Search

Background Somatic copy number alterations (sCNAs) acquired during the evolution of breast cancer provide valuable prognostic and therapeutic information. Here we present a workflow for screening sCNAs using picogram amounts of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and single circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Methods We repurposed the Ion ReproSeq PGS™ preimplantation genetic testing kit to perform shallow whole genome sequencing on 178 cfDNA samples (300 pg) and individual CTCs from 10 MBC patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) recovered by CellSearch®/DEPArray™. Results were analyzed using a tailored ichorCNA workflow. Results sCNAs were detected in cfDNA of 41/105 (39%) patients with MBC and 3/23 (13%) primary breast cancers on follow-up (PBC FU), all of whom subsequently relapsed. In 8 of 10 MBCs, individual CTCs had a higher copy number count than matched cfDNA. The median tumor fraction detected by ichorCNA was 0.34 (range 0.17–0.58) for MBC and 0.36 (range 0.31–0.37) for PBC FU. Patients with detectable tumor fraction (≥ 0.1) and TFx and OncomineTM variants had significantly lower overall survival rates (P values P = 0.002 and P < 0.0001 for the log-rank test, respectively). Conclusions The ReproSeq PGS assay is rapid, at approximately $120 per sample, providing both a sCNA profile and estimation of the tumor DNA fraction from limiting cfDNA template (300pg) and individual CTCs. The approach could be used to examine the copy number landscape over time to guide treatment decisions, support future trial designs, and be applied to low volume blood spot samples enabling remote monitoring.

Breast cancer (BC) is a common cancer in women worldwide. Despite advances in treatment, up to 30% of women eventually relapse and die of metastatic breast cancer. Liquid biopsy analysis of circulating cell-free DNA fragments in the patients’ blood can monitor clonality and evolving mutations as a surrogate for tumour biopsy. Next generation sequencing platforms and digital droplet PCR can be used to profile circulating tumour DNA from liquid biopsies; however, they are expensive and time consuming for clinical use. Here, we report a novel strategy with proof-of-concept data that supports the usage of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to detect PIK3CA c.3140 A > G (H1047R), a prevalent BC missense mutation that is attributed to BC tumour growth. Allele-specific primers were designed and optimized to detect the p.H1047R variant following the USS-sbLAMP method. The assay was developed with synthetic DNA templates and validated with DNA from two breast cancer cell-lines and two patient tumour tissue samples through a qPCR instrument and finally piloted on an ISFET enabled microchip. This work sets a foundation for BC mutational profiling on a Lab-on-Chip device, to help the early detection of patient relapse and to monitor efficacy of systemic therapies for personalised cancer patient management.

Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women, and despite the introduction of new screening programmes, therapies and monitoring technologies, there is still a need to develop more useful tests for monitoring treatment response and to inform clinical decision making. The purpose of this study was to compare circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumour cells (CTCs) with conventional breast cancer blood biomarkers (CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase (AP)) as predictors of response to treatment and prognosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods One hundred ninety-four female patients with radiologically confirmed MBC were recruited to the study. Total cfDNA levels were determined by qPCR and compared with CELLSEARCH® CTC counts and CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase (AP) values. Blood biomarker data were compared with conventional tumour markers, treatment(s) and response as assessed by RECIST and survival. Non-parametric statistical hypothesis tests were used to examine differences, correlation analysis and linear regression to determine correlation and to describe its effects, logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) to estimate the strength of the relationship between biomarkers and clinical outcomes and value normalization against standard deviation to make biomarker values comparable. Kaplan–Meier estimator and Cox regression models were used to assess survival. Univariate and multivariate models were performed where appropriate. Results Multivariate analysis showed that both the amount of total cfDNA (p value = 0.024, HR = 1.199, CI = 1.024–1.405) and the number of CTCs (p value = 0.001, HR = 1.243, CI = 1.088–1.421) are predictors of overall survival (OS), whereas total cfDNA levels is the sole predictor for progression-free survival (PFS) (p value = 0.042, HR = 1.193, CI = 1.007–1.415) and disease response when comparing response to non-response to treatment (HR = 15.917, HR = 12.481 for univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively). Lastly, combined analysis of CTCs and cfDNA is more informative than the combination of two conventional biomarkers (CA15-3 and AP) for prediction of OS. Conclusion Measurement of total cfDNA levels, which is a simpler and less expensive biomarker than CTC counts, is associated with PFS, OS and response in MBC, suggesting potential clinical application of a cheap and simple blood-based test.

PURPOSE We investigated the utility of the Oncomine Breast cfDNA Assay for detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in women from a breast screening population, including healthy women with no abnormality detected by mammogram, and women on follow-up through to advanced breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Blood samples were taken from 373 women (127 healthy controls recruited through breast screening, 28 ductal carcinoma in situ, 60 primary breast cancers, 47 primary breast cancer on follow-up, and 111 metastatic breast cancers [MBC]) to recover plasma and germline DNA for analysis with the Oncomine Breast cfDNA Assay on the Ion S5 platform. RESULTS One hundred sixteen of 373 plasma samples had one or more somatic variants detected across eight of the 10 genes and were called ctDNA-positive; MBC had the highest proportion of ctDNA-positive samples (61; 55%) and healthy controls the lowest (20; 15.7%). ESR1, TP53, and PIK3CA mutations account for 93% of all variants detected and predict poor overall survival in MBC (hazard ratio = 3.461; 95% CI, 1.866 to 6.42; P = .001). Patients with MBC had higher plasma cell-free DNA levels, higher variant allele frequencies, and more polyclonal variants, notably in ESR1 than in all other groups. Only 15 individuals had evidence of potential clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential mutations. CONCLUSION We were able detect ctDNA across the breast cancer spectrum, notably in MBC where variants in ESR1, TP53, and PIK3CA predicted poor overall survival. The assay could be used to monitor emergence of resistance mutations such as in ESR1 that herald resistance to aromatase inhibitors to tailor adjuvant therapies. However, we suggest caution is needed when interpreting results from a single plasma sample as variants were also detected in a small proportion of HCs., Detection of ctDNA increases as breast cancer progresses and predicts poor overall survival in metastatic patients. or ctDNA detection increases as breast cancer progresses and predicts poor overall survival in metastatic patients.

PurposeThere is growing interest in the application of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a sensitive tool for monitoring tumour evolution and guiding targeted therapy in patients with cancer. However, robust comparisons of different platform technologies are still required. Here we compared the InVisionSeq™ ctDNA Assay with the Oncomine™ Breast cfDNA Assay to assess their concordance and feasibility for the detection of mutations in plasma at low (MethodsNinety-six plasma samples from 50 patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) were profiled using the InVision Assay. Results were compared to the Oncomine assay in 30 samples from 26 patients, where there was sufficient material and variants were covered by both assays. Longitudinal samples were analysed for 8 patients with endocrine resistance.ResultsWe detected alterations in 59/96 samples from 34/50 patients analysed with the InVision assay, most frequently affectingESR1, PIK3CAandTP53. Complete or partial concordance was found in 28/30 samples analysed by both assays, and VAF values were highly correlated. Excellent concordance was found for most genes, and most discordant calls occurred at VAF ESR1andPIK3CA.ConclusionThis study shows that both ultra-deep next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can detect genomic alternations even at low VAFs in plasma samples of mBC patients. The strong agreement of the technologies indicates sufficient reproducibility for clinical use as prognosic and predictive biomarker.

Background: Many breast cancer patients relapse after primary treatment but there are no reliable tests to detect distant metastases before they become overt. Here we show earlier identification of recurring patients through a scalable personalised ctDNA analysis. The method is applicable to all patients, and not limited to hot-spot mutations typically detected by gene panels. Methods: Forty-nine non-metastatic breast cancer patients were recruited following surgery and adjuvant therapy. Plasma samples (n=208) were serially collected semi-annually. Using the analytically validated SignateraTM workflow, we determined mutational signatures from primary tumour whole exome data and designed personalised assays targeting 16 variants with high sensitivity by ultra-deep sequencing (average >100,000X). The patient-specific assay was used to detect the presence of the mutational signature in the plasma. Results: In 16 of 18 (89%) clinically-relapsing patients, ctDNA was detected ahead of metastatic relapse being diagnosed by clinical examination, radiological and biochemical (CA15-3) measurements, and remained ctDNA-positive through follow-up. Of the 2 patients not detected by ctDNA, one had a small local recurrence only (now resected) and the other had three primary tumours. None of the 31 non-relapsing patients were ctDNA-positive at any time point (n=142). Metastatic relapse was predicted by Signatera with high accuracy and a lead time of up to 2 years (median=9.5 months). Conclusions: The use of a scalable patient-specific ctDNA-based validated workflow detects breast cancer recurrence ahead of clinical detection. Accurate and earlier prediction by ctDNA analysis could provide a means of monitoring breast cancer patients in need of second-line salvage adjuvant therapy in order to prevent overt life-threatening metastatic progression. Citation Format: Coombes RC, Armstrong A, Ahmed S, Page K, Hastings RK, Salari R, Sethi H, Boydell A-R, Shchegrova SV, Fernandez-Garcia D, Gleason KL, Goddard K, Guttery DS, Assaf ZJ, Balcioglu M, Moore DA, Primrose L, Navarro SL, Aleshin A, Rehman F, Toghill BJ, Louie MC, Zimmermann BG, Lin C-HJ, Shaw JA. Early detection of residual breast cancer through a robust, scalable and personalized analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) antedates overt metastatic recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-02.