Search

Following gastric bypass surgery (GBP), there is a post-prandial rise of incretin and satiety gut peptides. The mechanisms of enhanced incretin release in response to nutrients after GBP is not elucidated and may be in relation to altered nutrient transit time and/or malabsorption.Seven morbidly obese subjects (BMI = 44.5 ± 2.8 kg/m(2)) were studied before and 1 year after GBP with a D: -xylose test. After ingestion of 25 g of D: -xylose in 200 mL of non-carbonated water, blood samples were collected at frequent time intervals to determine gastric emptying (time to appearance of D: -xylose) and carbohydrate absorption using standard criteria.One year after GBP, subjects lost 45.0 ± 9.7 kg and had a BMI of 27.1 ± 4.7 kg/m(2). Gastric emptying was more rapid after GBP. The mean time to appearance of D: -xylose in serum decreased from 18.6 ± 6.9 min prior to GBP to 7.9 ± 2.7 min after GBP (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in absorption before (serum D: -xylose concentrations = 35.6 ± 12.6 mg/dL at 60 min and 33.9 ± 9.1 mg/dL at 180 min) or 1 year after GBP (serum D: -xylose = 31.5 ± 18.1 mg/dL at 60 min and 27.2 ± 11.9 mg/dL at 180 min).These data confirm the acceleration of gastric emptying for liquid and the absence of carbohydrate malabsorption 1 year after GBP. Rapid gastric emptying may play a role in incretin response after GBP and the resulting improved glucose homeostasis.

OBJECTIVE To characterize the magnitude and variance of the change of glucose and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) concentrations, and to identify determinants of glucose control up to 2 years after gastric bypass (GBP). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Glucose and GLP-1 concentrations were measured during an oral glucose challenge before and 1, 12, and 24 months after GBP in 15 severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS Glucose area under the curve from 0 to 180 min (AUC0–180) started decreasing in magnitude (P < 0.05) 1 month after surgery. GLP-1 AUC0–180 increased in magnitude 1 month after GBP (P < 0.05), with increased variance only after 1 year (Pσ2 ≤ 0.001). GLP-1 AUC0–180 was positively associated with insulin AUC0–180 (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS The increase in variance of GLP-1 at 1 and 2 years after GBP suggests mechanisms other than proximal gut bypass to explain the enhancement of GLP-1 secretion. The association between GLP-1 and insulin concentrations supports the idea that the incretins are involved in glucose control after GBP.

Weight regain after gastric bypass (GBP) can be associated with a gastrogastric fistula (GGF), in which a channel forms between the gastric pouch and gastric remnant, allowing nutrients to pass through the “old route” rather than bypassing the duodenum. To further understand the mechanisms by which GGF may lead to weight regain, we investigated gut hormone levels in GBP patients with a GGF, before and after repair. Seven post-GBP subjects diagnosed with GGF were studied before and 4 months after GGF repair. Another cohort of 22 GBP control subjects without GGF complication were studied before and 1 year post-GBP. All subjects underwent a 50-g oral glucose tolerance test and blood was collected from 0–120 min for glucose, insulin, ghrelin, PYY3-36, GIP, and GLP-1 levels. Four months after GGF repair subjects lost 6.0 ± 3.9 kg and had significantly increased postprandial PYY3-36 levels. After GGF repair, fasting and postprandial ghrelin levels decreased and were strongly correlated with weight loss. The insulin response to glucose also tended to be increased after GGF repair, however no concomitant increase in GLP-1 was observed. Compared to the post-GBP group, GLP-1 and PYY3-36 levels were significantly lower before GGF repair; however, after GGF repair, PYY3-36 levels were no longer lower than the post-GBP group. These data utilize the GGF model to highlight the possible role of duodenal shunting as a mechanism of sustained weight loss after GBP, and lend support to the potential link between blunted satiety peptide release and weight regain.