Search

Objective: To evaluate the influence of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine given to uninfected volunteers on the interpretation of serodiagnostic HIV test results.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting: 5 AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Units funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.Participants: The first 266 healthy adult volunteers (aged 18 to 60 years) who did not have HIV infection and whose history suggested that they were at low risk for acquiring HIV infection.Measurements: HIV antibody was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot test, the results of which were interpreted on the basis of four different published criteria.Results: At some time during the first 12 months of the vaccine studies, 68% of volunteers were positive for HIV antibodies by ELISA. Depending on criteria used to interpret Western blot test results, 0% to 44% of volunteers had positive results that might have caused them to be incorrectly labeled as HIV infected.Conclusions: Significant social risks to volunteers participating in HIV vaccine studies were identified. Persons interpreting HIV serodiagnostic test results must consider that an HIV vaccine can cause a positive result in persons who are not infected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A phase I double-blind trial was done to examine the safety and immunogenicity of a prototype synthetic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 MN strain (HIV-1MN) third variable region domain (V3) branched peptide vaccine in HIV-1-uninfected healthy adult volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 20, 100, or 500 micrograms of vaccine or alum adjuvant control on days 0, 28, and 168. The vaccine was well-tolerated and appeared safe. Induction of binding antibody to V3 MN branched peptide was vaccine dose-related and was detectable in 9 of 10 subjects in the highest-vaccine-dose group. HIV-1MN-neutralizing antibody was detected after the third 500-micrograms dose in 8 of 10 subjects at the 90% neutralization end point. V3 MN peptide stimulated lymphocyte proliferation in 15 (75%) of 20 subjects after vaccination. In conclusion, this prototype vaccine was safe and it induced humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The high HIV prevalence and incidence in South Africa makes it suitable for recruitment of participants for large-scale HIV preventive vaccine trials. However, fear of vaccine-induced seropositivity (VISP) may be a barrier for community acceptability of the trial, for volunteers to participate in HIV preventive vaccine trials and for uptake of an efficacious vaccine. Prior to 2015, when the first phase 1 safety HIV vaccine trial was undertaken at Setshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, the local community stakeholders and healthcare workers were naive about HIV vaccine research and HIV preventive vaccines., Objective: To explore knowledge and perceptions regarding VISP among community stakeholders and healthcare workers in peri-urbanb Soshanguve, Tshwane., Methods: Using a quantitative-qualitative mixed-methods study design, surveys (n=50) and in-depth interviews (n=18) were conducted during July - August 2015. Participants included community stakeholders, community advisory board members and healthcare workers, who were >18 years old and had attended community educational workshops during September 2014 - May 2015. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using content thematic analysis. Data were further analysed by sex, age and educational level., Results: Of a maximum score of 2 on knowledge on VISP, the 50 survey participants (mean age 33.78 years; 45 females) obtained an average of 0.88 (44%). Of 17 in-depth interviewees (one interview could not be transcribed; mean age 30.9 years; 12 females), 8 (47%) displayed some knowledge about VISP, of whom only 5 defined VISP correctly. Women were more knowledgeable about VISP than men; 5 of 12 women (42%) came close to defining VISP correctly, while none of the 5 men did so. The main fear of trial participation expressed by most participants (n=6) was testing HIV-positive as a result of the vaccine. While some participants believed that the community's perceptions of VISP would negatively affect HIV vaccine trial support and recruitment efforts, others noted that if trial participants understand the concept of VISP and are part of support groups, then they would have the information to combat negative attitudes within their community., Conclusion: Most participants had an inaccurate and incomplete understanding of VISP. Many feared testing HIV-positive at clinics; therefore, education on improving a basic understanding of how vaccines work and why VISP occurs is essential. In addition, assessing participant understanding of HIV testing, transmission and VISP is critical for recruitment of participants into HIV vaccine trials and may improve acceptability of an HIV preventive vaccine.

This report evaluates long-term safety data from 3189 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) uninfected, healthy volunteers who were enrolled into 51 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)-sponsored Phase I and II multicentred, randomized, double-blind trials of recombinant HIV-1 subunit vaccines (23 studies), synthetic peptide vaccines (7 studies), live vaccinia-vector recombinant envelope vaccines (7 studies), canarypox vector recombinant vaccines (13 studies), a DNA vaccine (1 study), and a Salmonella-vector vaccine (1 study). During the 12,340 person-years of follow-up, participants were monitored for adverse events including immune dysfunction/autoimmunity, anaphylaxis, cancer, death, and vaccine allergy. The analysis provides evidence that a preparation of a C4-V3 polypeptide vaccine emulsified in incomplete Freund's caused serious toxicity, but otherwise no safety problems considered serious were identified for any of the vaccines and adjuvants studied. These data serve to solidify the growing safety base of current vaccine technologies utilized in candidate vaccines for HIV-1 infection.

Three separate studies were undertaken in HIV-1 uninfected persons to determine if the adjuvant QS-21 improves the magnitude or kinetics of immune responses induced by recombinant soluble gp120 HIV-1(MN) protein (rsgp120) immunization. The QS-21 was administered at two doses (50 and 100 microg), either alone or in combination with aluminum hydroxide (600 microg). At the highest doses of rsgp120 (100, 300, and 600 microg), QS-21 exerted no significant effect on either binding or neutralizing antibody titers. Antibody binding and neutralizing responses fell dramatically when rsgp120, formulated with alum alone, was given at low doses (3 and 30 microg). In contrast, antibody responses similar in titer to those in the high dose antigen groups were induced with the low dose rsgp120 formulated with QS-21. In addition, the lymphocyte proliferation and delayed type hypersensitivity skin testing were superior in the QS-21 recipients compared with the alum recipients at the low antigen doses. Moderate to severe pain was observed in majority of the volunteers receiving QS-21 formulations, and vasovagal episodes and hypertension were not infrequent. Thus, the use of QS-21 may provide a means to reduce the dose of a soluble protein immunogen.

Twenty-six human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women participated in a placebo-controlled study of immunogenicity and safety of multiple doses of MN rgp120 vaccine over the last half of pregnancy. The women had CD4 lymphocyte counts>400/mm3, no AIDS-defining illness and normal pregnancies. Vaccination was well tolerated, with no significant local or systemic reactions in the women and no adverse outcomes in the infants attributable to the vaccine. Vaccination did not alter plasma RNA reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction copy number; moreover, immunization was not associated with changes in CD4 counts or HIV binding and neutralization antibody titers. Infants were followed up until 18 months of age. Five of 26 infants (19%) were HIV infected, with infection occurring in children of both vaccinated and placebo women. Analysis of factors that influence transmission did not disclose associations with immunization status, viral load, CD4 count, or maternal viral neutralization titers.

Induction of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells is considered one of the important correlates for the protective efficacy of candidate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccines. To induce CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) along with neutralizing antibody and CD4+ T cell help, a live canarypox virus construct expressing gp120, transmembrane gp41, the gag and protease genes, and sequences containing CTL epitopes in nef and pol was given simultaneously with, or followed by, rgp120 SF2. CD8+ CTLs were detected in 61% of volunteers at some time during the trial. Three to 6 months after the last immunization, the gene-specific responses were gag, 26/81; env, 17/77; nef, 12/77; and pol, 3/16. Simultaneous immunization with the canarypox vector and the subunit, beginning with the initial immunization, resulted in earlier antibody responses. In summary, a strategy of immunization with a canarypox vector expressing multiple genes of HIV-1 given with gp120 results in durable CD8+ CTL responses to a broad range of epitopes.

Objective: To determine the ability of live attenuated canarypox virus expressing HIV antigens to induce CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell responses and to prime for neutralizing antibody responses to boosting with purified recombinant gp120 subunit vaccine., Design: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, immunogenicity and safety study was conducted in healthy adults at low risk for acquiring HIV infection and who were seronegative for HIV., Methods: CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells directed against Env or Gag expressing target cells were measured after live recombinant canarypox-HIV-1 vaccine priming (vaccine given at days 0, 7, 14 and 21). Neutralizing antibodies were measured after subunit boosting (vaccine given at days 28 and 84)., Results: CD8+ CTL were induced in 64% of volunteers by the live recombinant canarypox-HIV-1 vaccine. All volunteers who received two doses of subunit vaccine after live recombinant canarypox priming developed neutralizing antibodies directed against laboratory strains of HIV-1 and seven out of eight volunteers tested developed neutralizing antibodies to the primary isolate, BZ167, but to none of eight other primary isolates. Unprimed controls had low or absent neutralizing antibodies after two doses of subunit vaccine., Conclusions: The live canarypox vector was safe, stimulated cytotoxic T-cells and primed for a vigorous neutralizing antibody response upon boosting with subunit gp120 vaccine. This vaccine combination should be evaluated further for inducing protection against HIV infection.

Context: Preventive HIV vaccines can temporarily cause uninfected individuals to have positive results on HIV testing. As preparations are underway to mount larger efficacy trials, the social risks of trial participation should be studied., Objective: To describe frequency of HIV testing and discrimination among participants in a preventive phase II HIV vaccine trial., Participants: 266 vaccine trial volunteers were eligible; 247 participated in a confidential survey., Results: 63 volunteers (26% of respondents) reported 185 HIV tests during the prior 12 to 24 months; most tests were for other research studies, health care, insurance, incarceration, or employment. Only 5 volunteers reported having positive HIV test results. Volunteers reported 99 adverse social incidents or problems, 53 of which were related to the trial. The most common type of event occurred when volunteers disclosed their trial participation and were mistakenly presumed to be infected with HIV. Few reported difficulty obtaining insurance, job loss, and inadvertent disclosure of their participation in the trial., Conclusion: In this vaccine trial, few serious social harms were reported. Those who conduct HIV tests for insurance, employment, health care, or other reasons should be made aware that HIV vaccines can cause false-positive HIV test results. Those planning future trials must continue to provide needed support to volunteers. Social harms should be monitored with the same vigilance accorded to physical harms.

A safety and immunogenicity trial was conducted in vaccinia-immune and vaccinia-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-uninfected adults who were randomized to receive 10(6) or 10(7) TCID50 of canarypox (ALVAC) vector expressing HIV-1MN gp160 or 10(5.5) TCID50 of ALVAC-rabies virus glycoprotein control at 0 and 1 or 2 months and ALVAC-gp160 or 50 microg of HIV-1SF2 recombinant (r) gp120 in microfluidized emulsion at 9 and 12 months; others received rgp120 at 0, 1, 6, and 12 months. All vaccines were well-tolerated. Neither vaccinia-immune status before vaccination nor ALVAC dose affected HIV immune responses. HIV-1MN and HIV-1SF2 neutralizing antibodies were detected more often (100%) in ALVAC-gp160/rgp120 recipients than in recipients of ALVAC-gp160 (<65%) or rgp120 (89%) alone. ALVAC-gp160/rgp120 also elicited more frequent HIV V3-specific and fusion-inhibition antibodies, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, lymphoproliferation, and cytotoxic CD8+ T cell activity than did either vaccine alone. Trials with ALVAC expressing additional HIV components and rgp120 are underway.

Among 2099 uninfected subjects in phase I and II trials of candidate AIDS vaccines, 23 were diagnosed with intercurrent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. High-risk sexual exposures accounted for 17 infections, and intravenous drug use accounted for 6. Four subjects received placebo, 13 received a complete immunization schedule (> or = 3 injections), and 6 were partially immunized (< or = 2 injections). There was no significant difference between vaccine recipients and control groups in incidence of HIV-1 infection, virus load, CD4 lymphocyte count, or V3 loop amino acid sequence. In summary, 19 vaccinated subjects acquired HIV-1 infection during phase I and II trials, indicating that immunization with the products described is < 100% effective in preventing or rapidly clearing infection. Laboratory analysis suggested that vaccine-induced immune responses did not significantly affect the genotypic or phenotypic characteristics of transmitted virus or the early clinical course of HIV-1 infection.

Purpose: To study the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with itraconazole for disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS., Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label study conducted at university-based hospitals participating in the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG). Forty-six AIDS patients with mild to moderate disseminated histoplasmosis who had successfully completed 12 weeks of induction treatment with itraconazole were treated with itraconazole, 200 mg once daily (42 patients) or 400 mg once daily (4 patients). Patients were followed at monthly intervals with clinical and laboratory assessment for relapse or toxicity. Primary outcome measures were relapse of histoplasmosis and survival. Secondary outcome measures included drug-limiting toxicity and changes in serum and urine Histoplasma polysaccharide antigen (HPA) levels., Results: Two patients relapsed during a median follow-up period of 87 weeks. The 1-year relapse-free rate was estimated to be 95.3% (95% CI, 85.3%-99.7%). One relapse may have been related to poor adherence to treatment and the second to concurrent administration of rifampin. From the start of maintenance treatment, the estimated 1-year survival rate was 73.0% (95% CI, 67.5%-77.9%). Five patients discontinued treatment because of suspected drug toxicity, three of whom had possible or probable hepatotoxicity. Median serum and urine HPA levels declined significantly during treatment. The only patient in whom antigen levels rose >2 U developed clinical relapse 1 week later; antigen levels were unavailable in the other relapsing patient., Conclusions: Itraconazole, 200 mg daily, is effective in preventing relapse of disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS. It is generally well tolerated, but clinicians should be alert for drug interactions and possible hepatotoxicity.

The NIAID-sponsored AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group was established in 1988 to perform phase I/II clinical trials with candidate preventive HIV-1 vaccines. This report includes safety data from 1398 HIV-negative, healthy volunteers who were enrolled into 25 phase I and 1 phase H multicentered, randomized, double-blind studies evaluating seven recombinant HIV-1 envelope vaccines, two V3 loop synthetic peptide vaccines, and two live poxvirus-vectored recombinant envelope vaccines. All studies but three were placebo controlled; the placebo was either the adjuvant alone or, in studies of recombinant poxvirus vaccines, it was the vector with no gene insert or a non-HIV gene insert. All candidate vaccines were generally well tolerated. The only adverse effects that were clearly related to vaccination were occasional acute local and systemic reactions that were associated with the adjuvants. Three adjuvants in particular were associated with moderate to severe local reactions: alum plus deoxycholate (ImmunoAg), MTP-PE (Biocine Corp.), and QS21 (Genentech, Inc.). MTP-PE was also associated with self-limited severe systemic reactions. There were no serious adverse laboratory toxicities and no evidence of significant immunosuppressive events after receipt of the candidate vaccines. A few volunteers experienced symptoms that might relate to an underlying immunopathologic mechanism (rash, hemolytic anemia, arthralgia), but their presentations were mild and their incidence was low. Eleven volunteers were diagnosed with malignancies during or after their participation, which was within the 95% confidence interval of the number of cases predicted by the National Cancer Institute SEER (Program for cancer surveillance, epidemiology, and end result reporting) database. In conclusion, the envelope-based recombinant or synthetic candidate HIV-1 vaccines appear to be safe and this work has prepared the way for the testing of increasingly complex candidate HIV-1 vaccines.

The natural variability of quantitative virologic measures among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected persons was prospectively studied in 29 untreated persons with >600 CD4 cells/microL and in 15 persons receiving zidovudine monotherapy who had 400-550 CD4 cells/microL at study entry. Cell- and plasma-associated infectious HIV-1, provirus, and virion RNA were determined monthly as were numbers of CD4 and CD8 cells. HIV-1 replication varied widely among subjects with similar CD4 cell counts. The within-individual variability was significantly less than the variability between subjects for all virologic measures. Plasma virion HIV-1 RNA levels had the least variability. A mathematical model was devised to assess whether a potential therapeutic intervention significantly alters peripheral HIV-1 load. The model indicated that three measurements of plasma RNA would be outside the 95th percentile for the expected change in an individual due to natural variability. This approach can be used to accurately assess a therapeutic intervention among persons with low plasma HIV-1 titers.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of recombinant glycoprotein (rgp) 120, a candidate vaccine for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), formulated with a novel adjuvant, MF59, with or without a biological response modifier, MTP-PE., Design: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial., Setting: University medical centers., Participants: 49 healthy, HIV-seronegative volunteers 18 to 60 years of age who were at low risk for HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infection., Interventions: In part A of the study, 32 participants were randomly assigned to receive either 15 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59, 15 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59 plus 50 micrograms of MTP-PE, 50 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59, or 50 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59 plus 50 micrograms of MTP-PE. Participants were vaccinated at 0, 1, 6, and 12 to 18 months. In part B, 17 participants were randomly assigned to receive five monthly injections of either 50 micrograms of rgp 120 in MF59 or MF59 alone followed by a booster injection at 12 to 18 months., Main Outcome Measures: Local and systemic reactions; laboratory measures of hepatic, renal, immunologic, and bone marrow toxicity; and HIV-specific serologic and cell-mediated immune responses., Results: 13 patients in part A received 50-micrograms doses of rgp 120; type-specific neutralizing antibody responses against the SF-2 strain of HIV-1 (HIV-1/SF-2) were induced in all 13. Nine of the 13 had crossreactive neutralizing activity against the MN strain of HIV-1 (HIV-1/MN), and 2 had crossreactive neutralizing activity against the IIIB strain of HIV-1 (HIV-1/IIIB). Twelve patients had typespecific fusion inhibition activity; only 1 had crossreactive fusion inhibition activity against HIV-1/MN. The monthly vaccination schedule used in part B resulted in decreased antibody titers, indicating that a rest period in the schedule is necessary for maximal immunogenicity. Lymphoproliferative responses against gp120 were induced in all vaccine recipients. The stimulation index to gp120 was persistently greater than 15 for 6 months after the last booster vaccination was given. CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity was detected in 1 of the 11 participants tested. Vaccine that contained MTP-PE caused a greater number of moderate or severe local and systemic reactions (of 16 participants, 4 had local reactions and 13 had systemic reactions) than did vaccine formulated with MF59 alone (of 16 participants, 7 had local reactions [P < 0.01] and 0 had systemic reactions [P < 0.001])., Conclusions: The SF-2 rgp120 vaccine is safe and immunogenic. Three vaccinations with rgp120 in MF59 can induce type-specific and crossreactive neutralizing antibody against B-subtype laboratory strains of HIV-1. Human immunodeficiency virus-specific lymphoproliferative responses were induced in all vaccinated participants, and CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity was shown in one participant. A trend toward the augmentation of lymphoproliferative and humoral responses by MTP-PE was seen in the participants receiving 15 micrograms of rgp120. However, MTP-PE caused a statistically significant increase in the incidence of local and systemic side effects, which was felt to outweigh the small increase in immunogenicity provided by this biological response modifier in an otherwise well-tolerated vaccine.

We investigated the safety and immunogenicity of a candidate HIV-1 vaccine, Env 2-3 (Chiron Biocine Co.), in combination with an adjuvant emulsion, MF59, with or without an additional immune modulator, MTP-PE 78 healthy HIV-1-seronegative adults. Sixteen subjects participated in a dose escalation study of MTP-PE in MF59 without Env 2-3, given at 0 and 1 months; 48 subjects participated in a study of a fixed dose of 30 micrograms of Env 2-3 in MF59 with increasing doses of MTP-PE (0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 micrograms), and 14 subjects participated in a study of 100 micrograms of Env 2-3 in MF59 without MTP-PE. Subjects were assigned to study groups under a randomized, double-blind allocation. Subjects received immunization at 0, 1, and 6 months, and had the option of receiving a fourth dose at 12-18 months. Env 2-3 in MTP-PE/MF59 was associated with significant reactogenicity, in that severe, although self-limited systemic and/or local reactions occurred in 15 of 30 vaccinees. In contrast, Env 2-3 in MF59 without MTP-PE was relatively well tolerated, and severe local and/or systemic reactions occurred in only 2 of 18 subjects. Env 2-3 stimulated serum antibodies to HIV-1 envelope protein (gp120) as detected by Western blot in 39 of 43 subjects and to HIV-1 virus lysate by EIA in 28 of 43 subjects after three injections. The majority of subjects also developed EIA antibodies to recombinant gp120 (SF-2), gp120 (LAI), and V3 peptide (SF-2). Neutralizing antibodies to the homologous SF-2 strain developed in 30 of 43 and 27 of 34 subjects, and fusion inhibition antibodies in 25 of 43 and 15 of 36 subjects after three and four injections, respectively. Lymphoproliferative responses to the immunogen, Env 2-3 were observed in over 80% of the vaccinees examined, and CD4+ cytotoxic T cell activity directed against HIV-1 was noted transiently in 2 of 20 vaccinees. Addition of MTP-PE to Env 2-3 or increasing the dose of Env 2-3 from 30 to 100 micrograms did not augment immunogenicity. Env 2-3 in MF59 was well tolerated and immunogenic in HIV-1-seronegative individuals. The addition of MTP-PE significantly increased reactogenicity, but had little, if any, effect on immunogenicity.

Phase I studies of volunteers not infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) have shown that immunization with envelope subunit vaccine products elicits antibodies that neutralize laboratory-adapted (prototype) HIV-1 strains in vitro. Prototype strains are adapted to grow in continuous (neoplastic) cell lines and are more susceptible to neutralization than are primary isolates cultured in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In this study, 50 sera from nine phase I vaccine trials and 16 from HIV-1-infected persons were evaluated for neutralizing antibody activity against 3 laboratory-adapted and 5 primary HIV-1 isolates. Of 50 sera, 49 neutralized at least 1 of the prototype strains; however, none displayed neutralizing activity against primary isolates of HIV-1. Serum from most HIV-1-infected persons neutralized both laboratory-adapted and primary HIV-1 isolates. These data demonstrate a qualitative, or large quantitative, difference in the neutralizing antibody response induced by envelope subunit vaccination and natural HIV-1 infection.

We examined the safety and immunogenicity of a baculovirus-derived recombinant HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein vaccine candidate, rgp160 (VaxSyn; MicroGeneSys, Meriden, CT), administered at doses of 160 or 640 micrograms to 56 healthy, HIV-1-seronegative adults, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Immunizations were given intramuscularly at 0, 1, 6, and 12 months. Both doses were generally well tolerated, although self-limited local reactions were frequent. No other clinical or laboratory toxicities were noted, and no effects on CD4 or CD8 lymphocyte counts or percentages were noted. Serum antibody responses to HIV proteins were detected by Western blot (WB) in 19 of 20 and in 19 of 19 recipients of four doses of 160 and 640 micrograms, respectively. Western blot responses developed more rapidly in the 640-micrograms group. High rates of EIA antibody responses to HIV-1 lysate were also present in both groups, and developed more rapidly in the 640-micrograms group. Enzyme immunoassay antibody responses to the immunogen (rgp160) were also frequent, but were infrequent to V3 to gp41 peptides. Neutralizing antibodies against the homologous HIV-1 LAI isolate were seen in 3 of 20 subjects (GMT = 11) who received four doses of 160 micrograms, and in 10 of 19 subjects who received four doses of 640 micrograms (GMT = 32). Fusion inhibiting antibody was not detected. CD4 blocking activity was seen in 3 of 19 subjects who received four doses of 640 micrograms. Complement-mediated antibody-dependent enhancement was found in sera from 11 of 19 volunteers in the 640-micrograms group. Lymphocyte proliferative responses to the immunogen were detected in 4 of 4 subjects tested, but no cytotoxic T cell activity was noted in 11 subjects. Administration of the 640-micrograms dose of this rgp160 vaccine candidate relative to the lower doses was associated with increased immunogenicity, including higher rates of homologous neutralizing antibody responses, although at low titer.

Priming with a live recombinant vector followed by subunit boosting is a promising strategy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) immunization. Twenty-nine vaccinia-naive volunteers were primed with gp160-recombinant vaccinia virus (HIVAC-1e) and boosted with recombinant (r) gp160 to define factors associated with the magnitude and specificity of antibody response after booster immunization. A longer interval between inoculation and boost, two inoculations of HIVAC-1e with lesion formation occurring after the first, and Western blot-detectable antibody to gp160 after inoculation were significantly associated with higher neutralizing antibody titers and fusion-inhibiting activity after boosting. HIVAC-1e-primed vaccinees were more likely to have antibody to V3- and CD4-binding regions of gp120 and less likely to have antibody to constant regions 2 and 3 than vaccinees immunized with rgp160 alone. Priming volunteers with HIVAC-1e was a key determinant of the epitope specificity and magnitude of functional antibody responses induced by rgp160 boosting.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the MN strain of recombinant gp120 (MN rgp120) as a vaccine prototype to prevent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)., Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study with subjects vaccinated at 0, 4, 24, and 48 weeks and followed up through 64 weeks., Setting: The AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Units in St Louis, Mo, Nashville, Tenn, and Rochester, NY, conducted the clinical study. Laboratory studies were conducted at Duke University, Raleigh, NC; data analysis was done by the Data Coordinating and Analysis Center at the EMMES Corporation, Potomac, Md., Participants: Fifty-seven persons seronegative for HIV, at low risk for acquiring HIV infection, and 18 to 60 years of age., Interventions: The MN rgp120 vaccine was administered to 12 volunteers each in doses of 100 micrograms, 300 micrograms, or 600 micrograms, and 12 volunteers received a combination of 300 micrograms of MN rgp120 vaccine and 300 micrograms of vaccine from rgp120 of strain IIIB. Nine volunteers received alum adjuvant alone (control)., Main Outcome Measures: Safety was assessed by monitoring lymphocyte subsets, serum creatinine, and liver enzymes. Immunogenicity was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the immunogen and synthetic peptide corresponding to the variable region 3 domain of gp120. Functional antibody assays included CD4 binding blocking; antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity; and neutralization of homologous and heterologous HIV strains., Results: No severe adverse reactions occurred. In 33 of 48 volunteers, two doses of vaccine induced antibodies that neutralized the homologous strain HIV-1/MN. Three doses of vaccine induced antibodies that neutralized MN (in 46 of 48 volunteers), SF-2 (in 45 of 48 volunteers), or IIIB strains of HIV-1 (in 30 of 48 volunteers)., Conclusion: The vaccines were safe and immunogenic. Multiple injections of vaccine broadened and increased the neutralizing antibody response.

Recombinant gp160 derived from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)IIIB and produced in mammalian tissue culture cells using a vaccinia virus expression system (rgp160-mam) was evaluated as a vaccine in combination with alum and deoxycholate adjuvant. Sixty low-risk, uninfected subjects received 12.5 micrograms, 50.0 micrograms, or adjuvant control at 0, 1, 6, and 12 months in a randomized, double-blind dose-escalation study. A single injection of 200 micrograms of vaccine was given at 18 months in an open study to 9 vaccines who had received 50 micrograms. The vaccine was safe. Six of 16 subjects receiving 50 micrograms developed neutralizing antibody to HIV-1IIIB. Seven of the 9 boosted with 200 micrograms of vaccine at 18 months developed neutralizing antibodies. Lymphocyte proliferation to rgp160-mam and baculovirus-derived rgp160 and rgp120 was induced in both groups (12.5 and 50.0 micrograms) and appeared after the first dose. Further studies with higher doses of rgp160-mam and vaccines derived from other strains of HIV-1 are warranted.

Mononuclear leukocytes (MNL) were obtained from vaccina-naive, non-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected subjects who were vaccinated with HIV-1-derived recombinant (r) live vaccina-gp160, 4 of whom were boosted 1-2 years later with purified rgp160. MNL obtained after receipt of the vaccinia-gp160 alone showed persisting (> or = 1 year) gp160-specific lymphocyte proliferative responses and production of immune-specific interferon (IFN)-gamma. All 4 subjects who were boosted with rgp160 responded to the boost, including 2 whose cellular responses had waned prior to the boost. MNL from these 4 exhibited gp160-specific proliferative responses, IFN-gamma production, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity. The gp160-specific cytolysis was severely reduced or abolished by depletion of CD8+ cells and was not detected using HLA class I-mismatched target cells. Persisting (> or = 15 months after boost) HIV gp160-specific T cell recognition and functional responses can be induced by HIV-derived envelope vaccines.

Twelve vaccinia-naive volunteers were inoculated with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strain IIIB (HIV-1IIIB) envelope glycoprotein gp160 and subsequently immunized with 640 micrograms of recombinant (r) gp160 protein produced in baculovirus. After booster immunization with rgp160, the sera of all vaccinees showed strong antibody responses detected by Western blot and ELISA; 8 had neutralizing activity and 5 had fusion inhibition activity against the homologous strain; 5 blocked binding of CD4 cells to gp120. Cross-reactive neutralization of HIV-1MN was detected in 3 of 8 sera that neutralized HIV-1IIIB. The combination of live recombinant vaccinia followed by subunit booster immunization was more immunogenic than either product alone and represents a promising approach for HIV-1 immunoprophylaxis. Further definition of recombinant vaccinia safety and augmentation of immune responses to geographically prevalent HIV-1 strains will be necessary before expanding clinical trials to high-risk groups.

The safety and immunogenicity of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gp160 recombinant vaccinia virus (HIVAC-1e) vaccine was evaluated in vaccinia-naive, healthy adults at low risk for acquiring HIV-1 infection. Volunteers (n = 36) were randomized to receive HIVAC-1e or control vaccinia virus at two dosages by bifurcated needle puncture at 0 and 2 months; 12 HIVAC-1e and 6 control vaccinia virus recipients received either 10(6) or 10(7) pfu/mL at each inoculation. There was no significant difference in lesion size, level of viral replication, or systemic symptoms after vaccination with HIVAC-1e or control vaccinia virus. Of 22 HIVAC-1e recipients with lesion formation, 16 developed low-titer gp160-specific antibody responses detectable by Western blot. The peak response occurred between days 70 and 120 and was still detectable at day 365 in 9 of 18 vaccinees. gp160-specific lymphoproliferative responses were detected in 5 of 10 vaccinees. Vaccination with HIVAC-1e was safe in vaccinia-naive, healthy adults and could induce both humoral and cell-mediated gp160-specific immune responses.

The lymphocyte proliferative responses were studied of 12 volunteers enrolled in a phase I trial of a baculovirus-expressed recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein (rgp160) vaccine. Six subjects received rgp160 and three subjects each received recombinant hepatitis B vaccine or placebo at 0, 1, and 6 months. rgp160 and a control preparation, baculovirus-expressed recombinant HIV-1 p24, were used as in vitro antigens. At day 56, all rgp160 recipients had stimulation indexes (rgp160/rp24) greater than 3.0, and five of six had differences in counts per minute (cpm) greater than 1000. Stimulation indexes were less than 2.0 and cpm differences were less than 150 in all six who did not receive rgp160. Lymphocyte proliferative responses were first noted 2 weeks to 5 months before initial Western blot reactivity and persisted for greater than or equal to 540 days, even among subjects who lost detectable antibody. Thus, the HIV-1 rgp160 vaccine induces persistent cellular immune recognition as demonstrated by lymphocyte proliferation.

The efficacy and safety of prophylactic low dose amantadine hydrochloride was assessed in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies. In a study of 476 subjects aged 18 to 55 years, adverse reactions were not significantly different between the group receiving 100 mg/day amantadine and the placebo group but significantly greater in the group given 200 mg/day (P less than 0.009). The influenza attack rate in this study was too low to assess efficacy. In an experimental challenge study of influenza A/Beth/1/85 in 78 subjects of similar age the prophylactic administration of 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg/day doses of amantadine were more effective than placebo in preventing influenza illness (P less than 0.02, 66, 74 and 82% protection, respectively), and in suppressing viral replication (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between amantadine groups in influenza illness or viral shedding. Compared with the placebo group the 100 and 200 mg amantadine groups showed a significant decrease in infection rate (100 mg: 40% protection: P = 0.012; 200 mg: 32% protection: P = 0.045) whereas the 50 mg group did not (20% protection: P = 0.187). These results suggest that 100 mg/day of amantadine will reduce toxicity but maintain the prophylactic efficacy seen with 200 mg/day.