Search

Background Switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was noninferior to continuing tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)–based regimens for maintaining virologic suppression at week 48 of the TANGO study. Here we present week 144 outcomes (efficacy, safety, weight, and biomarkers). Methods TANGO is a randomized (1:1, stratified by baseline third agent class), open-label, noninferiority phase 3 study. Virologically suppressed (>6 months) adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) switched to once-daily DTG/3TC or continued TAF-based regimens. Results A total of 741 participants received study treatment (DTG/3TC, n = 369; TAF-based regimen, n = 372). At week 144, the proportion of participants with an HIV-1 RNA level ≥50 copies/mL (primary end point, Snapshot; intention-to-treat–exposed population) after switching to DTG/3TC was 0.3% (1 of 369) versus 1.3% (5 of 372) for those continuing TAF-based regimens, demonstrating noninferiority (adjusted treatment difference, −1.1 [95% confidence interval, −2.4 to .2), with DTG/3TC favored in the per-protocol analysis (adjusted treatment difference, −1.1 [−2.3 to −.0]; P = .04). Few participants met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria (none in the DTG/3TC and 3 in the TAF-based regimen group), with no resistance observed. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent with DTG/3TC (15%; leading to discontinuation in 4%) than TAF-based regimens (5%; leading to discontinuation in 1%) through week 144, but rates were comparable after week 48 (4%; leading to discontinuation in 1% in both groups). Changes from baseline in lipid values generally favored DTG/3TC; no clinical impact on renal function and comparable changes in inflammatory and bone biomarkers across groups were observed. Conclusions Switching to DTG/3TC demonstrated noninferior and durable efficacy compared with continuing TAF-based regimens in treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1, with good safety and tolerability, and no resistance through 144 weeks.

To assess efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) + lamivudine (3TC) vs. DTG + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 in the prespecified 144-week secondary analyses of GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2.Design:Identical, multicenter, phase III, randomized, non-inferiority studies (double-blind through 96 weeks).Methods:Participants with HIV-1 RNA ≤500 000 copies/ml and no major viral resistance mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, or protease inhibitors were randomized 1:1 to once-daily DTG + 3TC or DTG + TDF/FTC.Results:At week 144, DTG + 3TC (N = 716) was noninferior to DTG + TDF/FTC (N = 717) in proportion of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA, This study was funded by ViiV Healthcare

Background: The 2-drug regimen dolutegravir (DTG) + lamivudine (3TC) is indicated for treatment-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We present efficacy and safety of switching to DTG/3TC in virologically suppressed individuals. Methods: TANGO is an open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study that randomized adults (1:1, stratified by baseline third agent class) with HIV-1 RNA, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Two-drug regimens (2DRs) can potentially reduce long-term cumulative drug exposure and decrease treatment-associated costs for HIV-1–infected individuals, who require lifelong therapy.1 The core antiretroviral agent in a 2DR must have high potency and a high barrier to resistance.1 As such, early studies investigating 2DRs as initial or maintenance therapy for HIV infection evaluated the pairing of the potent, well-tolerated nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) lamivudine with pharmacologically boosted protease inhibitors (PIs), which have a high barrier to resistance.2–6 Although noninferior efficacy was shown against 3-drug regimens (3DRs), PIs are associated with adverse metabolic effects, long-term toxicities, and drug–drug interactions, limiting their appeal as components of lifelong therapy.7,8 Thus, a need remains for well-tolerated, potent 2DRs with a high barrier to resistance. The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir has a high barrier to resistance, making it a well-suited candidate for inclusion in a 2DR,9 particularly when paired with lamivudine,10 as previously observed.11,12 In primary week 48 analyses of the 2 phase III studies GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 in treatment-naive adults, dolutegravir + lamivudine was noninferior to dolutegravir + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine in achieving HIV-1 RNA

Understanding long-term consequences of exposure to individual antiretroviral therapy (ART) components is important in making an initial HIV treatment selection. Initiation of ART is associated with a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD). This initial bone loss is greater with some antiretrovirals, in particular, protease inhibitors [1–4] and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) [1,5–9]. The impact on bone health of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) class has not been well characterized. Few studies to date have evaluated the effects of INSTI-containing regimens [either raltegravir (RAL) or elvitegravir] on bone composition over 48 weeks or longer. BMD outcomes tended to be more favorable when RAL was administered as part of a protease inhibitor-sparing or TDF-sparing regimen [6,10–12]; elvitegravir was administered as part of a TDF-containing fixed-dose combination and showed similar decreases in BMD as a TDF-containing, protease inhibitor-based comparator regimen [13]. Dolutegravir (DTG) is the most recently approved INSTI, and no studies to date have evaluated long-term changes in BMD in individuals initiating a DTG-based regimen. Measuring BMD in large, randomized trials is complex, as many sites do not have access to appropriate radiological facilities. As a consequence, most studies of BMD are done by monitoring changes after initiation of ART in a subset of the larger study, limiting the generalizability of conclusions and the participation to individuals seen in tertiary medical centers in the developed world. Bone remodeling occurs throughout life. Changes in biochemical markers of bone remodeling [e.g. both resorption markers: type 1 collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTx) and urinary N-telopeptide; and formation markers: serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), osteocalcin, and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)] can be used to predict the risk of fracture independently from bone density and the rapidity of bone loss in patients with untreated osteoporosis [14]. In the ASSERT study (NCT00549198), which compared abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) with TDF/emtricitabine (FTC) administered with efavirenz (EFV), results showed a significantly greater decline in BMD and a significant increase in bone turnover markers (BTMs) in the TDF/FTC arm over 96 weeks [8]. Changes in bone markers have been associated with changes in BMD in HIV-positive individuals: in the RADAR study (NCT00677300) and SMART Body Composition substudy (NCT00027352), early increases in CTx, osteocalcin, BSAP, or P1NP predicted decreases in BMD at 48 weeks [6,15]. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the changes in BTMs in the SINGLE study (ING114467) through 144 weeks of treatment with either DTG + ABC/3TC or EFV/FTC/TDF.

Objectives Dolutegravir (DTG) has been studied in three trials in HIV treatment-naive participants, showing noninferiority compared with raltegravir (RAL), and superiority compared with efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted darunavir. We explored factors that predicted treatment success, the consistency of observed treatment differences across subgroups and the impact of NRTI backbone on treatment outcome. Design Retrospective exploratory analyses of data from three large, randomized, international comparative trials: SPRING-2, SINGLE, and FLAMINGO. Methods We examined the efficacy of DTG in HIV-infected participants with respect to relevant demographic and HIV-1-related baseline characteristics using the primary efficacy endpoint from the studies (FDA snapshot) and secondary endpoints that examine specific elements of treatment response. Regression models were used to analyze pooled data from all three studies. Results Snapshot response was affected by age, hepatitis co-infection, HIV risk factor, baseline CD4⁺ cell count, and HIV-1 RNA and by third agent. Differences between DTG and other third agents were generally consistent across these subgroups. There was no evidence of a difference in snapshot response between abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) and tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) overall [ABC/3TC 86%, TDF/FTC 85%, difference 1.1%, confidence interval (CI) -1.8, 4.0 percentage points, P = 0.61] or at high viral loads (difference -2.5, 95% CI -8.9, 3.8 percentage points, P = 0.42). Conclusions DTG is a once-daily, unboosted integrase inhibitor that is effective in combination with either ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC for first-line antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive individuals with a variety of baseline characteristics.

Background. Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) reduces genital tract human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) load and reduces the risk of sexual transmission, but little is known about the efficacy of cART for decreasing genital tract viral load (GTVL) and differences in sex or HIV-1 subtype. Methods. HIV-1 RNA from blood plasma, seminal plasma, or cervical wicks was quantified at baseline and at weeks 48 and 96 after entry in a randomized clinical trial of 3 cART regimens. Results. One hundred fifty-eight men and 170 women from 7 countries were studied (men: 55% subtype B and 45% subtype C; women: 24% subtype B and 76% subtype C). Despite similar baseline CD4+ cell counts and blood plasma viral loads, women with subtype C had the highest GTVL (median, 5.1 log10 copies/mL) compared to women with subtype B and men with subtype C or B (4.0, 4.0, and 3.8 log10 copies/mL, respectively; P < .001). The proportion of participants with a GTVL below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) at week 48 (90%) and week 96 (90%) was increased compared to baseline (16%; P < .001 at both times). Women were significantly less likely to have GTVL below the LLQ compared to men (84% vs 94% at week 48, P = .006; 84% vs 97% at week 96, P = .002), despite a more sensitive assay for seminal plasma than for cervical wicks. No difference in GTVL response across the 3 cART regimens was detected. Conclusions. The female genital tract may serve as a reservoir of persistent HIV-1 replication during cART and affect the use of cART to prevent sexual and perinatal transmission of HIV-1.

Background: Managing hypertriglyceridemia in HIV-infected patients often requires multiple pharmacologic strategies. Many protease inhibitors (PIs), one of 6 classes of drugs used to treat HIV, have been associated with hypercholesterolemia and drug interactions. For this study, we examined a dual strategy to manage hypertriglyceridemia in HIV-infected patient taking PIs: 1) switching patients to fosamprenavir (FPV), a PI with fewer drug interactions, and 2) adding prescription fish oil (LOVAZA(R)), which has been shown to reduce triglycerides. Methods: This multicenter, 24-week study enrolled 36 patients virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA

The long-term efficacy of once-daily (qd) fosamprenavir (FPV) 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 100 mg (FPV/r100) has not been evaluated previously. A 96-week open-label, randomized, multicenter study compared the efficacy/safety of FPV/r100 with FPV 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 200 mg qd (FPV/r200), plus abacavir/lamivudine 600 mg/300 mg qd, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL)or =1000 copies/ml. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving VL400 copies/ml or discontinuing for drug-related reasons. In the intent-to-treat:exposed (ITT-E) population, missing = failure (M = F), and observed approaches were used to assess between-arm differences in VL responses by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and CD4(+) count by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. One hundred and fifteen (115) patients enrolled, with 58 on FPV/r100 (median VL 4.7 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 259 cells/mm(3)) and 57 on FPV/r200 (median VL 4.9 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 179 cells/mm(3)). Fewer FPV/r100-treated patients discontinued treatment prematurely (12 vs. 24) and experienced virologic failure (5 vs. 8, none developing major protease inhibitor resistance mutations). At week 96, more FPV/r100-treated patients had VL400 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 78% (45/58) vs. 53% (30/57), p = 0.006; observed: 98% (45/46) vs. 94% (30/32)] and VL50 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 66% (38/58) vs. 53% (30/57); observed: 83% (38/46) vs. 94% (30/32)]. The FPV/r100 and FPV/r200 arms were similar at week 96 regarding median change from baseline in CD4(+) count (+265 vs. +260 cells/mm(3)) and total cholesterol (+33 vs. +35 mg/dl), and in total-cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio (4.0 vs. 4.1) and type/frequency of treatment-related grade 2-4 adverse events, although FPV/r100 was associated with a lower elevation in triglycerides (+27 vs. +48 mg/dl). In conclusion, through 96 weeks, FPV/r100 was more effective and prompted less elevation in triglycerides than FPV/r200.

Once-daily (QD) fosamprenavir (FPV) at 1,400 mg boosted with low-dose ritonavir (RTV) at 200 mg is effective when it is used in combination regimens for the initial treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Whether a lower RTV boosting dose (i.e., 100 mg QD) could ensure sufficient amprenavir (APV) concentrations with improved safety/tolerability is unknown. This randomized, two 14-day-period, crossover pharmacokinetic study compared the steady-state plasma APV concentrations, safety, and tolerability of FPV at 1,400 mg QD boosted with either 100 mg or 200 mg of RTV QD in 36 healthy volunteers. Geometric least-square (GLS) mean ratios and the associated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for plasma APV maximum plasma concentrations ( C max ), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing period (AUC 0-τ ), and trough concentrations ( C τ ) during each dosing period. Equivalence between regimens (90% CIs of GLS mean ratios, 0.80 to 1.25) was observed for the plasma APV AUC 0-τ (GLS mean ratio, 0.90 [90% CI, 0.84 to 0.96]) and C max (0.97 [90% CI, 0.91 to 1.04]). The APV C τ was 38% lower with RTV at 100 mg QD than with RTV at 200 mg QD (GLS mean ratio, 0.62 [90% CI, 0.55 to 0.69]) but remained sixfold higher than the protein-corrected 50% inhibitory concentration for wild-type virus, with the lowest APV C τ observed during the 100-mg QD period being nearly threefold higher. The GLS mean APV C τ was 2.5 times higher than the historical C τ for unboosted FPV at 1,400 mg twice daily. Fewer clinical adverse drug events and smaller increases in triglyceride levels were observed with the RTV 100-mg QD regimen. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of FPV at 1,400 mg QD boosted by RTV at 100 mg QD are now under way with antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients.

The SINGLE study was a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study that evaluated the safety and efficacy of 50 mg dolutegravir + abacavir/lamivudine versus efavirenz/tenofovir/emtricitabine in 833 ART-naive HIV-1 + participants. Of 833 randomized participants, 71% in the dolutegravir + abacavir/lamivudine arm and 63% in the efavirenz/tenofovir/emtricitabine arm maintained viral loads of

Notwithstanding the continued development of new antiretroviral agents with unique profiles of resistance mutations and simpler dosing schedules,1–6 the development of multiclass antiretroviral resistance remains a serious problem for HIV-infected patients.7–12 With the failure of each regimen, the number of remaining effective choices decreases and the virologic threshold for changing antiretroviral therapy necessarily increases.13,14 For persons with clinical and virologic treatment failure, the benefits of changing therapy are evident. Many patients continue to demonstrate prolonged immunologic benefit from treatment, although achieving only partial viral suppression.9,15–21 For these patients, one option is to continue on a stable failing regimen and accept the risk of emergence of further resistance mutations, treatment failure, and the consequent reduction in future treatment choices.13,14 The primary alternative is to change therapy using new agents that are predicted to be effective. If the number or potency of new agents is small, however, application of the latter strategy may fail to suppress viral replication, and thus again lead to the emergence of new resistance mutations and yet further reductions in the number of subsequent viable treatment opportunities. Other options such as complete or partial structured treatment interruptions have failed to show consistent benefit or not undergone careful scrutiny in clinical trials.22–24 Complicating these decisions is the relative paucity of data regarding the rate at which anti-retroviral resistance develops after the onset of virologic treatment failure in patients receiving highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART).25–27 The purpose of this study was to define the time to accrual of genotypic resistance mutations, particularly thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) and major protease inhibitor mutations, in persons with a persistently detectable plasma viral load (pVL) despite being on a stable antiretroviral regimen. We also sought to evaluate the impact of co-administration of lamivudine on the emergence of TAMs given the detrimental effect of the 184V mutation on HIV replication capacity, especially in combination with TAMs.28,29

Introduction A study of the consumer's understanding of the product label instructions and the resulting product use were conducted to support the switch of a product from prescription to nonprescription status. H2 receptor antagonists have recently been approved for nonprescription use. This study evaluated the consumer's understanding of the product label for ranitidine hydrochloride (Zantac 75) and the product usage pattern in the treatment of episodic heartburn. Objectives Our objectives were to evaluate each aspect of the communication of labeled indications, contraindications, and directions for use of two label formats (old and new) for a new nonprescription preparation of ranitidine (Zantac) and to evaluate nonprescription consumers' use of ranitidine 75-mg tablets (as Zantac 75) in a medically unsupervised, at-home setting to observe whether these consumers used the product appropriately and followed directions as written on the package label. Methods Adult male and female consumers (n = 1405) in a shopping mall environment who were attracted to a poster asking, “Do you have stomach problems?” were recruited for the label comprehension phase (two different label formats) and the 3-week usage phase if after reading the Zantac 75 package label they decided the product was appropriate for them. No instructions regarding the use of Zantac 75 were provided beyond what was printed on the package label. Subjects recorded use in a diary and tablet counts were performed at the end of the study period. A medical history was also taken at this time and an assessment of product use was performed by a physician. Results In at least 84% of all subjects, both formats were effective in the communication of label objectives for the contraindication against concurrent prescription stomach ulcer medication, maximum daily dose, and maximum duration of dosing at maximum daily doses. The direction to take one tablet per dose was adhered to by 90% of consumers, and 90% of consumers followed the instructions to take no more than two tablets in 24 hours. Ninety-six percent of consumers complied with the direction not to take the maximum daily dose for more than 14 consecutive days. Notably, the maximum daily dose was taken for ≤3 consecutive days by 79% of consumers. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache, acute nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, diarrhea, nausea, and menstrual cramps. Conclusion The study demonstrated that the vast majority of a large sample of unsupervised consumers understood the package label and fully complied with the package directions by not exceeding the maximum daily dosage and length of use. Nonprescription consumers safely used Zantac 75 without medical supervision.

Background: Many Americans have heartburn or related symptoms monthly and >20% experience heartburn at least once per day. Although many self-treat episodic heartburn with nonprescription antacids, newer treatments that decrease gastric volume and increase the pH of refluxed material are proving effective and popular in relieving heartburn. Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose regimens of ranitidine for the relief of heartburn. Methods: Adults with at least a 3-month history of heartburn were eligible for this randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter dose-ranging study. Following a 1-week, open-label run-in phase to document baseline heartburn frequency, subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment with one tablet of either ranitidine, 75 mg (n = 537); ranitidine, 25 mg (n = 539); or placebo (n = 544), to be taken as needed up to four times daily for 2 weeks for the relief of heartburn. Results: The ranitidine 75-mg regimen was statistically (P < 0.05) and clinically (as defined a priori as ≥10% improvement) more effective than placebo in relieving episodic heartburn and in reducing antacid consumption. Ranitidine, 25 mg, was also statistically superior (P < 0.05) to placebo in providing heartburn relief. In addition, both regimens were superior to placebo in providing heartburn relief within 30 to 45 minutes of dosing. Ranitidine continued to be as effective over placebo in the treatment of the last heartburn episode as in the treatment of the first heartburn episode. Ranitidine was also equally effective over placebo in the treatment of mild, moderate, and severe episodes of heartburn. Ranitidine, 75 mg, was statistically superior to placebo for the relief of nocturnal heartburn episodes, whereas ranitidine, 25 mg, was not. All treatments were well tolerated and adverse events occurred no more frequently with the ranitidine regimens than with placebo. Conclusions: Low-dose ranitidine provides prompt and lasting relief of heartburn and has a safety profile comparable to that of placebo.

Background : This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel group, dose-ranging trial of ranitidine tablets for relief of episodic heartburn. Adult out-patients who reported heartburn relieved by antacids at least seven times per week were eligible. Methods : Patients who successfully completed a 1-week single-blind placebo run-in phase and who did not achieve adequate relief in more than 50% of heartburn episodes were randomized to a 1-week, double-blind treatment phase during which they received ranitidine doses of 25, 75 or 125 mg, or placebo. Results : Of 577 patients randomized, 566 had at least one evaluable heartburn episode and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. All three ranitidine doses were statistically significantly superior to placebo in providing overall episodic heartburn relief for the first episode (P

Background : Ranitidine 75 mg (Zantac 75) has been shown to be effective for the treatment of pre-existing heartburn symptoms. Aim : To compare the efficacy of dosing ranitidine 75 mg or placebo 30 min prior to a proven heartburn-provoking meal in completely preventing or reducing subsequent heartburn symptoms. Methods : A randomized, double-blind, parallel methodology was used at nine investigative centres. Following a screening visit, patients ate a standard test meal consisting of chilli, chips and a soft drink on two occasions. On the first occasion, patients received single-blind placebo 30 min before the meal. This meal was used to qualify patients and to ensure the onset of a minimum level of heartburn. Patients who qualified were randomized (n = 284) to receive double-blind ranitidine 75 mg or placebo 30 min before a second test meal administered 4–14 days later at the treatment visit. Patients recorded whether heartburn was present and rated heartburn severity by completing visual analogue scales at 15-min intervals over the 4.5 h meal evaluation periods. Results : Statistically significant differences favouring ranitidine 75 mg were determined for complete prevention of heartburn (P

In vitro, the reverse transcriptase mutation K65R can simultaneously reduce drug susceptibility, replicative capacity and restrict HIV-1 replication. Here, we assessed the effect of tenofovir discontinuation for a patient receiving antiretroviral therapy whose HIV-1 had a dominant K65R/M184V genotype. Although limited by the single-case nature, the data support a hypothesis that there is no HIV viral RNA or CD4+ T-cell count benefit of taking tenofovir for experienced patients with genotypic evidence of K65R/M184V.

Ranitidine 75 mg has been shown previously to be effective for the treatment of existing heartburn symptoms. In the present study, the efficacy and safety of ranitidine 75 mg in preventing or reducing heartburn symptoms were assessed when the study medication was taken 60 minutes before a meal. A total of 296 adult patients were compared in a randomized, parallel-group, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. A standard provocative meal was consumed on two occasions separated by at least 4 days. The qualifying meal followed administration of single-masked placebo, while the randomized meal followed administration of double-masked study medication. Patients reported the presence or absence of heartburn, and completed a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) to record the presence of heartburn and their level of heartburn discomfort. The primary end point was heartburn severity calculated as area under the concentration—time curve (AUC) for the assessment period. Study findings demonstrated that the heartburn severity AUC was significantly lower in ranitidine-treated patients than in the placebo group. The success rates for four clinical end points were significantly higher in the ranitidine group than in the placebo group. Significant differences favoring ranitidine 75 mg were also observed for the secondary end points of percent reduction in heartburn severity AUC, peak VAS heartburn severity, percent reduction in peak VAS heartburn severity, distribution of patients' global efficacy ratings of study medication, and overnight VAS heartburn severity. The overall incidence of adverse events was low following double-masked treatments (1% for ranitidine 75 mg and 2% for placebo). The study findings demonstrate clearly that ranitidine 75 mg is effective and safe in significantly reducing heartburn severity in adult patients when administered 60 minutes before a provocative meal

Background : In two 48-week studies in naive subjects, dolutegravir with NRTI of choice has shown non-inferiority to raltegravir and, with ABC/3TC, superiority to Atripla. Factors that influenced choice of NRTIs included viral load, resistance and safety. Methods : We analysed response rates and time to virologic failure by NRTI backbone and baseline viral load in the pivotal DTG-naive studies. SPRING-2 randomized participants to DTG 50 mg QD or RAL 400 mg BID, each in combination with investigator-selected NRTIs (TDF/FTC or ABC/3TC). SINGLE randomised participants to DTG 50 mg + ABC/3TC QD or TDF/FTC/EFV (Atripla) QD. In SPRING-2, changes in serum creatinine were examined by INI and NRTI backbone. Results : The two studies randomized and treated 1655 subjects, of whom 249 (15%) were female, 388 (23%) non-white, 495 (30%) had HIV-1 RNA >100,000 c/ml, and 224 (14%) had CD4+ count

Limited data compare once-daily options for initial therapy for HIV-1.To compare time to virologic failure; first grade-3 or -4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality (safety); and change or discontinuation of regimen (tolerability) for atazanavir plus ritonavir with efavirenz-containing initial therapy for HIV-1.A randomized equivalence trial accrued from September 2005 to November 2007, with median follow-up of 138 weeks. Regimens were assigned by using a central computer, stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA level less than 100 000 copies/mL or 100 000 copies/mL or greater; blinding was known only to the site pharmacist. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00118898)59 AIDS Clinical Trials Group sites in the United States and Puerto Rico.Antiretroviral-naive patients.Open-label atazanavir plus ritonavir or efavirenz, each given with with placebo-controlled abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF)-emtricitabine.Primary outcomes were time to virologic failure, safety, and tolerability events. Secondary end points included proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA level less than 50 copies/mL, emergence of drug resistance, changes in CD4 cell counts, calculated creatinine clearance, and lipid levels.463 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive atazanavir plus ritonavir and 465 were assigned to receive efavirenz, both with abacavir-lamivudine; 322 (70%) and 324 (70%), respectively, completed follow-up. The respective numbers of participants in each group who received tenofovir DF-emtricitabine were 465 and 464; 342 (74%) and 343 (74%) completed follow-up. Primary efficacy was similar in the group that received atazanavir plus ritonavir and and the group that received efavirenz and did not differ according to whether abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir DF-emtricitabine was also given. Hazard ratios for time to virologic failure were 1.13 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.56) and 1.01 (CI, 0.70 to 1.46), respectively, although CIs did not meet prespecified criteria for equivalence. The time to safety (P = 0.048) and tolerability (P0.001) events was longer in persons given atazanavir plus ritonavir than in those given efavirenz with abacavir-lamivudine but not with tenofovir DF-emtricitabine.Neither HLA-B*5701 nor resistance testing was the standard of care when A5202 enrolled patients. The third drugs, atazanavir plus ritonavir and efavirenz, were open-label; the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were prematurely unblinded in the high viral load stratum; and 32% of patients modified or discontinued treatment with their third drug.Atazanavir plus ritonavir and efavirenz have similar antiviral activity when used with abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir DF-emtricitabine.National Institutes of Health.

Treatment guidelines for initial HIV-1 therapy recommend 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with a non-NRTI (NNRTI), ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, or integrase inhibitor (1, 2). Abacavir–lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF)–emtricitabine are efficacious, once-daily NRTIs (3–5). The preferred NNRTI is efavirenz, and atazanavir plus ritonavir is 1 of the preferred protease inhibitors (1, 6, 7). AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Study A5202 compared efficacy, safety, and tolerability of abacavir–lamivudine or tenofovir DF–emtricitabine with atazanavir plus ritonavir or efavirenz. After scheduled interim data review, the data and safety monitoring board noted inferior virologic efficacy of abacavir–lamivudine compared with tenofovir DF–emtricitabine among patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of 100 000 copies/mL or more at screening (8). We now report the final results of the primary study objectives comparing atazanavir plus ritonavir against efavirenz.

Detection of drug resistance is critical for determining antiretroviral treatment options. Ultradeep pyrosequencing (UDPS; 454 Life Sciences) is capable of detecting virus variant subpopulations with much greater sensitivity than population sequencing, which typically has a detection limit around 20%. UDPS of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) (amino acids 56-120) was performed to detect the key mutations K65R and L74V associated with tenofovir and abacavir use. Plasma specimens from subjects with persistent rebound viremia following suppression on tenofovir (n = 8) or abacavir (n = 9)-based therapy were studied. Samples from a subject treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz with a similar loss of virologic response served as a control. HIV-1 plasma RNA was ≥3.68 log(10) copies/ml at all time points sequenced. The median number of UDPS sequences analyzed/time point was 33,246. Among the eight tenofovir-treated subjects, three showed high-frequency (20%) RT K65R at the time of failure, whereas one showed low-frequency (20%) L74V; no low-frequency K65R was detected in these subjects. Among the nine abacavir-treated subjects, three showed low-frequency K65R; no L74V was detected in these patients. No K65R or L74V was detected in the samples from the control subject. At failure, other RT mutations were detected, including low-frequency NNRTI-resistant species detected at ≥1 time point in nine subjects; the key NNRTI mutation K103N, however, was always observed at20% frequency. Although UDPS is useful in the detection of low-frequency subpopulations with transmitted resistance in antiviral-naive patients, it may have less utility in treatment-experienced patients with persistent viremia on therapy.

Population genotyping (PG) can underestimate resistance if resistance-containing low abundance variants go undetected. PG and clonal analysis (CA) results were compared in virologic failures (VFs) from a 48-week clinical trial that evaluated once-daily fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPV/r) 1400 mg/100 mg or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) 300 mg/100 mg, each combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine, in antiretroviral-naive patients. VF was defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA > or =400 copies/ml at > or =24 weeks or viral rebound >400 copies/ml any time following viral suppression. All patients had baseline PG. One hundred and six patients enrolled (53/arm). Baseline resistance mutations were more prevalent in patients receiving FPV/r (10/53) than ATV/r (3/53). Seven patients (7%) were VFs-four on FPV/r and three on ATV/r. In the four FPV/r-treated VFs, baseline HIV TAMs combinations and/or PI mutations were detected in one by PG at VF (RT: L210W + T215C; PR: M46I + L76V) and three others by CA alone (RT: L210W + T215Y; RT: M41L; RT: K65R + K70R; PR: I47V); all four had study drug-associated mutations (CA detecting more HIV-1 resistance mutations than PG). In the three ATV/r VFs, no baseline drug-associated mutations were detected by PG; for one patient CA detected RT: K65R; PR: I84V. Phylogenetic analysis revealed tight clustering for FPV/r-treated VFs with highly related clones, whereas HIV-1 from ATV/r-treated VFs had no outgrowth from baseline of low abundance resistance-containing variants. In conclusion, low-abundance HIV resistance-containing variants were detected in baseline samples from patients with VF. The archived viruses that reemerged under selection pressure and acquired additional mutations were found primarily in patients in the FPV/r arm. Despite this and a baseline resistance imbalance between the two arms, FPV/r and ATV/r provided similar virologic suppression through 48 weeks; however, these findings highlight the necessity for the development of quick and inexpensive methods for detection of minority species to better guide therapy selection.

Objective An open-label, three-period pharmacokinetic study was conducted to investigate the drug interaction potential between fosamprenavir (FPV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Methods Thirty-six healthy subjects received TDF 300 mg once daily (qd) for 7 days (period 1), and then were randomized to 14 days of either FPV 1400 mg twice daily (bid) or FPV/ritonavir (RTV) 700/100 mg bid alone or with TDF (period 2). Subjects continued their randomized dose of FPV for 14 more days, adding or removing TDF based upon its receipt in period 2 (period 3). Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic sampling was carried out on day 7 of period 1 and on day 14 of periods 2 and 3. Steady-state plasma amprenavir (APV) and tenofovir (TFV) pharmacokinetics were assessed by noncompartmental analysis and parameter values observed with each regimen were compared using geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals. Results After TDF coadministration, APV geometric mean minimum concentration (Cmin), maximum concentration (Cmax), and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) increased by 31, 3 and 7% above values observed with unboosted FPV alone; they also increased by 31, 4 and 16% above values observed with FPV/RTV alone. TFV Cmin, Cmax and AUC decreased by 12, 25 and 15% after FPV coadministration and by 9, 18 and 7% after FPV/RTV coadministration. No significant changes in RTV pharmacokinetics were observed. No differences were noted in adverse events among dosing periods. Conclusions In this evaluation of the interaction between FPV and TDF, increases in APV exposures and modest decreases in TFV exposures were observed. These were unlikely to be clinically significant.

We analyzed virologic response and safety data from six recent clinical studies conducted in antiretroviral-naïve subjects treated with ABC/3TC or its components to assess the impact of baseline viral load on efficacy and safety endpoints used in the ACTG5202 protocol.Primary endpoints were time to virologic failure (confirmed HIV-1 RNAor = 1,000 copies/mL at 16-24 weeks oror = 200 copies/mL ator = 24 weeks) and time to first grade 3 or 4 adverse event or laboratory abnormality that was at least one grade higher than at baseline. The survival distributions of both endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method overall and by baseline viral load (100,000 vs. 100,000 copies/mL). A weighted mean of the virologic response and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by inverse-variance weighting for baseline viral load 100,000 copies/mL across studies.For subjects with baseline HIV-1 RNA 100,000 copies/mL, the rate of virologic survival ranged from 87% to 95% by 48 weeks. Few subjects treated with ABC/3TC developed grade 3 or 4 adverse events, laboratory toxicities, or changes in lipid levels. The weighted mean (CI) for the pooled virologic response was 91% (87%-96%).Based on the A5202 endpoints, ABC/3TC-containing regimens in this analysis had a high rate of virologic survival and were generally well tolerated in antiretroviral-naïve subjects regardless of baseline viral load. The pooled virologic response for ABC/3TC in our analysis is higher than the A5202 estimate.

In vitro, the reverse transcriptase mutation K65R can simultaneously reduce drug susceptibility, replicative capacity and restrict HIV-1 replication. Here, we assessed the effect of tenofovir discontinuation for a patient receiving antiretroviral therapy whose HIV-1 had a dominant K65R/M184V genotype. Although limited by the single-case nature, the data support a hypothesis that there is no HIV viral RNA or CD4+ T-cell count benefit of taking tenofovir for experienced patients with genotypic evidence of K65R/M184V.

To compare the lipid and metabolic effects, efficacy, and safety of twice-daily regimens of Trizivir (abacavir 300 mg/lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg triple nucleoside tablet; TZV), Combivir (lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg combination tablet; COM)+nelfinavir (NFV), and stavudine (d4 T)+lamivudine (3TC)+NFV.An international, phase 4, open-label, parallel-group, 34-centre study was conducted in 254 non-diabetic, antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected out-patients with an HIV-1 RNA level of1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL andor =200,000 copies/mL and a CD4 cell count of50 cells/microL.Patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to TZV twice daily (n = 85), COM/NFV 1250 mg twice daily (n = 88), or d4T 40 mg+3TC 150 mg+NFV 1250 mg twice daily (n = 81) for 96 weeks. Treatments were compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with regard to changes from baseline in fasting lipids in the total population and in sex and ethnic subgroups. The proportions of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA50 and400 copies/mL were compared using a 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference between proportions.The study population was diverse (50% female, 40% black and 37% Hispanic). Mean baseline low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was 99 mg/dL, HIV-1 RNA was 4.43 log10 copies/mL and CD4 cell count was 355 cells/microL. At week 96, fasting LDL cholesterol changed minimally in the TZV group [least square mean (LSM) change from baseline, -8 mg/dL], but increased with d4T/3TC/NFV and COM/NFV (+29 and +19 mg/dL, respectively; P0.001 versus TZV). Week 96 LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly lower in the TZV group than in the other two treatment groups in women and men and lower than in the d4T/3TC/NFV group in Hispanic and black patients. In black patients, the week-96 LSM change from baseline in LDL cholesterol was significantly less with TZV than with d4T/3TC/NFV (+1 vs+39 mg/dL; P = 0.003). Total cholesterol200 mg/dL occurred in a smaller proportion of patients receiving TZV (30%) compared with COM/NFV (50%) or d4T/3TC/NFV (60%; P = 0.005 vs TZV). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol did not change markedly with any treatment. Although triglycerides increased, they changed least in women and Hispanic patients receiving TZV. Virological and CD4 responses to the treatments were similar in the total population and in the subgroups. Diarrhoea was reported more often in the NFV arms and nausea in the ZDV arms.Over 96 weeks, TZV twice daily has significantly less effect on LDL cholesterol than COM/NFV or d4T/3TC/NFV twice daily, especially in women and black patients, and is associated with similar virological and CD4 responses.

Background Low-dose ritonavir (RTV) boosts plasma amprenavir (APV) exposure. Little has been published on the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of APV 600 mg/RTV 100 mg (APV600/RTV) twice daily (BID) compared to APV 1200 mg BID (APV1200). Methods ESS40011 was a 24-week, multicenter, open-label, clinical trial in which antiretroviral therapy-naïve and -experienced HIV-1-infected adults were randomized 3:1 to receive either APV600/RTV BID or APV1200 BID, in combination with ≥ 2 non-protease inhibitor antiretroviral drugs. Non-inferiority of the APV600/RTV regimen to the APV1200 regimen was established if the 95% lower confidence limit for the difference in proportion of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA Results 211 patients were randomized, 158 to APV600/RTV and 53 to APV1200. At week 24, APV600/RTV was similar to or better than APV1200 (HIV-1 RNA P = 0.04), and greater mean reduction from baseline in HIV-1 RNA was observed (-2.21 vs -1.59 log10 copies/mL, P = 0.028). The two treatment arms were similar with respect to mean overall change from baseline in CD4+ count, frequency of drug-related grade 1–4 adverse events, and frequency of discontinuing treatment due to adverse events (most commonly nausea, diarrhea, vomiting or fatigue; 7% vs 8%), although a lower proportion of patients in the APV600/RTV arm experienced drug-related oral/perioral paresthesia (2% vs 8%). Eleven (73%) of 15 patients who had HIV-1 RNA Conclusions APV600 RTV BID was similar to or better than APV1200 BID in virologic response. Virologic results in a small number of patients who continued treatment for 24 weeks post-study suggest that virologic suppression with APV600 RTV BID is durable.

BackgroundAntiretroviral regimens with simplified dosing and better safety are needed to maximize the efficiency of antiretroviral delivery in resource-limited settings. We investigated the efficacy and safety of antiretroviral regimens with once-daily compared to twice-daily dosing in diverse areas of the world.Methods and findings1,571 HIV-1-infected persons (47% women) from nine countries in four continents were assigned with equal probability to open-label antiretroviral therapy with efavirenz plus lamivudine-zidovudine (EFV+3TC-ZDV), atazanavir plus didanosine-EC plus emtricitabine (ATV+DDI+FTC), or efavirenz plus emtricitabine-tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (DF) (EFV+FTC-TDF). ATV+DDI+FTC and EFV+FTC-TDF were hypothesized to be non-inferior to EFV+3TC-ZDV if the upper one-sided 95% confidence bound for the hazard ratio (HR) was ≤1.35 when 30% of participants had treatment failure. An independent monitoring board recommended stopping study follow-up prior to accumulation of 472 treatment failures. Comparing EFV+FTC-TDF to EFV+3TC-ZDV, during a median 184 wk of follow-up there were 95 treatment failures (18%) among 526 participants versus 98 failures among 519 participants (19%; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72-1.27; p = 0.74). Safety endpoints occurred in 243 (46%) participants assigned to EFV+FTC-TDF versus 313 (60%) assigned to EFV+3TC-ZDV (HR 0.64, CI 0.54-0.76; pConclusionEFV+FTC-TDF had similar high efficacy compared to EFV+3TC-ZDV in this trial population, recruited in diverse multinational settings. Superior safety, especially in HIV-1-infected women, and once-daily dosing of EFV+FTC-TDF are advantageous for use of this regimen for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection in resource-limited countries. ATV+DDI+FTC had inferior efficacy and is not recommended as an initial antiretroviral regimen.Trial registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00084136. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

M Keith Rawlings1, Jennifer Klein1, Edna P Toubes Klingler1, Ejeanée Queen1, Lauren Rogers1, Linda H Yau2, Keith A Pappa2, Gary E Pakes21AIDS Arms Peabody Health Clinic, Dallas, Texas; 2GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USAPurpose: Renal impairment in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients could potentially be caused by many factors. HIV-related renal impairment risks have been little studied in African Americans and Hispanics. We investigated the impact of HIV itself, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), comorbidities, and non-HIV-related drug treatment on glomerular filtration rate in a predominantly African American/Hispanic HIV-infected population who had received HAART for at least one year. This study was a retrospective electronic medical record database evaluation of renal impairment risks in a largely African American/Hispanic HIV population obtaining medical care at an HIV clinic in Dallas, Texas.Methods: Proportional hazards models were used to investigate an association between an estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease >25% from baseline (ie, renal impairment) and demographics, antiretroviral/nonantiretroviral medications, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hepatitis C virus [HCV] infection, hepatitis B virus [HBV] infection), CD4+ counts, viral load, and duration patients were monitored at the clinic (time on study).Results: In total, 323 patients were evaluated: 82% males; 61% African American/12% Hispanic/19% Caucasian; mean age 37.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.5); 6% HBV-positive; 34% HCV-positive; 29% hypertensive; 3% diabetic; 52% tenofovir-treated; mean weight 75.4 kg (SD, 15.4); mean estimated glomerular filtration 114.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SD, 36.7) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) calculation method; mean creatinine clearance (from which estimated glomerular filtration was extrapolated) by the Cockcroft-Gault calculation method 120.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SD, 41.2); mean time on study 2.7 years (SD, 1.0 year). An estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease of . >25% from baseline was significantly associated with time on study (P = 0.0017; hazards ratio [HR] = 0.999) and hypertension (HR = 1.706; P = 0.0158) by the MDRD method, and with age (HR = 1.039; P = 0.0077), weight (HR = 0.987; P = 0.0023), and time on study (HR = 0.999; P = 0.0043) by extrapolation of Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance calculation. No specific HAART agent was associated with significant renal impairment risk by the definition used in this study.Conclusion: This retrospective database study showed time on study, hypertension, weight, and age to be the only significant predictors of an estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease >25% from baseline.Keywords: nephropathy, antiretroviral therapy, comorbidities, tenofovir, African American, Hispanic

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPV/r) versus efavirenz (EFV), both in combination with abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC), in a population that is often underrepresented in U.S. clinical trials. Supplement: Abstracts of the Tenth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1758-2652-13-S4-info.pdf Conference: Tenth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection 7-11 November 2010 Glasgow, UK (Published: 8 November 2010) doi:10.1186/1758-2652-13-S4-P7 Cite this article as: Kumar et al.: SUPPORT: 48-week results of fosamprenavir/ritonavir vs efavirenz with abacavir/lamivudine in underrepresented, antiretroviral-naive patients. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2010 13(Suppl 4):P7. Full text: PubMed Central: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113075/

Background Once-daily (QD) ritonavir 100 mg-boosted fosamprenavir 1400 mg (FPV/r100) or atazanavir 300 mg (ATV/r100), plus tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) 300 mg/200 mg, have not been compared as initial antiretroviral treatment. To address this data gap, we conducted an open-label, multicenter 48-week study (ALERT) in 106 antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-infected patients (median HIV-1 RNA 4.9 log10 copies/mL; CD4+ count 191 cells/mm3) randomly assigned to the FPV/r100 or ATV/r100 regimens. Results At baseline, the FPV/r100 or ATV/r100 arms were well-matched for HIV-1 RNA (median, 4.9 log10 copies/mL [both]), CD4+ count (mean, 176 vs 205 cells/mm3). At week 48, intent-to-treat: missing/discontinuation = failure analysis showed similar responses to FPV/r100 and ATV/r100 (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL: 75% (40/53) vs 83% (44/53), p = 0.34 [Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test]); mean CD4+ count change-from-baseline: +170 vs +183 cells/mm3, p = 0.398 [Wilcoxon rank sum test]). Fasting total/LDL/HDL-cholesterol changes-from-baseline were also similar, although week 48 median fasting triglycerides were higher with FPV/r100 (150 vs 131 mg/dL). FPV/r100-treated patients experienced fewer treatment-related grade 2–4 adverse events (15% vs 57%), with differences driven by ATV-related hyperbilirubinemia. Three patients discontinued TDF/FTC because their GFR decreased to Conclusion The all-QD regimens of FPV/r100 and ATV/r100, plus TDF/FTC, provided similar virologic, CD4+ response, and fasting total/LDL/HDL-cholesterol changes through 48 weeks. Fewer FPV/r100-treated patients experienced treatment-related grade 2–4 adverse events.

Mupirocin is a novel antibiotic totally unrelated in chemical structure and mode of action to any other clinically useful class of antibiotics. It has greatest antibacterial activity against aerobic gram-positive cocci, namely, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes, and other beta-hemolytic streptococci. Bactroban ointment is formulated as 2% mupirocin in polyethylene glycol ointment. No systemic absorption of mupirocin or its major metabolite, monic acid, has been detected in short courses of topical administration to healthy volunteers or to patients with epidermolysis bullosa after prolonged courses of therapy with Bactroban ointment. Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trials have shown that mupirocin is safe and effective for the treatment of impetigo.

In a long-term, open study, 47 patients with epidermolysis bullosa were treated with topical 2% mupirocin (Bactroban) ointment to decrease bacterial infection and promote wound healing. This antibiotic is effective against gram-positive but not gram-negative organisms. No significant adverse effects were noted, although some patients have been treated for more than 4 years. We sought evidence in this patient population for the appearance of bacterial strains with decreased sensitivity to mupirocin. In five patients cultures from nonhealing wounds revealed Staphylococcus aureus resistance to mupirocin. Four of these patients were given oral antibiotics to which S. aureus was sensitive; they improved clinically, and cultures of their wounds became negative for pathogens.