Search

Abstract: Altered signaling pathways resulting from aberrant changes in epigenetic parameters may play a pivotal role in carcinogenesis. To identify biological pathways likely to be affected by methylation-mediated alterations in gene expression in prostate cancer, we performed a genome-wide methylation analysis of 27,578 CpG sites, corresponding to 14,495 genes on a pooled sample of 12 pairs of prostate tumor and adjacent normal tissues. In all, 972 CpG sites were significantly hypermethylated while 209 sites were hypomethylated in prostate tumor tissue (FDR adjusted p-value<0.05; fold change⩾2) corresponding to 1043 unique genes, which is consistent with genome-wide gene-specific hypermethylation patterns previously observed in multiple cancer models. Global hypomethylation in prostate tumor was also detected by measuring methylation changes in ALU repeat sequences. Pathway analysis of the genes with altered methylation patterns identifies the involvement of a cancer related network of genes whose activity may be heavily regulated by TNF-α in prostate tumorigenesis. Our results suggest that epigenetic dysregulation of cellular processes relevant to TNF-α-dependent apoptosis and electrophile detoxification may be intimately involved in prostate carcinogenesis. These findings may lend credence to the possibility of using tumor-specific alterations in methylation patterns as biomarkers in estimating prognosis and assessing treatment options for prostate cancer. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article presents a study which evaluates the safety and feasibility of radiotherapy after paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate and carboplatin (TEC) plus androgen therapy in previously treated prostate cancer patients. It mentions that patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer were treated with four cycles of paclitaxel in a period of 16 weeks. It affirms that the authors concluded that neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy with TEC followed by high-dose radiation therapy is safe.

Given the heterogeneity of prognoses in patients with castrate metastatic prostate cancer, the ability to accurately predict survival is vital for optimal patient counseling, selection of treatments, clinical trial design, and interpretation of clinical data. Over the past 20 years, several prognostic models have been developed in an attempt to refine the clinician''s predictive ability. Early models were based on patients with more advanced disease. They included variables that are no longer regularly encountered today and involved cumbersome calculations that were not practical for everyday use in the clinic. Recently, 2 point-based nomograms have been developed based on pretreatment variables measured on a routine basis. These models provide a user-friendly format in which to make sophisticated predictions of survival. These models have improved our ability to predict the outcomes of patients with castrate metastatic disease. However, further work to identify novel prognostic markers to improve the accuracy of these predictions is needed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Over the last decade, an increasing number of novel therapies have been tested in prostate cancer. Although each agent has potential to affect the natural history of the disease, how we should proceed, select, and test these agents to show a clinical benefit remains a dilemma. Because prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease, an understanding of the disease states is required to screen and test novel agents. Only with the appropriate selection of disease state, trial design, and endpoints will we be able to select the most promising regimens to move forward. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Introduction: Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are commonly employed in prostate cancer therapy in an interchangeable manner. These drugs are highly efficacious in androgen antagonism to improve patient outcomes, but they also carry noteworthy risk of adverse effects. Common toxicities vary amongst the two drugs and may have differential interactions with patient co-morbidities, but these patterns are unclear as co-morbidities typically serve as exclusion criteria in clinical trials. Hence, there is no existing guidance on how clinicians may tailor treatment based on patient-specific factors. Analysis of differential patient outcomes between these two drugs can inform future systematic reviews, new clinical studies, and clinical decision making. Method and analysis: The framework for this methodology was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Title and abstract screening will be performed by two independent researchers to create an initial study inventory. This will be followed by full-text screening for study inclusion. Population-based studies describing patient outcomes, common toxicities, and associations with patient co-morbidities following abiraterone or enzalutamide therapy will be included. After data is extracted, it will be summarized for presentation. Ethics and dissemination: The findings of this scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The results will be used to inform future studies on patient-specific factors informing treatment choice between abiraterone and enzalutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer. All data are from published openly accessible sources, and therefore, no ethical clearance is necessary. The protocol is also registered at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19149227. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: Germline genetic testing (GT) is important for prostate cancer (PCA) management, clinical trial eligibility, and hereditary cancer risk. However, GT is underutilized and there is a shortage of genetic counselors. To address these gaps, a patient-driven, pretest genetic education webtool was designed and studied compared with traditional genetic counseling (GC) to inform strategies for expanding access to genetic services. METHODS: Technology-enhanced acceleration of germline evaluation for therapy (TARGET) was a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04447703) comparing a nine-module patient-driven genetic education webtool versus pretest GC. Participants completed surveys measuring decisional conflict, satisfaction, and attitudes toward GT at baseline, after pretest education/counseling, and after GT result disclosure. The primary end point was noninferiority in reducing decisional conflict between webtool and GC using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale. Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to compare decisional conflict between groups. Participants opting for GT received a 51-gene panel, with results delivered to participants and their providers. RESULTS: The analytic data set includes primary outcome data from 315 participants (GC [n = 162] and webtool [n = 153]). Mean difference in decisional conflict score changes between groups was –0.04 (one-sided 95% CI, –∞ to 2.54; P =.01), suggesting the patient-driven webtool was noninferior to GC. Overall, 145 (89.5%) GC and 120 (78.4%) in the webtool arm underwent GT, with pathogenic variants in 15.8% (8.7% in PCA genes). Satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms; knowledge of cancer genetics was higher but attitudes toward GT were less favorable in the webtool arm. CONCLUSION: The results of the TARGET study support the use of patient-driven digital webtools for expanding access to pretest genetic education for PCA GT. Further studies to optimize patient experience and evaluate them in diverse patient populations are warranted. TARGET: A randomized, noninferiority trial of a pretest, patient-driven genetic education webtool vs. genetic counseling for #prostatecancer germline testing by @LoebStacy @vedangiri et al. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are novel therapies used in advanced prostate cancer. However, their outcomes and toxicities may differ based on patient–specific factors. Understanding these differences may allow clinicians to make personalized treatment decisions based on individual patients. Because clinical trials do not represent the real-world population, this study used a formal protocol to review and collate smaller, real-world samples, aiming to explain the differences in outcomes following administration of these two drugs. We found that enzalutamide typically has improved cancer response and overall survival. Enzalutamide more commonly causes neurological side effects and fatigue, while abiraterone acetate has cardiovascular complications. Abiraterone acetate leads to increased costs and healthcare needs, including hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Ultimately, this study demonstrates significant differences in patient experiences and outcomes following abiraterone acetate versus enzalutamide. Clinicians may use this information to inform their treatment choice on a patient-specific basis. Abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are commonly used for metastatic prostate cancer. It is unclear how their outcomes and toxicities vary with patient-specific factors because clinical trials typically exclude patients with significant comorbidities. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap and facilitate informed treatment decision making. A registered protocol utilizing PRISMA scoping review methodology was utilized to identify real-world studies. Of 433 non-duplicated publications, 23 were selected by three independent reviewers. ENZ offered a faster and more frequent biochemical response (30–50% vs. 70–75%), slowed progression (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50–0.88), and improved overall survival versus AA. ENZ was associated with more fatigue and neurological adverse effects. Conversely, AA increased risk of cardiovascular- (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.09–3.05) and heart failure-related (HR 2.88; 95% CI 1.09–7.63) hospitalizations. Ultimately, AA was associated with increased length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.04–1.53). Accordingly, total costs were higher for AA, although pharmacy costs alone were higher for ENZ. Existing data suggest that AA and ENZ have important differences in outcomes including toxicities, response, disease progression, and survival. Additionally, adherence, healthcare utilization, and costs differ. Further investigation is warranted to inform treatment decisions which optimize patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hypertension and proteinuria are common bevacizumab-induced toxicities. No validated biomarkers are available for identifying patients at risk of these toxicities.Methods: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis was performed in 1039 bevacizumab-treated patients of European ancestry in four clinical trials (CALGB 40502, 40503, 80303, 90401). Grade ≥2 hypertension and proteinuria were recorded (CTCAE v.3.0). Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-toxicity associations were determined using a cause-specific Cox model adjusting for age and sex.Results: The most significant SNP associated with hypertension with concordant effect in three out of the four studies (p-value <0.05 for each study) was rs6770663 (A > G) in KCNAB1, with the G allele increasing the risk of hypertension (p-value = 4.16 × 10-6). The effect of the G allele was replicated in ECOG-ACRIN E5103 in 582 patients (p-value = 0.005). The meta-analysis of all five studies for rs6770663 led to p-value = 7.73 × 10-8, close to genome-wide significance. The most significant SNP associated with proteinuria was rs339947 (C > A, between DNAH5 and TRIO), with the A allele increasing the risk of proteinuria (p-value = 1.58 × 10-7).Conclusions: The results from the largest study of bevacizumab toxicity provide new markers of drug safety for further evaluations. SNP in KCNAB1 validated in an independent dataset provides evidence toward its clinical applicability to predict bevacizumab-induced hypertension. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00785291 (CALGB 40502); NCT00601900 (CALGB 40503); NCT00088894 (CALGB 80303) and NCT00110214 (CALGB 90401). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preliminary data suggest a potential decreased benefit of docetaxel in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who previously received abiraterone acetate, a novel androgen synthesis inhibitor (ASI). Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial 90401 (Alliance), a phase 3 trial in patients with mCRPC who received docetaxel-based chemotherapy, offered the opportunity to evaluate effect of prior ketoconazole, an earlier generation ASI, on clinical outcomes after docetaxel.Methods: In CALGB trial 90401, 1050 men with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC were randomized to receive treatment with docetaxel and prednisone that included either bevacizumab or placebo. In total, 1005 men (96%) had data available regarding prior ketoconazole therapy. The observed effects of prior ketoconazole on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline, and the objective response rate (ORR) were assessed using proportional hazards and Poisson regression methods adjusted for validated prognostic factors and treatment arm.Results: Baseline characteristics between patients who did (N=277) and did not (N=728) receive prior ketoconazole therapy were similar. There were no statistically significant differences between patients who did and those who did not receive prior ketoconazole therapy with respect to OS (median OS, 21.1 months vs 22.3 months, respectively; stratified log-rank P=.635), PFS (median PFS, 8.1 months vs 8.6 months, respectively; stratified log-rank P=.342), the proportion achieving a decline ≥ 50% in PSA (61% vs 66%, respectively; relative risk, 1.09; adjusted P=.129), or ORR (39% vs 43%, respectively; relative risk, 1.11; adjusted P=.366).Conclusions: As measured by OS, PFS, PSA, and the ORR, there was no evidence that prior treatment with ketoconazole had an impact on the clinical outcomes of patients with mCRPC who received subsequent docetaxel-based therapy. The current results highlight the need for prospective studies to assess for potential cross-resistance with novel ASIs and to define the optimal sequence of therapy in mCRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest a potential decreased benefit of docetaxel in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who previously received abiraterone acetate, a novel androgen synthesis inhibitor (ASI). Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial 90401 (Alliance), a phase 3 trial in patients with mCRPC who received docetaxel-based chemotherapy, offered the opportunity to evaluate effect of prior ketoconazole, an earlier generation ASI, on clinical outcomes after docetaxel. METHODS: In CALGB trial 90401, 1050 men with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC were randomized to receive treatment with docetaxel and predni-sone that included either bevacizumab or placebo. In total, 1005 men (96%) had data available regarding prior ketoconazole therapy. The observed effects of prior ketoconazole on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline, and the objective response rate (ORR) were assessed using proportional hazards and Poisson regression methods adjusted for validated prognostic factors and treatment arm. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics between patients who did (N = 277) and did not (N = 728) receive prior ketoconazole therapy were similar. There were no statistically significant differences between patients who did and those who did not receive prior ketoconazole therapy with respect to OS (median OS, 21.1 months vs 22.3 months, respec-tively; stratified log-rank P = .635), PFS (median PFS, 8.1 months vs 8.6 months, respectively; stratified log-rank P = .342), the propor-tion achieving a decline >50% in PSA (61% vs 66%, respectively; relative risk, 1.09; adjusted P = .129), or ORR (39% vs 43%, respectively; relative risk, 1.11; adjusted P = .366). CONCLUSIONS: As measured by OS, PFS, PSA, and the ORR, there was no evidence that prior treatment with ketoconazole had an impact on the clinical outcomes of patients with mCRPC who received subsequent docetaxel-based therapy. The current results highlight the need for prospective studies to assess for potential cross-resistance with novel ASIs and to define the optimal sequence of therapy in mCRPC [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Androgen deprivation therapy, alone or in combination with androgen signaling inhibitors, is a treatment option for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC). When making treatment decisions, health care providers must consider the long-term effects of treatment on the patient's overall health and well-being. Herein, we review the effects of these treatments on the musculoskeletal and cardiovascular systems, cognition, and fall risk, and provide management approaches for each. We also include an algorithm to help health care providers implement best clinical practices and interdisciplinary care for preserving the overall well-being of PC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been associated with survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, no study has examined the prognostic value of NLR and PLR in the context of CTCs.Methods: Baseline CTCs from mCRPC patients were enumerated using the CellSearch System. Baseline NLR and PLR values were calculated using the data from routine complete blood counts. The associations of CTC, NLR, and PLR values, individually and jointly, with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, as well as univariate and multivariate Cox models.Results: CTCs were detected in 37 (58.7%) of 63 mCRPC patients, and among them, 16 (25.4%) had ≥5 CTCs. The presence of CTCs was significantly associated with a 4.02-fold increased risk for progression and a 3.72-fold increased risk of death during a median follow-up of 17.6 months. OS was shorter among patients with high levels of NLR or PLR than those with low levels (log-rank P = 0.023 and 0.077). Neither NLR nor PLR was individually associated with PFS. Among the 37 patients with detectable CTCs, those with a high NLR had significantly shorter OS (log-rank P = 0.024); however, among the 26 patients without CTCs, the OS difference between high- and low-NLR groups was not statistically significant. Compared to the patients with CTCs and low NLR, those with CTCs and high levels of NLR had a 3.79-fold risk of death (P = 0.036). This association remained significant after adjusting for covariates (P = 0.031). Combination analyses of CTC and PLR did not yield significant results.Conclusion: Among patients with detectable CTCs, the use of NLR could further classify patients into different risk groups, suggesting a complementary role for NLR in CTC-based prognostic stratification in mCRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Elderly patients (≥65 yr) with advanced prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) conditions are often excluded from clinical trials of abiraterone acetate (AA) or enzalutamide (ENZ). Consequently, little is known about the effects of these medications on these vulnerable patients. To assess the short-term outcomes of AA and ENZ in patients with pre-existing CVDs. A population-based retrospective study. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare–linked database was used to identify prostate cancer patients using AA or ENZ. The primary endpoint was 6-mo all-cause mortality, analyzed using modified Poisson regression modeling of relative risk (RR) adjusted for confounders and comorbidities. Among eligible patients (2845 with AA and 1031 with ENZ), 67% had at least one pre-existing CVD. Compared with those without pre-existing CVDs, having one to two pre-existing CVDs was associated with 16% higher 6-mo mortality (RR = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00–1.36), and the risk increased further among those having three or more CVDs (RR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.29–1.88). Most of the differences in survival of patients with pre-existing CVD condition occurred within the first 6 mo of treatment. After treatment with AA or ENZ, elderly prostate cancer patients with pre-existing CVDs experienced higher short-term mortality than otherwise similar patients without CVDs. Mortality associated with CVDs did not depend on having received AA versus ENZ. Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) experienced higher short-term mortality after abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide than those without pre-existing CVDs. It is recommended that a multidisciplinary team, including a cardiologist, evaluate patients having pre-existing CVDs in the process of making treatment decisions and monitoring potential side effects. Pre-existing cardiovascular conditions are associated with higher short-term mortality after abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. The survival benefit observed in the pivotal clinical trials might not hold for patients with significant pre-existing cardiovascular conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Sirolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, may complement the anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activity of sunitinib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, by vertical disruption of vascular epithelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) signaling, by reducing the compensatory production of VEGF in sunitinib-treated patients and also by directly inhibiting tumor cell proliferation. We conducted this phase 1 study to investigate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for this combination of sunitinib and sirolimus in humans. Patients and Methods: Sunitinib was given at 50 mg daily × 28 every 6 weeks. The first cohort received sunitinib alone for cycle 1 (50 mg daily for 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks off) and received sunitinib at standard dose 50 mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off in combination with sirolimus 4 mg weekly; this dose and schedule were further investigated in second cohort. The third cohort received decreased dose of sunitinib at 37.5 mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off in combination with sirolimus at 4 mg weekly. Sirolimus dose was escalated to 8 mg weekly in fourth cohort. Results: Eighteen patients with ECOG PS of 0 or 1 were enrolled, median age 57 years (range 24-76), M:F ratio: 11:7. Median number of prior treatments is 2 (range 0-5); six patients had no prior systemic therapy. Half of patients from the first two cohorts required dose reduction or early discontinuation of treatment; therefore, sunitinib dose was decreased to 37.5 mg daily in third and fourth cohort. In third and fourth cohort, one-third of patients required dose modification during cycle 1 or cycle 2. Multiple patients had significant toxicities including fatigue and hand-foot syndrome. One patient developed interstitial pneumonitis, and one patient died suddenly on day 8 due to progressive disease. There were six patients who tolerated four or more cycles. Among these six patients, two patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) achieved partial response; one subsequently underwent surgical resection of residual renal mass and lymph node dissection and achieved complete response afterward. One with metastatic melanoma also achieved complete response after metastatectomy. There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between sunitinib and sirolimus. 4 mg weekly sirolimus did not reduce the sunitinib-induced circulating VEGF production but stimulated more VEGF production through some unknown compensatory mechanism. Conclusion: Toxicity precluded dose escalation of weekly sirolimus in combination with a standard sunitinib dose/schedule. These results suggest caution when combining targeted agents lacking specificity for tumor signaling or vasculature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose/Objectives: To provide preliminary data on an Internet intervention that incorporates cognitive reframing and self-management strategies to help older men undergoing active surveillance (AS) self-manage disease-related issues and improve quality of life (QOL).Design: Single-subject design.Setting: Two participating urologic practices at major academic medical centers in the northeastern United States.Sample: 9 patients undergoing AS.Methods: Baseline data were compared to data immediately after completion of the intervention and five weeks later. Telephone interviews were used to determine overall feasibility as well as the ease of use, user friendliness, and acceptability of the intervention in patients undergoing AS.Main Research Variables: Self-efficacy, uncertainty, and QOL.Findings: The results revealed change between baseline (time 1) and intervention completion (time 2) in the majority of variables, with a return toward baseline after the intervention (time 3). Ten of the 12 measures of intervention acceptability were met. The results showed positive trends in the impact of the intervention and good overall acceptability.Conclusions: The results of this pilot study will lead to further research aimed at helping men manage issues related to AS and improve QOL.Implications for Nursing: The intervention may reduce the overtreatment of prostate cancer in men who are clinically appropriate for this management option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To describe the 5-year outcomes of patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant estramustine and vinblastine followed by concurrent chemotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT).Methods: A total of 23 patients completed therapy consisting of two 8-week cycles of vinblastine, weekly as 4 mg/m2, followed by 8 weeks of concomitant chemotherapy and 3D-CRT. Estramustine was given daily at 10 mg/kg in three divided doses. 3D-CRT consisted of a total dose of 7560 cGy.Results: Assessable patients include 9 with Stage T3 or greater tumors and 5 with lymph node metastasis at diagnosis. All patients had a Gleason score 7 or greater. The median follow-up was 60 months. Of the 23 assessable patients, 15 (65%) experienced biochemical relapse by American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology criteria. The median time to prostate-specific antigen relapse was 12 months (range 7 to 16). Five patients (22%) developed metastases. The median time to metastasis had not been reached by last follow-up. Of the 23 assessable patients, 11 (48%) received no additional therapy and had noncastrate testosterone levels. Six patients had no evidence of disease and 9 patients were receiving androgen blockade. Three patients died (one of prostate cancer and two of other diseases).Conclusions: A substantial proportion of patients with unfavorable-risk localized prostate cancer achieved long-term disease control with estramustine and vinblastine and concurrent 3D-CRT, no significant long-term toxicities were seen and 48% underwent no further therapy after RT. These long-term findings support the continued study of chemotherapy combined with RT as a potential alternative to prolonged androgen deprivation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]