Search

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy is a standard of care in recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC). Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have immunomodulatory properties and have offered promising results when combined with anti-PD-1 agents. We conducted a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm trial of pembrolizumab and cabozantinib in patients with RMHNSCC who had Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v.1.1 measurable disease and no contraindications to either agent. We assessed the primary end points of tolerability and overall response rate to the combination with secondary end points of progression-free survival and overall survival and performed correlative studies with PDL-1 and combined positive score, CD8(+) T cell infiltration and tumor mutational burden. A total of 50 patients were screened and 36 were enrolled with 33 evaluable for response. The primary end point was met, with 17 out of 33 patients having a partial response (52%) and 13 (39%) stable disease with an overall clinical benefit rate of 91%. Median and 1-year overall survival were 22.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI) = 11.7–32.9) and 68.4% (95 % CI = 45.1%–83.5%), respectively. Median and 1-year progression-free survival were 14.6 months (95% CI = 8.2–19.6) and 54% (95% CI = 31.5%–72%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included increased aspartate aminotransferase (n = 2, 5.6%). In 16 patients (44.4%), the dose of cabozantinib was reduced to 20 mg daily. The overall response rate correlated positively with baseline CD8(+) T cell infiltration. There was no observed correlation between tumor mutational burden and clinical outcome. Pembrolizumab and cabozantinib were well tolerated and showed promising clinical activity in patients with RMHNSCC. Further investigation of similar combinations are needed in RMHNSCC. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT03468218.

Purpose:A phase II multi-institutional clinical trial was conducted to determine overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with a combination of cetuximab and nivolumab.Patients and Methods:Patients with R/M HNSCC were treated with cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 14 as a lead-in followed by cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. and nivolumab 240 mg i.v. on day 1 and day 15 of each 28-day cycle. Expression of p16 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in archived tumors were determined. Tumor-tissue–modified human papillomavirus (TTMV) DNA was quantified in plasma.Results:Ninety-five patients were enrolled, and 88 patients were evaluable for OS with a median follow-up of 15.9 months. Median OS in the 45 patients who had prior therapy for R/M HNSCC (cohort A) was 11.4 months, with a 1 year OS 50% [90% confidence interval (CI), 0.43–0.57]. Median OS in the 43 patients who had no prior therapy (cohort B) was 20.2 months, with a 1-year OS 66% (90% CI, 0.59–0.71). In the combined cohorts, the p16-negative immunostaining was associated with higher response rate (RR; P = 0.02) but did not impact survival while higher PD-L1 combined positive score was associated with higher RR (P = 0.03) and longer OS (log-rank P = 0.04). In the p16-positive patients, lower median (1,230 copies/mL) TTMV DNA counts were associated with higher RR (P = 0.01) and longer OS compared with higher median (log-rank P = 0.05).Conclusions:The combination of cetuximab and nivolumab is effective in patients with both previously treated and untreated R/M HNSCC and warrants further evaluation.

Supplementary Figure from Phase II Multi-institutional Clinical Trial Result of Concurrent Cetuximab and Nivolumab in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Supplementary Table from Phase II Multi-institutional Clinical Trial Result of Concurrent Cetuximab and Nivolumab in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background Cigarette smoking is related to greater cancer incidence, worse cancer-related clinical outcomes, and worse patient quality of life. Few studies have evaluated the role of smoking in patients’ experiences of cancer-related symptom burden. This study examined relationships between smoking and total symptom burden as well as the incidence of severe symptoms among adult cancer patients. Patients and Methods Patients at Moffitt Cancer Center completed self-report surveys as part of routine cancer care. Symptom burden was evaluated as the sum of individual symptom ratings (total symptom burden) and the number of symptoms rated severe (incidence of severe symptoms). Zero-inflated negative binomial modeling was used to evaluate the relationships between smoking status (ever vs never smoker) and symptom burden outcomes controlling for relevant sociodemographic and clinical covariates and accounting for the proportion of participants reporting no symptom burden. Results This study included 12 571 cancer patients. More than half reported a history of cigarette smoking (n = 6771, 55%). Relative to never smokers, participants with a smoking history had 15% worse expected total symptom burden (ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.20, P < .001) and 13% more expected severe symptoms (ratio = 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.21, P = .001) above and beyond the effects of relevant sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Conclusion Results provide support that smoking is associated with worse cancer symptom burden. More research is needed to evaluate how smoking history (ie, current vs former smoker) and smoking cessation influence cancer symptom burden.

PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other health care providers on immunotherapy and biomarker testing for head and neck cancers. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included survival, overall response, and locoregional control. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 28 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address biomarker testing, first-line treatment regimens based on programmed death ligand-1 scores, immunotherapy in platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, immunotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and radiation therapy in combination with immunotherapy for treatment of local recurrence. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells and other immunotherapies have markedly changed the paradigm of treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. While notable in efficacy, immunotherapy is characterized by a significant possibility of life-threatening side effects. Consequently, patients are often required to have informal family caregivers present and to stay near the treating center for several weeks after cell infusion. Further, the responsibility of managing a great deal of physical care and emotional support falls to these caregivers. Given the novelty of immunotherapy treatment, there is a need to better understand the psychosocial experience of patients receiving this treatment and their caregivers. This article describes the psychosocial characteristics of patients undergoing cellular immunotherapies and their caregivers across time, including patient/caregiver distress, coping, and caregiver burden and preparedness.

Head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCCs) represent a diverse group of tumors emerging within different mucosal surfaces of the oral cavity, nasopharynx, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx. HNSCCs share common clinical risk factors and genomic features, including smoking, alcohol, age, male sex, aneuploidy, and TP53 mutations. Viral initiating and contributing events are increasingly recognized in HNSCCs. While both Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) and human papilloma virus (HPV) are observed, EBV is more frequently associated with nasopharyngeal cancers whereas HPV is associated with oropharyngeal cancers. HNSCCs are associated with high tumor mutational burden and loss of tumor suppressor gene function, especially in TP53 and X-linked genes. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that HNSCCs are subject to immunologic surveillance and immune-induced evolutionary pressure that correlate with negative clinical outcomes. This review will discuss genomic mechanisms related to immune-mediated pressures and propose prognostic and therapeutic implications of detectable immune escape mechanisms that drive tumorigenesis and disease progression.

Introduction The standard diagnosis for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is clinical diagnosis (CD) based on radiographic and biochemical studies. Biopsy diagnosis (BD) is seldom required for the suspicion of secondary malignancy. We aim to study the impact of BD in the context of underlying T1/T2 ACC on overall survival (OS) compared with CD. Methods National Cancer Database (NCDB) for endocrine malignancies was utilized. Only patients with non-metastatic ACC, whose method of diagnosis and local disease extension were reported, and received a surgical adrenalectomy with curative intent were included. Patients were divided by disease stage into T1/T2, T3, and T4 groups. A propensity score match was applied to those with T1/T2 disease who received CD versus BD and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare OS. Results In total, 4000 patients with ACC were reported in the database, 1410 met selection criteria. Eight hundred and thirty patients had T1/T2, 365 had T3, and 162 had T4 ACC. Of patients with T1/T2 ACC, 742 (89.4%) received CD versus 88 (11.6%) with BD. A propensity score was calculated per a multivariable regression model with 79 patients matched from each group. Exact matching was applied for margin status and adjuvant therapies. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference in median OS between CD versus BD patients in the matched data set (103.89 ± 15.65 vs. 54.93 ± 8.22 months; p = 0.001). In all comers, patients with T1/T2 ACC and BD had comparable median OS to that of patients with T3 ACC (52.21 ± 9.69 vs. 36.01 ± 3.33 months; p = 0.446). Conclusion BD in T1/T2 ACC could be associated with disease upstaging and worse OS outcomes.

Background: Clinicians must closely monitor patients for toxicities after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (e.g., toxicities, quality of life) and activity data (e.g., steps, sleep) may complement clinicians’ observations. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of collecting PROs and activity data from patients with hematologic malignancies during CAR-T and explored preliminary data patterns. Methods: Participants wore a Fitbit tracker and completed PROs at several timepoints through 90-days post-infusion. Feasibility was assessed with a priori benchmarks for recruitment (≥50%), retention (≥70%), PRO completion (≥70%), and days wearing the Fitbit (≥50%). Acceptability was assessed with participant satisfaction (a priori benchmark > 2 on a 0–4 scale). Results: Participants (N = 12) were M = 66 years old (SD = 7). Rates of recruitment (68%), retention (83%), PRO completion (85%), and days wearing the Fitbit (85%) indicated feasibility. Satisfaction with completing the PROs (M = 3.2, SD = 0.5) and wearing the Fitbit (M = 2.9, SD = 0.5) indicated acceptability. Preliminary data patterns suggested that participants with better treatment response (vs. progressive disease) had a higher toxicity burden. Conclusions: Longitudinal PRO and activity data collection was feasible and acceptable. Data collected on a larger scale may be used to specify risk prediction models to identify predictors of severe CAR-T-related toxicities and inform early interventions.

This study aimed to describe considerations for developing supportive care interventions targeted to head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors.One-time semi-structured interviews (N = 33) were conducted with HNC survivors who had recently finished treatment (n = 20) and HNC providers (e.g., physicians, nurses; n = 13). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using inductive applied thematic analysis techniques to identify themes.HNC survivors (75% male; M = 61 years old) and providers (54% physicians; 62% female) were unanimously supportive of developing HNC-specific supportive care interventions. Participants described potential benefits of offering interventions at various points throughout the HNC treatment and survivorship trajectory rather than at a single critical time. Many participants preferred group-based interventions because of the high value of peer-support. Others described how group interventions may not be appropriate for all HNC survivors due to risks for negative social comparisons and exacerbated anxiety. Participants suggested topics that should be addressed in HNC-specific interventions including education about acute and long-term side effects, symptom management, nutritional support, relationship/social role changes, grief/loss, and fear of recurrence.HNC-specific supportive care interventions are critically needed, as survivors experience persistent symptoms and distinct psychosocial concerns that impact quality of life. Findings from this study can inform the development of supportive care interventions targeted to the unique psychosocial concerns of HNC survivors.

209 Background: Metastatic colorectal (CRC), pancreatic (PANC), and gastroesophageal cancers are the leading causes of GI cancer–related mortality (5-y survival: 15%, 3%, and 5%-6%, respectively) (ACS 2022). HLA LOH is a recurrent mechanism of immune escape observed in 15%-20% of GI cancers (Hecht R., ASCO GI 2022). The Tmod platform is a logic-gated chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell modular system, comprising a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)- or mesothelin (MSLN)-targeting CAR activator and a separate HLA-A*02-targeting blocker receptor. Both in vitro/in vivo, Tmod CAR T therapy kills cells with HLA-A*02 LOH (tumor) without harming cells with retained HLA-A*02 expression (normal). However, HLA-A*02 LOH can only be therapeutically exploited if patients are identifiable through a feasible and timely clinical workflow. Methods: We established a biobanking protocol (BASECAMP-1, NCT04981119) to determine whether HLA-A*02 LOH patients can be prospectively identified. Patients with CRC, PANC, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and a high risk for incurable relapse, were screened first using a standard HLA assay. Heterozygous HLA-A*02 positive tumor samples were then assessed for LOH using a bioinformatic algorithm applied via the Tempus xT platform. Results: As of Sep 1, 2022, 83 patients were consented at 4 institutions. HLA status was obtained from 70 patients and 28 were identified as HLA-A*02:01 heterozygous (40%; expected frequency based on USA NMDP data, 27.6%). LOH results were available for 16 patients; 4 LOH-positive patients were identified (25%, 2 PANC, 2 NSCLC). The LOH assay sensitivity declines below a tumor purity of 40% (Hecht R., ASCO GI 2022). Six patients had a tumor purity of 20% (all with PANC, a tumor known for high stromal content), limiting possible LOH detection. The impact of tumor purity on LOH sensitivity was highlighted in a patient with a low initial sample tumor purity (30%) that resulted in a 41% probability of HLA-A*02:01 LOH (below positive threshold). A second sample with a higher tumor purity (70%), obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections, resulted in a 92% probability of HLA-A*02:01 LOH (positive). Conclusions: BASECAMP-1 prospective identification of HLA-A*02 LOH is feasible in the real-world setting. The frequencies of the HLA-A*02 allele and of HLA-A*02 LOH in this cohort mirrored expected population frequencies. LOH results can be obtained within a clinically feasible workflow and timeframe, although samples with a < 40% tumor purity have a reduced sensitivity for LOH detection, an issue recurrently observed in patients with PANC. The BASECAMP-1 strategy enables prospective identification of appropriate patients for future therapeutic clinical trials using Tmod CEA and MSLN logic-gated CAR T cells. Clinical trial information: NCT04981119 .

785 Background: Socioeconomic deprivation has been described as a barrier to cancer clinical trial participation. However, few studies have examined socioeconomic deprivation using patient-level or granular geocoded designations. To overcome this challenge, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to assess neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation in a cohort of gastrointestinal cancer clinical trial patients at an NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Methods: Patients enrolled in a gastrointestinal cancer clinical trial from 2008 to 2019 with an identifiable ADI national rank were identified. Socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the ADI, a publicly available, validated dataset that ranks census block groups into percentiles using variables such as income, education, employment, and housing characteristics. For this study, ADI was categorized as quintiles listed in the table. Statistical analyses included Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: The median age of the cohort (N=1,334) was 62.0 years. Most patients were male (54.3%). Race included White (88.2%), African American (6.8%), and Asian (1.5%) patients. Hispanic/Latinx patients made up 6.7% of the cohort. The median ADI was 46. The proportion of enrollees from lowest to highest ADI quintile was 11.2%, 29.3%, 27.3%, 19.1%, and 13.1%. Trial enrollment differed by ADI and age (p=0.019), gender (p=0.042), race (p

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically changed cancer care delivery strategies. Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC) may be particularly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, as they often undergo treatments that require daily clinic visits (e.g., radiation therapy). The goal of this study was to characterize the lived experience of LA-HNC patients and their healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods LA-HNC patients who completed a full course of chemotherapy and radiation therapy during the COVID19 pandemic (N = 20) and LA-HNC healthcare providers (N = 13) participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed for qualitative themes. Results The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on patients’ overall quality of life and health care. Results were organized in four main themes: (1) increased psychological distress; (2) exacerbated social isolation; (3) added stress in clinic for patients and providers; and (4) delays in health care. Conclusions Findings highlight myriad ways LA-HNC patients and providers have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Results can inform the development of supportive interventions to assist LA-HNC in managing COVID-19-related stress and unmet needs related to social isolation and in-clinic support. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06773-x.

The engineering of immune cells to target cancer cells (cellular immunotherapy) has been an exciting area of development in recent years. One type of cellular therapy, T cell receptor (TCR) gene engineered therapy, has shown particular promise in solid tumors. Through use of a heterodimer to recognize intracellular tumor antigens presented through the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), TCR T cells are able to evoke a cytotoxic response as well as a clinical response. In this review, we discuss the potential of TCR-based cellular therapies in solid tumors. While various challenges exist with this therapy, multiple clinical trials are ongoing, in attempt to mitigate these limitations.

6008 Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro) is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) approved for treating pts with recurrent/metastatic (RM) HNSCC. Cabozantinib (cabo) is a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting MET and VEGFR2 shown to reduce tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis and has immuno-modulatory properties. Methods: This is a phase II, open label multi-center, single arm trial evaluating the tolerability and clinical benefit of pembro administered at 200 mg every 3 weeks and cabo 40 mg daily for pts with RM HNSCC who have not received prior ICI. It had a lead-in safety cohort allowing reduction of cabo dose to 20mg daily. Eligible pts had RM HNSCC, deemed incurable, with a tumor PD-L1 CPS > 1, RECIST 1.1 measurable disease, a life expectancy of > 3 months, an Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) of 0-1. Enrollment was initiated in March of 2019. We estimated that the ORR will improve to 35% with pembro+ cabo (from a historic of 18%) with a significance level of 0.05 and 80% power. Results: A total of 47 pts were screened, 13 screen failures [cavitation on scan (4), inability to swallow pills (2), other exclusions (7)]; 34 pts were enrolled, 32 were dosed and 31 evaluable (at least one follow-up scan). Pts had cancers of the oropharynx (21, 65%), nasopharynx (6, 19%), larynx/hypopharynx (4, 13%) and oral cavity (1,3%). 32 patients received cabo at 40 mg daily; 13 patients (41%) were dose reduced to 20mg daily [mucositis, increased liver function (LFT) tests, diarrhea]; males (n=29, 90%), median age 63 years (range 53-67); presence of distant metastases (34, 100%); prior radiation (29, 90%), chemotherapy (14, 43%); ECOG PS =0 (16, 50%), 1 (16,50%); HPV/p16 positive (17, 53%), negative (5, 16%), not applicable (10, 29%); the most frequent adverse event (AE) (all grades) was fatigue (16,50.0%), grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AE were increased LFTs, hyponatremia (3, 9.3% each). With a median follow up of 12.7 months (mos) (range 6.9- 20.5 mos), a RECIST 1.1 overall response rate ORR= 45.2% (CR=0; PR=14, 45.2%; SD =14, 45.2%; PD=3.0, 10%) with an overall clinical benefit of 90.4% were observed; The 1-yr OS was 67.7% (95% CI, 42.9%-83.6%; median 22.3 mos) and 1-yr PFS was 51.8% (95% CI, 28.8%-70.7%; median 14.6 mos). Conclusions: This phase II trial of pembro + cabo met its primary endpoint of ORR. The regimen is well-tolerated with very encouraging clinical activity in RM HNSCC and warrants further exploration in this disease. The study was supported by a grant from Exelixis to NFS. Clinical trial information: NCT03468218.

BackgroundT cell receptor (TCR) signaling profile is a fundamental property that underpins both adaptive and innate immunity in the host. Despite its potential clinical relevance, the TCR repertoire in peripheral blood has not been thoroughly explored for its value as an immunotherapy efficacy biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The purpose of the present study is to characterize and compare the TCR repertoire in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with HNSCC treated with the combination of cetuximab and nivolumab.MethodsWe used the immunoSEQ assay to sequence the TCR beta (TCR-B) chain repertoire from serially obtained PBMC at baseline and during the treatments from a total of 41 patients who received the combination (NCT03370276). Key TCR repertoire metrics, including diversity and clonality, were calculated and compared between patients with different therapy responses and clinical characteristics (eg, human papillomavirus (HPV) status and smoking history). Patient survival outcomes were compared according to patient groups stratified by the TCR-B clonotyping. To confirm the observed patterns in TCR spectrum, samples from patients who achieved complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were further profiled with the immunoSEQ deep resolution assay.ResultsOur data indicated that the patients who achieved CR and PR had an increased TCR sequence diversity in their baseline samples, this tendency being more pronounced in HPV-negative patients or those with a smoking history. Notably, the CR/PR group had the lowest proportion of patients with oligoclonal TCR clones (2 out of 8 patients), followed by the stable disease group (9 out of 20 patients) and lastly the progressive disease group (7 out of 10 patients). An overall trend toward favorable patient survival was also observed in the polyclonal group. Finally, we reported the shared TCR clones across patients within the same response group, as well as the shared clones by aligning immunoSEQ reads with TCR data retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas- head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (TCGA-HNSC) cohort.ConclusionsOur data suggest that, despite the great clinical heterogeneity of HNSCC and the limited responders in the present cohort, the peripheral TCR repertoires from pretreatment PBMC may be developed as biomarkers for the benefit of immunotherapy in HNSCC.

TPS2676 Background: Solid tumors comprise > 90% of cancers. Metastatic colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer are among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality (5-year overall survival: 14%, 6%, and 3%, respectively) (ACS. 2021). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated clinical efficacy in hematologic malignancies (Neelapu S. et al. N Engl J Med. 2017). Translating engineered T-cell therapies to solid tumors has proven to be challenging due to a lack of tumor-specific targets that can discriminate cancer cells from normal cells. Previous studies using carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) T-cell receptors and mesothelin (MSLN) CARs resulted in dose-limiting on-target, off-tumor toxicities (Parkhurst M, et al. Mol Ther. 2011; Tanyi J. Cellicon Valley '21). To create a therapeutic safety window, Tmod CAR T-cell therapy utilizes dual-signaling receptors to create a robust NOT logic gate capable of killing tumor cells, while leaving healthy cells intact (Hamburger A, et al. Mol Immunol. 2020). The 2 receptors in Tmod CAR T-cell therapy comprise an activator that recognizes an antigen on the surface of tumor cells that may also be present on normal cells, such as CEA and MSLN, and a blocker that recognizes a second surface antigen from an allele lost only in tumor cells. The frequency of HLA LOH among advanced GI solid tumor cancers in the Tempus real-world dataset is 16.3% with a range of 15.6%-20.8% between colorectal, pancreatic, and gastroesophageal tumors (Hecht R. et al. ASCO-GI 2022. Abstract #190). As such, HLA LOH offers a definitive tumor versus normal discriminator target for CAR T-cell therapy. Different activator/blocker combinations can be engineered with the Tmod platform technology and may be applied to T cells and natural killer cells in autologous and allogeneic settings. BASECAMP-1 is a currently enrolling observational study with key objectives of 1) To identify patients with somatic HLA LOH eligible for Tmod CAR T-cell therapy, and 2) To obtain leukapheresis and feasibility for the future EVEREST Tmod CAR T-cell trial. Methods: BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) patient eligibility has 2 parts: 1) Patients will be initially screened to identify germline HLA-A*02 heterozygosity by central NGS. If HLA-A*02 heterozygosity is confirmed, primary archival tumor tissue will be analyzed for somatic mutations by xT-Onco NGS testing. 2) If the tumor demonstrates HLA-A*02 LOH and the patient is eligible after screening, the patient will undergo leukapheresis. Banked T cells will be available for the autologous EVEREST Tmod CAR T-cell therapy interventional study to reduce waiting time at relapse. Clinical trial information: NCT04981119.

6055 Background: Gut microbiome has emerged as an important predictor of response to ICB therapy in various cancers, most notably in melanoma. Due to functional redundancy of microbiota, there has been lack of consistency in gut microbial signature associated with ICB response. Microbial metabolites in addition to taxonomy may play a superior role in predicting response to ICB. Gut microbiome/metabolome signatures of ICB response is unknown in RM HNSCC patients. Methods: Two cohorts of patients were included (stool and plasma samples were collected)- cohort 1, newly diagnosed RM HNSCC patients starting first line ICB, for whom samples were collected before ICB initiation (baseline) and post-treatment at 3, 6, and 12 months. Cohort 2 with durable response (disease control lasting ≥ 6 months), with single sample collected at study entry. 16s rRNA sequencing was performed on stool samples while plasma metabolites were quantitated using Q Exactive plus Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Response was defined as partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) as per RECIST 1.1 Results: The 16-S sequence was carried on 31 samples (cohort 1- 16 baseline, 7 post treatment; cohort 2- 8 durable responders). Targeted metabolomics was completed on 92 plasma samples [cohort 1-27 baseline and 50 post-treatment, cohort 2- 15]. Responders had a significantly higher Shannon’s diversity index, lower Fermicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio, and were enriched with genus Bacteroides and Lachnospiracea incerate sedis at baseline and post treatment, compared to non-responders (p < 0.05). At species level, baseline and post treatment microbiome of responders was enriched with Eubacterium oxidoreducens and Bacteroides uniformis. Ruminococcus was preferentially enriched in durable responders. Targeted analysis of plasma metabolites (associated with gut microbial metabolism) showed that responders had a significantly lower baseline adenosine, Inosine and xanthine level as compared to non responders. Further, Inosine levels decreased with response, while levels increased in non-responders (p < 0.05), suggestive of consumption by re-activated T cells Further, ICB responders had significantly lower Kynurenine to tryptophan ratio compared to non responders Conclusions: This is the first study evaluating association of gut microbiome and metabolome on response to first line ICB, in RM HNSCC patients. We found higher diversity and specific gut microbial signatures associated with ICB response. Interestingly, we found that inosine and kynurenine/tryptophan pathways, both which play a crucial role in host as well as gut microbial metabolism were differentially expressed in ICB responders. Our results if validated in larger cohort, lays groundwork for gut microbiome and importantly microbial metabolite modulation to improve response to ICB in RM HNSCC.

Simple Summary To improve overall survival (OS), we evaluated a combination of cetuximab and nivolumab for toxicity and efficacy in patients with incurable recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In addition, electronic health record-derived real-world data were used to provide clinical context for our prospective findings and to explore sequential treatment effects of cetuximab and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) including nivolumab and pembrolizumab. The cetuximab and nivolumab combination was very well tolerated. Although patients with no prior CPI showed a trend for more favorable progression-free survival relative to patients with prior CPI, the improvement in the 1-year OS did not reach the statistical threshold in this heavily treated patients. Optimal sequencing of cetuximab and CPI may have an impact in prognosis and requires further evaluation in management of patients with incurable HNSCC. Abstract We hypothesized the combination of cetuximab and nivolumab would improve survival in recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC by providing synergy in cancer control and evaluated toxicities and efficacy of the combination. Effects of sequential administration of cetuximab and anti-Programmed Cell Death-1 checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) were also explored. Patients who failed at least one line of palliative treatment for incurable HNSCC were treated with cetuximab 500 mg/m2 IV on Day (D)-14 as a lead-in followed by cetuximab 500 mg/m2 IV and nivolumab 240 mg/m2 IV on D1 and D15 every 28-D cycle. Electronic health record-derived real-world data (RWD) were used to explore sequential treatment effects of CPI and cetuximab. A total of 45 evaluable patients were analyzed, and 31/45 (69%) patients had prior exposure to either CPI or cetuximab. The only grade 4 treatment-related adverse event was cetuximab infusion reaction in one patient. The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 19% and 44%, respectively. Although patients with no prior CPI (23/45, 51%) showed a trend for more favorable PFS relative to patients with prior CPI (22/45, 49%), the improvement in the 1-year OS did not reach the statistical threshold. For evaluation of sequential CPI and cetuximab treatment effects, we selected RWD-cetuximab cohort with 173 patients and RWD-CPI cohort with 658 patients from 6862 R/M HNSCC. Our result suggested patients treated with RWD-cetuximab after RWD-CPI had worse OS compared to no prior RWD-CPI (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.02–3.16). Our data suggest the combination of cetuximab and nivolumab is well tolerated. Optimal sequencing of cetuximab and CPI may have an impact in prognosis and requires further evaluation.

The landscape of treatment options for radioactive iodine refractory thyroid cancer is rapidly changing. While there are no curative options in this setting, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the management of radioiodine refractory disease to help delay progression of metastatic and life-threatening disease. Ongoing development of more selective targeted inhibitors will certainly improve medication tolerability and tumor specificity. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology of radioactive iodine refractory thyroid cancer and examine the definition of radioactive iodine refractory disease and the current systemic therapy options. We then discuss molecularly targeted strategies both approved by the FDA and currently under study in clinical trials. In particular, we examine the data relevant to specific targeted mutations in thyroid cancer. We also discuss novel approaches in development, such as immunotherapy, to the management of radioactive iodine refractory disease.

190 Background: Metastatic colorectal (CRC), pancreatic (PANC), and gastroesophageal (GE) cancers are the leading causes of GI cancer–related mortality (5-yr survival rate, 14%, 3% and ̃5-6%, respectively). T-cell immunotherapy targeting GI-associated tumor antigens has been attempted, but efficacy has been constrained by on-target off-tumor toxicity, limiting the therapeutic window. The Tmod (TM) platform is an AND-NOT logic-gated CAR T modular system, versions of which have a CEA- or MSLN-targeting CAR activator and a separate HLA-A*02-targeting blocker receptor to protect normal cells. Tmod CAR T exploits HLA LOH, common in GI malignancies (10-33% in primary solid tumors [TCGA]) and can kill tumor cells without harming healthy cells in vitro and in vivo. However, the prevalence of HLA LOH across GI tumors is unknown in the real-world setting. We utilized the Tempus xT oncology NGS database of patients with multiple GI tumors. From a standard-of-care NGS assay, GI cancer patients can be readily identified for HLA LOH and future treatment with Tmod CAR T therapy. Methods: The occurrence of HLA LOH in GI tumors of 1439 patients was assessed using paired germline and somatic DNA sequencing using a research assay [6]. CRC, PANC and GE patients with ≥ stage 3 were then extracted, and rates of HLA LOH were identified (ie, whether loss occurred across high-frequency HLA-A alleles). In addition, mutations in KRAS and BRAF, as well as MSI status were stratified to determine any association with HLA-A LOH. Results: HLA-A LOH was detected in 830 (17.3%) of all solid tumor records, and a similar proportion when all GI cancer records were analyzed (17.0%). For GI subtypes, these values ranged from 13.5% to 23.1% (Table). No high-frequency HLA-A allele (A*01, A*02, A*03, A*11) was more likely to be lost. Clinical biomarkers ( KRAS, BRAF and MSI status) were not associated with HLA-LOH. Conclusions: The frequency of HLA LOH among advanced solid tumor cancers in this dataset is 17.3%, with a range of 13.5-23% between CRC, PANC and GE. The HLA LOH frequency observed in these GI tumors is consistent with that in primary tumors from TCGA, which also used germline-matched and tumor samples. Clinical biomarkers were not associated with HLA LOH. Tempus NGS was able to identify HLA LOH, which can be used for Tmod CAR T therapy to an enhanced therapeutic window. Identification of these patients in BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) will enable novel Tmod CAR T therapy. [Table: see text]

Outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia remain poor, and treatment decisions must consider not just quantity, but also quality of life (QOL). We conducted a systematic review of studies in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome that incorporated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. PubMed and PsycINFO were searched for articles published from January 2000 through June 2016. Forty-one were relevant for our review with more published in recent years. There was considerable inter-study heterogeneity in which instruments were used, and many studies employed multiple (often overlapping) instruments. Longitudinal studies in particular suffered from both high attrition rates due to disease-related mortality as well as waning compliance with questionnaire completion. There remain significant challenges to incorporation of PROs into leukemia trials. Despite these limitations, however, well-implemented PROs can provide important information beyond objective response outcomes and highlight areas of focus for clinicians caring for patients and for future research endeavors.

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can lead to durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurs in up to 64% of patients. There is concern that ICANS places patients at risk for longer-term cognitive impairment. This study examined changes in patients' perceived cognition from prior to CAR T-cell therapy to days 90 and 360 in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma, as well as CAR T-cell therapy-specific risk factors (e.g., ICANS, cytokine release syndrome [CRS]) and non-specific risk factors (e.g., age, education) associated with changes in cognition. Methods: Patients' perceived cognition was assessed at baseline and at days 90 and 360 with the Everyday Cognition Questionnaire (ECog), that provides scores for global cognition (which includes subscales for memory, language, visuospatial abilities, planning, organization, divided attention), and satisfaction with cognition. Quality of life was scored using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29. Frailty was examined with the hand grip strength test. Cognitive reserve was examined with the Weschler Test of Adult Reading. Clinical variables were extracted from medical records. Demographic variables were self-reported by participants. Percentages of patients reporting clinically significant worsening, clinically significant improvement, and unchanged cognition over time were calculated. Piecewise mixed models were used to examine average change in perceived cognition from baseline to day 90 and from day 90 to day 360, as well as to explore potential risk factors of average change in global cognition. Risk factors included demographic (i.e., age, education) and clinical factors (i.e., grade>2 CRS, grade>2 ICANS, disease response at days 90 and 360, baseline grip strength, baseline cognitive reserve) as well as baseline quality of life variables (i.e., fatigue, physical function, pain, depression, anxiety). Results: A total of 118 participants provided data (mean age 61, 59% male, 86% diagnosed with large B-cell lymphomas, 87% received axicabtagene ciloleucel). At day 90, relative to baseline, 17% of participants reported worsened global cognition, 10% improved global cognition, and 73% no change in global cognition (Figure 1). At day 360, relative to baseline, 28% reported worsened global cognition, 11% improved global cognition, and 61% no change in global cognition (Figure 1). Piecewise mixed models indicated that from baseline to day 90, there were no changes on average in global cognition or in any cognitive domain (ps>.05). In contrast, from day 90 to 360, participants reported, on average, worsened global cognition (p=.01), language (p=.04), visuospatial abilities (p=.04), divided attention (p=.03) and satisfaction with cognition (p=.01). At baseline, greater fatigue, anxiety and depression were associated with worse concurrent perceived cognition (p.05). Post-hoc analyses indicated no differences in cognition by disease status at day 360 (ps>.05). Conclusions: Results suggest that perceived cognition worsens on average beyond day 90, with patients reporting worse baseline physical functioning being at risk of worse perceived cognition by day 90. Results should be incorporated when preparing patients about what to expect when receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Further research is needed regarding objective neurocognitive performance after CAR T-cell therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Barata: Grifols: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Almirall: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Gonzalez: SureMed Compliance Equity: Consultancy; Elly Health, Inc.: Consultancy. Kirtane: Oncternal Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Seattle Genetics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Myovant Sciences: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Veru: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Jain: Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mokhtari: Kite: Consultancy. Chavez: ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Epizyme: Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy. Lazaryan: Kadmon: Consultancy; Avrobio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Humanigen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Amgen: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Expenses; Acrotech/Spectrum: Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Servier Genetics: Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Locke: Gerson Lehrman Group: Consultancy; Emerging Therapy Solutions: Consultancy; EcoR1: Consultancy; Cowen: Consultancy; Umoja: Consultancy, Other; Wugen: Consultancy, Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Other, Research Funding; Legend Biotech: Consultancy, Other; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role, Research Funding; Iovance Biotherapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; GammaDelta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Cellular Biomedicine Group: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Calibr: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Allogene Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role, Research Funding; Moffitt Cancer Center: Patents & Royalties: field of cellular immunotherapy. Jim: Kite pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Consultancy; RedHill Biopharma: Consultancy.

PURPOSE: United States Hispanics are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced cancer as parents than their non-Hispanic white counterparts but little is known about Hispanic parents’ willingness to discuss a terminal cancer diagnosis with dependent children, potentially resulting in suboptimal child coping. Therefore, we investigated Hispanic mothers’ willingness to communicate with dependent children about her actual or hypothetical advanced cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Two focus groups (n = 6 participants) and three, one-on-one interviews (n=3), were conducted among adult, Mexican-American mothers with a current cancer diagnosis of any stage residing in U.S.-Mexico border communities. Participants reported their perceived concerns, parenting challenges and openness to discussing an incurable cancer diagnosis with a dependent child. Audio files were transcribed into English and qualitatively coded using content analysis. RESULTS: Participants, most with breast cancer, ranged in age from 25–47. Five had considered the possibility of their own death from advanced cancer and three had previously discussed this with their children. While many expected their children would carry on well without them, seven expressed concern for the emotional/spiritual well-being of their children. Mothers anticipated physical and time-based parenting challenges but wanted the opportunity to focus on themselves and their children in advance of death. All but one would be willing to discuss an advance cancer diagnosis with dependent children; four expressed the value of doing so or the potential harm of abdicating this responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: If faced with an advanced cancer diagnosis, Mexican-American mothers are open to communicating with dependent children.

Patients who undergo upfront curative intent resection for locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas and who have adverse pathologic features benefit from adjuvant therapy. Concurrent cisplatin based chemoradiation is an established standard of care endorsed by national guidelines. Controversy now exists on the applicability of this strategy to the good risk human papilloma virus (HPV) related oropharynx cancer (OPC) patient. Ongoing clinical studies are exploring therapeutic de-escalation in the postoperative setting for this distinct patient population. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors to the therapeutic armamentarium for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer patients has led to clinical investigation of incorporation of PD-1 inhibition in the postoperative setting.

e18020 Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a standard option for re-irradiation of recurrent or second primary cancers of the head and neck. We conducted performed a phase I clinical trial to establish a maximum tolerated dose of SBRT with concurrent cisplatin. We previously reported our safety data, and now present our secondary disease control endpoints. Methods: Major inclusion criteria were recurrence of previous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in patients who had previously undergone radiotherapy to doses ≥ 45 Gy to the area of recurrence, ≥ 6 months prior to enrollment, and who were medically unfit for surgery, deemed unresectable, or refused surgery. Patients were treated with radiation therapy every other day for five fractions at three dose levels: 30 Gy, 35 Gy, and 40 Gy. Cisplatin was given prior to every SBRT fraction at a dose of 15 mg/m2. Secondary end points reported herein are locoregional control (LRC), freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM), and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty patients were enrolled and of those 18 patients were evaluable for secondary endpoints. Nine patients had a primary tumor in the oropharynx, four patients in the oral cavity, three in the neck, one in the larynx, and one simultaneously in the larynx and neck. All patients received the planned dose of Cisplatin. Five patients received a radiation dose of 30 Gy, three patients received a dose of 35 Gy, and 9 patients received a dose of 40 Gy. Median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 11.725 cm3. With a median follow up of 9 months the 1-year OS was 38.9%. LRC at 1 year was 45.7% and FFDM at 1 year was 87.8%. There was a trend to improved OS with increasing SBRT dose, 40 Gy vs < 40 Gy (p = 0.08). There was an improved 1-year OS with a GTV ≤11.725 cm3 of 77.8% vs 0% for tumors > 11.725 cm3 (p < 0.001). For patients with a GTV < 11.725 cm3 who received 40 Gy the 1 year OS was 100% compared with 0% for tumors larger than 11.725 cm3. Conclusions: For patients with previously radiated locally or regionally recurrent head and neck cancer, SBRT up to 40 Gy given concurrently with cisplatin provides reasonable locoregional control and overall survival for patients with smaller tumors. Further evaluation in prospective trials is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02158234.

6017 Background: Current standard of care for patients (pts) with previously untreated R/M HNSCC that are incurable is either pembrolizumab (pembro) with/without chemotherapy depending on the Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS). We evaluated the combination of CTX and NIVO for its efficacy. Methods: Pts were treated with CTX 500 mg/m2 IV on Day (D) -14 as a lead-in followed by CTX 500 mg/m2 IV and NIVO 240 mg/m2 IV on D1 and D15 every 28-D cycle (C). Pts with CTX infusion reaction or who did not receive C1D1 for any reason were non-evaluable and replaced. NIVO dose reduction was not allowed. Results: Fifty-four evaluable pts were analyzed. Median age was 62 (42-85). ECOG performance status at baseline was 0 (20, 37%), 1 (30, 56%), and 2 (4, 7%). Primary sites were oral cavity 19 (35%), oropharynx 22 (41%), hypopharynx 3 (6%), larynx 9 (17%), and unknown primary 1 (2%). p16 status is positive 22 (41%), negative 29 (54%), and unknown 3 (6%). PD-L1 CPS is < 1 in 6 (11%), >1 in 26 (48%), and unknown 22 (41%). Median follow up time for overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months. The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring in ≥2 pts were hypomagnesemia 2 (4%), hypophosphatemia 2 (4%), fatigue 4 (7%), and rash-acneiform 4 (7%). The only grade 4 TRAEs were hypomagnesemia in 1 (2%) and CTX infusion reaction in 1 (2%). The most common grade 3 immune-related adverse event (IRAE) occurring in ≥2 was fatigue 2 (4%). No grade 4 IRAEs is observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 7.8 and 14.5 months, while 1-year PFS and 1-year OS were 39% and 61%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in either PFS and OS based on tumor p16 or PD-L1 status. Conclusions: The clinical trial met its primary endpoint of 1-year OS. Our data indicate the combination of CTX and NIVO is safe and effective in pts with previously untreated incurable R/M HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03370276.

Simple Summary Even with recent advances, there are urgent needs for novel therapies to improve overall survival and decrease toxicities in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This article reviews historical data to provide a context and highlights recent data in understanding of epidemiology and pathophysiology and supporting changes in treatments of HNSCC, particularly in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease. For use of immune checkpoint modulators such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, potential predictive biomarkers of clinical benefits are also summarized. In addition, this article reviews currently ongoing clinical trials and provides a perspective on future research directions. Abstract Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most common cancer arising in the head and neck region. The most common risk factors are smoking, excessive drinking, and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. While the overall incidence of smoking is decreasing, the incidence of HPV-related HNSCC is increasing in the United States and Western Europe, which led to a shift in understanding of the pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis of this disease. The outcomes for non-metastatic HNSCC remains very encouraging and continues to improve. Advances in radiation technology and techniques, better organ preserving surgical options, and multidisciplinary treatment modalities have improved cure rates for locally advanced HNSCC patients. The treatment of metastatic disease, however, remains an area of need. The advancement of immune checkpoint inhibitors has provided significantly better outcomes, but only a small proportion of patients obtain benefits. Most recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC patients continue to have poor survival. This has led to the vigorous investigation of new biomarkers and biomarker-based therapies. Novel therapeutic options including adaptive cellular therapy and therapeutic vaccines are also on the horizon. In this review, we highlight the latest advances in the field of HNSCC and the future direction of research.

Background Outcomes of therapy targeting molecular driver alterations detected in advanced non–small-cell lung (NSCLC) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have not been widely reported in patients who are targeted therapy-naive. Patients and Methods We performed a multicenter retrospective review of patients with unresectable stage IIIB to IV NSCLC who received matched therapy after a targetable driver alteration was identified using a commercial ctDNA assay through usual clinical care. Eligible patients must not have received targeted therapy prior to ctDNA testing (prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy was permitted). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the median duration of targeted therapy. Patients still on targeted therapy were censored at last follow-up. Results Seventy-six patients met inclusion criteria. The median age of diagnosis of NSCLC was 64.5 years (range, 31-87 years), 67% were female, 74% were never-smokers, and 97% had adenocarcinoma histology. Twenty-one (28%) patients received systemic treatment prior to targeted therapy, including chemotherapy (n = 17), immunotherapy (n = 5), and/or a biologic (n = 4). Thirty-three (43%) patients remain on targeted therapy at the time of data analysis. The median time on targeted therapy was similar to what has been reported for tissue-detected oncogenic driver mutations in the targeted therapy-naive setting. Conclusions Patients with ctDNA-detected drivers had durable time on targeted therapy. These treatment outcomes data compliment previous studies that have shown enhanced targetable biomarker discovery rates and high tissue concordance of ctDNA testing when incorporated at initial diagnosis of NSCLC. Identification of NSCLC driver mutations using well-validated ctDNA assays can be used for clinical decision-making and targeted therapy assignment.