Search

Lindsay A Petty,1 Oryan Henig,1 Twisha S Patel,2 Jason M Pogue,3 Keith S Kaye1 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 3Department of Pharmacy Services, Sinai-Grace Hospital, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA Abstract: There has been a worldwide increase in infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Meropenem-vaborbactam, a carbapenem antibiotic and novel boronic acid-based beta-lactamase inhibitor, is a fixed-dose combination product with potent in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae that are Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase producers. Meropenem-vaborbactam has been studied in two Phase III trials, Targeting Antibiotic Non-susceptible Gram-negative Organisms (TANGO)-I and TANGO-II. TANGO-I was a multicenter, international Phase III, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection, including acute pyelonephritis. Among patients with complicated urinary tract infection and growth of a baseline pathogen, meropenem-vaborbactam was determined to be superior to piperacillin-tazobactam based on the composite outcome of symptom improvement or resolution and microbial eradication at the end of intravenous therapy. TANGO-II was a multicenter, international, Phase III, randomized, prospective, open-label, comparative trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem-vaborbactam vs best available therapy for CRE infections. Treatment with meropenem-vaborbactam resulted in higher rates of clinical cure at the end of therapy (64.3%vs 33.3%, P=0.04). Additionally, 28-day all-cause mortality was 17.9% in the meropenem-vaborbactam group compared to 33.3% in the best available therapy group, a relative risk reduction of 46.5% (P=0.03). In addition to meropenem-vaborbactam, three other agents with activity against CRE are in late-stage development: imipenem-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. The data from Phase II and III studies will help to further define the role of these agents. Overall, the recent approval of meropenem-vaborbactam and the active pipeline for other agents with broad Gram-negative activity are encouraging developments on the CRE therapeutic front. Keywords: meropenem, vaborbactam, carbapenemase, CRE, UTI, KPC

Comorbidity is a known risk factor for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Although aggregate comorbidity measures are useful in epidemiologic research, none of the existing measures was developed for use with this outcome. This study compared the utility of two comorbidity measures, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Chronic Disease Score, in assessing the comorbidity-attributable risk of nosocomial infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Two case-control studies were conducted at the University of Maryland Medical System in Baltimore, Maryland. Cases were inpatients with a first positive clinical culture of MRSA or VRE at least 48 hours postadmission (July 1, 1998-July 1, 2001). Three inpatient controls were randomly selected per case. The MRSA study included 2,164 patients, and the VRE study included 1,948. The scores' discrimination and calibration were measured by using the c statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square test. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (c = 0.653) and Chronic Disease Score (c = 0.608) were similar discriminators of MRSA and VRE (c = 0.670 and c = 0.647, respectively). Calibration of the scores was poor for both outcomes (p < 0.05). A revised comorbidity measure specific to resistant infections would likely provide a better assessment of the comorbidity-attributable risk of antibiotic-resistant infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Environmental disinfection is essential for reducing spread of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Previous studies report conflicting results regarding the effects of ultraviolet (UV) light in reducing infections. This trial evaluated the impact of adding pulsed-xenon UV (PX-UV) to standard terminal cleaning in reducing environmentally implicated HAIs (eiHAIs)., Methods: The Lowering the Acquisition of MDROs with Pulsed-xenon (LAMP) trial was conducted in 2 hospitals (15 inpatient wards) utilizing a cluster-randomized, controlled, double-blinded, interventional crossover trial comparing standard terminal cleaning followed by either PX-UV (intervention arm) or sham (control arm) disinfection. The primary outcome was incidence of eiHAIs from clinical microbiology tests on the fourth day of stay or later or within 3 days after discharge from the study unit. EiHAIs included clinical cultures positive for vancomycin-resistant enterococci, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumonia, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Acinetobacter baumannii, and stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive for Clostridiodes difficile., Results: Between 18 May 2017 and 7 January 2020, 25 732 patients were included, with an incidence of 601 eiHAIs and 180 954 patient-days. There was no difference in the rate of eiHAIs in the intervention and sham arms (3.49 vs 3.17 infections/1000 patient-days, respectively; RR, 1.10; 95% CI, .94-1.29; P = .23). Study results were similar when stratified by eiHAI type, hospital, and unit type., Conclusions: The LAMP study failed to demonstrate an effect of the addition of UV light disinfection following terminal cleaning on reductions in rates of eiHAIs. Further investigations targeting hospital environmental surfaces and the role of no-touch technology to reduce HAIs are needed. Clinical Trials Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03349268; R01HS024709., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. C. J. received funding to their institution from US AHRQ grant/contract R01HS025598 and a US Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development (ORD) grant, and royalties from the US government (Department of Veterans Affairs) and Xenex. P. E. K. received grant/contracts to their institution from Moderna, Inc, Pfizer, GSK, and Merck; consulting fees from IgY LifeSciences; payments from Merck; and meeting/travel support for attending meetings and/or travel from IgY Lifesciences and Merck. M. J. C. received consulting fees from Xenex. T. C. received consulting fees, payments, or honoraria from Pfizer, Melinta, and Ferring. At the time of the study, S. E. was employed by Xenex. K. S. K. received consulting fees from Merck, Shionogi, AbbVie, Entasis, Qpex, Allecra, Carb-X, VenatoRx, MicuRx, and GSK. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute appendicitis. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Evaluation of relationships as potential conflicts of interest (COIs) is determined by a review process. The assessment of disclosed relationships for possible COIs is based on the relative weight of the financial relationship (ie, monetary amount) and the relevance of the relationship (ie, the degree to which an association might reasonably be interpreted by an independent observer as related to the topic or recommendation of consideration). A. W. C. receives honoraria from UpToDate, Inc, and serves on an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality technical expert panel for diagnosis of acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain (suspected acute appendicitis). J. R. B. serves as past president of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. M. S. E. receives royalties from UpToDate, Inc, as co-section editor of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. M. K. H. serves on the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Board of Directors. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute diverticulitis. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Evaluation of relationships as potential conflicts of interest (COIs) is determined by a review process. The assessment of disclosed relationships for possible COIs is based on the relative weight of the financial relationship (ie, monetary amount) and the relevance of the relationship (ie, the degree to which an association might reasonably be interpreted by an independent observer as related to the topic or recommendation of consideration). A. W. C. receives honoraria from UpToDate, Inc. J. R. B. serves as past president of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. M. S. E. receives royalties from UpToDate, Inc, as co-section editor of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. M. K. H. serves on the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Board of Directors. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This article is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this guideline, the panel provides recommendations for obtaining blood cultures in patients with known or suspected intra-abdominal infection. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Evaluation of relationships as potential conflicts of interest (COIs) is determined by a review process. The assessment of disclosed relationships for possible COIs is based on the relative weight of the financial relationship (ie, monetary amount) and the relevance of the relationship (ie, the degree to which an association might reasonably be interpreted by an independent observer as related to the topic or recommendation of consideration). A. W. C. receives honoraria from UpToDate, Inc; serves on an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality technical expert panel for diagnosis of acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain (suspected acute appendicitis); and has served as an advisor for GenMark Diagnostics, Inc, on molecular diagnostics for gastrointestinal pathogens. J. R. B. serves as past president of ESCMID. M. S. E. receives royalties from UpToDate, Inc, as co–section editor of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. M. K. H. serves on the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Board of Directors and has received free services from OpGen, Inc, for a research project. R. H. is an advisor for bioMérieux, Inc, and was previously an employee of Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc; has received research funding from bioMérieux, Inc; and has served as an advisor for Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides a recommendation for risk stratification according to severity of illness score. The panel's recommendation is based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adheres to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Evaluation of relationships as potential conflicts of interest (COIs) is determined by a review process. The assessment of disclosed relationships for possible COIs is based on the relative weight of the financial relationship (ie, monetary amount) and the relevance of the relationship (ie, the degree to which an association might reasonably be interpreted by an independent observer as related to the topic or recommendation of consideration). A. W. C. receives honoraria from UpToDate, Inc. J. R. B. serves as past president of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. M. S. E. receives royalties from UpToDate, Inc. as co-section editor of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. M. K. H. serves on the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Board of Directors. All other authors report no relevant disclosures. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This article is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this article, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute intra-abdominal abscess. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Evaluation of relationships as potential conflicts of interest (COIs) is determined by a review process. The assessment of disclosed relationships for possible COIs is based on the relative weight of the financial relationship (ie, monetary amount) and the relevance of the relationship (ie, the degree to which an association might reasonably be interpreted by an independent observer as related to the topic or recommendation of consideration). A. W. C. receives honoraria from UpToDate and serves on an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality technical expert panel for diagnosis of acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain (suspected acute appendicitis). M. S. E. receives royalties from UpToDate, as co-section editor of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. M. K. H. serves on the board of directors for the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. J. R. B. serves as past president of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for obtaining cultures of intra-abdominal fluid in patients with known or suspected intra-abdominal infection. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . Evaluation of relationships as potential conflicts of interest (COIs) is determined by a review process. The assessment of disclosed relationships for possible COIs is based on the relative weight of the financial relationship (ie, monetary amount) and the relevance of the relationship (ie, the degree to which an association might reasonably be interpreted by an independent observer as related to the topic or recommendation of consideration). A. W. C. receives honoraria from UpToDate, Inc.; serves on an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality technical expert panel for diagnosis of acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain (suspected acute appendicitis); and has served as an advisor for GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. on molecular diagnostics for gastrointestinal pathogens. J. R. B. serves as past president of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. M. S. E. receives royalties from UpToDate, Inc. as co-section editor of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. M. K. H. serves on the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Board of Directors and has received free services from OpGen, Inc. for a research project. R. H. is an advisor for bioMerieux, Inc. and was previously an employee of Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc.; has received research funding from bioMerieux, Inc.; and served as an advisor for Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. All other authors reported no relevant disclosures. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

As the first part of an update to the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the panel presents 21 updated recommendations. These recommendations span risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Evaluation of relationships as potential conflicts of interest (COIs) is determined by a review process. The assessment of disclosed relationships for possible conflicts of interest is based on the relative weight of the financial relationship (ie, monetary amount) and the relevance of the relationship (ie, the degree to which an association might reasonably be interpreted by an independent observer as related to the topic or recommendation of consideration). A. W. C. receives honoraria from UpToDate, Inc.; serves on an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality technical expert panel for diagnosis of acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain (suspected acute appendicitis); and has served as an advisor for GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. on molecular diagnostics for gastrointestinal pathogens. J. R. B. serves as past president of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. M. S. E. receives royalties from UpToDate, Inc. as co-section editor of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. M. H. serves on the Society Healthcare Epidemiology of America Board of Directors and has received free services from OpGen, Inc. for a research project. R. H. is an advisor for bioMérieux, Inc. and was previously an employee of Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc.; has received research funding from bioMérieux, Inc.; and served as an advisor for Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Use of anti-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (anti-CRE) agents such as ceftazidime/avibactam has been associated with improved clinical outcome in cohorts that primarily include patients infected with CRE that are resistant to meropenem (MCRE)., Objectives: To clarify whether patients with CRE resistant to ertapenem but susceptible to meropenem (ertapenem-only-resistant Enterobacterales; EORE) benefit from therapy with anti-CRE agents., Methods: Patients treated for CRE infection in hospitals in the USA between 2016 and 2019 and enrolled in the CRACKLE-2 study were included. The primary outcome was the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) assessed at 30 days after index cultures., Results: The EORE group included 213 patients and the MCRE group included 643. The demographics were similar between the groups except for the patients' race and origin before admission. The MCRE group received anti-CRE agents for definitive therapy significantly more frequently compared with the EORE group (30% versus 5% for ceftazidime/avibactam). We did not observe a significant difference between the groups in the adjusted DOOR probability of a more desirable outcome for a randomly selected patient in the EORE group compared with the MCRE group (52.5%; 95% CI, 48.3%-56.7%). The MCRE group had a similar proportion of patients who died at 30 days (26% versus 21%) and who were discharged to home (29% versus 40%), compared with the EORE group., Conclusions: Patients with clinical EORE infection rarely received anti-CRE agents, but attained similar outcomes compared with patients with MCRE infection. The findings support current IDSA treatment guidance for meropenem- or imipenem-based therapy for treatment of EORE infections., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacterales are a global health threat. There are limited surveillance data available to characterize the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among outpatients in the United States (US)., Methods: This retrospective cohort (database) study investigated co-resistance among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary isolates from US female outpatients aged ≥ 12 years with presumed uncomplicated UTI (uUTI), ≥ 3 months of data (2011-2019), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. Eligible isolates were the first urinary E. coli or K. pneumoniae isolate per patient collected within 30 days; classified as not susceptible (NS) if antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were intermediate or resistant to each antibiotic tested. Four resistance phenotypes were identified: NS to fluoroquinolones (FQ), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), nitrofurantoin (NTF), and extended-spectrum β-lactamase+/third-generation cephalosporin (ESBL+/3GC NS). Co-resistance phenotypes included all possible combinations of resistance to ≥ 2 drug classes., Results: Of 1,513,882 E. coli isolates and 250,719 K. pneumoniae isolates, 856,918 and 187,459 isolates with ≥ 1 resistance phenotype were included in the analysis, respectively. The most common resistance phenotypes were SXT NS for the E. coli isolates (44.8%) and NTF NS for the K. pneumoniae isolates (75.5%), while ESBL+/3GC NS comprised 11.2 and 5.9%, respectively. Among ESBL+/3GC NS E. coli isolates, 72.4, 56.7, and 46.6% were co-resistant to FQ, SXT, and FQ + SXT, respectively. For ESBL+/3GC NS K. pneumoniae isolates, 65.7 and 45.7% were co-resistant to SXT and FQ + SXT., Conclusion: Both species exhibited high rates of co-resistance, emphasizing the need to raise awareness of co-resistance and of the unmet need for effective treatment options for uUTI., (© 2024. GSK.)

Background: Novel treatments are needed for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, particularly for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Exebacase is a first-in-class antistaphylococcal lysin that is rapidly bactericidal and synergizes with antibiotics., Methods: In Direct Lysis of Staph Aureus Resistant Pathogen Trial of Exebacase (DISRUPT), a superiority-design phase 3 study, patients with S. aureus bacteremia/endocarditis were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of intravenous exebacase or placebo in addition to standard-of-care antibiotics. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical response at day 14 in the MRSA population., Results: A total of 259 patients were randomized before the study was stopped for futility based on the recommendation of the unblinded Data Safety Monitoring Board. Clinical response rates at day 14 in the MRSA population (n = 97) were 50.0% (exebacase + antibiotics; 32/64) versus 60.6% (antibiotics alone; 20/33) (P = .392). Overall, rates of adverse events were similar across groups. No adverse events of hypersensitivity related to exebacase were reported., Conclusions: Exebacase + antibiotics failed to improve clinical response at day 14 in patients with MRSA bacteremia/endocarditis. This result was unexpected based on phase 2 data that established proof-of-concept for exebacase + antibiotics in patients with MRSA bacteremia/endocarditis. In the antibiotics-alone group, the clinical response rate was higher than that seen in phase 2. Heterogeneity within the study population and a relatively small sample size in either the phase 2 or phase 3 studies may have increased the probability of imbalances in the multiple components of day 14 clinical outcome. This study provides lessons for future superiority studies in S. aureus bacteremia/endocarditis. Clinical Trials Registration.NCT04160468., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. V. G. F. reports grants to his institution and personal consulting fees from ContraFect. Grants/research support: MedImmune, Cerexa/Forest/Actavis/Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Cubist/Merck, Medical Biosurfaces, Locus, Affinergy, ContraFect, Karius, Genentech, Regeneron, Basilea. Paid Consultant: Pfizer, Novartis, Galderma, Novadigm, Durata, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, Medicines Co., Cerexa, Tetraphase, Trius, MedImmune, Bayer, Theravance, Cubist, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, xBiotech, ContraFect, Regeneron, Basilea, Destiny. Membership: Merck Co-Chair V710 Vaccine. Educational fees: Green Cross, Cubist, Cerexa, Durata, Theravance; Debiopharm. Royalties: UpToDate. Patent pending: sepsis diagnostics. ArcBio and Valanbio stock. A. F. D. reports personal consulting fees from ContraFect, Achaogen, IterumTx, Paratek, Nabriva, Wockhardt, UTILITY, Zavante, Tetraphase, Theravance, and Cempra. Membership: Scynexis. Stock options from Utility. J. L. D. reports personal consulting fees and membership for ContraFect. J. E. A. is an employee of ContraFect and has a PCT Application with publication no. W0/2022/261360 and reports grants from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CONTRAFECT20XO-SC; CONTRAFECT21WO-SC). R. S. is an employee of ContraFect and has US Patent No. 9,889,181 issued and US Patent No. 9,499,594 issued, stock options and support for meetings and/or travel from ContraFect. R. P. is an employee of ContraFect. C. C. was an employee of ContraFect and reports stock options from ContraFect. L. J. P. reports grants from ContraFect. G. J. M. reports grants from ContraFect; grants and personal consulting fees from Nabriva. Consulting fees and stock options for Light AT, payment for lectures from Hippo Education. M. E. R. reports grants from ContraFect and Magnolia; personal consulting fees from Citius, Teleflex, Armata, and 3M. Payment for lectures from ACP- Dynamed, Membership: Armata Pharmaceuticals. A. M. L. reports grants/research support from ContraFect, Cidara, Veru, Shionogi, and Novartis. J. L. K. reports grants from ContraFect, bioMeriuex, Entasis, Food and Drug Administration, Merck, Pfizer, Shionogi, and Venatorx; consulting/advisory board/speaker fees from Abbvie, GSK, and Shionogi. R. A. W. reports personal consulting fees from ContraFect, Pulmonx, Roche, Merck, AbbVie, Kamada, Galderma, AstraZeneca, Savara, Bristol-Myers, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Chiesi; grants from Shinogi, Sanofi-Aventis, AstraZeneca, Verona, and Chiesi, Pfizer, Moderna. Membership: ContraFect. K. S. K. reports personal consulting fees from ContraFect, Merck, Spero, Abbvie, Allecra, Carb-X, Shionogi, VenatoRX, MicuRx, Glaxo SmithKline, Entasis; DSMB for Entasis. Membership: Venato-Rx, Meiji, ContraFect M. J. Z. reports personal consulting fees from ContraFect; grants from Pfizer, Merck, Medimmune, and Genetech. W. G. N. reports personal consulting fees from ContraFect and Istari Oncology, stock options from ContraFect Corporation Inc. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To assess risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR) and extended-β-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa (EBR) infection/colonization, and to develop and compare tools for predicting isolation of CR and EBR from clinical cultures., Methods: This retrospective study analysed hospitalized patients with positive P. aeruginosa cultures between 2015 and 2021. Two case-control analyses were performed to identify risk factors and develop scoring tools for distinguishing patients with CR versus carbapenem-susceptible (CS) P. aeruginosa and EBR versus CS P. aeruginosa. The performance of institutionally derived scores, externally derived scores and the presence/absence of key risk factors to predict CR and EBR were then compared., Results: A total of 2379 patients were included. Of these, 8.3% had a positive culture for CR, 5.0% for EBR and 86.7% for CS P. aeruginosa. There was substantial overlap in risk factors for CR and EBR. Institutional risk scores demonstrated modestly higher area under the ROC curve values than external scores for predicting CR (0.67 versus 0.58) and EBR (0.76 versus 0.70). Assessing the presence/absence of ≥1 of the two strongest predictors (prior carbapenem use or CR isolation within 90 days) was slightly inferior to scoring tools for predicting CR, and comparable for predicting EBR., Conclusions: Clinicians concerned about CR in P. aeruginosa should consider the likelihood of EBR when making treatment decisions. A simple approach of assessing recent history of CR isolation or carbapenem usage performed similarly to more complex scoring tools and offers a more pragmatic way of identifying patients who require coverage for resistant P. aeruginosa., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In this study, the authors review antibiotic treatment options for both acute uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infection (UTI). In addition, they also review regimens used in the setting of drug-resistant pathogens including vancomycin resistant Enterococcus, extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterals, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterals and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas, which are encountered with increasing frequency., Competing Interests: Disclosure A. Yassin has no conflict of interest to disclose. T. Bhowmick served on the advisory board for Shionogi. K.S. Kaye serves as a consultant for Merck, Shionogi, Allecra, AbbVie, VenatorRx, Carb-X, Contrafect and Spero. He also participated on the advisory board for VenatoRx, DMID and Contrafact., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The FDA issued a "black box" warning regarding risks of fluoroquinolones in 2008 with updates in 2011, 2013, and 2016., Objective: To examine antimicrobial use in hospital-treated UTIs from 2000 to 2020., Design: Cross-sectional study with interrupted time series analysis., Participants: Patient encounters with a diagnosis of UTI from January 2000 to March 2020, excluding diagnoses of renal abscess, chronic cystitis, and infection of the gastrointestinal tract, lungs, or prostate., Main Measures: Monthly use of fluoroquinolone and non-fluoroquinolone antibiotics were assessed. Fluoroquinolone resistance was assessed in available cultures. Interrupted time series analysis examined level and trend changes of antimicrobial use with each FDA label change., Key Results: A total of 9,950,790 patient encounters were included. From July 2008 to March 2020, fluoroquinolone use declined from 61.7% to 11.7%, with similar negative trends observed in inpatients and outpatients, age ≥ 60 and < 60 years, males and females, patients with and without pyelonephritis, and across physician specialties. Ceftriaxone use increased from 26.4% encounters in July 2008 to 63.6% of encounters in March 2020. Among encounters with available culture data, fluoroquinolone resistance declined by 28.9% from 2009 to 2020. On interrupted time series analysis, the July 2008 FDA warning was associated with a trend change (-0.32%, < 0.001) and level change (-5.02%, p < 0.001) in monthly fluoroquinolone use., Conclusions: During this era of "black box" warnings, there was a decline in fluoroquinolone use for hospital-treated UTI with a concomitant decline in fluoroquinolone resistance and rise in ceftriaxone use. Efforts to restrict use of a medication class may lead to compensatory increases in use of a single alternative agent with changes in antimicrobial resistance profiles., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.)

Antimicrobial resistance in uropathogens commonly causing urinary tract infections (UTIs) is a growing problem internationally. Pivmecillinam, the oral prodrug of mecillinam, has been used for over 40 years, primarily in Northern Europe and Canada. It is recommended in several countries as a first-line agent for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs (uUTIs) and is now approved in the United States. We performed a structured literature search to review the available evidence on susceptibility of common uUTI-causing uropathogens to mecillinam. Among 38 studies included in this literature review, susceptibility rates for Escherichia coli to mecillinam-including resistant phenotypes such as extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli -exceed 90% in most studies. High rates of susceptibility were also reported among many other uropathogens including Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and Citrobacter spp. In the current prescribing climate within the United States, pivmecillinam represents a viable first-line treatment option for patients with uUTI., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. T.L.: consultant and advisory board member for UTILITY therapeutics. K.S.K.: consultant for AbbVie, CARB-X, GSK, Merck, and Shionogi. A.S.H.: consultant for UTILITY therapeutics. G.K.: no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Although the incidence of hospital-associated respiratory virus infection (HARVI) is well recognized, the risk factors for infection and impact on patient outcomes are not well characterized., Methods: We identified a cohort of all inpatient admissions ≥24 hours duration at a single academic medical center from 2017 to 2020. HARVI were defined as respiratory virus detected in a test ordered after the 95th percentile of the virus-specific incubation period. Risk factors for HARVI were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models of the competing outcomes of HARVI and discharge. The associations between time-varying HARVI status and the rates of ICU admission, discharge, and in-hospital death were estimated using Cox-proportional hazards models in a competing risk framework., Results: HARVI incidences were 8.8 and 3.0 per 10,000 admission days for pediatric and adult patients, respectively. For adults, congestive heart failure, renal disease, and cancer increased HARVI risk independent of their associations with length of stay. HARVI risk was also elevated for patients admitted in September-June relative to July admissions. For pediatric patients, cardiovascular and respiratory conditions, cancer, medical device dependence, and admission in December increased HARVI risk. Lengths of stay were longer for adults with HARVI compared to those without, and hospital-associated influenza A was associated with increased risk of death. Rates of ICU admission were increased in the 5 days after HARVI identification for adult and pediatric patients. HARVI was not associated with length of stay or death among pediatric patients., Conclusions: HARVI is associated chronic health conditions and increases morbidity and mortality.

Objective: To investigate the source and transmission dynamics of an endoscope-associated New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumonia (NDM-KP) outbreak., Design: Epidemiological and genomic investigation., Setting: Academic acute care hospital in New Jersey., Patients: Five patients with active NDM-KP infection identified on clinical isolates, and four NDM-KP colonized patients identified via rectal swab screening., Results: Over a twelve-month period, nine patients were identified with NDM-KP infection or colonization. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that all of the identified cases were related by 25 mutational events or less. Seven of the cases were linked to gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (four clinical cases and three positive screens among patients exposed to endoscopes suspected of transmission). Two cases demonstrated delayed transmission that occurred five months after the initial outbreak, likely through shared usage of a non-therapeutic gastroscope without an elevator channel., Conclusions: Although all endoscope cultures in our investigation were negative, the epidemiological link to gastrointestinal endoscopes, the high degree of relatedness via WGS, and the identification of asymptomatic NDM-KP colonization among patients exposed to shared endoscopes make the endoscopic mode of transmission most likely. This investigation highlights the probable transmission of NDM-KP via a gastroscope without an elevator channel, observed several months after an initial outbreak. We hypothesize that persistent mechanical defects may have contributed to the delayed device-related transmission of NDM-KP.

Objectives: Diagnostic error in the use of respiratory cultures for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) fuels misdiagnosis and antibiotic overuse within intensive care units. In this prospective quasi-experimental study (NCT05176353), we aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a novel VAP-specific bundled diagnostic stewardship intervention (VAP-DSI) to mitigate VAP over-diagnosis/overtreatment., Methods: We developed and implemented a VAP-DSI using an interruptive clinical decision support tool and modifications to clinical laboratory workflows. Interventions included gatekeeping access to respiratory culture ordering, preferential use of non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage for culture collection, and suppression of culture results for samples with minimal alveolar neutrophilia. Rates of adverse safety outcomes, positive respiratory cultures, and antimicrobial utilization were compared between mechanically ventilated patients (MVPs) in the 1-year post-intervention study cohort (2022-2023) and 5-year pre-intervention MVP controls (2017-2022)., Results: VAP-DSI implementation did not associate with increases in adverse safety outcomes but did associate with a 20% rate reduction in positive respiratory cultures per 1000 MVP days (pre-intervention rate 127 [95% CI: 122-131], post-intervention rate 102 [95% CI: 92-112], p < 0.01). Significant reductions in broad-spectrum antibiotic days of therapy per 1000 MVP days were noted after VAP-DSI implementation (pre-intervention rate 1199 [95% CI: 1177-1205], post-intervention rate 1149 [95% CI: 1116-1184], p 0.03)., Discussion: Implementation of a VAP-DSI was safe and associated with significant reductions in rates of positive respiratory cultures and broad-spectrum antimicrobial use. This innovative trial of a VAP-DSI represents a novel avenue for intensive care unit antimicrobial stewardship. Multicentre trials of VAP-DSIs are warranted., (Copyright © 2023 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) occurs frequently, and concomitant antibiotic (CA) during the initial episode for treatment of non-CDI is a major risk factor. We sought to address the comparative efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the setting of CA during the initial CDI episode., Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label trial at 2 hospitals in Ann Arbor, Michigan. We consecutively consented and enrolled hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with diarrhea, a positive test for C. difficile, and ≥1 qualifying CA. Complicated CDI, CDI treatment for >24 hours prior to enrollment, and planned long-term (>12 weeks) CA use were notable exclusions. Clinical cure was defined as resolution of diarrhea for 2 consecutive days maintained until 2 days after therapy, and rCDI as recurrent diarrhea with positive testing ≤30 days after initial treatment. Patients were randomized to fidaxomicin or vancomycin., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups of 144 patients. Rates of clinical cure (73% vs 62.9%, P = .195) and rCDI (3.3% vs 4.0%; P > .99) were similar for fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol cohorts, respectively. Only 4 patients developed rCDI., Conclusions: In this study of patients with CDI receiving CA, a numerically higher proportion were cured with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin, but this result did not reach statistical significance. Overall recurrence was lower than anticipated in both arms compared with previous studies that did not extend duration of CDI treatment during CA., Clinical Trials Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02692651)., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. K. R. is supported, in part, by an investigator-initiated grant from Merck & Co, Inc, and he has consulted for Seres Therapeutics, Inc, Rebiotix, Inc, and Summit Therapeutics, Inc. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Antimicrobial resistance research in uncomplicated urinary tract infection typically focuses on the main causative pathogen, Escherichia coli; however, little is known about the antimicrobial resistance burden of Klebsiella species, which can also cause uncomplicated urinary tract infections. This retrospective cohort study assessed the prevalence and geographic distribution of antimicrobial resistance among Klebsiella species and antimicrobial resistance trends for K. pneumoniae in the United States (2011-2019)., Methods: K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca urine isolates (30-day, non-duplicate) among female outpatients (aged ≥ 12 years) with presumed uUTI at 304 centers in the United States were classified by resistance phenotype(s): not susceptible to nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, or fluoroquinolone, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-positive/not susceptible; and multidrug-resistant based on ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 resistance phenotypes. Antimicrobial resistance prevalence by census division and age, as well as antimicrobial resistance trends over time for Klebsiella species, were assessed using generalized estimating equations., Results: 270,552 Klebsiella species isolates were evaluated (250,719 K. pneumoniae; 19,833 K. oxytoca). The most frequent resistance phenotypes in 2019 were nitrofurantoin not susceptible (Klebsiella species: 54.0%; K. pneumoniae: 57.3%; K. oxytoca: 15.1%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole not susceptible (Klebsiella species: 10.4%; K. pneumoniae: 10.6%; K. oxytoca: 8.6%). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-positive/not susceptible prevalence was 5.4%, 5.3%, and 6.8%, respectively. K. pneumoniae resistance phenotype prevalence varied (p < 0.0001) geographically and by age, and increased over time (except for the nitrofurantoin not susceptible phenotype, which was stable and > 50% throughout)., Conclusions: There is a high antimicrobial resistance prevalence and increasing antimicrobial resistance trends among K. pneumoniae isolates from female outpatients in the United States with presumed uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Awareness of K. pneumoniae antimicrobial resistance helps to optimize empiric uncomplicated urinary tract infection treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Meropenem therapy will be open-label, while tobramycin or placebo will be administered in a double-blind fashion. The primary trial endpoint will be a composite hierarchical outcome of 1) 28-day all-cause mortality, 2) ventilator-free days, and 3) modified time to clinical stability, evaluated using a win ratio methodology (see below). Secondary trial outcomes will include frequency of safety events (acute kidney injury), resolution of circulatory shock, recurrent HABP, and emergence of meropenem resistance both during treatment and in cases of recurrent infection. Using simulation studies to inform sample size calculations, we estimate that recruitment of 130 patients per treatment arm would provide at least 80% power to detect a win ratio of 1.50 while preserving a two-sided type 1 error rate of 0.05., (Copyright © 2023 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

With the increase in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) infections, there has been a resurgence in the use of polymyxins, specifically colistin (COL). Since the reintroduction of COL-based regimens in treating CRAB infections, several COL-resistant A. baumannii isolates have been identified, with the mechanism of resistance heavily linked with the loss of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) layer of the bacterial outer membrane through mutations in lpxACD genes or the pmrCAB operon. SPR206, a novel polymyxin derivative, has exhibited robust activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii . However, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding its efficacy in comparison with other A. baumannii -active therapeutics and whether traditional polymyxin (COL) mediators of A. baumannii resistance also translate to reduced SPR206 activity. Here, we conducted susceptibility testing using broth microdilution on 30 A. baumannii isolates (17 COL-resistant and 27 CRAB), selected 14 COL-resistant isolates for genomic sequencing analysis, and performed time-kill analyses on four COL-resistant isolates. In susceptibility testing, SPR206 demonstrated a lower range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) compared with COL, with a four-fold difference observed in MIC 50 values. Mutations in lpxACD and/or pmrA and pmrB genes were detected in each of the 14 COL-resistant isolates; however, SPR206 maintained MICs ≤ 2 mg/L for 9/14 (64%) of the isolates. Finally, SPR206-based combination regimens exhibited increased synergistic and bactericidal activity compared with COL-based combination regimens irrespective of the multiple resistance genes detected. The results of this study highlight the potential utility of SPR206 in the treatment of COL-resistant A. baumannii infections.

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a pathogen-targeted β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) in patients 18 years of age and older. Sulbactam is a penicillin derivative with antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter but is prone to hydrolysis by β-lactamases encoded by contemporary isolates. Durlobactam is a diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Ambler classes A, C and D serine β-lactamases that restores sulbactam activity both in vitro and in vivo against multidrug-resistant ABC. Sulbactam-durlobactam is a promising alternative therapy for the treatment of serious Acinetobacter infections, which can have high rates of mortality.

In the past decade, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GN) bacterial infections has increased significantly, leading to higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Treating these infections poses numerous challenges, particularly when selecting appropriate empiric therapy for critically ill patients for whom the margin for error is low. Fortunately, the availability of new therapies has improved the treatment landscape, offering safer and more effective options. However, there remains a need to establish and implement optimal clinical and therapeutic approaches for managing these infections. Here, we review strategies for identifying patients at risk for MDR-GN infections, propose a framework for the choice of empiric and definitive treatment, and explore effective multidisciplinary approaches to managing patients in the hospital while ensuring a safe transition to outpatient settings., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. J. M. P. reports a grant from Merck and consulting fees from Merck, Shionogi, AbbVie, Entasis, Qpex, Melinta, La Jolla, and VenatoRx. R. G. S. reports consulting fees from AbbVie and MoInIycke and serving as a board member of the Surgical Infection Society Foundation. K. S. K. reports a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; consulting fees from Shionogi, Allecra, Spero, Qpex, Merck, GSK, VenatoRx, MicuRx, and Entasis; participation on advisory boards for VenatoRx, Entasis, the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases of the NIH, and Meji Seika Pharma; and having stock in Merck.All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: We evaluated the outcomes associated with initial antibiotic management strategies for infected diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) diagnosed in an outpatient multidisciplinary center., Methods: Consecutive outpatient individuals with infected DFUs, stratified according to Infectious Diseases Society of America infection severity, were followed for 1 year from the initial antibiotic administration to treat acute infection. The main outcomes were hospitalization rates for a diabetes-related foot complication within 30 days of diagnosis and requiring an amputation or death during follow-up. Outcomes were analyzed by regression analysis, accounting for demographics, clinical characteristics, and antibiotic therapy., Results: Among 147 outpatients with infected DFUs, 116 were included. Infections were categorized as mild (68%), moderate (26%), and severe (6%). Empirical antibiotics (not culture-guided) were prescribed as initial treatment in 39 individuals, while 77 received culture-based antibiotics. There were no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the antibiotic administration groups, except for a higher body mass index and prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the empirical cohort. Forty-two infected DFU patients required hospitalization within 30 days of diagnosis for the same reason. The relative risk for hospitalizations was 1.87 greater in those with mild infections when treated with empirical antibiotics compared with culture-directed antibiotics. There were no differences in amputations and/or death at 1 year follow-up., Conclusions: These data support obtaining tissue culture to guide antibiotic therapy, regardless of DFU infection severity, to decrease hospitalizations., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: no reported conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Since the initial publication of A Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections in Acute Care Hospitals in 2008, the prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) has continued to be a national priority. Progress in healthcare epidemiology, infection prevention, antimicrobial stewardship, and implementation science research has led to improvements in our understanding of effective strategies for HAI prevention. Despite these advances, HAIs continue to affect ∼1 of every 31 hospitalized patients, leading to substantial morbidity, mortality, and excess healthcare expenditures, and persistent gaps remain between what is recommended and what is practiced.The widespread impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on HAI outcomes in acute-care hospitals has further highlighted the essential role of infection prevention programs and the critical importance of prioritizing efforts that can be sustained even in the face of resource requirements from COVID-19 and future infectious diseases crises.The Compendium: 2022 Updates document provides acute-care hospitals with up-to-date, practical expert guidance to assist in prioritizing and implementing HAI prevention efforts. It is the product of a highly collaborative effort led by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of organizations and societies with content expertise, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (PIDS), the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), the Society for Hospital Medicine (SHM), the Surgical Infection Society (SIS), and others.

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb) is one of the most problematic antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. We sought to elucidate the international epidemiology and clinical impact of CRAb., Methods: In a prospective observational cohort study, 842 hospitalized patients with a clinical CRAb culture were enrolled at 46 hospitals in five global regions between 2017 and 2019. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days from the index culture. The strains underwent whole-genome analysis., Results: Of 842 cases, 536 (64%) represented infection. By 30 days, 128 (24%) of the infected patients died, ranging from 1 (6%) of 18 in Australia-Singapore to 54 (25%) of 216 in the United States and 24 (49%) of 49 in South-Central America, whereas 42 (14%) of non-infected patients died. Bacteremia was associated with a higher risk of death compared with other types of infection (40 [42%] of 96 vs. 88 [20%] of 440). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, bloodstream infection and higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Clonal group 2 (CG2) strains predominated except in South-Central America, ranging from 216 (59%) of 369 in the United States to 282 (97%) of 291 in China. Acquired carbapenemase genes were carried by 769 (91%) of the 842 isolates. CG2 strains were significantly associated with higher levels of meropenem resistance, yet non-CG2 cases were over-represented among the deaths compared with CG2 cases., Conclusions: CRAb infection types and clinical outcomes differed significantly across regions. While CG2 strains remained predominant, non-CG2 strains were associated with higher mortality., Clinicaltrials.gov: #NCT03646227., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model with data from the largest polymyxin B-treated patient population studied to date to optimize its dosing in hospitalized patients., Methods: Hospitalized patients receiving intravenous polymyxin B for ≥48 hours were enrolled. Blood samples were collected at steady state and drug concentrations were analysed by liquid chromotography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Population PK analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA)., Results: One hundred and forty-two patients received intravenous polymyxin B (1.33-6 mg/kg/day), providing 681 plasma samples. Twenty-four patients were on renal replacement therapy, including 13 on continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). A 2-compartment model adequately described the PK with body weight as a covariate on the volume of distribution that affected C max , but it did not impact clearance or exposure. Creatinine clearance was a statistically significant covariate on clearance, although clinically relevant variations of dose-normalized drug exposure were not observed across a wide creatinine clearance range. The model described higher clearance in CVVHDF patients than in non-CVVHDF patients. Maintenance doses of ≥2.5 mg/kg/day or ≥150 mg/day had a PTA ≥90% (for non-pulmonary infections target) at a steady state for minimum inhibitory concentrations ≤2 mg/L. The PTA at a steady state for CVVHDF patients was lower., Discussion: Fixed loading and maintenance doses of polymyxin B seemed to be more appropriate than weight-based dosing regimens in patients weighing 45-90 kg. Higher doses may be needed in patients on CVVHDF. Substantial variability in polymyxin B clearance and volume of distribution was found, suggesting that therapeutic drug monitoring may be indicated., (Copyright © 2023 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: An urgent need exists for antibiotics to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Sulbactam-durlobactam is a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Acinetobacter, including multidrug-resistant strains. In a phase 3, pathogen-specific, randomised controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin, both in combination with imipenem-cilastatin as background therapy, in patients with serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC., Methods: The ATTACK trial was done at 59 clinical sites in 16 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with ABC-confirmed hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, ventilated pneumonia, or bloodstream infections were randomised 1:1 using a block size of four to sulbactam-durlobactam (1·0 g of each drug in combination over 3 h every 6 h) or colistin (2·5 mg/kg over 30 min every 12 h) for 7-14 days. All patients received imipenem-cilastatin (1·0 g of each drug in combination over 1 h every 6 h) as background therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with laboratory-confirmed carbapenem-resistant ABC (the carbapenem-resistant ABC microbiologically modified intention-to-treat population). Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference was less than +20%. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of nephrotoxicity assessed using modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease criteria measured by creatinine level or glomerular filtration rate through day 42. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03894046., Findings: Between Sep 5, 2019, and July 26, 2021, 181 patients were randomly assigned to sulbactam-durlobactam or colistin (176 hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, or ventilated pneumonia; and five bloodstream infections); 125 patients with laboratory-confirmed carbapenem-resistant ABC isolates were included in the primary efficacy analysis. 28-day all-cause mortality was 12 (19%) of 63 in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 20 (32%) of 62 in the colistin group, a difference of -13·2% (95% CI -30·0 to 3·5), which met criteria for non-inferiority. Incidence of nephrotoxicity was significantly (p<0·001) lower with sulbactam-durlobactam than colistin (12 [13%] of 91 vs 32 [38%] of 85). Serious adverse events were reported in 36 (40%) of 91 patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 42 (49%) of 86 patients in the colistin group. Treatment-related adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation were reported in ten (11%) of 91 patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 14 (16%) of 86 patients in the colistin group., Interpretation: Our data show that sulbactam-durlobactam was non-inferior to colistin, both agents given in combination with imipenem-cilastatin, for the primary endpoint of 28-day all-cause mortality. Sulbactam-durlobactam was well tolerated and could be an effective intervention to reduce mortality from serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC, including multidrug-resistant strains., Funding: Entasis Therapeutics and Zai Lab., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KSK was a member of the data safety monitoring committee for the ATTACK study and has received consulting fees from Entasis Therapeutics, Merck, Shionogi, Qpex Biopharma, GlaxoSmithKline, MicuRx Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals, and Allecra Therapeutics, and owns stock options in Merck. AFS is a member of the scientific and clinical board for Entasis Therapeutics and has received consulting fees from Entasis Therapeutics. RGW has received consulting fees from Entasis Therapeutics, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals, Merck, and Shionogi, and speaker fees from bioMérieux. The study institutions for BD and RGW received funding from Zai Lab or Entasis Therapeutics, or both, for provision of study materials and drugs. At the time of the study, GEP, KR, AM, DL, JO’D, SS, RI, and DA were employees of Entasis Therapeutics. RI has provided general consulting services to Entasis Therapeutics. At the time of the study, LC and HR were employees of and owned stock in Zai Lab., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Resistant gram-negative bacteria (R-GNB) colonization in nursing home patients can cause clinical infection and intrafacility transmission. Limited data exist on the roles of age and function on R-GNB colonization., Methods: A secondary data analysis was performed from a cohort study of 896 patients admitted to 6 Michigan nursing homes between November 2013 and May 2018. Swabs obtained upon enrollment, weekly for 1 month, then monthly until nursing home discharge from 5 anatomical sites were cultured for GNB. R-GNB were defined as resistant to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, or imipenem. Patients with growth of the same R-GNB as the initial positive visit, from any anatomical site at any subsequent visit, were considered persistently colonized. Demographic data, antibiotic use, device use, and physical self-maintenance scales (PSMSs) were obtained upon enrollment. Characteristics were compared between patients with R-GNB colonization versus those without, and those with persistent R-GNB colonization versus those with spontaneous decolonization., Results: Of 169 patients with a positive R-GNB culture and ≥2 subsequent study visits, 89 (53%) were transiently colonized and 80 (47%) were persistently colonized. Compared to uncolonized patients, persistent and transient R-GNB colonization were associated with higher PSMS score: 1.14 (95% confidence interval or CI, 1.05-1.23; P = .002) and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01-1.19; P = .023), respectively. Persistent colonization was independently associated with longer duration of nursing home stay (1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02; P < .001). Higher readmission rate among persistently colonized patients was observed on unadjusted analysis., Conclusions: Persistent R-GNB colonization is associated with younger age, functional disability, and prolonged length of nursing home stay. In-depth longitudinal studies to understand new acquisition and transmission dynamics of R-GNB in nursing homes are needed.

Colistin heteroresistance (HR) refers to a bacterial population comprised of several subpopulations with different levels of resistance to colistin. In this study, we discuss the classic form of HR, in which a resistant subpopulation exists within a predominantly susceptible population. We investigated the prevalence of colistin HR and its evolution into full resistance among 173 clinical carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and examined the effect of HR on clinical outcomes. To determine HR, we performed population analysis profiling. Our results showed a high prevalence of HR (67.1%). To examine evolution of HR strains into full resistance, the HR strains were grown in colistin-containing broth, transferred onto colistin-containing plates, and colonies on these plates were transferred into colistin-free broth. Many of the HR strains (80.2%) evolved into full resistance, 17.2% reverted to HR, and 2.6% were borderline. We used logistic regression to compare 14-day clinical failure and 14-day mortality between patients infected by HR versus susceptible non-HR carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. In the subgroup of patients with bacteremia, HR was significantly associated with 14-day mortality. IMPORTANCE To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study to report on HR in Gram-negative bacteria. We described the prevalence of colistin HR in a large sample of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates, the evolution of many colistin HR isolates to a resistant phenotype following colistin exposure and withdrawal, and the clinical consequences of colistin HR. We found a high prevalence of HR among clinical carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates; most evolved into a resistant phenotype following colistin exposure and withdrawal. In patients treated with colistin, evolution of HR A. baumannii into full resistance could lead to higher rates of treatment failure and contribute to the reservoir of colistin-resistant pathogens in health care settings., Competing Interests: The authors declare a conflict of interest. E.D.M. reports grants and/or personal fees from Pfizer, M.S.D., Rosh, Anglini, Nordic Pharma, and Sanofi-Aventis. G.L.D. reports grants and/or personal fees from Pfizer, Menarini, and M.S.D. K.S.K. reports grants and/or personal fees from Spero Therapeutics, Q.P.E.X., and MicuRx. M.P. reports grants and/or personal fees from Shionogi and Pfizer. Y.C. reports grants and/or personal fees from Allecra Therapeutics, Genentech, Nabriva Therapeutics, Pfizer, PPD, Q.P.E.X. Biopharma, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Spero Therapeutics, VenatoRX Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have no interests to declare.

Background: Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), including multidrug resistance (MDR), among Escherichia coli (E. coli) makes treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) difficult. We assessed risk factors for fluoroquinolone (FQ)-not-susceptible (NS) and MDR E. coli among US female outpatients., Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from female outpatients aged ≥ 12 years with E. coli positive urine culture and oral antimicrobial prescription ± 1 day from index. We assessed patient-level factors within 90 and 91-360 days prior to index as predictors of FQ NS (intermediate/resistant) and MDR (NS to ≥ 1 drug across ≥ 3 classes) E. coli: age, prior oral antimicrobial dispensing, prior AMR phenotypes, prior urine culture, and prior hospitalization., Results: Among 1,858 outpatients with urine-isolated E. coli, 369 (19.9%) had FQ NS and 59 (3.2%) had MDR isolates. After multivariable adjustment, independent risk factors (p < 0.03) for FQ NS E. coli were older age, prior FQ NS isolates, prior dispensing of FQ, and dispensing of any oral antibiotic. Independent risk factors (p < 0.02) for MDR were prior extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing isolates (ESBL+), prior FQ dispensing, and prior oral antibiotic dispensing., Conclusions: In women with uUTI due to E. coli, prior dispensing of FQ or any oral antibiotic within 90 days predicted FQ NS and MDR urine E. coli. Prior urine culture with FQ NS isolates and older age were predictive of FQ NS E. coli. Prior ESBL+ was predictive of MDR E. coli. These data could help identify patients at risk for AMR E. coli and inform empiric prescribing., Competing Interests: FSM-G – Employee of and shareholder in GSK. KSK – Symposia honoraria from GSK. VG – Employee of and shareholder in Becton, Dickinson and Company, which received funding from GSK to conduct this study. AM – Employee of and shareholder in GSK. BWT – Funding from Genentech and INSIGHT (NIH NIAID) for sponsored trials of potential COVID therapeutics. Funding from VA HSR&D (HX002171), VA RR&D (RX002596), and AHRQ (HS026901 and HS027869) for investigator-initiated research. Dr Trautner’s work is also supported in part by the Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (CIN 13-413). NES-O – Employee of and shareholder in GSK. KCY – Employee of and shareholder in Becton, Dickinson and Company, which received funding from GSK to conduct this study. GY – Employee of Becton, Dickinson and Company, which received funding from GSK to conduct this study. AVJ – Employee of and shareholder in GSK. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.)

The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute-care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their surgical-site infection (SSI) prevention efforts. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.

Background: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are prevalent on high-touch surfaces in multi-patient rooms., Aim: To quantify the impact of hanging single-use cleaning/disinfecting wipes next to each bed. Pre-specified outcomes were: (1) hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), (2) cleaning frequency, (3) MDRO room contamination, (4) new MDRO acquisitions, and (5) mortality., Methods: Clustered randomized crossover trial at Shamir Medical Center, Israel (October 2016 to January 2018). Clusters were randomly assigned to use for cleaning either single-use quaternary ammonium wipes (Clinell) or standard practices (reusable cloths and buckets with bleach). Six-month intervention periods were implemented in alternating sequence, separated by a washout period. Five high-touch surfaces were monitored by fluorescent markers. Study outcomes were compared between periods using generalized estimating equations, Poisson regression, and Cox proportional hazards models., Findings: Overall, 7725 patients were included (47,670 person-days), 3793 patients in rooms with intervention cleaning and 3932 patients in rooms with standard practices. During the intervention, there was no significant difference in HAI rates (incidence rate ratio: 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7-3.5; P = 0.3). However, in intervention rooms, the frequency of environmental cleaning was higher (odds ratio: 3.73; 95% CI: 2.0-7.1; P < 0.0001), MDRO environmental contamination rate was insignificantly lower (odds ratio: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-1.0; P = 0.06), new MDRO acquisition rate was lower (hazard ratio: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-1.0; P = 0.04), and in-hospital mortality rate was lower (incidence rate ratio: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.7-1.0; P = 0.03)., Conclusion: Hanging single-use cleaning/disinfecting wipes next to each bed did not affect the HAI rates but did improve the frequency of cleaning, reduce MDRO environmental contamination, and was associated with reduced incidence of new MDRO acquisitions and reduced mortality. This is a feasible, recommended practice to improve patient outcomes in multi-patient rooms., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Administration of doses via an extended infusion (EI) is an important strategy to optimize beta-lactams. Available data on the impact of EI on outcomes largely focus on clinical cure or mortality in critically ill patients or those with resistant pathogens. The potential benefits of EI extend beyond these populations and outcomes, and further study is warranted., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who received cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, or meropenem for Gram-negative bacteremia via EI or intermittent infusion. Patients were matched 1:1 based on study drug, sepsis severity, intensive care unit (ICU) status, bacteremia source, and pathogen. Outcomes assessed included time to clinical stabilization, rates of treatment failure, mortality, recurrence, and length of stay (LOS)., Results: Two hundred sixty-eight patients were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Forty-two percent of patients were in the ICU at infection onset and the most common pathogen was Escherichia coli (41%). After adjusting for residual differences between groups, receipt of EI was independently associated with shorter time to clinical stability (adjusted odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, .22-.47), time to defervescence, and time to white blood cell count normalization. Furthermore, EI was associated with a lower incidence of treatment failure, decreased recurrence of bacteremia, and shorter LOS. There was no difference in mortality. These findings were consistent regardless of patient location (ICU vs ward), baseline renal function, source of bacteremia, or study drug received., Conclusions: These findings suggest that EI beta-lactams are an important stewardship strategy to improve clinical outcomes in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Antimicrobial stewardship programs play a critical role in optimizing the use of antimicrobials against pathogens in the era of growing multi-drug resistance. However, implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs among the hematopoietic stem cell transplant and oncology populations has posed challenges due to multiple risk factors in the host populations and the infections that affect them. The consideration of underlying immunosuppression and a higher risk for poor outcomes have shaped therapeutic decisions for these patients. In this multidisciplinary perspective piece, we provide a summary of the current landscape of antimicrobial stewardship, unique challenges, and opportunities for unmet needs in these patient populations.