Search

Objective: To describe electroencephalographic (EEG) changes in pediatric patients with cerebral edema after cardiac arrest., Methods: A retrospective study of patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit from July 2021 to January 2023. We included patients with cardiac arrest and changes in EEG background with clinical changes and/or neuroimaging consistent with cerebral edema. We excluded patients with electrographic seizures. We applied American Clinical Neurophysiology Society standardized critical care EEG terminology to classify EEG background, noting timing of the change in background classification. Clinical variables included age, sex, and neuroimaging findings and were described with descriptive statistics., Results: Nine patients met inclusion criteria, with median age 24 months (interquartile range 21-49), and 89% were male. There were 5 common EEG stages: stage 1, burst suppression/burst attenuation; stage 2, continuous/discontinuous ± multifocal sporadic epileptiform discharges ± rhythmic or periodic patterns; stage 3, discontinuous/burst suppression/burst attenuation ± rhythmic or periodic patterns; stage 4, gradual voltage suppression; and stage 5, diffuse suppression. The ranges for each stage were as follows: stage 1, 2-10 hours; stage 2, 2.5-15.5 hours; stage 3, 0.5-6.24 hours; and stage 4, 0.5-11 hours. We could not calculate the duration of stage 5 given no uniform time to EEG discontinuation. One patient had a clinical change in stage 3. Remaining patients presented with fixed and dilated pupils with global anoxic injury., Conclusions: EEG stages of cerebral edema have not been described after pediatric cardiac arrest. These stages may be relevant to other patient populations. Early stages may be a therapeutic target for intracranial pressure-lowering medications and/or neuroprotective strategies to minimize sequalae of cerebral edema.

Background: The ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) consists of several electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns that are common in critically ill adults. Studies focused on the IIC are limited in critically ill children and have focused primarily on associations with electrographic seizures (ESs). We report the incidence of the IIC in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We then compare IIC patterns to rhythmic and periodic patterns (RPP) not meeting IIC criteria looking for associations with acute cerebral abnormalities, ES, and in-hospital mortality., Methods: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for patients admitted to the PICU at Children's National Hospital from July 2021 to January 2023 with continuous EEG. We excluded patients with known epilepsy and cerebral injury prior to presentation. All patients were screened for RPP. The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society standardized Critical Care EEG terminology for the IIC was applied to each RPP. Associations between IIC and RPP not meeting IIC criteria, with clinical and EEG variables, were calculated using odds ratios (ORs)., Results: Of 201 patients, 21% (42/201) had RPP and 12% (24/201) met IIC criteria. Among patients with an IIC pattern, the median age was 3.4 years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.6-12 years). Sixty-seven percent (16/24) of patients met a single IIC criterion, whereas the remainder met two criteria. ESs were identified in 83% (20/24) of patients and cerebral injury was identified in 96% (23/24) of patients with IIC patterns. When comparing patients with IIC patterns with those with RPP not qualifying as an IIC pattern, both patterns were associated with acute cerebral abnormalities (IIC OR 26 [95% confidence interval {CI} 3.4-197], p = 0.0016 vs. RPP OR 3.5 [95% CI 1.1-11], p = 0.03), however, only the IIC was associated with ES (OR 121 [95% CI 33-451], p < 0.0001) versus RPP (OR 1.3 [0.4-5], p = 0.7)., Conclusions: Rhythmic and periodic patterns and subsequently the IIC are commonly seen in the PICU and carry a high association with cerebral injury. Additionally, the IIC, seen in more than 10% of critically ill children, is associated with ES. The independent impact of RPP and IIC patterns on secondary brain injury and need for treatment of these patterns independent of ES requires further study., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.)

Objectives: To assess clinical and electroencephalogram (EEG) predictors of epilepsy and to describe the percentage of electrographic seizures and development of epilepsy among patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) due to arteriovenous malformation (AVM) rupture., Study Design: Retrospective review of patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with ICH secondary to AVM rupture over 11 years. Clinical variables were collected by review of the electronic medical record. Seizures were described as acute symptomatic (7 days after AVM rupture), subacute (7-30 days after AVM rupture) and remote (greater than 30 days after AVM rupture). Outcome metrics included mortality, and the development of epilepsy post discharge. Descriptive statistics were used., Results: Forty-three patients met inclusion criteria with a median age of 12.2 years (IQR 7.3-14.8) and 49% (21/43) were female. Sixteen percent (7/43) presented with a clinical seizure prior to EEG placement. EEG was performed in 62% (27/43) of patients; one had electrographic status epilepticus without clinical signs. Sixteen percent (7/43) of patients were diagnosed with epilepsy, with a median time to diagnosis of 1.34 years (IQR 0.55-2.07) after AVM rupture. One-year epilepsy-free survival was 84% (95% CI 70%-98%) and 2-year epilepsy-free survival was 79% (95% CI 63%-95%) Remote seizures were associated with epilepsy (P < .001), but acute symptomatic seizures were not (P = .16)., Conclusions: EEG-confirmed seizures are uncommon in patients with ICH secondary to AVM rupture; however, when identified, the seizure burden appears to be high. Patients with seizures 30 days after AVM rupture are more likely to develop epilepsy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)