Search

Importance Effects of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke are time-dependent. Ambulances that can administer thrombolysis (mobile stroke units [MSUs]) before arriving at the hospital have been shown to reduce time to treatment. Objective To determine whether dispatch of MSUs is associated with better clinical outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, nonrandomized, controlled intervention study was conducted in Berlin, Germany, from February 1, 2017, to October 30, 2019. If an emergency call prompted suspicion of stroke, both a conventional ambulance and an MSU, when available, were dispatched. Functional outcomes of patients with final diagnosis of acute cerebral ischemia who were eligible for thrombolysis or thrombectomy were compared based on the initial dispatch (both MSU and conventional ambulance or conventional ambulance only). Exposure Simultaneous dispatch of an MSU (computed tomographic scanning with or without angiography, point-of-care laboratory testing, and thrombolysis capabilities on board) and a conventional ambulance (n = 749) vs conventional ambulance alone (n = 794). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (a disability score ranging from 0, no neurological deficits, to 6, death) at 3 months. The coprimary outcome was a 3-tier disability scale at 3 months (none to moderate disability; severe disability; death) with tier assignment based on mRS scores if available or place of residence if mRS scores were not available. Common odds ratios (ORs) were used to quantify the association between exposure and outcome; values less than 1.00 indicated a favorable shift in the mRS distribution and lower odds of higher levels of disability. Results Of the 1543 patients (mean age, 74 years; 723 women [47%]) included in the adjusted primary analysis, 1337 (87%) had available mRS scores (primary outcome) and 1506 patients (98%) had available the 3-tier disability scale assessment (coprimary outcome). Patients with an MSU dispatched had lower median mRS scores at month 3 (1; interquartile range [IQR], 0-3) than did patients without an MSU dispatched (2; IQR, 0-3; common OR for worse mRS, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86; P < .001). Similarly, patients with an MSU dispatched had lower 3-month coprimary disability scores: 586 patients (80.3%) had none to moderate disability; 92 (12.6%) had severe disability; and 52 (7.1%) had died vs patients without an MSU dispatched: 605 (78.0%) had none to moderate disability; 103 (13.3%) had severe disability; and 68 (8.8%) had died (common OR for worse functional outcome, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.54-0.99; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance In this prospective, nonrandomized, controlled intervention study of patients with acute ischemic stroke in Berlin, Germany, the dispatch of mobile stroke units, compared with conventional ambulances alone, was significantly associated with lower global disability at 3 months. Clinical trials in other regions are warranted.This cohort study compares global disability at 3 months among Berlin patients with out-of-hospital ischemic stroke brought to care via a mobile stroke unit ambulance (with prehospital CT scanning with or without angiography, point-of-care laboratory testing, prehospital thrombolysis) vs conventional ambulance alone.Question Is the dispatch of mobile stroke units in the out-of-hospital setting before arriving at the hospital associated with better functional outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for thrombolysis or thrombectomy? Findings In this prospective nonrandomized controlled intervention study involving 1543 patients in Berlin, Germany, the dispatch of mobile stroke units in addition to conventional ambulances vs conventional ambulances alone was significantly associated with lower levels of global disability at 3 months (common odds ratio for higher modified Rankin Scale scores [ie, worse outcome], 0.71). Meaning Among patients with acute ischemic stroke in Berlin, Germany, dispatch of a mobile stroke unit was associated with lower global disability at 3 months; further research in diverse settings is needed.

Background and Purpose— Data on effects of intravenous thrombolysis on outcome of patients with ischemic stroke who are dependent on assistance in activities of daily living prestroke are scarce. Recent registry based analyses in activities of daily –independent patients suggest that earlier start of intravenous thrombolysis in the prehospital setting leads to better outcomes when compared with the treatment start in hospital. We evaluated whether these observations can be corroborated in patients with prestroke dependency. Methods— This observational, retrospective analysis included all patients with acute ischemic stroke depending on assistance before stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis either on the Stroke Emergency Mobile (STEMO) or through conventional in-hospital care (CC) in a tertiary stroke center (Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin) during routine care. Prespecified outcomes were modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 3 and survival at 3 months, as well as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Outcomes were adjusted in multivariable logistic regression. Results— Between February 2011 and March 2015, 122 of 427 patients (28%) treated on STEMO and 142 of 505 patients (28%) treated via CC needed assistance before stroke. Median onset-to-treatment times were 97 (interquartile range, 69–159; STEMO) and 135 (interquartile range, 98–184; CC; P P =0.01) and 86 (70%, STEMO) versus 85 (60%, CC) patients were alive ( P =0.07). After adjustment, STEMO care was favorable with respect to modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 3 (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–3.87; P =0.042) with a nonsignificant result for survival (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.95–3.16; P =0.07). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 5 STEMO versus 12 CC patients (4.2% versus 8.5%; P =0.167). Conclusions— The results of this study suggest that earlier, prehospital (as compared with in-hospital) start of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke may translate into better clinical outcome in patients with prestroke dependency. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02358772.

The effects of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in ischemic stroke are time dependent.1,2 Because of delays in conventional stroke workup, previous randomized IVT trials were unable to include patients with onset-to-treatment time (OTT) ≤60 minutes of symptom onset. With the invention of computed tomography–equipped mobile stroke units (MSUs), a relevant proportion of patients treated on such ambulances receive IVT within this ultraearly time window.3 In this study, we assessed the effects of IVT on 3-month functional outcome and mortality in different OTT intervals, including the first hour after onset, using a pooled analysis of 2 prospective prehospital and in-hospital registries in Berlin/Germany.4 Methods of patient inclusion and documentation in the 2 registries were described elsewhere4 (URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02358772). Briefly, all patients admitted through emergency medical services who received IVT between February 5, 2011, and March 5, 2015, were included in the registries. The prehospital registry included patients thrombolysed in an MSU and admitted to the nearest stroke unit thereafter. Intra-arterial treatment was optional in patients with occlusion of proximal intracranial arteries in both cohorts. The in-hospital registry comprised patients receiving IVT at Charite-Universitatsmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. We excluded patients with nonstroke diagnosis, IVT without known exact (witnessed) time of onset, denial/withdrawal of informed consent for follow-up, missing 3-month follow-up, or incomplete documentation of data used in the multivariable analyses. For the pooled analyses of time-to-treatment effects, we included …

Background: Specialized CT-equipped stroke ambulances can shorten time to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke. Although efficacy of thrombolytic treatment is known to be time-sensitive, effects of pre-hospital thrombolysis on functional outcomes have not yet been evaluated. Methods: We compared outcomes of all consecutive stroke patients who received thrombolysis during the same period cared for either by the Berlin Stroke Emergency Mobile (STEMO) or within conventional care (normal ambulance and in-hospital thrombolysis). Treatment and outcomes were documented in prospective registries. Patients who lived at home without assistance prior to their stroke were included. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤1 at 3 month. Secondary outcome was 3-month mortality. Outcomes were adjusted in multivariable regression for demographics, co-morbidities and stroke severity. Results: From Feb. 5, 2011 to Mar 5, 2015, 427 patients were treated on STEMO and 513 in conventional care. 303 (mean age: 71y, female gender: 48%, median NIHSS: 7) and 357 (mean age: 70y, female gender: 36%, median NIHSS: 7) of them had lived at home without assistance pre-stroke, respectively. Mean onset to treatment time was 34 minutes shorter in STEMO care (96±60 vs. 130±56min). The primary outcome of mRS≤1 was observed in 167 (55%) and 168 (47%) patients (p=0.039); 17 (6%) vs 38 (11%) had died (p=0.02), respectively. Adjusted odds ratios were favorable for STEMO care: OR 1.56 (95%-CI: 1.11-2.20; p=0.01) for mRS≤1 and OR 0.50 (95%-CI: 0.26-0.98; p=0.04) for death. Conclusions: The data suggest that earlier start of IVT by specialized prehospital stroke care leads to improved outcome.

Summary Background Specialised CT-equipped mobile stroke treatment units shorten time to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke by starting treatment before hospital admission; however, direct effects of pre-hospital thrombolysis on clinical outcomes have not been shown. We aimed to compare 3-month functional outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic who had received emergency mobile care or and conventional care. Methods In this observational registry study, patients with ischaemic stroke received intravenous thrombolysis (alteplase) either within a stroke emergency mobile (STEMO) vehicle (pre-hospital care covering 1·3 million inhabitants of Berlin) or within conventional care (normal ambulances and in-hospital care at the Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin in Berlin). Patient data on treatment, outcome, and demographics were documented in STEMO (pre-hospital) or conventional care (in-hospital) registries. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had lived at home without assistance before stroke and had a 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 1 or lower. Our multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and stroke severity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02358772. Findings Between Feb 5, 2011, and March 5, 2015, 427 patients were treated within the STEMO vehicle and their data were entered into a pre-hospital registry. 505 patients received conventional care and their data were entered into an in-hospital thrombolysis registry. Of these, 305 patients in the STEMO group and 353 in the conventional care group met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. 161 (53%) patients in the STEMO group versus 166 (47%) in the conventional care group had an mRS score of 1 or lower (p=0·14). Compared with conventional care, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for STEMO care for the primary outcome (OR 1·40, 95% CI 1·00–1·97; p=0·052) were not significant. Intracranial haemorrhage (p=0·27) and 7-day mortality (p=0·23) did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Interpretation We found no significant difference between the proportion of patients with a mRS score of 1 or lower receiving STEMO care compared with conventional care. However, our results suggest that pre-hospital start of intravenous thrombolysis might lead to improved functional outcome in patients. This evidence requires substantiation in future large-scale trials. Funding Zukunftsfonds Berlin, the Technology Foundation Berlin with EU co-financing by the European Regional Development Fund via Investitionsbank Berlin, and the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research via the Center for Stroke Research Berlin.

Background and Purpose— Specialized computed tomography–equipped stroke ambulances shorten time to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke by starting treatment before hospital arrival. Because of longer travel-time-to-scene, time benefits of this concept are expected to diminish with longer distances from base station to scene. Methods— We used data from the Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Cares in Stroke (PHANTOM-S) trial comparing time intervals between patients for whom a specialized stroke ambulance (stroke emergency mobile) was deployed and patients with conventional emergency medical service. Expected times from base station to scene had been calculated beforehand using computer algorithms informed by emergency medical service routine data. Four different deployment zones with–75% probability–expected arrival within 4, 8, 12, and 16 minutes and total population coverage of ≈1.3 million inhabitants were categorized for stroke emergency mobile deployment. We analyzed times from alarm-to-arrival at scene, to start of intravenous thrombolysis and from onset-to-intravenous thrombolysis. Results— Corresponding to the size of the respective catchment zone, the number of patients cared increased with distance (zone 1: n=30, zone 2: n=127, zone 3: n=156, and zone 4: n=217). Although time to stroke emergency mobile arrival increased with distance (mean: 8.0, 12.5, 15.4, and 18.4 minutes in zones 1–4), time from alarm-to-intravenous thrombolysis (mean: 41.8 versus 76.5; 50.2 versus 79.1; 54.5 versus 76.6; and 59.3 versus 78.0 minutes, respectively; all P Conclusions— In a metropolitan area such as Berlin, time benefits justify a specialized stroke ambulance service up to a mean travel time of 18 minutes from base station. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01382862.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is important for bone remodeling and may contribute to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) pathophysiology. We aimed to assess the value of OPG as a biomarker for CRPS and a possible correlation with radiotracer uptake in 3-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS). OPG levels were analyzed in 23 CRPS patients (17 women; mean age 50 ± 9.0 years; disease duration: 12 weeks [IQR 8–24]), 10 controls (6 women; mean age 58 ± 9.6 years) and 21 patients after uncomplicated fractures (12 women; mean age: 43 ± 15 years; time after fracture: 15 weeks [IQR: 6–22]). The CRPS and control patients also underwent TPBS. OPG in CRPS patients was significantly increased by comparison with both control groups (P = 0.001; Kruskal-Wallis test; CRPS patients: 74.1 pg/mL [IQR: 47.1–100.7]; controls: 46.7 pg/mL [IQR: 35.5–55.0]; P = 0.004; fracture patients: 45.9 pg/mL [IQR: 37.5–56.7]; P = 0.001). As a diagnostic test for CRPS, OPG had a sensitivity of 0.74, specificity of 0.80, positive predictive value of 68% and negative predictive value of 84%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.80 (CI: 0.68–0.91). For the CRPS-affected hand, a significant correlation between OPG and TPBS region of interest analysis in phase III was detected (carpal bones; r = 0.391; P = 0.03). The persistent OPG increase in CRPS indicates enhanced osteoblastic activity shown by increased radiotracer uptake in TPBS phase III. A contribution of bone turnover to CRPS pathophysiology is likely. OPG might be useful as a biomarker for CRPS.