Search

Disparities in health by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status within obstetrics and gynecology are well described and prompt evaluation for structural barriers. Academic medicine has a historical role in caring for marginalized populations, with medical trainees often serving as first-line clinicians for outpatient care. The ubiquitous approach of concentrating care of marginalized patients within resident and trainee clinics raises ethical questions regarding equity and sends a clear message of value that is internalized by learners and patients. A path forward is elimination of the structural inequities caused by maintenance of clinics stratified by training level, thereby creating an integrated patient pool for trainees and attending physicians alike. In this model, demographic and insurance information is blinded and patient triage is guided by clinical acuity and patient preference alone. To address structural inequities in our health care delivery system, we implemented changes in our department. Our goals were to improve access and patient experience and to send a unified message to our patients, learners, and faculty-our clinical staff, across all training levels, are committed to giving the highest standard of care to all people, regardless of insurance status or ability to pay. Academic medical centers must look internally for structural barriers that contribute to health care disparities within obstetrics and gynecology as we aim to make progress toward equity.

Women with opioid use disorder (OUD) face unique challenges meeting their reproductive goals. Because rates of unintended pregnancy in this population is almost 80% rate(1), there has been a push to increase contraceptive uptake among reproductive-aged women with OUD. The patient level ethical issues of such initiatives, however, are often overlooked. This review discusses the ethical issues in two realms: obtaining contraception when it is desired and avoiding contraceptive coercion when contraception is not desired. It is important that access to reproductive education and care be improved in order to ensure autonomous decision-making for women with OUD. However, it is also necessary to be mindful of the history of oppressive and coercive contraception and sterilization policies in the United States. These policies have left a legacy of mistrust and continue to manifest in the form of more subtly-oppressive policies in contemporary medical practice today. Such policies also point to the ongoing stigmatization of and implicit biases held against women with OUD. Thus, based on these ethical issues, solutions are suggested at the clinical, systemic, and societal levels.

Due to a history of coerced sterilization, a federal Medicaid sterilization policy mandates that a specific consent form be signed by a patient at least thirty days prior to when the patient undergoes sterilization. However, in contemporary obstetrical practice, the Medicaid sterilization policy serves as a policy-level barrier to autonomously desired care. We review the clinical and ethical implications of the current Medicaid sterilization policy. After discussing the utility and impact of waiting periods for other surgical procedures, we explore the psychology of time required for decision-making and consider scientific understanding of regret. We argue that the current Medicaid sterilization waiting period is clinically and ethically unjustifiable and that the policy ought to be revised in light of the goals, preferences, and concerns of the people most affected by it. While the need for continued protection against coercion remains, the current mandated waiting period does little to enforce the high-quality shared decision-making that is desired for sterilization counseling.

The Medicaid consent policy has been identified as a major barrier to desired permanent contraception, particularly for low-income communities and communities of color. As each state may modify their state Medicaid sterilization consent form, variation in the form has been reported. This study aims to characterize state-level variation in Medicaid Title XIX consent form interpretation and application.We aimed to collect primary data from Medicaid officials in all 50 United States from January to May 2020 via a 25-question electronic survey regarding state-level consent form implementation. Questions targeted consent form details and definitions, insurance and billing, clinician correspondence, and administrative processes. We used Qualtrics XM to collect survey responses. We performed descriptive statistics on the survey responses. There were no exclusion criteria.We had 41 responses from 36/50 states (72% participation rate). Heterogeneity existed in the key definitions of "Premature Delivery" and "Emergency Abdominal Surgery." One in five respondents reported the consent form was only available in English. Variation among Current Procedural Terminology codes covered in each state's sterilization policy were noted. Nearly a quarter of respondents did not know how Medicaid informed healthcare providers of consent form denials. Most participants (90%) were unaware of differences between state sterilization policies.This study demonstrates variation in terms of consent form definitions, procedures covered, correspondence with clinicians, and administrative review processes among state Medicaid offices regarding the sterilization consent form. Greater transparency is necessary in order to reduce administrative barriers to desired permanent contraception.Inconsistent interpretation poses an administrative barrier to care, raises concern regarding appropriate clinician reimbursement, and can potentially lead to unnecessarily denying patients the contraceptive option of their choice. Permanent contraception policies should be equitable no matter insurance status, preserve reproductive autonomy and effectively protect vulnerable populations.

Introduction The purpose of this study was to explore how doulas of color conceptualize both their work and how their racial and ethnic identities influence their work within the context of racial disparities in birth outcomes in the United States. Methods We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with doulas of color who had attended at least 3 births as doulas. Participants were recruited from across the United States. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis was used to derive themes from the transcribed interviews. Results Interviews were conducted with 8 doulas of color, ranging in age from 21 to 47 from across the United States. All participants were either current college students or had earned a college degree. Although many of the doulas identified as being of more than one racial or ethnic group, nearly all participants identified closely with being Black or African American first, and their other racial groups second. Four major themes emerged: relationship with the medical system, role of identity in the doulas' work, role of class, and divisions within the natural birth movement. Discussion The majority of doulas who participated in this study stated that their racial identity strongly influenced their work, particularly when working with women of the same race or ethnicity due to their shared identities. Several participants initially became doulas because of a desire to alleviate disparities in birth outcomes for women of color. This suggests a commitment on the part of the study participants to serving their communities and to bridging the gap between women of color and the health care system. Several participants also noted that they feel alienated by both the health care system and the mainstream natural birth community.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the practices of obstetrician–gynecologists in the United States surrounding postpartum sterilization when the Medicaid consent form was not valid. METHODS: Using the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ online directory, we conducted a qualitative study where we recruited obstetrician–gynecologists practicing in ten geographically diverse US states for a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews conducted by telephone. We analyzed interview transcripts using the constant comparative method and principles of grounded theory. RESULTS: Thirty obstetrician–gynecologists (63% women, 77% non-subspecialized, and 53% academic setting) were interviewed. While most physicians stated that they did not perform sterilizations without a valid Medicaid sterilization form, others noted that they sometimes did due to a sense of ethical obligation toward their patient’s health, being in a role with more authority or seniority, interpreting the emergency justification section of the form more broadly, or backdating the form. The physicians who said that they never went ahead without a signed form tended to work at large institutions and were concerned with losing funding and engaging in potentially illegal or fraudulent behavior. CONCLUSION: Physicians’ varied behaviors related to providing postpartum sterilization without a valid Medicaid consent form demonstrate that the policy is in need of revision. Unclear terminology and ramifications of the Medicaid sterilization policy need to be addressed to ensure equitable care.

There are multi-level barriers that impact uptake of postpartum contraception and result in disparities, including clinical barriers such as provider bias. Fortunately, clinicians have direct control over their contraceptive counseling practices, and thus reducing structural barriers is actionable through high quality contraceptive counseling that equips patients with the knowledge and guidance they need to fulfill their reproductive desires. Yet, many commonly employed contraceptive counseling strategies, like One Key Question and WHO tiered contraceptive counseling, are not patient-driven, do not account for the important nuances of contraceptive choices, and are not focused specifically on the postpartum period. Given the history of eugenics and reproductive coercion in the US, supporting patient through their contraceptive decision-making process is especially vital. Additionally, contraceptive preferences vary based on patient-level factors and fluctuate over time and counseling should account for such differences. Shared contraceptive decision-making occurs when patients provide input on their values, desires, and preferences and clinicians share medical knowledge and evidence-based information without judgement. This approach is considered the most ethically sound form of counseling, as it maximizes patient autonomy. Shared decision-making also has clinical benefits, including increased patient satisfaction. In sum, shared contraceptive decision-making should be universally adopted to promote ethical, high-quality care and reproductive autonomy.

Objective To evaluate state-level variation in Medicaid sterilization reimbursement policies for physicians in terms of policy details, flexibility, and review process. Study Design We reviewed state Medicaid websites and interviewed state employees to better understand reimbursement policies and implementation. We attempted to obtain policy details and instructions for physicians from all 50 state Medicaid office websites. We invited employees in all 50 state Medicaid director's offices to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Results We were able to collect data from 48 states’ websites for analysis, conducted 15 telephone interviews, and received 4 written responses from state Medicaid employees. State policies varied greatly in terms of degree of instruction available online to clinicians, number of content-related and logistical changes made compared to the federal policy, type of procedures included, corrections permitted, flexibility in terms of surgeon and procedure changes, review process, reasons for and ramifications of denial, and date of last policy revision. Conclusion There is need for increased transparency and instruction by state Medicaid offices as well as revision of the Medicaid policy to account for the contemporary clinical practice of female permanent contraception. Clinicians should communicate with state Medicaid employees in order to clarify important policy details and obtain greater understanding of their state's review process and ramifications to ensure their clinical practice is both correct and reimbursable. Implications Greater consistency between states in terms of Medicaid policy and implementation is crucial to ensuring physicians are fairly reimbursed for their work, and female permanent contraception remains an accessible contraceptive method for women.

This study uses American Hospital Association data to examine the volume and distribution of births in Catholic US hospitals and quantify county-level patterns of Catholic and non-Catholic hospital births.

An increasing number of young adolescents who identify as transgender or nonbinary are presenting to the health care system for gender affirmation therapy before the full progression of puberty. Gender-affirming therapy may impair future fertility, but options exist for fertility preservation. This perspective reviews these options for transmasculine and nonbinary youth, and explores related ethical considerations. The authors support the right of transgender and nonbinary youth to utilize available reproductive technologies, provide recommendations for treating health professionals, and advocate for increased research efforts and tools to aid patient decision making.

Objective To explore the attitudes and beliefs of obstetrician–gynecologists in the United States (US) regarding the Medicaid postpartum sterilization policy. Study Design We recruited obstetrician–gynecologists practicing in ten geographically diverse US states for a qualitative study using the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists directory. We conducted semi-structured interviews via telephone, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method and principles of grounded theory. Results We interviewed thirty obstetrician–gynecologists (63.3% women, 76.7% non-subspecialized, and 53.3% academic setting). Participants largely described the consent form as unnecessary, paternalistic, an administrative hassle, a barrier to desired patient care, and associated with worse health outcomes. Views on the waiting period’s utility and impact were mixed. Many participants felt the sterilization policy was discriminatory. However, some participants noted the policy’s importance in terms of the historical basis, used the form as a counseling tool to remind patients of the permanence of sterilization, felt the policy prompted them to counsel regarding sterilization, and protected patients in contemporary medical practice. Conclusion Many physicians shared concerns about the ethics and clinical impact of the Medicaid sterilization policy. Future revisions to the Medicaid sterilization policy must balance prevention of coercion with reduction in barriers to those desiring sterilization in order to maximize reproductive autonomy. Implications Obstetrician–gynecologists are key stakeholders of the Medicaid sterilization policy. Obstetrician–gynecologists largely believe that revision to the Medicaid sterilization policy is warranted to balance reduction of external barriers to desired care with a process that enforces the need for counseling regarding contraception and reviewing patient preference for sterilization throughout pregnancy in order to minimize regret.

Healthcare policies developed during the COVID-19 pandemic to safeguard community health have the potential to disadvantage women in three areas. First, protocols for deferral of elective surgery may assign a lower priority to important reproductive outcomes. Second, policies regarding the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 may not capture the complexity of the considerations related to pregnancy. Third, policies formulated to reduce infectious exposure inadvertently may increase disparities in maternal health outcomes and rates of violence towards women. In this commentary, we outline these challenges unique to women’s healthcare in a pandemic, provide preliminary recommendations and identify areas for further exploration and refinement of policy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics of women who have consistent plans in terms of contraceptive effectiveness from antepartum to postpartum care and whether consistency affects contraceptive outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a retrospective chart review of women who delivered at a single tertiary care center from 2012–2014. Preferred postpartum contraceptive plan was abstracted at three time points (prenatal care, hospital discharge, and outpatient postpartum care) and categorized into three tiers of effectiveness. We then examined consistency between the first two time points for the effectiveness in postpartum contraceptive method planned. RESULTS: Of the 8,394 women in the study cohort, 2,642 (31.5%) had a consistent postpartum contraceptive tier planned at the first two time points. Women who had consistent contraceptive preferences were more likely to have higher parity (aOR 2.36, 95% CI 2.06–2.70 for parity 2+), delivered via cesarean section (aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.34–1.68), and have received adequate prenatal care (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.66–2.24). Women who had a consistent choice were more likely to choose highly effective methods of contraception (p < 0.001) and more likely to achieve their contraception plan (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.85–2.52), but not more likely to have a subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.81–1.05). CONCLUSION: The majority of women in our study had variation in effectiveness of their postpartum contraceptive method plan from prenatal to inpatient postpartum care. Better understanding contraceptive decision-making as a journey and removing external barriers during that process is a necessary component of pregnancy care. IMPLICATIONS: Counseling and documentation of contraceptive preferences throughout antepartum and postpartum care can help improve contraceptive outcomes.

Over the last few years, research teams have made significant advancements in treating absolute uterine factor infertility through uterus transplantation, culminating in the birth of the first US baby born from a uterus transplant in November 2017. However, studies have differed on the choice of either deceased or living donors, with some centers even exploring both methods. As researchers continue to investigate the medical feasibility of these approaches, it is also important for the medical community to consider how deceased and living uterus donation differ ethically. We argue that if living and deceased donation demonstrate equivalent clinical efficacy and the deceased donor pool is sufficient, living uterus donation should be reevaluated and may no longer be ethically justifiable.

Background: We sought to compare associations of contraceptive preferences, beliefs, self-efficacy, and knowledge with use of sterilization versus other methods of contraception. Materials and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a telephone-based survey of a nationally representative sample of women Veterans not desiring future pregnancy. Contraceptive method used at last sex was categorized as female sterilization, long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), short-acting methods, or nonprescription methods/no method. Multinomial regression models were performed to compare the association between independent variables (contraceptive preferences, beliefs, self-efficacy, and knowledge) and use of sterilization versus other contraceptive methods. Results: Six hundred twelve women Veterans aged 18–44 years who were sexually active with men, had no history of hysterectomy or infertility, did not desire future pregnancy, and were not using male sterilization as their method of contraception were surveyed. A total of 208 women Veterans reported using female sterilization (34.0%). While method effectiveness was rated as extremely important by the majority of participants, there was no association between perceiving method effectiveness as extremely important and method selected in adjusted multinomial models. Women Veterans were more likely to use sterilization compared to hormonal methods of contraception if they reported that lack of hormones was an extremely important contraceptive method characteristic (aRRR 3.69, 95% CI 1.94–7.03). Women Veterans who strongly agreed with the belief that birth control decisions are mainly a woman's responsibility were less likely to use sterilization compared to LARC (aRRR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29–0.98). Conclusion: Associations between contraceptive preferences, beliefs, self-efficacy, and knowledge and use of sterilization in a population of women Veterans not desiring future pregnancy are complex, and decisions may not solely be driven by desire to select a highly effective method.

We provide an overview of the causes, manifestations, and potential mitigating steps regarding implicit bias in counseling for permanent contraception. The historical context of sterilization abuses and the implications of these on society's notions of fitness for parenthood are reviewed. We present contemporary examples of contraceptive coercion and discuss the impact of implicit bias from health care providers. Finally, we outline steps for ensuring a patient-centered shared decision-making ethical approach to permanent contraceptive counseling.

Background Prior studies have noted that public insurance status is associated with increased uptake of postpartum contraception whereas others have pointed to public insurance as a barrier to accessing highly effective forms of contraception. Objective To assess differences in planned method and provision of postpartum contraception according to insurance type. Study Design This is a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study examining postpartum women delivered at a single hospital in Cleveland, Ohio from 2012-2014. Contraceptive methods were analyzed according to Tier-based effectiveness as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The primary outcome was postpartum contraception method preference. Additional outcomes included method provision, postpartum visit attendance, and subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery. Results Of the 8281 patients in the study cohort, 1372 (16.6%) were privately and 6990 (83.4%) were publicly insured. After adjusting for the potentially confounding clinical and demographic factors through propensity score analysis, public insurance was not associated with preference for a Tier 1 versus Tier 2 postpartum contraceptive method (matched adjusted odds ratio [maOR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.15), but was associated with a preference for Tier 1/2 vs Tier 3/None (maOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.69). There was no difference between women with private or public insurance in terms of method provision by 90 days after delivery (maOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75-1.17). Public insurance status was also associated with decreased postpartum visit attendance (maOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.68) and increased rates of subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery (maOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.59). Conclusion Public insurance status does not serve as a barrier to either the preference or provision of effective postpartum contraception. Women desiring highly- or moderately effective methods of contraception should have these methods provided prior to hospital discharge to minimize barriers to method provision.

Women of color experience marked disparities in fulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception. While many attribute the disparity to the required Medicaid sterilization consent form and 30-day waiting period established in response to forced and coerced sterilizations, the policy does not entirely explain the disparity; racial and ethnic disparities persist even within strata of insurance type. We therefore propose framing postpartum permanent contraception as a health disparities issue that requires multi-level interventions to address. Based on the literature, we identify discrete levels of barriers to postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment at the patient, physician, hospital, and policy levels that interact and compound within and between individual levels, affecting each individual patient differently. At the patient level, sociodemographic characteristics such as age, race and ethnicity, and parity impact desire for and fulfillment of permanent contraception. At the physician level, implicit bias and paternalistic counseling contribute to barriers in permanent contraception fulfillment. At the hospital level, Medicaid reimbursement, operating room availability, and religious affiliation influence fulfillment of permanent contraception. Lastly, at the policy level, the Medicaid consent form and waiting period pose a known barrier to fulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception. Unpacking each of these discrete barriers and untangling their collective impact is necessary to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in permanent contraception fulfillment.

Study Objective Approximately 25% of teens in the U.S. will become pregnant before the age of 18 and within two years, more than 31% will have a repeat pregnancy. Acknowledging that some adolescents may seek or be ambivalent towards rapid repeat pregnancy, compared to their counterparts, not using a LARC method increases a teens’ risk of another pregnancy in two years by more than 35 times. We seek to better understand the influences and factors surrounding adolescent postpartum contraceptive decision-making following the index delivery. Design We completed a qualitative study via focused, semi-structured interviews during the inpatient postpartum course. The interview guide was modeled after those used in other studies of adolescent contraceptive decision-making, beta-tested, and developed iteratively. Interviews were completed, transcribed, coded, and analyzed with the assistance of Dedoose. Setting The study was conducted at MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, OH. Participants Parous adolescents aged 13-19 Results We performed twelve interviews prior to reaching theoretical saturation. Themes were identified related to the participants’ prior experiences with contraception and prior and current pregnancies. The participants’ contraceptive choices were influenced by personal relationships, varying levels of autonomy, misperceptions, and changing contraceptive needs. Conclusions We found adolescents’ contraceptive decision-making was influenced by their social networks and community, including their parents and friends. Mothers played a key role as adolescents transitioned to gaining more autonomy over their reproductive decisions. Providers should consistently present adolescents with comprehensive contraceptive options as a component of preventive health care.

There is variation of availability and policy details on each state Medicaid office’s website regarding the Medicaid sterilization policy.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain an overview of medical student attitudes on the need for explicit consent for pelvic exams under anesthesia performed for educational purposes DESIGN: From February to October 2020, 201 medical students at a single medical school in the United States participated in a cross-sectional survey after completion of the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Outcome measures included endorsement of need for explicit informed consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia, and knowledge of informed consent processes for such exams. SETTING: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine PARTICIPANTS: Third- and fourth-year medical students RESULTS: Overall, 75% of medical students endorsed a need for explicit informed consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia, which extended to prostate, rectal, and breast exams under anesthesia. Additionally, 45% and 77% of these participants indicated that consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia should take the form of a separate signature line on the surgical consent form and/or a verbal form, respectively. Only 40% of students correctly identified institutional policy for obtaining informed consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia. Rotation with the oncologic surgical service (p=0.02) and correct identification of institutional informed consent policies (p=0.002) were associated with decreased perceptions of the importance of explicit informed consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students at the institution studied largely support explicit informed consent for educational pelvic and other sensitive exams under anesthesia, but a knowledge gap on institutional informed consent policy exists. Medical students support increased transparency and bodily autonomy. Due to the agreement of patients and medical students and the ethical rationale for this position, it may be appropriate for physicians and institutions to consider new processes of obtaining explicit informed consent for pelvic exams under anesthesia by medical students. COMPETENCIES: Interpersonal and Communication Skills (ICS), Professionalism

Background Breastfeeding and optimal birth spacing are associated with improved maternal and infant health outcomes worldwide. Provision of contraceptive advice that is aligned with recommendations for breastfeeding has potential to maximize maternal and infant health. Although there is broad agreement regarding the breastfeeding compatibility of specific postpartum contraceptive methods, it is not known whether maternal breastfeeding intention influences prenatal provider contraceptive counseling. Research aim We aimed to determine if maternal feeding intention is considered by prenatal providers during contraceptive counseling. Methods This was a cross-sectional online author-created survey including all prenatal providers ( N = 40) at two academic safety-net institutions in Cleveland, Ohio. Of 100 obstetrics/gynecology faculty members, 40 (40%) completed the survey, which included multiple-choice questions. Nominal and ordinal survey results were reported with percentages and frequencies, and categorical variables were compared using the Fisher exact test. Results Participants appropriately promoted breastfeeding-compatible postplacental intrauterine device placement, even though maternal feeding intention was specifically considered by just 12 (30%). Endorsed barriers to contraception for breastfeeding mothers included provider medical worries, patient concerns, and colleague resistance. Postplacental levonorgestrel intrauterine devices were recommended for all mothers by 92.5% of participants ( n = 37). Recommendations regarding progestin-only and combined oral contraceptive pills were influenced by maternal breastfeeding versus formula-feeding intention. Conclusion Asking expectant women about their feeding intentions within each contraceptive discussion may create opportunities for shared decision making that can optimize perinatal outcomes for both mother and infant worldwide.

ObjectiveThere have been increased efforts to implement medical ethics curricula at the student and resident levels; however, practising physicians are often left unconsidered. Therefore, we sought to pilot an ethics and professionalism curriculum for faculty in obstetrics and gynaecology to remedy gaps in the formal, informal and hidden curriculum in medical education.MethodsAn ethics curriculum was developed for faculty within the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at a tertiary care, academic hospital. During the one-time, 4-hour, mandatory in-person session, the participants voluntarily completed the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, Handoff Clinical Evaluation Exercise, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine and overall course evaluation. Patient satisfaction survey scores in both the hospital and ambulatory settings were compared before and after the curriculum.ResultsTwenty-eight faculty members attended the curriculum. Overall, respondents reported less burnout and performed at the same level or better in terms of patient handoff than the original studies validating the instruments. Faculty rated the professionalism behaviours as well as teaching of professionalism much lower at our institution than the validation study. There was no change in patient satisfaction after the curriculum. However, overall, the course was well received as meeting its objectives, being beneficial and providing new tools to assess professionalism.ConclusionThis pilot study suggests that an ethics curriculum can be developed for practising physicians that is mindful of pragmatic concerns while still meeting its objectives. Further study is needed regarding long term and objective improvements in ethics knowledge, impact on the education of trainees and improvement in the care of patients as a result of a formal curriculum for faculty.

OBJECTIVES: To examine recent rates of long-acting and permanent methods (LAPM) of contraception use during delivery hospitalization and correlates of their use. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study utilizing the 2012–2016 National Inpatient Sample of hospitalizations in the United States of America. The International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) and 10(th) Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify deliveries, inpatient long-acting reversible contraception (IPP LARC), and postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL). We conducted univariable and multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between demographic, clinical, hospital and geographical characteristics with likelihood of LAPM including IPP LARC and PPTL. RESULTS: Our sample included 3,642,328 unweighted deliveries. The rate of IPP LARC increased from 34.6 to 54.9 per 10,000 deliveries (58.7%), while the rate of PPTL utilization decreased from 719.5 to 671.8 per 10,000 deliveries (6.6%) over the study period. In multivariable analysis of LAPM utilization versus neither, cesarean delivery (aOR=7.25, 95%CI: 7.08–7.43) was associated with greater utilization. Native American (aOR=4.01, 95% CI:2.91–5.53) race was associated with increased use of IPP LARC compared to a non-long-acting method of contraception. Age between 18 to 29 years (aOR=6.21, 95%CI: 5.42–7.11) was associated with greater use of IPP LARC versus PPTL. Delivering in a rural hospital ((aOR=0.09, 95%CI: 0.06–0.12) and cesarean delivery (aOR=0.09, 95%CI: 0.06–0.12) were associated with greater use PPTL versus IPP LARC. CONCLUSIONS: The IPP LARC rate remains at less than 10% the PPTL rates in our study timeframe. The demonstrated variation in uptake of highly effective methods of contraception inpatient after delivery offer possible opportunities for better understanding and improvement in access.

The goals of vaccination are to preserve the health of individual patients as well as the health of the general public. Although interventions to promote individual and public health are usually aligned, ethical challenges may arise that require a balancing or compromise between these two objectives. Major challenges to increasing vaccine uptake and acceptance include widespread misinformation and disinformation on social media regarding safety; limited knowledge and awareness about recommended vaccinations; lack of trust in the medical system, especially in communities of color because of historic and ongoing injustices and systemic racism; prioritization of personal freedoms over collective health; and vaccination delay and refusal through nonmedical exemptions from state-mandated vaccination requirements. Obstetrician-gynecologists are in a unique position to help address these barriers by educating and counseling patients throughout their lifespan, administering recommended vaccinations, and serving as role models in public health initiatives. This document includes updated guidance on the management of ethical issues related to routine vaccination, including vaccination hesitation and refusal by patients, nonmedical exemptions, vaccination during pregnancy and lactation, and physician vaccination. Clinical guidance on vaccination and vaccination during public health emergencies is provided in separate publications and resources from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Objective To explore the attitudes, beliefs, and interpretations of individual state Medicaid office employees regarding their state’s postpartum sterilization policy and its impact on patient care. Study design We invited employees in all 50 state Medicaid director’s offices who self- or peer-identified as best informed about the sterilization policy to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Using a pilot-tested interview guide, we transcribed, coded, and analyzed each interview. We attempted to obtain supplemental data, including relevant policy details and instructions for physicians in the state, from all 50 state Medicaid office websites. Results We collected data from 15 telephone interviews, four written responses, and 48 states’ websites for analysis. Participants had varying responses regarding the impact of the Medicaid-mandated sterilization consent form in terms of informed consent as well as the utility and ramifications of the waiting period. State policies varied in terms of the age of consent, complexity of the form, availability of translations, use of unclear terminology, and the consent-obtaining process. Conclusion State Medicaid employees have differences in opinions regarding the intent of the Medicaid-mandated sterilization consent form and policies. Better understanding of the variation in individual state policies that may contribute to inequitable access to sterilization is necessary. Implications Provision of consistent guidelines and widespread coordination of the Medicaid sterilization policies in identified areas impacting informed consent may reduce existing obstacles and provide more equitable access to contraceptive care.

Objective In 1974, the federal Sterilization Consent Form (SCF) was created for those with publicly funded insurance to document appropriate informed consent by a clinician for sterilization procedures. This form must be signed by the clinician and patient at least 30 days before the procedure and expires 180 days after being signed.1 While there are numerous barriers to desired sterilization, the Medicaid consent process is a major cause of unfulfilled sterilization requests.2 As long as they comply with federal statutes, states may modify the Medicaid SCF, further complicating this process.3 However, data regarding this state-level variability is largely unavailable.4 Federal policy dictates that the global obstetrical fee should not be affected by SCF rejection.5 We sought to describe how individual state Medicaid policies differed in terms of what constitutes proper SCF completion and the payment ramifications of a rejected SCF. Study Design A 25-question survey was administered with Qualtrics XM® to 50 United States state Medicaid Directors or the most appropriate state official based on a review of the state website. The survey assessed state officials’ knowledge of criteria used to assess completion and validity of SCFs, SCF rejection rate, and payment ramifications for rejected SCFs. Data were collected from January to May 2020. Deidentified data were analyzed and reported in aggregate. This study was given Exempt Status by the Tufts Health Sciences Institutional Review Board. Results There were 41 responses from 36 states for a 72% participation rate. Four states had submitted multiple nonidentical responses. Criteria for SCF rejection included an incomplete form (35, 85%), mismatching or incorrect dates/times on the SCF (28, 68%), and that greater than 180 days had passed since the patient’s signature rendering the form expired (27, 66%) (Figure 1A). Ten respondents (24%) estimated a SCF rejection rate of less than or equal to 10% while four respondents (10%) indicated a greater than 30% rejection rate (Figure 1B). The majority of respondents indicated that the ramification of a rejected SCF included the loss of payment for the postpartum sterilization procedure for the provider (32, 78%) as well as facility (29, 71%). Five respondents stated that a rejected SCF resulted in loss of the entire obstetrical global payment for provider and facility (5, 12% provider; 5, 12% facility). Conclusion From our survey, it is clear that wide variation exists between states or within individual states, in the criteria used by state Medicaid offices to assess SCF completion, rate of rejections, and subsequent payment ramifications for providers and facilities. While the majority of respondents identified objective measures (e.g. incorrect dates) as major reasons to reject SCFs, many also used subjective reasons (e.g. signature legibility). Though federal policy dictates that the global fee should not be affected by SCF rejection, our study found 12% of respondents indicated a loss of the global fee.4 The fear of payment loss can be a significant barrier to desired sterilization. Ensuring greater transparency and consistency in the Title XIX sterilization consent process within and between states is a key step to ensuring equitable access to postpartum sterilization.

Multiple barriers exist to sterilization in the postpartum period. One such barrier, the Medicaid Title XIX sterilization policy, requires publicly insured patients to complete a sterilization consent form at least 30 days prior to their scheduled procedure. While this policy was set in place in the 1970s to address the practice of coerced sterilization among marginalized women, it has served as a significant barrier to obtaining the procedure in the contemporary period. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted specific complexities surrounding postpartum sterilization and created additional barriers for women desiring this contraceptive method. Despite the time constraints to perform postpartum sterilization, some hospital administrators, elective officials, and state Medicaid offices deemed sterilization as “elective.” Additionally, as the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has revised telemedicine reimbursement and encouraged its increased use, it has provided no guidance for the sterilization consent form, use of oral consents, and change to the sterilization consent form expiration date. This leaves individual states to create policies and recommended procedures that may not be accepted or recognized by CMS. These barriers put significant strain on patients attempting to obtain postpartum sterilization, specifically for patients with lower incomes and women of color. CMS can support reproductive health for vulnerable populations by providing clear guidance to state Medicaid offices, extending the 180-day expiration of a sterilization consent form signed prior to the pandemic, and allowing for telemedicine oral consents with witnesses or electronic signatures.

Background Adequacy of prenatal care is associated with fulfillment of postpartum sterilization requests, though it is unclear whether this relationship is indicative of broader social and structural determinants of health or reflects the mandatory Medicaid waiting period required before sterilization can occur. We evaluated the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage (operationalized by the Area Deprivation Index; ADI) and the likelihood of undergoing postpartum sterilization. Methods Secondary analysis of a single-center retrospective cohort study examining 8654 postpartum patients from 2012 to 2014, of whom 1332 (15.4%) desired postpartum sterilization (as abstracted from the medical record at time of delivery hospitalization discharge) and for whom ADI could be calculated via geocoding their home address. We determined the association between ADI and sterilization completion, postpartum visit attendance, and subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery via logistic regression and time to sterilization via Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Of the 1332 patients included in the analysis, patients living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods were more likely to be younger, more parous, delivered vaginally, Black, unmarried, not college educated, and insured via Medicaid. Compared to patients living in less disadvantaged areas, patients living in more disadvantaged areas were less likely to obtain sterilization (44.8% vs. 53.5%, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75–0.93), experienced greater delays in the time to sterilization (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06–1.44), were less likely to attend postpartum care (58.9% vs 68.9%, OR 0.86, CI 0.79–0.93), and were more likely to have a subsequent pregnancy within a year of delivery (15.1% vs 10.4%, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10–1.94). In insurance-stratified analysis, for patients with Medicaid, but not private insurance, as neighborhood disadvantage increased, the rate of postpartum sterilization decreased. The rate of subsequent pregnancy was positively associated with neighborhood disadvantage for both Medicaid as well as privately insured patients. Conclusion Living in an area with increased neighborhood disadvantage is associated with worse outcomes in terms of desired postpartum sterilization, especially for patients with Medicaid insurance. While revising the Medicaid sterilization policy is important, addressing social determinants of health may also play a powerful role in reducing inequities in fulfillment of postpartum sterilization.

While all states in the United States require certain vaccinations for school attendance, all but three allow for religious exemptions to receiving such vaccinations, and 18 allow for exemptions on the basis of other deeply held personal beliefs. The rights of parents to raise children as they see fit may conflict with the duty of the government and society to protect the welfare of children. In the U.S., these conflicts have not been settled in a uniform and consistent manner. We apply a test that provides a concrete and formal rubric to evaluate such conflicts. For some vaccinations, based on the individual medical characteristics of the disease and the risks of being unvaccinated, the test would suggest that permitting conscientious exemptions is ethical. However, for vaccinations protecting against other diseases that are more severe or easily transmitted, the test would suggest that the federal government may ethically impose laws that deny such exemptions.

Kavita Shah Arora,1 Neko Castleberry,2 Jay Schulkin2,3 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; 2Research Department, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, USA; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA Introduction: Obstetrician–gynecologists (ob-gyns) play a prominent role in counseling patients regarding sterilization, offering alternative contraception, fulfilling sterilization requests, and referring patients if unable to provide the service due to a personal moral belief. Therefore, we sought to better characterize the counseling practices of ob-gyns with respect to postpartum sterilization. Materials and methods: This is a prospective, electronic survey-based study of 1,000 ob-gyn members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, half of whom are members of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network. Results: A total of 188 of 957 surveyed physicians (19.6%) opened and responded to the survey, after accounting for exclusions. Age (31.9%), body mass index (28.7%), and medical history (27.1%) were the three most frequent reasons for an ob-gyn reported declining to perform sterilization in a patient requesting sterilization. Medical history (36.2%), parity (31.9%), and availability of alternative contraception (27.7%) were the three most frequent reasons that an ob-gyn reported recommending postpartum sterilization in a patient not requesting sterilization. Conclusion: Our study has identified both medical and nonmedical factors that impact ob-gyns likelihood to recommend either toward or against postpartum sterilization. Nonmedical factors included clinical logistical issues such as availability of the operating room as well as considerations of a patient’s age, parity, gestational age at delivery, and whether the husband was in agreement. Physicians should be cautious of inappropriately blending medical decision-making with paternalistic counseling. Keywords: postpartum sterilization, contraception, counseling, patient–physician relationship, bias

Objective To evaluate whether women with Medicaid are less likely than their privately insured counterparts to receive a desired sterilization procedure at the time of cesarean delivery. Methods This is a secondary analysis of a single-center retrospective cohort examining 8,654 postpartum women from 2012 to 2014, of whom 2,205 (25.5%) underwent cesarean delivery. Insurance was analyzed as Medicaid compared with private insurance. The primary outcome was sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery. Reason for sterilization noncompletion and Medicaid sterilization consent form validity were recorded. Secondary outcomes included postpartum visit attendance, outpatient postpartum sterilization, and subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery. Results Of the 481 women included in this analysis, 78 of 86 (90.7%) women with private insurance and 306 of 395 (77.4%) women with Medicaid desiring sterilization obtained sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery (relative risk 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.94). After multivariable logistic regression, gestational age at delivery (1.02 [1.00-1.03]), adequacy of prenatal care (1.30 [1.18-1.43]), and marital status (1.09 [1.01-1.19]) were associated with achievement of sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery. Sixty-four (66.0%) women who desired but did not receive sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery did not have valid, signed Medicaid sterilization forms, and 10 (10.3%) sterilizations were not able to be completed at the time of surgery owing to adhesions. Sterilization during cesarean delivery was not associated with less frequent postpartum visit attendance for either the Medicaid or privately insured population. Rates of outpatient postpartum sterilization were similar among those with Medicaid compared with private insurance. Among patients who did not receive sterilization at the time of delivery, 15 patients (each with Medicaid) had a subsequent pregnancy within the study period. Conclusion Women with Medicaid insurance received sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery less frequently than privately insured counterparts, most commonly due to the absence of a valid Medicaid sterilization consent form as well as adhesive disease. The constraints surrounding the Medicaid form serve as a significant barrier to achieving desired sterilization.

Since USA constitutional precedent established in 1976, adolescents have increasingly been afforded the right to access contraception without first obtaining parental consent or authorisation. There is general agreement this ethically permissible. However, long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods have only recently been prescribed to the adolescent population. They are currently the most effective forms of contraception available and have high compliance and satisfaction rates. Yet unlike other contraceptives, LARCs are associated with special procedural risks because they must be inserted and removed by trained healthcare providers. It is unclear whether the unique invasive nature of LARC changes the traditional ethical calculus of permitting adolescent decision-making in the realm of contraception. To answer this question, we review the risk–benefit profile of adolescent LARC use. Traditional justifications for permitting adolescent contraception decision-making authority are then considered in the context of LARCs. Finally, analogous reasoning is used to evaluate potential differences between permitting adolescents to consent for LARC procedures versus for emergency and pregnancy termination procedures. Ultimately, we argue that the invasive nature of LARCs does not override adolescents’ unique and compelling need for safe and effective forms of contraception. In fact, LARCs may oftentimes be in the best interest of adolescent patients who wish to prevent unintended pregnancy. We advocate for the specific enumeration of adolescents’ ability to consent to both LARC insertion and removal procedures within state policies. Given the provider-dependent nature of LARCs and the stigma regarding adolescent sexuality, special political and procedural safeguards to protect adolescent autonomy are warranted.

Summary Secular states may be asked to override parental decisions based on religious beliefs when these decisions lead to concerns for the well-being of the child or welfare of society at large. Particular difficulties arise when goals of limited state importance to secular society conflict with practices that matter a great deal to members of religious groups. We propose a prudentially-based approach to resolving these conflicts by balancing the interests of the affected child, those close to the child, and society, without compromising the child's needs. This approach acknowledges the importance of children's relational interests as members of families and religious cultures. It is compatible both with legal and bioethical practice. Decisions are contextually framed, taking into account the degree to which the state generally tolerates risks to children's health and safety. The constraints built into our approach protect against using child welfare as a pretext for attacks on minorities. Finally, use of this approach partially addresses the imprecision of other standards that have been applied to judge the appropriateness of parental decisions.

The United States, along with other resource-rich countries, leads global health care by advancing medical care through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While most medical research is conducted in these resource-rich areas, RCTs, including replications of previous trials, are additionally carried out in low- and middle-income countries. On the basis of positive findings from several RCTs conducted in high-income countries, the Antenatal Corticosteroids Trial (ACT) evaluated the effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids in reducing neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries. ACT, however, was undertaken in dramatically different health care infrastructures and did not confirm the results of previous studies. We argue that it is neither clinically appropriate nor ethically acceptable to extrapolate findings from one region to another without accounting for the disparate cultural values, goals of care, and health services infrastructure that impact clinical outcomes.

Scientific Abstracts These scientific abstracts are scheduled for presentation at the 2021 Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting. This year, 225 abstracts were submitted for consideration, of which 12 were selected for oral presentation and 84 were selected for poster presentation. The scientific abstract review was completed by the scientific reviewers and selectors