Search

This article focuses on a study related to vascular brachytherapy (VTB) for the treatment of in stent restenosis (IRS). VBT remains the only proven treatment for ISR. Drug eluting stents show promise in limiting the number of patients presenting with ISR, but thus Far have not abolished the problem. Researchers have demonstrated that vascular brachytherapy is safe and effective in a British population. Pre treatment intravascular ultrasound findings stress the importance of optimal technique at the time of initial stent implantation.

This article focuses on a study that explores the burden of revascularisation following a strategy of thrombolysis for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI). Thrombolysis remains the predominant reperfusion strategy for ST elevation (STE) MI in Great Britain. Door to needle time targets may ensure efficient delivery of treatment, but do not guarantee arterial patency. Despite efficient delivery of thrombolysis, the majority of STE MI patients require unplanned invasive investigation, and commonly undergo percutaneous revascularisation.

Diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction remains challenging, primarily due to the lack of direct measurements of absolute coronary blood flow (Q) and microvascular resistance (R μ ). However, there has been recent progress with the development and validation of continuous intracoronary thermodilution, which offers a simplified and validated approach for clinical use. This technique enables direct quantification of Q and R μ , leading to precise and accurate evaluation of the coronary microcirculation. To ensure consistent and reliable results, it is crucial to follow a standardized protocol when performing continuous intracoronary thermodilution measurements. This document aims to summarize the principles of thermodilution-derived absolute coronary flow measurements and propose a standardized method for conducting these assessments. The proposed standardization serves as a guide to ensure the best practice of the method, enhancing the clinical assessment of the coronary microcirculation., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Drs Belmonte, Bertolone, and Viscusi are supported by a research grant from the CardioPaTh PhD Program. Dr Pijls has received institutional research grants from Abbott; has consulting relationships with and receives fees from Abbott and Coroventis; has equity in ASML, General Electric, HeartFlow, and Philips; is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Heartflow; and has patents pending in the field of the coronary microcirculation and aortic valve stenosis. Dr Mizukami has received consulting fees from Zeon Medical and HeartFlow; and has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr Barbato has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and GE. Dr Dannab has received grants from Philips, Abbott, and AstraZeneca; and has received consulting fees from Philips. Dr Keeble has received honoraria and institutional research funding from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Terumo, Zoll, and Shockwave; has received consulting fees from BD; has received speaker fees from Cardionovum, Abbott Vascular, and AstraZeneca; is on the steering group for the ORBITA-2 trial; and is on the committee for the National Institute for Health and Care Research Invention for Innovation (i4i), British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and Resuscitation Council. Dr Kern is a speaker for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Acist, Opsens, and Zoll. Dr Fearon has received institutional research support from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; has a consulting relationship with CathWorks and Siemens; and has stock options with HeartFlow. Dr Collet has received research grants from Biosensors, HeartFlow, and Abbott Vascular; and has received consultancy fees from HeartFlow, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Opsens, and Philips Volcano. Dr De Bruyne has consulting relationships with Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, CathWorks, Siemens, and Coroventis Research; has received research grants from Abbott Vascular, Coroventis Research, Cathworks, and Boston Scientific; and holds minor equities in Philips Volcano, Siemens, GE Healthcare, Edwards Lifesciences, HeartFlow, Opsens, Sanofi, and Celiad. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cognitive deficits are common, although often mild, in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Prevalence and severity of cognitive deficits on discharge from acute hospital, however, are not systematically assessed in clinical practice, and not frequently reported in scientific literature, potentially hindering the development of appropriate follow-up care pathways for these patients. We hereby present data from a consecutive case series of 75 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients discharged from our hospital over a period of 16 months; for 46 of them we were able to obtain a cognitive profile around the time of discharge from hospital, with 37 of them experiencing cognitive deficits, ranging from mild to severe. Memory, verbal fluency and cognitive flexibility were the areas more frequently impaired. The patients we were able to assess did not differ for age, cerebral performance category score and time to return of spontaneous circulation from those we were unable to assess. Cognitive deficits were not associated with duration of "no/low blood flow" during cardiac arrest or with age. Our results suggest that cognitive deficits in the immediate aftermath of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are common; however, these may be missed due to lack of systematic assessment and use of poorly sensitive cognitive tests.

Objective: The USA needs to produce more psychiatrists to meet projected workforce deficits. The American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training Directors (AADPRT) sought to examine opportunities for and obstacles to expanding or creating residencies and fellowships., Methods: In November 2019, the authors conducted a survey of residency and fellowship directors. The survey gathered information about new positions, new programs, participation in interprofessional education, and loss of residency or fellowship positions., Results: The survey was distributed to psychiatry residency (N=231) and fellowship (N=194) directors, with a response rate of 33.4%. One quarter of responding residencies and fellowships reported creating new programs; 24.7% of residency and 17.5% of fellowships reported expansion. The most common reason to develop or expand programs was the shortage of psychiatrists, with the local institution as the most common funding source. Fifty-seven percent reported that they had wanted to expand, but faced barriers, primarily lack of funding. Recruitment and retention of faculty are major challenges. Psychiatry departments frequently (87.5%) participate in interprofessional education, generally perceived as positive. Unfortunately, 15.7% of respondents reported loss of positions or closure of programs., Conclusions: Creating and expanding residencies and fellowships are common strategies for addressing the shortage of psychiatrists. Barriers include lack of funding and challenges recruiting/retaining faculty. The loss of residency/fellowship positions or closure of programs is a worrisome trend., (© 2021. Academic Psychiatry.)

Background: Several biochemical markers in blood correlate with the magnitude of brain injury and may be used to predict neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. We present a protocol for the evaluation of prognostic accuracy of brain injury markers after cardiac arrest. The aim is to define the best predictive marker and to establish clinically useful cut-off levels for routine implementation., Methods: Prospective international multicenter trial within the Targeted Hypothermia versus Targeted Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (TTM2) trial in collaboration with Roche Diagnostics International AG. Samples were collected 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after randomisation (serum) and 0 and 48 hours after randomisation (plasma), and pre-analytically processed at each site before storage in a central biobank. Routine markers neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100B, and neurofilament light, total-tau and glial fibrillary acidic protein will be batch analysed using novel Elecsys® electrochemiluminescence immunoassays on a Cobas e601 instrument., Results: Statistical analysis will be reported according to the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) and will include comparisons for prediction of good versus poor functional outcome at six months post-arrest, by modified Rankin Scale (0-3 vs. 4-6), using logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristics curves, evaluation of mortality at six months according to biomarker levels and establishment of cut-off values for prediction of poor neurological outcome at 95-100% specificities., Conclusions: This prospective trial may establish a standard methodology and clinically appropriate cut-off levels for the optimal biomarker of brain injury which predicts poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: This study is designed to provide detailed knowledge on cognitive impairment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and its relation to associated factors, and to validate the neurocognitive screening of the Targeted Hypothermia versus Targeted Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest trial (TTM2-trial), assessing effectiveness of targeted temperature management after OHCA., Methods: This longitudinal multi-center clinical study is a sub-study of the TTM2-trial, in which a comprehensive neuropsychological examination is performed in addition to the main TTM2-trial neurocognitive screening. Approximately 7 and 24 months after OHCA, survivors at selected study sites are invited to a standardized assessment, including performance-based tests of cognition and questionnaires of emotional problems, fatigue, executive function and insomnia. At 1:1 ratio, a matched control group from a cohort of acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients is recruited to perform the same assessment. We aim to include 100 patients per group. Potential differences between the OHCA patients and the MI controls at 7 and 24 months will be analyzed with a linear regression, using composite z-scores per cognitive domain (verbal, visual/constructive, working memory, episodic memory, processing speed, executive functions) as primary outcome measures. Results from OHCA survivors on the main TTM2-trial neurocognitive screening battery will be compared with neuropsychological test results at 7 months, using sensitivity and specificity analyses., Discussion: In this study we collect detailed information on cognitive impairment after OHCA and compare this to a control group of patients with acute MI. The validation of the TTM2 neurocognitive screening battery could justify its inclusion in routine follow-up. Our results may have a potential to impact on the design of future follow-up strategies and interventions after OHCA., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03543371 . Registered 1 June 2018.

In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction of both patients and mice, there was a decline in blood eosinophil count, with activated eosinophils recruited to the infarct zone. Eosinophil deficiency resulted in attenuated anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization, enhanced myocardial inflammation, increased scar size, and deterioration of myocardial structure and function. Adverse cardiac remodeling in the setting of eosinophil deficiency was prevented by interleukin-4 therapy., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Background: Dobutamine stress echocardiography is widely used to test for ischemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease. In this analysis, we studied the ability of the prerandomization stress echocardiography score to predict the placebo-controlled efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the ORBITA trial (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina)., Methods: One hundred eighty-three patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography before randomization. The stress echocardiography score is broadly the number of segments abnormal at peak stress, with akinetic segments counting double and dyskinetic segments counting triple. The ability of prerandomization stress echocardiography to predict the placebo-controlled effect of PCI on response variables was tested by using regression modeling., Results: At prerandomization, the stress echocardiography score was 1.56±1.77 in the PCI arm (n=98) and 1.61±1.73 in the placebo arm (n=85). There was a detectable interaction between prerandomization stress echocardiography score and the effect of PCI on angina frequency score with a larger placebo-controlled effect in patients with the highest stress echocardiography score ( P interaction =0.031). With our sample size, we were unable to detect an interaction between stress echocardiography score and any other patient-reported response variables: freedom from angina ( P interaction =0.116), physical limitation ( P interaction =0.461), quality of life ( P interaction =0.689), EuroQOL 5 quality-of-life score ( P interaction =0.789), or between stress echocardiography score and physician-assessed Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class ( P interaction =0.693), and treadmill exercise time ( P interaction =0.426)., Conclusions: The degree of ischemia assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI on patient-reported angina frequency. The greater the downstream stress echocardiography abnormality caused by a stenosis, the greater the reduction in symptoms from PCI., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02062593.

Background: There are no data on how fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are associated with the placebo-controlled efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in stable single-vessel coronary artery disease., Methods: We report the association between prerandomization invasive physiology within ORBITA (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina), a placebo-controlled trial of patients who have stable angina with angiographically severe single-vessel coronary disease clinically eligible for PCI. Patients underwent prerandomization research FFR and iFR assessment. The operator was blinded to these values. Assessment of response variables, treadmill exercise time, stress echocardiography score, symptom frequency, and angina severity were performed at prerandomization and blinded follow-up. Effects were calculated by analysis of covariance. The ability of FFR and iFR to predict placebo-controlled changes in response variables was tested by using regression modeling., Results: Invasive physiology data were available in 196 patients (103 PCI and 93 placebo). At prerandomization, the majority had Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II or III symptoms (150/196, 76.5%). Mean FFR and iFR were 0.69±0.16 and 0.76±0.22, respectively; 97% had ≥1 positive ischemia tests. The estimated effect of PCI on between-arm prerandomization-adjusted total exercise time was 20.7 s (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.0 to 45.5; P=0.100) with no interaction of FFR ( P interaction =0.318) or iFR ( P interaction =0.523). PCI improved stress echocardiography score more than placebo (1.07 segment units; 95% CI, 0.70-1.44; P<0.00001). The placebo-controlled effect of PCI on stress echocardiography score increased progressively with decreasing FFR ( P interaction <0.00001) and decreasing iFR ( P interaction <0.00001). PCI did not improve angina frequency score significantly more than placebo (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.96-2.80; P=0.072) with no detectable evidence of interaction with FFR ( P interaction =0.849) or iFR ( P interaction =0.783). However, PCI resulted in more patient-reported freedom from angina than placebo (49.5% versus 31.5%; odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.30-4.72; P=0.006) but neither FFR ( P interaction =0.693) nor iFR ( P interaction =0.761) modified this effect., Conclusions: In patients with stable angina and severe single-vessel disease, the blinded effect of PCI was more clearly seen by stress echocardiography score and freedom from angina than change in treadmill exercise time. Moreover, the lower the FFR or iFR, the greater the magnitude of stress echocardiographic improvement caused by PCI., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02062593.

Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the accuracy of instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) pullback measurements to predict post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) physiological outcomes, and to quantify how often iFR pullback alters PCI strategy in real-world clinical settings., Background: In tandem and diffuse disease, offline analysis of continuous iFR pullback measurement has previously been demonstrated to accurately predict the physiological outcome of revascularization. However, the accuracy of the online analysis approach (iFR pullback) remains untested., Methods: Angiographically intermediate tandem and/or diffuse lesions were entered into the international, multicenter iFR GRADIENT (Single instantaneous wave-Free Ratio Pullback Pre-Angioplasty Predicts Hemodynamic Outcome Without Wedge Pressure in Human Coronary Artery Disease) registry. Operators were asked to submit their procedural strategy after angiography alone and then after iFR-pullback measurement incorporating virtual PCI and post-PCI iFR prediction. PCI was performed according to standard clinical practice. Following PCI, repeat iFR assessment was performed and the actual versus predicted post-PCI iFR values compared., Results: Mean age was 67 ± 12 years (81% male). Paired pre- and post-PCI iFR were measured in 128 patients (134 vessels). The predicted post-PCI iFR calculated online was 0.93 ± 0.05; observed actual iFR was 0.92 ± 0.06. iFR pullback predicted the post-PCI iFR outcome with 1.4 ± 0.5% error. In comparison to angiography-based decision making, after iFR pullback, decision making was changed in 52 (31%) of vessels; with a reduction in lesion number (-0.18 ± 0.05 lesion/vessel; p = 0.0001) and length (-4.4 ± 1.0 mm/vessel; p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In tandem and diffuse coronary disease, iFR pullback predicted the physiological outcome of PCI with a high degree of accuracy. Compared with angiography alone, availability of iFR pullback altered revascularization procedural planning in nearly one-third of patients., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: An unusual case of typical angina which occurred on a long haul flight is presented. This case is notable as this was the index presentation, with no previous symptoms prior to this. Physiological changes at altitude can be marked, and include hypoxia, tachycardia and an increase in cardiac output. These changes were enough to expose underlying angina in our patient., Case Presentation: A 68 year old man presented with typical cardiac chest pain on a long haul flight. His symptoms first started 10-15 min after take-off and resolved on landing. This was his index presentation, and there were no similar symptoms in the past. Background history included hypercholesterolaemia and benign prostatic hypertrophy only. He led a rather sedentary lifestyle. A CT coronary angiogram showed significant disease in the proximal left anterior descending artery and proximal right coronary artery. He went on to have a coronary angiogram with invasive physiological measurements, which determined both lesions were physiologically significant. Both arteries were treated with drug eluting stents. Since treatment, he once again embarked on a long haul flight, and was completely asymptomatic., Conclusion: The presentation of symptoms in this individual was rather unusual, but clearly caused by significant coronary artery disease. Potentially his sedentary lifestyle was not enough in day-to-day activities to promote anginal symptoms. When his cardiovascular system was physiologically stressed during flight, brought about by hypoxia, raised sympathetic tone and increased cardiac output, symptoms emerged. In turn, when landing, with atmospheric conditions normalised, physiological stress was removed, and symptoms resolved. Clinically therefore, one should not exclude symptoms that occur with differing physiological states, such as stress and altitude, as they are also potential triggers for myocardial ischaemia, despite absence of day-to-day symptoms.

Background: Symptomatic relief is the primary goal of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in stable angina and is commonly observed clinically. However, there is no evidence from blinded, placebo-controlled randomised trials to show its efficacy., Methods: ORBITA is a blinded, multicentre randomised trial of PCI versus a placebo procedure for angina relief that was done at five study sites in the UK. We enrolled patients with severe (≥70%) single-vessel stenoses. After enrolment, patients received 6 weeks of medication optimisation. Patients then had pre-randomisation assessments with cardiopulmonary exercise testing, symptom questionnaires, and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Patients were randomised 1:1 to undergo PCI or a placebo procedure by use of an automated online randomisation tool. After 6 weeks of follow-up, the assessments done before randomisation were repeated at the final assessment. The primary endpoint was difference in exercise time increment between groups. All analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle and the study population contained all participants who underwent randomisation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02062593., Findings: ORBITA enrolled 230 patients with ischaemic symptoms. After the medication optimisation phase and between Jan 6, 2014, and Aug 11, 2017, 200 patients underwent randomisation, with 105 patients assigned PCI and 95 assigned the placebo procedure. Lesions had mean area stenosis of 84·4% (SD 10·2), fractional flow reserve of 0·69 (0·16), and instantaneous wave-free ratio of 0·76 (0·22). There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of exercise time increment between groups (PCI minus placebo 16·6 s, 95% CI -8·9 to 42·0, p=0·200). There were no deaths. Serious adverse events included four pressure-wire related complications in the placebo group, which required PCI, and five major bleeding events, including two in the PCI group and three in the placebo group., Interpretation: In patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis, PCI did not increase exercise time by more than the effect of a placebo procedure. The efficacy of invasive procedures can be assessed with a placebo control, as is standard for pharmacotherapy., Funding: NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Foundation for Circulatory Health, Imperial College Healthcare Charity, Philips Volcano, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)