Search

The effect of nozzle lip thickness and velocity ratio on coaxial subsonic jet mixing, at different Mach numbers, has been studied experimentally and numerically. Decay of coaxial subsonic jets emanating from coaxial nozzles of lip thickness 0.7, 1.7 and 2.65 mm with velocity ratio (VR) from 0.2 to 1.0 at primary jet exit Mach numbers of 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 has been studied. Free jet without co-flow (VR0) was also studied for comparison. Jet centerline Mach number decay, turbulence and velocity variation in the radial direction are analyzed. The results show that mixing the coaxial jet at a low-velocity ratio is better than a high-velocity ratio, at all Mach numbers of the present study. The nozzle lip thickness has a significant influence on the secondary jet. Mixing of the jet in the presence of VR0.2 coaxial jet is found to be the highest. Characteristic decay of Mach 0.8 and 1.0 jet for lip thickness 1.7 and 2.65 mm is faster than lip thickness 0.7 mm. For a given lip thickness, increasing of velocity ratio is found to retard the mixing between primary and secondary jets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The characteristics of a sonic under-expanded coaxial jet with lip thickness 1.5Dp (where Dp is the exit diameter of primary jet equals 10 mm) with the primary jet operating at nozzle pressure ratio (NPR) of 3, 4 and 5. For NPR 3 operating primary jet, the secondary jet operates at NPR 2.5, 1.4 and 1.27. For primary jet NPR 4, the secondary jet operating NPR is 3.2, 1.6 and 1.4. For NPR 5 primary jet, the secondary jet NPR is 3.8, 1.89 and 1.52. The study is performed using a co-flow nozzle of bypass ratio (BR) 6.4, 1.4 and 0.7. The core length of the primary jet is used as a measure to quantify the mixing of the primary jet in the presence of coaxial jet. The shock structure present in the near field was viewed using shadowgraph technique. Centreline pitot pressure distribution, radial spread and waves present in the jet core were analyzed. The results show that the mixing associated with the high bypass coaxial jet is superior to the low bypass coaxial jet. This mixing superiority associated with high bypass coaxial jet prevails all levels of expansion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]