Search

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically impacted healthcare provision in the UK and skin cancer services have had to adapt to ensure continuity of safe care. As we return to "normality" we reflect on lessons learned and the impact of the pandemic on skin cancer services. We looked at data on Public Health Scotland Dashboard, which compiles data from 14 local health boards across Scotland, comparing melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses during the years 2020 and 2019 (pre-COVID-19 pandemic). We looked at skin cancer cases within the North Cancer Alliance (NCA) and all of Scotland. Within the NCA, 518 cases of melanoma were diagnosed in 2019, compared to 429 in 2020. Within Scotland, 1950 cases of melanoma were diagnosed in 2019, compared to 1605 in 2020. In 2019, 5103 non-melanoma skin cancer cases were diagnosed in NCA, compared to 4071 in 2020. In Scotland, 21,626 non-melanoma skin cancer cases were diagnosed in 2019, compared to 16,193 in 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on skin cancer care within the NCA and the whole of Scotland. A significantly lower number of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer cases have been diagnosed within the NCA and in Scotland in 2020 compared to 2019. The trend is similar between NCA and other areas of Scotland. We must raise awareness of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer to improve timely presentation of patients during a global health crisis and a multidisciplinary approach is needed to address this problem.

BACKGROUND Melanoma is common and incidence increasing. Guidelines recommend monthly Total-Skin-Self-Examination (TSSE) performed by melanoma survivors to detect recurrent and new primary melanoma. TSSE is underperformed despite evidence of benefit. OBJECTIVE To compare a self-directed digital intervention (intervention group) with treatment as usual (control group) in patients treated for a first stage 0-IIC primary cutaneous melanoma within the preceding 60 months. METHODS This randomized clinical trial was conducted at two UK NHS hospitals (Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Grampian and Addenbrookes, Cambridge). Adults (aged ≥18) diagnosed with a first 0-IIC primary cutaneous melanoma were randomised to receive ASICA (Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare) a tablet-based digital intervention to prompt and support TSSE in melanoma survivors, or to usual care. The hypothesis tested was that ASICA would increase TSSE practice in those affected by melanoma using it, and compared to controls, without affecting psychological well-being. The main outcomes melanoma worry (Melanoma Worry Scale, MWS), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADs), and quality of life (EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L) were collected by postal questionnaire 3, 6 and 12-months following randomisation. RESULTS 241 recruits randomised (1:1) to ASICA (n=141) or control, n=140). There were no significant differences between groups for melanoma worry at 12 months (mean difference 0⸱12 95% confidence interval (-0⸱6, 0⸱84), p=0⸱743), at 3 months (0⸱23 (-0⸱31, 0⸱78) p=0.402) or 6 months (-0⸱1 (-0⸱7, 0⸱51) p=0⸱757). The ASICA group had lower anxiety scores at 12 months (-0.54 (-1.31, 0.230 p=0.168), at 3 months (-0⸱13; -0⸱.79, 0⸱54; p=0⸱711) and significantly at 6 months (-1⸱00 (-1⸱74, -0⸱26) p=0⸱009). Depression scores were similar being lower at 12 months (-0⸱44 (-1⸱11, 0⸱23), p=0.195) and 3 months (-0⸱24 (-0⸱84, 0⸱35)p=0⸱421) but only significantly lower at 6 months (-0⸱77 (-1⸱41, -0⸱12) p=0⸱020). The ASICA group had significantly higher quality of life scores at 12 months (0⸱044; (0⸱003, 0⸱085); p=0⸱036) and 6 months (0⸱070 (0⸱032, 0⸱107) p CONCLUSIONS Using ASICA for 12 months does not increase melanoma worry, and can reduce anxiety and depression and improves quality of life. ASICA has the potential to improve well-being of melanoma survivors and enable the benefits of regular TSSE. CLINICALTRIAL Clinical Trials.gov:Trial registration number NCT03328247. Registered 01 November 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03328247?term=ASICA&rank=1. First participant randomised on 25 January 2018. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.1186/s13063-019-3453-x

Background Melanoma incidence has quadrupled since 1970 and melanoma is now the second most common cancer in individuals under 50. Targeted immunotherapies for melanoma now potentially enable long-term remission even in advanced melanoma, but these melanoma survivors require ongoing surveillance, with implications for NHS resources and significant social and psychological consequences for patients. Total skin self-examination (TSSE) can detect recurrence earlier and improve clinical outcomes but is underperformed in the UK. To support survivors, the Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA) intervention was developed to prompt and improve TSSE performance, with subsequent reporting of concerns and submission of skin photos to a Dermatology Nurse Practitioner (DNP). ASICA was delivered as a randomized pilot trial. Methods This paper reports on process evaluation. Data on participants’ demographics and the concerns they reported during the trial were tabulated and displayed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. We explored which participants used ASICA, and how frequently, to report any skin concerns. We also determined how the interactions had worked in terms of quality of skin photographs submitted, clinical assessments made by the DNP, and the assessments and decisions made for each concern. Finally, we explored significant events occurring during the trial. Data on participants’ demographics and the concerns they reported during the trial were tabulated and displayed using SPSS. A semi-structured interview was undertaken with the DNP to gain perspective on the range of concerns presented and how they were resolved. Results Of 121 recruited melanoma patients receiving ASICA for 12 months, 69 participants submitted a total of 123 reports detailing 189 separate skin-related concerns and including 188 skin photographs. Where participants fully complied with follow-up by the DNP, concerns were usually resolved remotely, but 19 (10.1%) were seen at a secondary care clinic and 14 (7.4%) referred to their GP. 49 (25.9%) of concerns were not completely resolved due to partial non-compliance with DNP follow-up. Conclusion Melanoma patients randomized to the ASICA intervention were able to report skin-related concerns that could be resolved remotely through interaction with a DNP. Feasibility issues highlighted by ASICA will support further development and optimization of this digital tool. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov, NCT03328247. Registered on 1 November 2017

BackgroundMelanoma incidence has quadrupled since 1970 and melanoma is now the second most common cancer in individuals under 50. Targeted immunotherapies for melanoma now potentially enable long-term remission even in advanced melanoma, but these melanoma survivors require ongoing surveillance, with implications for NHS resources and significant social and psychological consequences for patients. Total skin self-examination (TSSE) can detect recurrence earlier and improve clinical outcomes but is underperformed in the UK. To support survivors, the Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA) intervention was developed to prompt and improve TSSE performance, with subsequent reporting of concerns and submission of skin photos to a Dermatology Nurse Practitioner (DNP). ASICA was delivered as a randomized pilot trial.MethodsThis paper reports on process evaluation. Data on participants’ demographics and the concerns they reported during the trial were tabulated and displayed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. We explored which participants used ASICA, and how frequently, to report skin concerns. We also determined how the interactions had worked in terms of quality of skin photographs submitted, clinical assessments made by the DNP, and the assessments and decisions made for each concern. Finally, we explored significant events occurring during the trial. Data on participants’ demographics and the concerns they reported during the trial were tabulated and displayed using SPSS. A semi-structured interview was undertaken with the DNP to gain perspective on the range of concerns presented and how they were resolved.Results Of 121 recruited melanoma patients receiving ASICA for 12 months, 69 participants submitted a total of 123 reports detailing 189 separate skin-related concerns and including 188 skin photographs. Where participants fully complied with follow-up by the DNP, concerns were usually resolved remotely, but 19 (10.1%) were seen at a secondary care clinic and 14 (7.4%) referred to their GP. 49 (25.9%) of concerns were not completely resolved due to partial non-compliance with DNP follow-up.ConclusionMelanoma patients randomized to the ASICA intervention were able to report skin-related concerns that could be resolved remotely through interaction with a DNP. Feasibility issues highlighted by ASICA will support further development and optimization of this digital tool.

Background: Melanoma is common and incidence is increasing. UK guidelines recommend monthly Total-Skin-Self-Examination (TSSE) performed by melanoma survivors to detect recurrent and new primary melanoma. TSSE is underperformed despite evidence of benefit. ASICA (Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare) is a tablet-based digital intervention to prompt and support TSSE in melanoma survivors. Methods: Adults diagnosed with 0-IIC primary cutaneous melanoma from two UK NHS hospitals (Grampian and Cambridge) were recruited and randomised (1:1) to ASICA or control. Data on co-primary outcomes: melanoma worry (Melanoma Worry Scale, MWS), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADs), and quality of life (EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L) were collected by postal questionnaire 3, 6 and 12-months following randomisation. Findings: Recruits were randomised (1:1) to ASICA (n=141) or control, n=140). There were no significant differences between groups for melanoma worry at 12 months (mean difference 0⸱12 95% confidence interval (-0⸱6, 0⸱84), p=0⸱743), at 3 months (0⸱23 (-0⸱31, 0⸱78) p=0.402) or 6 months (-0⸱1 (-0⸱7, 0⸱51) p=0⸱757). The ASICA group had lower anxiety scores at 12 months (-0.54 (-1.31, 0.230 p=0.168), at 3 months (-0⸱13; -0⸱.79, 0⸱54; p=0⸱711) and significantly at 6 months (-1⸱00 (-1⸱74, -0⸱26) p=0⸱009). Depression scores were similar being lower at 12 months (-0⸱44 (-1⸱11, 0⸱23), p=0.195) and 3 months (-0⸱24 (-0⸱84, 0⸱35)p=0⸱421) but only significantly lower at 6 months (-0⸱77 (-1⸱41, -0⸱12) p=0⸱020). The ASICA group had significantly higher quality of life scores at 12 months (0⸱044; (0⸱003, 0⸱085); p=0⸱036) and 6 months (0⸱070 (0⸱032, 0⸱107) p

A 52-year-old morbidly obese man with a body mass index (BMI) of 78 kg/m2 lost a great deal of weight through diet control over a 3-year period before undergoing bariatric surgery in the form of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. He continued to lose weight, reducing BMI to 56 kg/m2; however, a large left medial thigh mass persisted. Differential diagnoses included lipoma, liposarcoma and hernia. An MRI scan revealed a 37 × 23 × 23 cm oedematous fatty swelling through which contained multiple enlarged inguinal lymph nodes and the great saphenous vein. Plastic surgeons excised the mass with direct closure of skin. Pathology confirmed lipoma with localised lymphoedema. This represents a case of giant lipoma, of which several reports have been described. We highlight the importance of preoperative imaging when planning resection of large masses to delineate the regional anatomy and the need for histological and genetic analysis to differentiate liposarcoma from lipoma due to their similar presentations.