Search

The ozonesonde is a small balloon-borne instrument that is attached to a standard radiosonde to measure profiles of ozone from the surface to 35 km with ∼100-m vertical resolution. Ozonesonde data constitute a mainstay of satellite calibration and are used for climatologies and analysis of trends, especially in the lower stratosphere where satellites are most uncertain. The electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde has been deployed at ∼100 stations worldwide since the 1960s, with changes over time in manufacture and procedures, including details of the cell chemical solution and data processing. As a consequence, there are biases among different stations and discontinuities in profile time series from individual site records. For 22 years the Jülich (Germany) Ozonesonde Intercomparison Experiment (JOSIE) has periodically tested ozonesondes in a simulation chamber designated the World Calibration Centre for Ozonesondes (WCCOS) by WMO. During October–November 2017 a JOSIE campaign evaluated the sondes and procedures used in Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes (SHADOZ), a 14-station sonde network operating in the tropics and subtropics. A distinctive feature of the 2017 JOSIE was that the tests were conducted by operators from eight SHADOZ stations. Experimental protocols for the SHADOZ sonde configurations, which represent most of those in use today, are described, along with preliminary results. SHADOZ stations that follow WMO-recommended protocols record total ozone within 3% of the JOSIE reference instrument. These results and prior JOSIEs demonstrate that regular testing is essential to maintain best practices in ozonesonde operations and to ensure high-quality data for the satellite and ozone assessment communities.

Error characteristics of rainfall measurements were studied using six collocated Joss–Waldvogel (JW) disdrometers that are located at NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility. The six disdrometer means of rain rate R, reflectivity Z, and differential reflectivity ZDR, for a given minute were considered as a reference. The maximum deviations of R, Z, and ZDR from the mean in a rain event were 0.6 mm h−1, 1.3 dB, and 0.05 dB, respectively. Rainfall statistics were then examined between disdrometer pairs. The root-mean-square (rms) difference of R, Z, and ZDR between paired disdrometers in a rain event were as high as 3.2 mm h−1, 3.7 dB, and 0.3 dB, respectively. The rms difference of R and ZDR were even higher when the disdrometer observations were stratified based on reflectivity intervals. The differences in disdrometer rainfall measurements have a potential impact when the disdrometers are considered as calibration tools for vertically pointing and scanning radars. The differences between the disdrometer measurements also result in differences in coefficients and exponents of the derived relations between radar parameters and rain rate. Among the four different relations between radar parameters and rain rate, the absolute difference in rain rate |ΔR| from two different JW disdrometers was highest in R(ZH, ZDR) and lowest in R(KDP, ZDR). The other two relations were R(Z) and R(KDP). The |ΔR| increases with increasing horizontally polarized reflectivity ZH, and differential specific phase KDP in both single- and dual-parameter rainfall estimators, while the |ΔR| increases with decreasing ZDR in dual-parameter rainfall estimators. Several sources of JW disdrometer malfunctions were also presented. The hardware problems were the leading cause for the malfunction of the JW disdrometers, as identified by the manufacturer. A single JW disdrometer could have inherent measurement errors that can only be identified in the presence of collocated (preferably two) rain-measuring instruments.

Four impact disdrometers and 27 tipping bucket rain gauges were operated at 11 different sites during August and September 2001, as part of the Keys Area Microphysics Project. The rain gauge and disdrometer network was designed to study the range dependency of radar calibration and rainfall verification in tropical storms. The gauges were collocated at eight sites, while three to five gauge clusters were deployed at three sites. Four disdrometers were also collocated with rain gauges. Overall the experiment was quite successful, although some problems did occur including flooding of gauge loggers, vandalism, and excessive noise at disdrometer sites. Both a south-to-north and east-to-west rainfall gradient was observed, whereby the gauges on the western and northern sides of the Lower Keys recorded more rainfall. Considering the campaign-long rain accumulations, collocated gauges agreed well, with differences generally less than 2%, except for one gauge cluster where the rain accumulation differen...