Search

Introduction: This survey aimed to investigate German ambulatory physicians' opinions about mandatory continuing medical education (CME) and CME resources shortly before the introduction of mandatory CME in 2004. Methods: A structured national telephone survey of general practitioners and specialists was conducted. Main outcome measures were opinions about mandatory CME, preferred CME media, and financial aspects of CME. Data analysis applied Pearson's correlation coefficient for explorative analysis of correlations, analysis of variance for group comparison, and chi(2)-test for investigation of distribution of 2 or more categorical variables. Results: Of the 511 participants, 73% felt that CME supported them in keeping up to date with new medical knowledge, yet only half believed in its ability to minimize medical errors or increase quality of patient care. Traditional ways of learning were preferred. Significant differences in CME behavior were found between primary-care physicians and specialists, the latter using more communicative media. Also, a small group of very skeptical physicians who do not agree with the need for CME in general was identified. Average expenditure for CME was estimated between 500 and 1000 Euros per year. A majority of physicians called for other parties, eg, health insurances or government, to share the financial responsibility for CME. Discussion: Mandatory CME was accepted as a necessity already before the new legislation took effect, with prevailing skepticism at the same time. Future research is needed on how to motivate physicians and especially certain subgroups of physicians to use CME methods shown to be effective in changing clinical behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Approximately 25 % of all patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) discontinue CPAP-therapy in long-term follow-up. This study was conducted to investigate if there are any predictors signaling low compliance prior to initiation of CPAP-therapy. We used an open label longitudinal cohort study at an University hospital in-patient Sleep laboratory setting. In 85 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of OSAS confirmed by polysomnography a CPAP-therapy was initiated. Prior to CPAP-titration the subjects were interviewed using standardized, validated questionnaires (Nottingham Health Profile, von Zerssen's Depression Scale, State Trait Anxiety Inventory, IPC-Scale). On follow up (mean 16 +/- 8 month) 66 patients were still using CPAP regularly, 19 individuals had discontinued the therapy. Data of both groups were compared. There were no significant differences in polysomnographic parameters before CPAP except apnea-hypopnea-index (users: 30.72 +/- 20.68, rejecters: 18.43 +/- 10.43) and mean oxygen saturation (users: 91.65 +/- 3.32, rejecters 93.63 +/- 1.86). Depression and anxiety levels were normal in both groups. The subjects who discontinued CPAP had a significantly less external control belief. Internal control belief was normal in all patients. It is suggested that individuals who discontinued CPAP could not be convinced of the necessity of CPAP by physicians or nurses due to their reduced external control belief. Identifying patients with diminished external control belief prior to prescription of a device might be useful. In selected subgroups, different methods of motivation to maintain long-term acceptance for CPAP-therapy seems to be necessary.