Search

Introduction: Wrestling is one of the fastest-growing sports among females in the United States (US). However, female wrestling injuries remain poorly characterized. In this study we describe historical and projected national estimates of female wrestling injuries, and compare injury characteristics with those of male wrestlers.Methods: We queried the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database (2005-2019) to compare national weighted estimates and injury characteristics of male vs female wrestlers presenting to US emergency departments (ED) and projected annual female wrestling injuries expected by 2030.Results: Our analyses demonstrated a significant (P < 0.001) increase in female wrestling injuries between 2005 (N = 1500; confidence interval [CI], 923 – 2,078) and 2019 (N = 3,404; CI 2,296 – 4,513). Linear regression (R2 = 0.69; P < 0.001) projected 4,558 (CI, 3104 – 6033) such injuries in 2030. Of female wrestling injuries 50.1% (CI, 44.1 – 56.2) occurred in patients 14-18 years of age. Compared with age-matched males, female wrestlers were significantly less likely to present with fractures (Female [F]: 10.6%; CI 7.5% – 13.7%; Male [M]: 15.7%; CI 14.7% – 16.7%; P = 0.003) or head/neck injuries (F: 18.5%; CI 13.2% – 23.9%; M: 24.6%; CI 23.2% – 26.0%; P = 0.018), and significantly more likely to present with strains/sprains (F: 48.8%; CI, 41.2% – 56.3%; M: 34.4%; CI 31.6% – 37.1%; P < 0.001).Conclusion: Males and females possess distinctly unique physiology and anatomy, such as variances in ligamentous and muscular strength, which may help to explain differences in wrestling injury characteristics. Prompt management of injuries and specific training strategies aimed at prevention may help to reduce the projected increase of female wrestling-associated injuries as the popularity of the sport continues to rise.

Background: Although the Latarjet operation may be performed as a revision surgery for anterior shoulder instability, the high recurrence rate of anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) has led some to advocate for performing the Latarjet procedure as a primary stabilization surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the intermediate-term outcomes after primary open Latarjet (PLJ) and revision to open Latarjet (RLJ). Materials and Methods: This was a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients who underwent either PLJ or RLJ procedures for anterior shoulder instability between 2014 and 2023. Patients with less than 1 year of follow-up, seizure history, multidirectional instability, concurrent rotator cuff repair, or the absence of preoperative imaging were excluded. Glenoid bone loss (GBL), the width of Hill-Sachs lesions, recurrent dislocations, and reoperations were assessed. Results: The study included 29 patients, with 12 undergoing PLJ procedures and 17 undergoing RLJ procedures. The mean duration of follow-up was similar for the two groups (4.7 vs 4.6 years, P=.854). Patients undergoing PLJ procedures demonstrated a higher mean GBL (18.4%) compared with patients undergoing revision (10.5%; P=.035); however, there was no significant difference in Hill-Sachs lesion size (14.2 vs 10.4 mm, P=.374). After stratifying according to GBL, the groups undergoing PLJ and RLJ procedures had similar recurrent dislocation rates (8.3% and 11.8%, respectively; P=1.0) and reoperation frequency (25.0% and 23.5%, respectively; P=1.0). Conclusion: The PLJ and RLJ groups had comparable rates of recurrent dislocations, complications, and reoperations, emphasizing the value of considering Latarjet procedures as revision surgery after unsuccessful primary arthroscopic stabilization. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(6):343–348.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Basketball-related fractures involving the lower extremities frequently present to emergency departments (ED) in the United States (US). This study aimed to identify the primary mechanisms, distribution, and trends of these injuries. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that (1) lower extremity fracture frequency will decrease from 2013 to 2022, (2) the ankle will be the most common fracture site, and (3) noncontact twisting will be the most common injury mechanism. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiological. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was queried for lower extremity fractures from basketball presenting to US EDs from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2022. Patient demographics, injury location, and disposition were recorded. The injury mechanism was characterized using the provided narrative. National estimates (NEs) were calculated using the NEISS statistical sample weight. Injury trends were evaluated by linear regression. Results: There were 6259 cases (NE: 185,836) of basketball-related lower extremity fractures. Linear regression analysis of annual trends demonstrated a significant decrease in lower extremity fractures over the study period (2013-2022: P = 0.01; R 2 = 0.64). The most common injury mechanism was a noncontact twisting motion (NE: 49,897, 26.9%) followed by jumping (NE: 39,613, 21.3%). The ankle was the most common fracture site (NE: 69,936, 37.6%) followed by the foot (NE: 49,229, 26.49%). While ankle and foot fractures decreased significantly (P < 0.05), fractures of the lower leg, knee, toe, and upper leg showed no significant trends (P = 0.09, 0.75, 0.07, and 0.85, respectively). Conclusion: Basketball-related lower extremity fractures decreased from 2013 to 2022, with the ankle being the most common fracture site and most fractures arising from a noncontact twist. Increasing utilization of outpatient clinics may have contributed to the decline, particularly for ankle and foot fractures. The prevalence of ankle fractures and twisting-related injuries reinforces the importance of protective footwear and targeted strengthening protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a common procedure utilized to address degenerative pathologies of the glenohumeral joint and rotator cuff. Increased reliance on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have placed emphasis on the utilization of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and maximal outcome improvement (MOI) thresholds to assess the clinical efficacy of RTSA. In this study, we systematically reviewed the MCID, SCB, PASS, and MOI thresholds reported for PROMs following RTSA. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were queried for articles from January 1, 2000 to August 31, 2023 reporting MCID, SCB, PASS, or MOI values for PROMs following RTSA. Patient demographic data, study characteristics, MCID/SCB/PASS/MOI thresholds, and threshold calculation methods were extracted. One hundred and forty-one articles were screened with 39 ultimately included, comprising 11,984 total patients that underwent RTSA. 34 (87%) studies reported MCID thresholds, 20 (51%) reported SCB, 5 (13%) reported PASS, and 2 (5%) reported MOI. 25/39 (64%) studies referenced a previous study when reporting MCID, SCB, PASS, or MOI values, 11 (28%) used an anchor-based method to calculate threshold values, 1 (3%) used a distribution-based method, and 2 (5%) used both anchor and distribution methods. There were 19 newly calculated MCID (11), SCB (5), PASS (1), and MOI (2) thresholds. For 5 of the 6 most utilized PROMs (ASES, SST, Constant, UCLA, and SPADI), the range of reported MCID values exceeded 50% of the most common threshold. For 3 of 6, the range of SCB values exceeded 25% of the most common threshold. There is substantial variability in the MCID and SCB threshold values reported in the RTSA literature. Standardizing the methodologic calculation and utilization of MCID, SCB, PASS, and MOI thresholds for RTSA may allow for improved assessment of PROMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate outcomes of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic repair for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs). Patients with MRCTs (full-thickness tear of 2 or more tendons or full-thickness tear ≥5 cm) who underwent arthroscopic repair with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed (n = 51). All patients had preoperative magnetic resonance imaging used to characterize pattern of tear, degree of fatty degeneration (Goutallier classification), and degree of rotator cuff arthropathy (Hamada classification). Outcomes were determined by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and Penn Shoulder Scores (PSS). A total of 51 patients with a minimum 2.3-year follow-up (mean, 5.4 years; range, 2.3-9.7 years) were included in this study. Mean ASES score was 46.1 ± 7.8 (95% CI, 43.9-48.3) for pain and 39.4 ± 12.1 (95% CI, 36.0-42.8) for function. Total ASES score averaged 85.5 ± 18.4 (95% CI, 80.4-90.7). PSS had a mean pain score of 26.8 ± 4.4 (95% CI, 25.4-28.1), a mean satisfaction score of 7.9 ± 2.9 (95% CI, 7.0-8.2), and a mean function score of 48.5 ± 13.5 (95% CI, 44.7-52.3). Total PSS averaged 83.2 ± 19.6 (95% CI, 77.7-87.7). No correlation was found between Goutallier grade and ASES/PSS scores or between Hamada grade and ASES/PSS scores. Three patients underwent reoperation after primary arthroscopic repair of an MRCT (5.9%). Patients with MRCTs who undergo primary arthroscopic repair have postoperative outcome scores indicative of good shoulder function, low pain, and high satisfaction. The rate of reoperation for individuals who underwent primary arthroscopic repair with MRCTs was low at 6%. Level IV, retrospective case series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The recent addition of biceps tendon augmentation to partial arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for the treatment of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears is proposed to improve clinical outcomes and reduce re-tears. Materials and Methods: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis (5 studies) was to compare outcomes between partial ARCR with (142 patients) and without (149 patients) biceps augmentation. Results: Partial ARCR with and without biceps augmentation were comparable in pain, function, and range of motion. However, biceps augmentation vs no augmentation at all during ARCR may lower re-tear rates for irreparable large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (42.9% vs 72.5%, P=.007). Conclusion: More research is needed to investigate this technique and guide surgical decision-making. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):e217–e224.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An increasing reliance on patient-reported outcomes has led to greater emphasis on minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds in assessing rotator cuff repairs. Purpose: To review the MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds reported for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were queried for full-text journal articles in English published between January 1, 2000, and May 31, 2022. Studies with MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds reported for patients with rotator cuff repair and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were included. Reported MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds and associated calculation methods were extracted. Results: There were 41 unique studies (6331 shoulders) that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 37 (90%) reported MCID; 16 (39%), PASS; and 11 (27%), SCB values. The most common PROMs were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the Constant-Murley score. In total, 71% (29/41) of these studies referenced values in the literature, usually studies of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (21/29). Twelve studies calculated MCID, SCB, or PASS thresholds using anchor-based approaches, whereas 6 studies also calculated thresholds using distribution-based methods. The use of MCID, SCB, and PASS in the rotator cuff repair literature is increasing, with half of the included studies published within the final 17 months of the studied period. Conclusion: Significant variability was seen in the reporting of MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values after rotator cuff repair. Researchers should prioritize studies that report clinical outcome thresholds calculated using anchor-based methods and should critically review both the anchor question and its response choices. Standardization of MCID, SCB, and PASS values and calculation methods will allow for a more reliable assessment of PROMs in rotator cuff repair moving forward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study sought to understand trends in industry payments for research awarded to orthopedic surgeons. Materials and Methods: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database was queried for the years 2016 to 2021 for industry payments for research. Financial analyses were performed to understand temporal trends and differences by orthopedic subspecialty and principal investigator characteristics such as sex. The threshold for statistical significance was set at.05. Results: A total of 2014 orthopedic surgeons were identified, among whom 542 adult reconstruction (27%) and 460 sports medicine (23%) surgeons were major beneficiaries. Seventy-one female orthopedic surgeons comprised the minority (4%). Total research payments awarded during the study period aggregated to $266,633,592, with adult reconstruction ($88,819,047; 33%) and sports medicine ($57,949,822; 22%) receiving the highest amounts. Total research payments awarded trended upward yearly except for a decline in 2020 that subsequently rebounded (P<.001). Median annual research payment per orthopedic surgeon was $13,375. Median total industry payments per orthopedic surgeon differed between specialties (P <.001), with the highest amounts for adult reconstruction ($44,063) and sports medicine ($34,567) and the lowest amounts for hand ($12,052) and foot and ankle ($19,233). Median total payments did not differ significantly when stratified by sex (P=.276) and region (P=.906). Specialties in which the respective top three companies offered the majority of the research funding were musculoskeletal oncology (90%), pediatric orthopedics (66%), and shoulder and elbow (64%). Conclusion: These results can be used as a primer for orthopedic surgeons seeking to leverage industry relationships to fund translational research. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):172–178.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medical shadowing helps provide clinical exposure to aspiring and current medical students, mainly at the college level. This paper makes a case for making medical shadowing opportunities more widely available for high school students. Through the perspective of a high school student who got such an opportunity, we demonstrate that high school students can gain valuable clinical knowledge and exposure to the ethics involved in patient care, inspiring them to explore further pathways that will help them make better-informed academic and career choices. This high school student provides pointers on preparing for medical shadowing encounters through background research and developing a note-taking template. We also offer early-career and experienced physicians' perspectives on how providing medical shadowing opportunities to high school students benefits practicing physicians by energizing their motivation, reaffirming their commitment to the profession, and gaining a fresh perspective on their work. We believe that medical shadowing for high school students can open channels to attract and motivate a young and diverse talent pool to the medical profession that will help mitigate the projected shortfall of physicians in the next decade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A double cortical button technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) has advantages including significant control over graft tensioning, less concern about graft length, and minimized risk of bone tunnel fracture compared with traditional UCLR techniques. This double cortical button technique was recently found to be noninferior in mechanical performance to the traditional docking technique regarding joint strength, joint stiffness, and graft strain. However, clinical outcomes have not been compared between these UCLR techniques. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether baseball players who underwent UCLR with a double cortical button (double button) technique have similar return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes to baseball players who underwent UCLR with the traditional docking (docking) technique. Baseball players who underwent primary UCLR from 2011 to 2020 across 2 institutions were identified. Included patients were contacted to complete a follow-up survey evaluating reoperations, RTS, and functional outcome scores. Functional outcome surveys include the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score, the Conway-Jobe score, the Andrews-Timmerman elbow score, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score. Overall, 78 male baseball players (age: 18.9 ± 2.4 years) with an average follow-up of 3.1 ± 2.4 years were evaluated, with 73 of the players being baseball pitchers. Players in the double button group more frequently received palmaris longus autografts (78% vs. 30%) and less frequently received gracilis autografts (22% vs. 58%) compared with players in the docking group (P =.001); however, all other demographic factors were similar between the groups. All players in the double button group were able to RTS in 11.1 ± 2.6 months, whereas 96% of players in the docking group were able to RTS in 13.5 ± 3.4 months (P >.05). All postoperative outcomes and patient-reported outcomes were statistically similar between the groups and remained similar after isolating pitchers only and after separating partial-thickness from full-thickness UCL tears (all P >.05). RTS and other postoperative outcomes may be similar between baseball players who underwent UCLR with the double button technique and the docking technique. Although future research may be necessary to strengthen clinical recommendations, these findings provide the first clinical outcomes in light of a recent cadaveric study finding similar elbow strength, joint stiffness, and graft strain compared with the docking technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study analyzed the academic accomplishments and demographics of elected presidents of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), American Orthopaedic Association (AOA), and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS). Curriculum vitae and internet-based resources were reviewed to collect demographics, training characteristics, bibliometrics, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) research funding of contemporary presidents (1990–2020). Eighty presidents were included. Most presidents were men (97%), and 4% of presidents were non-White (3% Black and 1% Hispanic). Few had an additional graduate degree (4% MBA, 3% MS, 1% MPH, 1% PhD). Ten orthopedic surgery residency programs trained 47% of these presidents. Most had fellowship training (59%), and the top three were hand surgery (11%), pediatric orthopedics (11%), and adult reconstruction (10%). Twenty-nine presidents (36%) participated in a traveling fellowship. The mean age at appointment was 58±5 years, which was 27 years since residency graduation. The mean h-index was 36±23, resulting from 150±126 peer-reviewed manuscripts. Orthopedic surgery presidents had more peer-reviewed manuscripts (150±126) than chairs (73±81) and program directors (27±32) (P<.001). AOA presidents had the highest mean h-index (42±21) compared with AAOS (38±27) and ABOS (25±16) presidents (P=.035). Nineteen presidents had NIH funding (24%). More presidents had NIH funding in the AOA (39%) and AAOS (25%) than the ABOS (0%) (P=.007). Orthopedic surgery presidents possess high levels of scholarly output. AOA presidents had the highest h-index values and prevalence of NIH funding. Females and racial minorities remain underrepresented at the highest levels of leadership. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):e45–e51.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the value of slowing down in order to live a more intentional, deliberate, and mindful life. The author, an orthopaedic surgeon, acknowledges the frenetic and hurried nature of their profession but emphasizes the importance of taking the time to slow down. Slowing down can lead to reduced stress, enhanced relationships, increased mental clarity, and improved productivity. The author suggests various ways to incorporate slowness into daily life, such as pausing throughout the day, being present in conversations, spending time outdoors, and practicing silence. [Extracted from the article]

Currently, little is known about the differences in medical knowledge acquisition between osteopathic and allopathic orthopedic surgery residents. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) performance and training pathway in orthopedic surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study of all orthopedic surgery residents taking the OITE during the 2019–2020 academic year. Comparisons in OITE performance were made with parametric tests. A total of 4407 orthopedic surgery residents were in allopathic (86%) and osteopathic (14%) training programs. There was significant improvement in OITE performance between subsequent postgraduate year (PGY) levels among allopathic residents (P<.001). Among osteopathic residents, OITE performance increased between PGY1 and PGY4 (P<.001) but plateaued between PGY4 and PGY5 (P>.05). At the PGY1 level, osteopathic residents had higher OITE performance than allopathic residents (P<.001), but scores were equivalent at the PGY2 to PGY4 levels (P>.05). At the PGY5 level, allopathic residents had higher OITE performance than osteopathic residents (P<.001). Allopathic medical students scored higher on the Step 1 (248±19 vs 242±17, P<.001) and Step 2 (255±16 vs 250±15, P<.001) board examinations. Medical knowledge increases during orthopedic surgery residency. Disparities exist by training pathway, with osteopathic residents outperforming allopathic residents at the PGY1 level but then underperforming at the PGY5 level. Ultimately, this study provides insights into how resident promotion and training pathway impacts the acquisition of medical knowledge during orthopedic surgery residency. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):379–383.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article titled "Your Best Life: Facing Life Head On" discusses the importance of embracing hardship and making difficult decisions in order to grow and find balance in life. The author emphasizes that avoiding uncomfortable situations and delaying hard choices only leads to increased stress and dissatisfaction. The article also highlights the significance of accepting misfortune, letting go of what no longer works, and facing loss head-on. The author shares personal experiences and encourages readers to tackle their most dreaded tasks, prioritize their well-being, and invest in meaningful relationships. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused the cancellation or postponement of virtually every sporting event, resulting in training disruptions, income loss, and career uncertainties for athletes around the world. At present, the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental and emotional health of athletes is not well understood. Purpose: To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental and emotional health of athletes and to identify risk factors associated with poor mental health outcomes. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify all articles reporting on athletes' mental and emotional health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Articles were selected based on relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study characteristics, athlete demographics, and COVID-19 mental health data (sex-, type of sport—, and level of play—specific differences) were collected from each included article and analyzed. Results: A total of 35 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising athletes around the world and across numerous sports and levels of play. Most studies utilized at least 1 validated mental health questionnaire and assessed for outcomes such as depression, anxiety, stress, motivation, and athletic identity. Overall, athletes reported worse mental and emotional health during the COVID-19 pandemic, although these effects were attenuated by home training programs and quarantine training camps. Female sex and more elite levels of play were associated with an increased risk for poor mental health outcomes. Type of sport was associated with mixed results, with individual and team sports carrying different increased risks for poor mental and emotional health. Nearly all studies recommended the need for increased psychological support of athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental and emotional health of athletes is complex and multifaceted. Increased social interactions with coaches and teammates, continued access to training facilities and mental health professionals, and active utilization of healthy coping mechanisms can improve mental health outcomes for athletes in the era of COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]