplementary Table S3 shows statistics of the clustering analysis of the human PDAC single cell RNA sequencing, Supplementary Table S5 shows statistics of the human PDAC ductal cell analysis, Supplementary Table S7 shows statistics of the human PDAC myeloid cell analysis, Supplementary Table S9 shows statistics of the human PDAC T & NK cell analysis, Supplementary Table S11 shows cell numbers analyzed for fibroblast subtypes from each human PDAC sample, Supplementary Table S12 shows statistics of the human PDAC fibroblast analysis, Supplementary Table S17 shows statistics of all viable KPC mouse cell analysis, Supplementary Table S19 shows statistics of the KPC mouse fibroblast-enriched fraction analysis, Supplementary Table S21 shows statistics of the fibroblasts from KPC mouse fibroblast-enriched population

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) are major players in the progression and drug resistance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). CAFs constitute a diverse cell population consisting of several recently described subtypes, although the extent of CAF heterogeneity has remained undefined. Here we use single-cell RNA sequencing to thoroughly characterize the neoplastic and tumor microenvironment content of human and mouse PDAC tumors. We corroborate the presence of myofibroblastic CAFs and inflammatory CAFs and define their unique gene signatures in vivo. Moreover, we describe a new population of CAFs that express MHC class II and CD74, but do not express classic costimulatory molecules. We term this cell population “antigen-presenting CAFs” and find that they activate CD4+ T cells in an antigen-specific fashion in a model system, confirming their putative immune-modulatory capacity. Our cross-species analysis paves the way for investigating distinct functions of CAF subtypes in PDAC immunity and progression.Significance:Appreciating the full spectrum of fibroblast heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is crucial to developing therapies that specifically target tumor-promoting CAFs. This work identifies MHC class II–expressing CAFs with a capacity to present antigens to CD4+ T cells, and potentially to modulate the immune response in pancreatic tumors.See related commentary by Belle and DeNardo, p. 1001.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 983

Supplementary Figure S1 shows the data quality and clustering metrics of the human PDAC single cell transcriptomes, Supplementary Figure S2 shows the distribution of sub-clusters of cells throughout the human dataset, Supplementary Figure S3 shows pathway analysis in human PDAC iCAFs and myCAFs, Supplementary Figure S4 shows the data quality and clustering metrics of the KPC mouse PDAC single cell transcriptomes, Supplementary Figure S5 shows pathway analysis in different KPC CAFs, Supplementary Figure S6 shows that Podoplanin is a pan-fibroblast marker in murine PDAC, Supplementary Figure S7 shows the validation of apCAFs in human PDAC, Supplementary Figure S8 shows the characterization of apCAFs in KPC and orthotopic transplantation models

Supplemental Table Legends

Supplementary Figure from Clinico-genomic Characterization of ATM and HRD in Pancreas Cancer: Application for Practice

Supplementary Data from Clinico-genomic Characterization of ATM and HRD in Pancreas Cancer: Application for Practice

Purpose:Characterizing germline and somatic ATM variants (gATMm, sATMm) zygosity and their contribution to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is important for therapeutic strategy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).Experimental Design:Clinico-genomic data for patients with PDAC and other cancers with ATM variants were abstracted. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were derived from ATM-mutant cancers and overall survival (OS) was evaluated.Results:Forty-six patients had PDAC and pathogenic ATM variants including 24 (52%) stage III/IV: gATMm (N = 24), and sATMm (N = 22). Twenty-seven (59%) had biallelic, 15 (33%) monoallelic, and 4 indeterminate (8%) variants. Median OS for advanced-stage cohort at diagnosis (N = 24) was 19.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.3–not reached (NR)], 27.1 months (95% CI: 22.7–NR) for gATMm (n = 11), and 12.3 months for sATMm (n = 13; 95% CI: 11.9–NR; P = 0.025). GIS was computed for 33 patients with PDAC and compared with other ATM-mutant cancers enriched for HRD. The median was lower (median, 11; range, 2–29) relative to breast (18, 3–55) or ovarian (25, 3–56) ATM-mutant cancers (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Interestingly, biallelic pathogenic ATM variants were mutually exclusive with TP53. Other canonical driver gene (KRAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4) variants were less frequent in ATM-mutant PDAC.Conclusions:ATM variants in PDAC represent a distinct biologic group and appear to have favorable OS. Nonetheless, pathogenic ATM variants do not confer an HRD signature in PDAC and ATM should be considered as a non-core HR gene in this disease.

Supplementary Data 1-8

Purpose:KRAS is mutated in the majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. MAPK and PI3K-AKT are primary KRAS effector pathways, but combined MAPK and PI3K inhibition has not been demonstrated to be clinically effective to date. We explore the resistance mechanisms uniquely employed by malignant cells.Experimental Design:We evaluated the expression and activation of receptor tyrosine kinases in response to combined MEK and AKT inhibition in KPC mice and pancreatic ductal organoids. In addition, we sought to determine the therapeutic efficacy of targeting resistance pathways induced by MEK and AKT inhibition in order to identify malignant-specific vulnerabilities.Results:Combined MEK and AKT inhibition modestly extended the survival of KPC mice and increased Egfr and ErbB2 phosphorylation levels. Tumor organoids, but not their normal counterparts, exhibited elevated phosphorylation of ERBB2 and ERBB3 after MEK and AKT blockade. A pan-ERBB inhibitor synergized with MEK and AKT blockade in human PDA organoids, whereas this was not observed for the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib. Combined MEK and ERBB inhibitor treatment of human organoid orthotopic xenografts was sufficient to cause tumor regression in short-term intervention studies.Conclusions:Analyses of normal and tumor pancreatic organoids revealed the importance of ERBB activation during MEK and AKT blockade primarily in the malignant cultures. The lack of ERBB hyperactivation in normal organoids suggests a larger therapeutic index. In our models, pan-ERBB inhibition was synergistic with dual inhibition of MEK and AKT, and the combination of a pan-ERBB inhibitor with MEK antagonists showed the highest activity both in vitro and in vivo.

Purpose:Genomic methods can identify homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Rigorous evaluation of their outcome association to DNA damage response–targeted therapies like platinum in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is essential in maximizing therapeutic outcome.Experimental Design:We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced-stage PDAC, who had both germline- and somatic-targeted gene sequencing. Homologous recombination gene mutations (HRm) were evaluated: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRIP1, CHEK2, FAM175A, FANCA, FANCC, NBN, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51C, and RTEL1 HRm status was grouped as: (i) germline versus somatic; (ii) core (BRCAs and PALB2) versus non-core (other HRm); and (iii) monoallelic versus biallelic. Genomic instability was compared using large-scale state transition, signature 3, and tumor mutation burden.Results:Among 262 patients, 50 (19%) had HRD (15% germline and 4% somatic). Both groups were analyzed together due to lack of difference in their genomic instability and outcome. Median [95% confidence interval (CI)] follow-up was 21.9 (1.4–57.0) months. Median OS and PFS were 15.5 (14.6–19) and 7 (6.1–8.1) months, respectively. Patients with HRD had improved PFS compared with no HRD when treated with first-line (1L) platinum [HR, 0.44 (95% CI: 0.29–0.67); P < 0.01], but not with 1L-non-platinum. Multivariate analysis showed HRD patients had improved OS regardless of their first-line treatment, but most had platinum exposure during their course. Biallelic HRm (11%) and core HRm (12%) had higher genomic instability, which translated to improved PFS on first-line platinum (1L-platinum) versus 1L-non-platinum.Conclusions:Pathogenic HRm identifies HRD in patients with PDAC with the best outcome when treated with 1L-platinum. Biallelic HRm and core HRm further enriched benefit from 1L-platinum from HRD.

Supplementary Data Legends

Supplementary Figure Legends

Supplementary Table 1: List of genes used for PGx modeling Supplementary Table 2: Correlation of PGx model prediction in tumor tissue to CTICs, soft tissue sarcoma. Supplementary Table 3. Normalized Enrichment Scores for chemotherapeutic agents modeled in three pancreatic cancer derived xenografts, referenced in (Figure 2). Supplementary Figure 1. Correlation of PGx model prediction in tumor tissue to CTICs, soft tissue sarcoma. Supplementary Figure 2. Correlation of Treatment Score to (A) PFS and (B) OS.

Supplementary Figures 1-3

Purpose: Despite a challenging prognosis, modern cytotoxic therapy can induce tumor responses and extend life in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Pharmacogenomic (PGx) modeling of tumor tissue can predict the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents in preclinical cancer models. We hypothesized that PGx profiling of circulating tumor and invasive cells (CTIC) isolated from peripheral blood could predict tumor response, progression, and resistance.Experimental Design: A PGx model was created and validated in preclinical models. A prospective clinical trial was conducted. Fifty patients with advanced PDAC were enrolled. Before treatment, 10 mL of peripherally drawn blood was collected. CTICs isolated from this blood sample were expression profiled and the PGx model was used to predict effective and ineffective chemotherapeutic agents. The treating physicians were blinded to PGx prediction.Results: We found that CTICs could be reliably isolated, total RNA extracted and profiled from 10 mL of peripheral blood from patients with unresectable PDAC before chemotherapy treatment and at disease progression. Using previously created PGx models to predict chemotherapy sensitivity, we found that clinical benefit was seen for study participants treated with chemotherapy regimens predicted to be effective versus chemotherapy regimens predicted to be ineffective with regard to progression-free (10.4 mo vs. 3.6 mo; P < 0.0001; HR, 0.14) and overall survival (17.2 mo vs. 8.3 mo; P < 0.0249; HR, 0.29).Conclusions: These findings suggest that PGx profiling of CTICs can predict treatment response. Clin Cancer Res; 20(20); 5281–9. ©2014 AACR.

Background Many real‐world studies of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are restricted to single centers, limiting the generalizability of their insights. This study aimed to identify important population‐based predictors for survival in patients diagnosed with mPDAC in a broader setting. Methods Data between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019 were extracted from the Flatiron Health EHR database. Treatment‐specific predictive models were generated for patients treated with first‐line gemcitabine+nab­paclitaxel (GNP), FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine monotherapy (gem‐mono), and second‐line liposomal irinotecan‐based regimens. The holdout method was used for cross‐validation. Age at diagnosis, sex, BMI, smoking status, and ECOG performance score were included in all models with additional demographic, clinical characteristics, and hematological function assessed for inclusion. Results Of the 3625 patients, 43% received GNP, 26% received FOLFIRINOX, 7% received gem‐mono, and 23% received other regimens; 40% (n = 1448) advanced to the second line. Among all first‐line patients, the following were included in the final model: prior surgery, white blood cell (WBC) counts, serum albumin (SA), liver function tests (LFTs), serum bilirubin, serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9, and ascites. Models for patients receiving specific therapies differed from the overall model, GNP (ascites removed), FOLFIRINOX (stage at initial diagnosis added), and gem‐mono (LFTs omitted). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), SA, and WBC counts were important predictors of survival among patients treated with second‐line liposomal irinotecan. Across all regimens, the strongest predictors of survival were ECOG score, SA, and ALP. Conclusions In this real‐world study of patients with mPDAC, important population prognostic factors of survival were identified in a large cohort of patients receiving systemic treatment., This retrospective observational analysis of US patient‐level electronic health record data identified a sample of 3625 patients who initiated first‐line systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from 2017 to 2019. Important population prognostic factors of survival were identified that applied across all regimens including performance status, serum albumin, and alkaline phosphatase levels. Additional patient characteristics were identified as prognostic factors of survival in the context of specific therapies.

Cancer cell plasticity due to the dynamic architecture of interactome networks provides a vexing outlet for therapy evasion. Here, through chemical biology approaches for systems level exploration of protein connectivity changes applied to pancreatic cancer cell lines, patient biospecimens, and cell- and patient-derived xenografts in mice, we demonstrate interactomes can be re-engineered for vulnerability. By manipulating epichaperomes pharmacologically, we control and anticipate how thousands of proteins interact in real-time within tumours. Further, we can essentially force tumours into interactome hyperconnectivity and maximal protein-protein interaction capacity, a state whereby no rebound pathways can be deployed and where alternative signalling is supressed. This approach therefore primes interactomes to enhance vulnerability and improve treatment efficacy, enabling therapeutics with traditionally poor performance to become highly efficacious. These findings provide proof-of-principle for a paradigm to overcome drug resistance through pharmacologic manipulation of proteome-wide protein-protein interaction networks., Joshi, Gomes et al. employ a chemical modulation approach of the cellular interactome to a hyperconnectivity state and show association with the increased response of pancreatic cancer cell lines to specific drugs, including those that target the MAPK-pathways and PI3K-mTOR pathway. To achieve this, the authors employ chemical modulation of the interactome via epichaperome inhibition with the small molecule PU-H71.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by the occurrence of pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 in 5-6% of patients. Biallelic loss of BRCA1/2 enriches for response to platinum agents and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitors. There is a dearth of evidence on the mechanism of inactivation of the wild-type BRCA1 allele in PDAC tumors with a germline BRCA1 (gBRCA1) pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (P/LPV). Herein, we examine promotor hypermethylation as a "second hit" mechanism in patients with gBRCA1-PDAC.We evaluated patients with PDAC who underwent Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) somatic and germline testing from an institutional database. DNA isolated from tumor tissue and matched normal peripheral blood were sequenced by MSK-IMPACT. In patients with gBRCA1-PDAC, we examined the somatic BRCA1 mutation status and promotor methylation status of the tumor BRCA1 allele via a methylation array analysis. In patients with sufficient remaining DNA, a second methylation analysis by pyrosequencing was performed.Of 1012 patients with PDAC, 19 (1.9%) were identified to harbor a gBRCA1 P/LPV. Fifteen patients underwent a methylation array and the mean percentage of BRCA1 promotor methylation was 3.62%. In seven patients in whom sufficient DNA was available, subsequent pyrosequencing confirmed an unmethylated BRCA1 promotor. Loss of heterozygosity was detected in 12 of 19 (63%, 95% confidence interval 38-84) patients, demonstrating loss of heterozygosity is the major molecular mechanism of BRCA1 inactivation in PDAC. Two (10.5%) cases had a somatic BRCA1 mutation.In patients with gBRCA1-P/LPV-PDAC, loss of heterozygosity is the main inactivating mechanism of the wild-type BRCA1 allele in the tumor, and methylation of the BRCA1 promoter is a distinctly uncommon occurrence.

OBJECTIVE We sought to compare overall survival (OS) and disease control for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with ablative dose radiotherapy (A-RT) versus resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Locoregional treatment for PDAC includes resection when possible or palliative RT. A-RT may offer durable tumor control and encouraging survival. METHODS This was a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with PDAC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by A-RT [≥98 Gy biologically effective dose (BED) using 15-25 fractions in 3-4.5 Gy/fraction] or pancreatectomy. RESULTS One hundred and four patients received A-RT (49.8%) and 105 (50.2%) underwent resection. Patients receiving A-RT had larger median tumor size after induction chemotherapy [3.2 cm (undetectable-10.9) vs 2.6 cm (undetectable-10.7), P < 0.001], and were more likely to have celiac or hepatic artery encasement (48.1% vs 11.4%, P

Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Emerging studies support metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) as effective, challenging established paradigms of dosing and schedules. The blood-based ChemoSensitivity Assay has been shown to predict response and survival in advanced PDAC patients treated with standard chemotherapy. The current study combines these concepts for a highly personalized treatment approach. This was a retrospective analysis; a pilot (n = 50) and validation cohort (n = 45) were studied. The ChemoSensitivity Assay was performed at baseline and during therapy; results were correlated to drugs administered and patient outcomes. MCT was administered based on the assay results at the treating physician′s discretion. Patients in the pilot cohort experienced favorable survival compared with historical controls (median overall survival (mOS) 16.8 mo). Patients whose treatment closely matched the ChemoSensitivity Assay predictions experienced longer median time on lines of therapy (5.3 vs. 3.3 mo, p = 0.02) and showed a trend for longer mOS (20.9 vs. 12.5 mo, p = 0.055) compared with those not closely matched. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. Overall, patients treated with MCT closely matching Assay results experienced a remarkable mOS of 27.7 mo. ChemoSensitivity profiling-guided MCT is a promising approach for personalized therapy in advanced PDAC.

Purpose: Characterizing germline and somatic ATM variants (gATMm, sATMm) zygosity and their contribution to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is important for therapeutic strategy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Experimental Design: Clinico-genomic data for patients with PDAC and other cancers with ATM variants were abstracted. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were derived from ATM-mutant cancers and overall survival (OS) was evaluated. Results: Forty-six patients had PDAC and pathogenic ATM variants including 24 (52%) stage III/IV: gATMm (N = 24), and sATMm (N = 22). Twenty-seven (59%) had biallelic, 15 (33%) monoallelic, and 4 indeterminate (8%) variants. Median OS for advanced-stage cohort at diagnosis (N = 24) was 19.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.3–not reached (NR)], 27.1 months (95% CI: 22.7–NR) for gATMm (n = 11), and 12.3 months for sATMm (n = 13; 95% CI: 11.9–NR; P = 0.025). GIS was computed for 33 patients with PDAC and compared with other ATM-mutant cancers enriched for HRD. The median was lower (median, 11; range, 2–29) relative to breast (18, 3–55) or ovarian (25, 3–56) ATM-mutant cancers (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Interestingly, biallelic pathogenic ATM variants were mutually exclusive with TP53. Other canonical driver gene (KRAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4) variants were less frequent in ATM-mutant PDAC. Conclusions: ATM variants in PDAC represent a distinct biologic group and appear to have favorable OS. Nonetheless, pathogenic ATM variants do not confer an HRD signature in PDAC and ATM should be considered as a non-core HR gene in this disease.

Most pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) are lethal and resistant to immunotherapy. Thus, identifying the immunogenic subgroup (iPDAC) and therapeutic targets can save lives. Herein, we present molecular features of iPDAC. 3 cohorts (A, B, C) from 288 patients whose sequenced tumors (MSK-IMPACT) were classified by homologous recombination deficiency groups. MSI-H were excluded. Survival, tumor mutation burden, genomic instability score, and enriched pathways for each cohort are included in Table 1. Patients in A (BRCA1/2/PALB2) had longer survivals vs B/C. 61 samples were selected for bulk RNAseq analysis for A vs C. Gene Ontology was enriched for upregulated humoral, T cell, and neutrophil immunity. CIBERSORT suggested higher infiltration of gamma delta T (Tgd) cells (p=0.039) and neutrophils (p=0.012), but lower Treg (p=0.001). Multidimensional insights in cellular components of cancer, immune, stroma, and neural genes were obtained by single nuclear RNA (snRNAseq) analysis from 30 biopsies for A vs C. 10x Genomics Chromium platform for library and Scanpy for computational analysis after Cell Ranger pipelines were used. 61,868 nuclei were profiled from 18 (13 baseline and 5 matched longitudinal) samples after quality evaluation. UMAP accurately clustered cells from each patient. Long-term survivors (LTS) had heterogenous baseline immune cell infiltrates of plasma cells, neutrophils, and CD8 (+) cytotoxic T cells. In matched samples of LTS, evolution of more prominent CD8 (+) T cells, macrophage, plasma cell, and neutrophil were observed. Single nucleus T-Cell Receptor sequencing for clonal trajectory inference will be done to determine the associated single cell molecular features contributing to iPDAC and identify novel targets for future intervention. Table 1. Cohort (Total: N=288) A: core HRD (BRCA1/2/PALB2) B: non-core HRD (ATM, BARD1, BLM, CHEK2, RAD50, RAD51C, RTEL1, MUTYH) C: others without HR-gene alterations Number (%) 48 (16.6) 19 (6.5) 221 (76) Median overall survival (95% confidence Interval) 33 months (3.6-64) 16 (11- not reached) 16 (14-18) Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) 4.4 3.5 3.9 Genomic Instability Score (GIS, HRD score) 26 12 13 Gene Ongology term, enrichment score, adjusted p-value Adaptive immune response, GO:0002250, 0.49, 1.69e-10 Not included Reference to cohort A Humoral immune response, GO:0006959, 0.58, 1.67e-9 T cell activation, GO:0042110, 0.44, 2.75e-8 Neutrophil chemotaxis, GO:0030593, 0.73, 4.3e-10 Citation Format: Wungki Park, Catherine O'Connor, Shigeaki Umeda, Roshan Sharma, Yingjie Zhu, Elias-Ramzey Karnoub, Anna Varghese, Kevin C. Soares, Alejandro Jimemez, Asli Yavas, Kenneth H. Yu, Balachandran P. Vinod, Joanne F. Chou, Danny N. Khalil, Kelsen David, Hulya Sahin Ozkan, Olca Basturk, Marinela Capanu, Tal Nawy, Michael F. Berger, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Ronan Chaligne, Nadeem Riaz, Dana Pe'er, Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue, Eileen M. O'Reilly. Molecular profiles and single cell analysis identify immunogenic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (iPDAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6421.

685 Background: Adjuvant mFFX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) is a standard-of-care for fit patients (pts) with resected PDAC, owing to the immediate practice-changing PRODIGE 24/CCTG PA6 trial (2018). Five-year follow-up: median overall survival (mOS) 53.3 months (m) and median disease-free survival (mDFS) 21.4 m for mFFX vs 35.5 m and 12.8 m for gemcitabine (Conroy, JAMA Onc, 2022). RWO for pts outside a clinical trial are lacking. Herein, we report RWO for pts with resected PDAC and intent for adjuvant mFFX at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK). Methods: Institutional databases were queried to identify pts with resected PDAC who received any dose of adjuvant mFFX. Demographic, clinicopathologic, genomic, dosing details, and survival data were abstracted from medical and pharmacy records. Primary endpoint was to determine recurrence-free survival (RFS) calculated from start date mFFX to disease recurrence or death and OS calculated from start date mFFX to death. Secondary endpoints included dose reductions, significant treatment delay, toxicity profile, patterns of failure, genomic associations with outcome. RFS and OS are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Study approved by MSK IRB. Results: N = 114 pts with resected PDAC treated with mFFX (> 1 dose) identified between 01/2015- 01/2022. Median age: 67 years (range 35 to 82); N = 43 (38%) > 70 years, N = 18 (16%) > 75 years, N = 2 (2%) > 80 years. Baseline Performance Status recorded in N = 104: N = 31 (30%) ECOG 0, N = 64 (62%) ECOG 1, N = 9 (9%) ECOG 2. Disease stage: N = 36 (32%) stage III, N = 61 (54%) stage II, and N = 17 (15%) pts stage I. Resection status: N = 91 (80%) R0, N = 23 (20%) R1. Presence of lymphovascular invasion: N = 92 (81%), perineural invasion N = 106 (93%). Median baseline CA 19-9: 20 U/mL (IQR; 9, 38). Median follow up: 22.4 m (range 6.2, 50.4). Median time from surgery to start mFFX: 7.4 weeks (IQR; 6.1, 9.3). Median # of mFFX doses received: 12 (IQR; 12, 12), N = 90 (79%) pts completed 12 doses. Dosing details available N = 112. N = 55 (49%) prescribed less than full dose of > one drug at baseline. Dose reductions: N = 57 (51%). N = 69 (62%) received < 12 doses oxaliplatin. N = 97 (87%) received growth factor support. mRFS: 31 m (95% CI; 23, Not Reached). N = 18 (16%) were hospitalized for treatment related adverse events, no therapy related mortality. N = 24 (21%) received adjuvant radiation therapy. One-year OS rate: 93% (95% CI; 89%, 98%) and 2-year OS rate: 78% (95%CI: 70%, 88%). Among patients with recurrence (N = 44), most common sites of first recurrence were: liver (N = 18, 41%), local (N = 14, 32%), and lung (N = 9, 20%). Conclusions: These data endorse mFFX as standard therapy for resected PDAC. The survival signals are encouraging in a prognostically unfavorable albeit select patient population (relative to PRODIGE 24). Dose adjustments to facilitate optimizing tolerability is key. Additional genomic and subtype analyses are underway.

TPS774 Background: SHARON is a phase 1, single-arm trial to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of 2 cycles of melphalan, BCNU, hydroxocobalamin (vitamin B12b), dose-escalated vitamin C, and autologous stem cells in patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer and an inherited, deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation. Cancers that evolve in patients with a germline BRCA1/ 2 mutation generally have loss or inactivation of the wild type allele, which results in hypersensitivity to melphalan. The melphalan dose-response is log-linear: doubling the melphalan area under the curve (AUC) doubles the log reduction in clonogenic survival. The melphalan AUC that can safely be achieved with melphalan followed by stem cell rescue has the potential to provide major log reductions in cancer cell survival in BRCA-deficient cancers. However, reversion mutations in BRCA can cause resistance to DNA-crosslinking agents such as melphalan. Studies have shown that oxidizing cellular glutathione (GSH) to glutathione disulfide (GSSG) can inhibit DNA repair and hypersensitize wild-type cancer cells to melphalan. In this trial, BCNU, vitamin B12b, and vitamin C are used to increase cancer cell GSSG levels. Methods: Eligibility criteria include stage IV pancreatic cancer, an inherited deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation, life expectancy of at least 6 months, measurable or non-measurable disease, and suitability for apheresis, chemotherapy, and stem cell infusion. Prior treatment with PARP inhibitors is allowed. Stem cells are collected by apheresis. Participants receive 2 cycles of melphalan 100 mg/m2, BCNU 150 mg/m2, vitamin B12b 1.45 g/m2, and vitamin C 3, 6, or 8 g/m2 on Day −2. Stem cell infusion administered on day 0. A 2 + 4 dose-escalation schedule is employed for vitamin C. Adverse reactions summarized by CTCAE 5.0. The primary endpoint is safety, and secondary endpoints are objective response rate (overall and for metastatic lesions) and overall and progression-free survival. Amendment pending to include stage IV, BRCA-related, HER2-negative breast cancer and PALB2 mutations. The trial is enrolling at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Massachusetts General Hospital. Clinical trial information: NCT04150042 .

710 Background: For patients with localized but not immediately resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the role for local therapy remains undefined. Phase II MAIBE trial studied ablative radiation (A-RT) followed by consideration of surgery for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who remain unresectable after induction chemotherapy. Methods: Participants with histologically confirmed PDAC judged unresectable by multidisciplinary review using NCCN definition after completing 3-6 months of mFOLFIRINOX (FFX) or Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel (GN) were eligible. They received hypofractionated A-RT (either 67.5Gy in 15 fractions or 75Gy in 25 fractions based on anatomy) with concurrent capecitabine followed by consideration of resection within 1-3 months. Primary endpoints included resectability (80% power to detect resectability improvement from 15% in historical controls to 30% with α = 0.05) and overall survival (OS) from A-RT. Secondary endpoints included safety of surgical resection after ablative RT using 90-day Clavien-Dindo Classification of adverse events (AE). Results: Between 6/2018 and 4/2022, 47 eligible participants underwent A-RT. Median age was 67 (range, 50-80) years, 24 (51%) were male with a median tumor size of 3.95 (1.6 – 8.3) cm and CA19-9 of 92 ( < 1-1601) U/mL. Forty-four patients (94%) received at least 1 cycle of FFX with a median duration of chemotherapy (FFX or GN) of 3.5 months (1.0 – 9.4). Sixteen (34%) underwent a laparoscopy and 12 (26%) underwent a resection (Pancreaticoduodenectomy, N = 11; distal pancreatectomy, N = 1) at a median time of 3.2 months (1.9-16.9 months) from start of A-RT. The rate of resection satisfied our prespecified boundary of 11. R0 rate was 58.3%. Two-year OS from A-RT for the entire cohort was 38.9% (95% CI, 21.9 – 55.6%), including 37.1% (18.5 - 55.8%) in non-surgical and 39.4% (7.0- 72.1%) in surgical groups. There were no deaths within 90 days of surgery and 9 surgical AEs were recorded in 6 participants, including grade 1 (n = 1), grade 2 (n = 5), grade 3 (n = 2) and grade unknown (n = 1). Conclusions: In patients with LAPC and no metastatic disease after 3-6 months of chemotherapy, A-RT results in a favorable rate of resection without excess surgical toxicity. Promising 2-year OS rates were noted in both resected and non-resected patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03523312 .

725 Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has a modest signal in the treatment of patients with genomically unselected pancreatic cancer (PDAC). Synergistic effects of combined radiotherapy and ICB are postulated. Preliminary results of a phase 1/2 trial of anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab (D) and SABR in locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable PDAC (Tuli, AACR; 2019; Abstr B58), noted SABR and D to be safe and tolerable following induction chemotherapy. We sought to further evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of D and SABR, in LA PDAC. Methods: A single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial was conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK). Key eligibility: histologically confirmed LA unresectable PDAC, with stable or responding disease following 4-6 months (m) of FOLFIRINOX (FFX), ECOG 0-2. Therapy: D and SABR; D dosed on day 1 750mg x 4 doses Q14 days, and subsequently 1500mg Q 28 days x 11 doses (1 year total), or until progression of disease (POD), or limiting toxicity. All patients received MRI adaptive ablative radiation, 50Gy in 5 fractions between doses 1 and 2 of D. Primary endpoint: 6-m progression free survival (6 m PFS) by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints were Duration of Response, Overall Response Rate (ORR), CA 19-9 response, rates of downstaging/resection, and survival outcomes (overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)) calculated from date of enrolment. OS and PFS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Pre- and on-treatment tissue, blood and microbiome samples were collected to evaluate tumor-intrinsic and peripheral immunogenomic correlates of response. Results: Between 09/2020 and 05/2022, N = 18 enrolled. Median age 67.5 years (IQR; 62.5, 71.5), 28% (5/18) female. Baseline Performance Status: N = 8 (44%) ECOG 0; N = 10 (56%) ECOG 1. Tumor location: Head/uncinate N = 9 (50%), body N = 7 (39%), neck N = 2 (11%). Median # doses FFX prior to enrolment: 8.5 (IQR; 8.0- 11.0). At median follow-up of 13.8 m, 6-m PFS: 62% (95% CI 43%, 91%). Median PFS: 10.2 m (95% CI; 5.03, NA) and median OS 17.2 m (95% CI; 12.98, NA). Disease progression (any time) N = 12, of which local POD in N = 7 (58%). N = 3 completed maintenance D; N = 5 on active treatment. ORR: N = 17 (94.4%) stable disease (95% CI; 64.6%, 99.4%). Toxicity endpoints of special interest: Grade 3 ICB-related: in N = 4 patients; diarrhea N = 2; elevated AST/ALT N = 2; G3 lipase elevation N = 1; attribution uncertain. Conclusions: D and SABR following FFX in LA PDAC had an encouraging 6-m PFS of 62% (43-91%) and a tolerable safety profile. Immuno-genomic analyses of correlative biospecimens is underway. Funding support AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT03245541 .

The rotating detonation engine is increasingly favored as a viable pressure gain combustion technology for both propulsion and power generation applications. Practical designs involve the discrete ...

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a refractory disease; however, modern cytotoxic chemotherapeutics can induce tumor regression and extend life. A blood-based, pharmacogenomic, chemosensitivity assay using gene expression profiling of circulating tumor and invasive cells (CTICs) to predict treatment response was previously developed. The combination regimen of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G/nab-P) are established frontline approaches for treating advanced PDAC; however, there are no validated biomarkers for treatment selection. A similar unmet need exists for choosing second-line therapy.The chemosensitivity assay was evaluated in metastatic PDAC patients presenting for frontline treatment. A prospective study enrolled patients (n = 70) before receiving either FOLFIRINOX or G/nab-P at a 1:1 ratio. Six milliliters of peripheral blood was collected at baseline and at time of disease progression. CTICs were isolated, gene-expression profiling was performed, and the assay was used to predict effective and ineffective chemotherapeutic agents. Treating physicians were blinded to the assay prediction results.Patients receiving an effective regimen as predicted by the chemosensitivity assay experienced significantly longer median progression-free survival (mPFS; 7.8 months vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; p = .0002) and median overall survival (mOS; 21.0 months vs. 9.7 months; HR, 0.40; p = .005), compared with an ineffective regimen. Assay prediction for effective second-line therapy was explored. The entire study cohort experienced favorable outcomes compared with historical controls, 7.1-month mPFS and 12.3-month mOS.Chemosensitivity assay profiling is a promising tool for guiding therapy in advanced PDAC. Further prospective validation is under way (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03033927).

[18F]-FAC (29-deoxy-29-[18F] fluoro-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine) has close structural similarity to gemcitabine, and thus offers the potential to image drug delivery to tumors. We compared tumor [18F]-FAC PET images to [14C]-gemcitabine levels, established ex vivo, in three mouse models of pancreatic cancer. We further modified tumor gemcitabine levels with injectable hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) to test whether changes in gemcitabine would be tracked by [18F]-FAC. Methods: [18F]-FAC was synthesized at MSKCC as described previously. Three patient derived xenografts (PDX) models were grown in the flanks of NSG mice. Mice were given PEGPH20 or vehicle i.v. 24 hours prior to co-injection of [18F]-FAC and [14C]-gemcitabine. Animals were euthanized and imaged one hour after tracer administration. Tumor and muscle uptake of both [18F]-FAC and [14C]-gemcitabine were obtained ex vivo. The efficacy of PEPGPH20 was validated through staining with hyaluronic acid binding protein. Additionally, an organoid culture initiated from a KPC (Pdx-1 Cre LSL-Kras G12D LSL-p53 R172H) tumor, was used to generate orthotopically growing tumors in C57BL/6J mice, which were then serially transplanted. Animals were injected with PEGPH20 and 14C gemcitabine as described above to validate increased drug uptake by ex vivo assay. PET-MR images were obtained using a PET insert on a 7T Brucker MR scanner. Animals were imaged immediately before injection with PEGPH20, and again 24 hours later. Results: Tumor/muscle ratios of [14C]-gemcitabine and [18F]-FAC correlated well across all PDX models and treatments (R2 = 0.78). There was a significant increase in the tumor PET signal in PEGPH20 treated PDX animals which was matched in ex vivo counts for 2 out of 3 models. In KPC-derived tumors, PEGPH20 raised [14C]-gemcitabine levels (T/M 1.9 vs 2.4, control vs treated, P = 0.013). PET-MR [18F]-FAC images showed a 12% increase in tumor [18F]-FAC uptake following PEGPH20 treatment (P = 0.023). PEGPH20 treated animals uniformly displayed clear reductions in hyaluronic acid staining. Conclusion: [18F]-FAC PET was shown to be a good surrogate for gemcitabine uptake, and when combined with MR, to successfully determine drug uptake in tumors growing in the pancreas. PEGPH20 had moderate effects on tumor uptake of gemcitabine.

Purpose: Genomic methods can identify homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Rigorous evaluation of their outcome association to DNA damage response–targeted therapies like platinum in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is essential in maximizing therapeutic outcome. Experimental Design: We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced-stage PDAC, who had both germline- and somatic-targeted gene sequencing. Homologous recombination gene mutations (HRm) were evaluated: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRIP1, CHEK2, FAM175A, FANCA, FANCC, NBN, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51C, and RTEL1 HRm status was grouped as: (i) germline versus somatic; (ii) core (BRCAs and PALB2) versus non-core (other HRm); and (iii) monoallelic versus biallelic. Genomic instability was compared using large-scale state transition, signature 3, and tumor mutation burden. Results: Among 262 patients, 50 (19%) had HRD (15% germline and 4% somatic). Both groups were analyzed together due to lack of difference in their genomic instability and outcome. Median [95% confidence interval (CI)] follow-up was 21.9 (1.4–57.0) months. Median OS and PFS were 15.5 (14.6–19) and 7 (6.1–8.1) months, respectively. Patients with HRD had improved PFS compared with no HRD when treated with first-line (1L) platinum [HR, 0.44 (95% CI: 0.29–0.67); P < 0.01], but not with 1L-non-platinum. Multivariate analysis showed HRD patients had improved OS regardless of their first-line treatment, but most had platinum exposure during their course. Biallelic HRm (11%) and core HRm (12%) had higher genomic instability, which translated to improved PFS on first-line platinum (1L-platinum) versus 1L-non-platinum. Conclusions: Pathogenic HRm identifies HRD in patients with PDAC with the best outcome when treated with 1L-platinum. Biallelic HRm and core HRm further enriched benefit from 1L-platinum from HRD.

Background Necuparanib, a rationally engineered low-molecular-weight heparin, combined with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel showed an encouraging safety and oncologic signal in a phase Ib trial. This randomised multicentre phase II trial evaluates the addition of necuparanib or placebo to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Patients and methods Eligibility included 18 years, histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic PDAC, measurable disease and Eastern Co-Operative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1. Patients were randomly assigned to necuparanib (5 mg/kg subcutaneous injection once daily) or placebo (subcutaneous injection once daily) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 of 28-day cycles. The primary end-point was median overall survival (OS), and secondary end-points included median progression-free survival, response rates and safety. Results One-hundred ten patients were randomised, 62 to necuparanib arm and 58 to placebo arm. The futility boundary was crossed at a planned interim analysis, and the study was terminated by the Data Safety Monitoring Board. The median OS was 10.71 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.95–11.96) for necuparanib arm and 9.99 months (95% CI: 7.85–12.85) for placebo arm (hazard ratio: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.66–1.89, P-value: 0.671). The necuparanib arm had a higher incidence of haematologic toxicity relative to placebo patients (83% and 70%). Conclusion The addition of necuparanib to standard of care treatment for advanced PDAC did not improve OS. Safety was acceptable. No further development of necuparanib is planned although targeting the coagulation cascade pathway remains relevant in PDAC. NCT01621243

OBJECTIVES Patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) receive induction chemotherapy with or without radiation, with the goal of R0 resection and improving survival. Herein, we evaluate the outcomes of patients who presented with Stage III PDAC and received induction FOLFIRINOX. METHODS An institutional database was queried for consecutive patients who received induction FOLFIRINOX for locally unresectable PDAC between 2010 and 2016. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed pre- and posttreatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS There were 200 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The median number of cycles of FOLFIRINOX was 8, 70% (n = 140) received radiation, and 18% (n = 36) underwent resection. Median overall survival (OS) in resected patients was 36 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24-56), and this group had improved OS compared to patients that did not undergo resection (hazard ratio (95% CI): 0.41 (0.26-0.64), p

The present study aims to monitor longitudinal changes in simulated tumor interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and velocity (IFV) values using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI-based computational fluid modeling (CFM) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Nine PDAC patients underwent MRI, including DCE-MRI, on a 3-Tesla MRI scanner at pre-treatment (TX (0)), after the first fraction of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT, (D1-TX)), and six weeks post-TX (D2-TX). The partial differential equation of IFP formulated from the continuity equation, incorporating the Starling Principle of fluid exchange, Darcy velocity, and volume transfer constant (Ktrans), was solved in COMSOL Multiphysics software to generate IFP and IFV maps. Tumor volume (Vt), Ktrans, IFP, and IFV values were compared (Wilcoxon and Spearman) between the time- points. D2-TX Ktrans values were significantly different from pre-TX and D1-TX (p &lt, 0.05). The D1-TX and pre-TX mean IFV values exhibited a borderline significant difference (p = 0.08). The IFP values varying &lt, 3.0% between the three time-points were not significantly different (p &gt, 0.05). Vt and IFP values were strongly positively correlated at pre-TX (r = 0.90, p = 0.005), while IFV exhibited a strong negative correlation at D1-TX (r = −0.74, p = 0.045). Vt, Ktrans, IFP, and IFV hold promise as imaging biomarkers of early response to therapy in PDAC.

BackgroundThe NAPOLI-1 trial demonstrated that liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) prolonged survival with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. Real-world data on clinical outcomes associated with liposomal irinotecan in NAPOLI-1-based regimens is needed to further substantiate this.MethodsThis real-world, retrospective chart review study included patients with mPDAC who received NAPOLI-1-based regimens from six academic centers in the United States. Liposomal irinotecan initiation defined the index date. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier methodology.ResultsThere were 374 patients evaluated; median age was 68 years, and 51% were female. Among 326 patients with baseline ECOG information, approximately 74% had ECOG score ConclusionsPatients in a real-world setting treated with NAPOLI-1-based liposomal irinotecan doublet regimens at academic centers were older with poorer performance status compared to trial patients yet had similar outcomes and efficacy. Furthermore, liposomal irinotecan was frequently used in the 3L+ setting where no treatment has been approved and provided clinical benefit.

Purpose Notch signaling dysregulation is implicated in the development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Tarextumab is a fully human IgG2 antibody that inhibits Notch2/3 receptors. Patients and methods Aphase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial evaluated the activity of tarextumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic PDAC. Patients were stratified based on ECOG performance score and Ca 19-9 level and randomized 1:1 to nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine with either tarextumab or placebo. Based on preclinical and phase Ib results suggesting a positive correlation between Notch3 gene expression and tarextumab anti-tumor activity, patients were also divided into subgroups of low, intermediate, and high Notch3 gene expression. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in all and in patients with the three Notch3 gene expression subgroups (≥25th, ≥50% and ≥75% percentiles); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 12-month OS, overall response rate (ORR), and safety and biomarker investigation. Results Median OS was 6.4 months in the tarextumab group vs 7.9 months in the placebo group (HR = 1.34 [95% CI = 0.95, 1.89], P = .0985). No difference observed in OS in the Notch3 gene expression subgroups. PFS in the tarextumab-treated group (3.7 months) was significantly shorter compared with the placebo group (5.5 months) (hazard ratio was 1.43 [95% CI = 1.01, 2.01]; P = .04). Grade 3 diarrhea and thrombocytopenia were more common in the tarextumab group. Conclusions The addition of tarextumab to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine did not improve OS, PFS, or ORR in first-line metastatic PDAC, and PFS was specifically statistically worse in the tarextumab-treated patients. Clinical trial registry no NCT01647828.

Sweet bystander becomes a villain Patients with pancreatic cancer often have elevated blood levels of CA19-9, a carbohydrate antigen present on many proteins. CA19-9 is thus commonly used as a biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring disease progression. In a study of mice, Engle et al. found that CA19-9 may be more than an innocent bystander that marks the presence of pancreatic disease; it may play a causal role in disease (see the Perspective by Halbrook and Crawford). Transgenic mice expressing the human enzymes that add CA19-9 to proteins developed severe pancreatitis that could be reversed by treatment with CA19-9 antibodies. When the transgenic mice also harbored a Kras oncogene, they went on to develop pancreatic cancer. These unexpected observations suggest new avenues for the treatment of pancreatic disease. Science , this issue p. 1156 ; see also p. 1132