Search

AIM Clinical presentation and course of Immunoglobulin A nephropathy vary by ethnicity and geography and significance of extracapillary proliferation or crescents (IgAN-C) in Southeast Asia is not well described. We aimed to describe the clinical course of IgAN-C in Singapore. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of adult biopsy-proven IgAN diagnosed between February 2011 and October 2016 in 2 hospital-based nephrology units. Outcome was chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, defined as reduction in eGFR ≥50% or end stage renal failure (ESRF). RESULTS One hundred and forty-five patients were studied. Among individuals with IgAN-C (n = 44, 30%), 38 patients had cellular or fibrocellular crescents in 1 to 25% of the glomeruli and 6 had crescents in >25%. Median eGFR was 54 (33, 83) mL/min/1.73 m2 . Compared to IgAN without crescents, IgAN-C had greater proteinuria (median 2.9 [1.4, 5.4] g/g vs 1.9 [1.1, 3.6] g/g, P = .03) and more had endocapillary hypercellularity (96% vs 39%, P

Background Renal involvement is common among Asians with systemic lupus erythematosus and long-term renal outcomes have been described in homogeneous Caucasian and East Asian populations with lupus nephritis, but data are scarce for other ethnicities. Aim To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) in multi-ethnic Southeast Asians with lupus nephritis. Methods This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study of adults with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis diagnosed between May 2001 and May 2009. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. Patients were excluded if baseline comorbid, renal function or pharmacotherapy data were incomplete or if they default follow-up within 3 months from time of diagnosis. Primary outcome was progressive CKD, defined by end-stage renal disease or persistent doubling of serum creatinine or reduction in eGFR ≥50% for ≥3 months from baseline. Results We studied 113 patients with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. Median age was 42 (interquartile range 29-52) years; the majority were Chinese (76%; Malay 13% and others 11%) and female (81%). Two-thirds had International Society of Nephrology and Renal Pathology Society Class III or IV nephritis; serum creatinine was 86 (67-125) μmol/L with heavy proteinuria (6.3 (2.5-12.2) g/g creatinine). Median follow-up was 110 (83-142) months. Remission (partial and complete) occurred in 96% at 3.1 (1.6-5.2) months after diagnosis. Among patients who achieved remission, 56% had disease relapse at 19.0 (6.0-40.2) months after remission. Patients with progressive CKD (n = 13, 11%) had lower baseline CKD Epidemiology Collaboration estimated glomerular filtration rate (37.3 (16.5-82.0) vs 79.4 (57.5-101.0) mL/min/1.73 m2 , P = 0.03) and higher chronicity index (5 (3-6) vs 3 (2-3), P = 0.04) than those who did not. Remission, early remission within 6 months, complete remission and non-relapse were less frequently associated with progressive CKD (P Conclusion Multi-ethnic Southeast Asians with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis had high remission rates and low incidence of progressive CKD. Progressive CKD was associated with poorer baseline renal function, higher histological chronicity index, failure to achieve remission and occurrence of relapse.

Renal involvement is common among Asians with systemic lupus erythematosus and long-term renal outcomes have been described in homogeneous Caucasian and East Asian populations with lupus nephritis, but data are scarce for other ethnicities.To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) in multi-ethnic Southeast Asians with lupus nephritis.This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study of adults with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis diagnosed between May 2001 and May 2009. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. Patients were excluded if baseline comorbid, renal function or pharmacotherapy data were incomplete or if they default follow-up within 3 months from time of diagnosis. Primary outcome was progressive CKD, defined by end-stage renal disease or persistent doubling of serum creatinine or reduction in eGFR ≥50% for ≥3 months from baseline.We studied 113 patients with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. Median age was 42 (interquartile range 29-52) years; the majority were Chinese (76%; Malay 13% and others 11%) and female (81%). Two-thirds had International Society of Nephrology and Renal Pathology Society Class III or IV nephritis; serum creatinine was 86 (67-125) μmol/L with heavy proteinuria (6.3 (2.5-12.2) g/g creatinine). Median follow-up was 110 (83-142) months. Remission (partial and complete) occurred in 96% at 3.1 (1.6-5.2) months after diagnosis. Among patients who achieved remission, 56% had disease relapse at 19.0 (6.0-40.2) months after remission. Patients with progressive CKD (n = 13, 11%) had lower baseline CKD Epidemiology Collaboration estimated glomerular filtration rate (37.3 (16.5-82.0) vs 79.4 (57.5-101.0) mL/min/1.73 mMulti-ethnic Southeast Asians with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis had high remission rates and low incidence of progressive CKD. Progressive CKD was associated with poorer baseline renal function, higher histological chronicity index, failure to achieve remission and occurrence of relapse.

An acute increase in the international normalized ratio (INR; a comparison of prothrombin time to monitor the effects of warfarin) over 3 in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often associated with an unexplained acute increase in serum creatinine (SC) and an accelerated progression of CKD. Kidney biopsy in a subset of these patients showed obstruction of the renal tubule by red blood cell casts, and this appears to be the dominant mechanism of the acute kidney injury. We termed this warfarin-related nephropathy (WRN), and previously reported cases of WRN only in patients with CKD. We now assess whether this occurs in patients without CKD, its risk factors, and consequences. In 15,258 patients who initiated warfarin therapy during a 5-year period, 4006 had an INR over 3 and SC measured at the same time; however, the large data set precluded individual patient clinical assessment. A presumptive diagnosis of WRN was made if the SC increased by over 0.3 mg/dl within 1 week after the INR exceeded 3 with no record of hemorrhage. WRN occurred in 20.5% of the entire cohort, 33.0% of the CKD cohort, and 16.5% of the no-CKD cohort. Other risk factors included age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. The 1-year mortality was 31.1% with compared with 18.9% without WRN, an increased risk of 65%. Thus, WRN may be a common complication of warfarin therapy in high-risk patients and CKD doubles this risk. The mechanisms of these risks are unclear.

To the Editor: We read with great interest the article by Garcia-Garcia,1 which reviews the key link between poverty and chronic kidney disease (CKD), where the authors stated that disadvantaged people from low-resource ethnic minority and/or indigenous and socially disadvantaged backgrounds suffer from marked increases in the burden of unrecognized or untreated CKD. It was stated that even in developed countries ethnic minorities bear a disproportionate burden of CKD. The article reported that in the United Kingdom, the rates of untreated end-stage renal disease are higher in ethnic minority groups with increasing social deprivation. Similarly, in Singapore, the CKD prevalence is higher among Malays and Indians compared with Chinese, with socioeconomic and behavioral factors accounting for 70–80% of the excess risk.

To the Editor: We read with great interest the article by Kim-Mitsuyama and the commentary by Briasoulis and Bakris in the recent issue of Kidney International.1, 2 Both the authors and the commentators have attributed the more optimal blood pressure (BP) control in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on combination therapy with angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and calcium channel blocker (CCB) as the main factor contributing to the prevention of cardiovascular events compared with those on high-dose ARB. In patients without CKD, the incidence of primary events was the same in both groups, suggesting that decreased eGFR was the independent risk factor for cardiovascular events.

To the Editor: We have read the letter to the editor by Jerzy Przedlacki1 and the response from the authors2 of the Kidney Disease-Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines for bisphosphonate (BP) treatment in chronic kidney disease (CKD), and would like to share our concerns regarding the use of BP treatment of CKD. The kidney is the organ that excretes many drugs, and any change in renal function will affect the pharmacology of these drugs. Existing or residual renal function of the patient will have to be taken into account while prescribing drugs. This is just as important for the patient with CKD 4 or 5, including those with CKD 5 already on peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis, who may still have residual renal function. Nephrotoxic drugs including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can very readily destroy whatever residual renal function patients may still have. Residual renal function is important to preserve as it contributes to less patient morbidity and mortality3 in the dialysis patient. Recently, there have been adverse reports of a certain BP that works by inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, thereby slowing the breakdown of bone to reduce the risk of fractures. As of 14 August 2009, there have been 139 post-marketing reports of renal impairment following its use as an infusion worldwide. Many of these occur in patients with pre-existing medical conditions or risk factors (elderly, renal impairment, and/or concurrent dehydration), or in those on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or other concurrent exposure to other nephrotoxic agents. There have also been cases requiring dialysis, and occasional fatal outcomes have been reported in patients with pre-existing renal impairment and concomitant risk factors.4, 5, 6, 7