Search

Cannabinoid agonists have been shown to produce dose-related impairments in several measures of cognitive performance. However, it is unclear if low doses of cannabinoid CB 1 agonists, or CB 1 antagonists, can facilitate aspects of stimulus detection. The present study employed an operant procedure involving visual stimulus detection in rats. The task was found to be sensitive to the muscarinic acetylcholine antagonist scopolamine. The CB 1 antagonist AM 251 did not affect stimulus detection processes across a broad range of doses. However, the novel CB 1 agonist AM 411 produced a biphasic effect, with the two lowest doses (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) enhancing accuracy. AM 411 changed patterns of responding toward runs of consecutive errors on only one of the two levers. It produced a biphasic effect on consecutive errors on the lever associated with a higher level of errors, with decreases in errors following the lower doses (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) and increases following the highest dose (2.0 mg/kg). These effects were not accompanied by changes in measures of bias commonly used to uncover such patterns in rodent operant models of cognitive performance. In contrast to the cognitive impairment seen after administration of moderate to high doses of CB 1 agonists, it appears that low doses of some CB 1 agonists may be capable of enhancing stimulus detection processes.

Due to the ubiquity of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor throughout the nervous system, as well as the many potential therapeutic uses of CB1 agonist-based interventions, it is desirable to synthesize novel probes of the CB1 receptor. Here, the acute behavioral effects of systemic (i.p.) administration of the putative novel CB1 full agonist AM 4054 were tested in rats. In Experiment 1, a dose range (0.15625 – 1.25 mg/kg) of AM 4054 produced effects consistent with CB1 agonism in the cannabinoid tetrad of tasks in rats, including induction of analgesia, catalepsy, hypothermia, and locomotor suppression. These effects were reversed with the CB1-selective inverse agonist AM 251 in Experiment 2, indicating that AM 4054 produced CB1 receptor-mediated effects. Analysis of open-field activity indicated that the reduction in locomotion is more consistent with general motor slowing than anxiogenesis. AM 4054 (0.0625 – 0.5 mg/kg) also dose-dependently reduced fixed-ratio 5 (FR5) operant responding for food in Experiment 3, and microanalysis of the timing and rate of lever pressing indicated a pattern of suppression similar to other CB1 agonists. Minimum doses of AM 4054 (0.125 – 0.3125 mg/kg) required to produce significant effects in these behavioral assays were lower than those of many CB1 agonists. It is likely that AM 4054 is a potent pharmacological tool for assessment of cannabinoid receptor function.

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonists are becoming increasingly recognized for their potential therapeutic utility as appetite suppressants. In the current paper we characterize the biochemical and behavioral effects of AM 1387, which is a novel CB1 antagonist. AM 1387 exhibited binding affinity and selectivity for the CB1 over the CB2 receptor. Moreover, AM 1387 decreased GTPγS (EC 50 : 22.82 nM) and increased forskolin-stimulated cAMP (EC 50 : 274.6 nM), as did the CB1 inverse agonist AM 251 (GTPγS EC 50 : 25.82 nM; cAMP EC 50 : 363.8 nM), indicating that AM1387 also has inverse agonist properties in vitro. In the behavioral characterization in rats, AM 1387 suppressed lever pressing for food on two operant schedules (fixed-ratio 1 and 5). Timecourse of the effect on fixed-ratio 5 responding was then determined, and the half-life ( t 1/2 = 4.87 h) was found to be threefold shorter than what has been shown for SR 141716A, and fourfold shorter than AM 251. Finally, AM 1387 was found to suppress food intake using three diets of differing macronutrient composition and palatability. It was concluded that AM 1387 may be a useful tool for examining the effects of CB1 receptor antagonism or inverse agonism on food intake.

AM 411 ((-)-1-adamantyl-Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol) is a novel full agonist at cannabinoid CB1 receptors. The present studies were conducted to provide behavioral characterization of this compound in rats. It was hypothesized that AM 411 should produce behavioral effects similar to known cannabinoid agonists, and that these effects should be inhibited by co-treatment with a CB1 antagonist. In Experiments 1 and 2, AM 411 dose-dependently produced behaviors consistent with CB1 agonism, including analgesia, hypothermia, catalepsy and reductions in locomotion, which were blocked by a CB1-selective antagonist. In Experiment 3, AM 411 produced a dose-dependent suppression of lever-pressing on a fixed-ratio 5 (FR5) schedule, a task known to be sensitive to administration of CB1 agonists. Detailed analysis of the temporal patterns of operant responding showed that AM 411 altered the distribution of interresponse times. Experiment 4 showed that AM 411 decreased relative interior activity in the open field, which is suggestive of an anxiogenic effect. It is concluded that AM 411 produces CB1 agonist-like behavior with potency between that of WIN 55,212-2 and AM 356. AM 411 could be a useful tool for understanding the behavioral and neural effects of CB1 receptor stimulation.

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists, including delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta 9-THC) (the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana) have been shown to increase feeding in rats and humans. Conversely, it has been reported that acute administration of the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A reduces food intake in rats. Based upon this observation, it has been suggested that CB1 antagonists could be useful as appetite suppressant drugs. The present studies were designed to provide a detailed examination of the effects of CB1 antagonists on food intake across a range of paradigms. Two CB1 antagonists (SR 141716A and AM 251) were administered to rats trained on fixed-ratio schedules with two different ratio requirements (fixed-ratio 1 and fixed-ratio 5). Both drugs produced a dose-dependent decrease in lever pressing, and had a relatively long duration of action (T1/2: SR 141716A, 15.1 h; AM 251, 22.0 h). Furthermore, intake of three diets with differing macronutrient composition (lab chow, high fat, high carbohydrate) was studied. Both drugs significantly suppressed intake of all three foods, and there were no significant interactions between drug dose and diet type. These findings support the hypothesis that CB1 receptor antagonists could be useful pharmacological tools for the suppression of appetite.