Search

Purpose Prior studies have been inconclusive in documenting whether the prevalence of adolescent anxiety is increasing, given sampling and measurement limitations. This study adds new information on recent time trends in anxiety prevalence, specifically investigating trends among previously unexamined sociodemographic subgroups. Methods Weighted data of 37,360 youth respondents (51.1% female, 71.8% White, 91.3% heterosexual, 99.2% cisgender) from the 2012–2018 Dane County Youth Assessment, a county-wide survey administered to youth in participating school districts, were analyzed to estimate time trends in anxiety prevalence among the whole sample and by sociodemographic subgroups. Results The prevalence of youth meeting anxiety-screening criteria increased from 34.1% (95% CI 33.4–34.9) in 2012 to 44% (95% CI 43.2–44.7) in 2018 (OR for trend = 1.07, P for trend

This qualitative study explored how 249 transgender and non-binary (TNB) adolescents (ages 14–18) described salient supports in their lives, and ways in which key social-ecological contexts could better support TNB adolescents’ wellbeing. Participants were recruited through social media, and completed online surveys; all study procedures were approved by the Boston University Institutional Review Board. Most (84.7%) participants identified as White, and as sexual minorities (96.4%). Modified consensual qualitative research (CQR-M) methods were used to examine TNB adolescents’ responses to two questions: “In your life, which people, if any, would you describe as most supportive, and why?” and “What can individuals/groups within families, schools, and communities do to best support the well-being of transgender and non-binary adolescents?” Results indicated that the most common source of support for TNB participants was peers, followed by family members. Participants also highlighted the centrality of supportive environments that offer access to resources, as well as support derived through policies and practices that reduce stigma. Collectively, results have implications for how individuals and systems can foster wellbeing among TNB adolescents.

Transgender and gender diverse youth (TGD) report high rates of mental health concerns. However, there is reason to expect that among TGD youth there is variation in mental health experiences related to specific aspects of gender identity. Furthermore, although certain school characteristics are related to improved mental health for sexual minority youth, it is unclear whether the same school characteristics are associated with improved mental health for TGD youth and whether gender identity moderates the associations between school characteristics and mental health. Using baseline data from Project AVANT, a longitudinal study of TGD youth ages 14-18 years in the United States (N = 252), we report on several mental health outcomes (i.e., depression, anxiety, nonsuicidal self-injury, and PTSD), with attention to differences by gender identity. Secondly, we examined associations of three protective school-related factors (i.e., school-connectedness, presence of a Gay-Straight or Gender-Sexuality Alliance [GSA], and state mandated protections for sexual and gender minority students) with TGD youth mental health. TGD youth reported elevated levels of anxious and depressive symptoms, with nonbinary youth assigned female at birth reporting higher mean depressive symptoms relative to transgender females. Among the aggregate sample of TGD youth, 69.9% reported clinically significant anxiety, 57.9% reported clinically significant depression, 56.7% reported nonsuicidal self-injury, and 46.4% met screening criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder. Despite a small effect size, greater school-connectedness was significantly associated with fewer mental health concerns and gender identity moderated the association between school-connectedness and number of anxiety symptoms. Gender identity also moderated the association between presence of a GSA and number of anxious symptoms, depressive symptoms, and clinically significant depression, respectively. No significant associations of state-level protections and mental health outcomes were detected. Findings highlight the importance of improving mental health and fostering GSA-engagement and school-connectedness among TGD youth. Implications for school psychologists are discussed.