Search

Konstantinos Kostikas,1 Katerina Dimakou,2 Konstantinos Gourgoulianis,3 Mina Gaga,4 Dimosthenis Papapetrou,5 Georgios Tsoukalas,6 Panagiotis Chatziapostolou,7 Antonios Antoniadis,8 Georgios Meletis,9 Efstathia Evangelopoulou,10 Panagiota Styliara,11 Ilektra Karypidou,12 Athena Gogali,1 Konstantinos Kalafatakis,13,14 Nikolaos Tzanakis15 1Respiratory Medicine Department, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; 2 5th Respiratory Medicine Department, General Hospital for Chest Diseases of Athens “SOTIRIA”, Athens, Greece; 3Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece; 4 7th Respiratory Medicine Department, General Hospital for Chest Diseases of Athens “SOTIRIA”, Athens, Greece; 5Iatriko Athinon, Paleo Faliro, Attiki, Greece; 6 4th Respiratory Medicine Department, General Hospital for Chest Diseases of Athens “SOTIRIA”, Athens, Greece; 7Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Euromedica General Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece; 8Department of Pulmonary Medicine, General Hospital of Serres, Serres, Greece; 9Department of Pulmonary Medicine, General Hospital of Heraklion “VENIZELEIO”, Heraklion, Greece; 10Respiratory Medicine Department, General Hospital of Nikaia “ST. PANTELEIMON”, Piraeus, Greece; 11Menarini Hellas, Athens, Greece; 12Department of Pulmonary Medicine, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “GEORGIOS PAPANIKOLAOU”, Thessaloniki, Greece; 13Department of Informatics & Telecommunications, University of Ioannina, Arta, Greece; 14Barts and the London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London (Malta Campus), Victoria, Gozo, Malta; 15Department of Respiratory Medicine, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, GreeceCorrespondence: Konstantinos Kostikas, Respiratory Medicine & Head of Respiratory Medicine Department, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, Tel +30-2651007536 ; +30-6944780616, Email ktkostikas@gmail.com; ktkostikas@uoi.grPurpose: The rationale of this study was to investigate the prevalence of daily and night symptoms and quality of sleep in Greek COPD patients as a means to evaluate their response to treatment with the fixed dose combination of aclidinium/formoterol (administered through the Genuair® device).Patients and Methods: This study was a multicenter, nationwide, non-interventional, observational study in 2105 patients suffering from COPD, who have recently started treatment with aclidinium/formoterol. Patients were attending to two visits, one baseline and a final visit, 3 months later. Different variables have been collected on either the baseline or the final visit or both: demographics, vital sign measurements, COPD-related medical history parameters, comorbidities, COPD assessment test (CAT), COPD severity based on spirometry measurements, COPD stage based on the ABCD assessment approach proposed by the 2019 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), COPD treatment report, and severity of early-morning, daytime and night-time COPD-related symptoms. Reasons for prescribing aclidinium/formoterol, satisfaction of patients to the treatment, as well as their compliance have also been recorded.Results: After 3 months on aclidinium/formoterol, 50.1% of the patients experienced an improvement in their early-morning symptoms. Furthermore, 49.9% of them experienced an improvement in their daily symptoms, 44.9% improved their night-time symptoms and 43.2% reduced the frequency of overnight sleep disruptions due to COPD symptoms. These favorable outcomes apply mainly to GOLD Groups B–D. Treatment with aclidinium/formoterol improved on average the pre-bronchodilation FEV1% pred by 3.18%, the post-bronchodilation FEV1% pred by 2.78% and reduced CAT score by 5.22 points. Satisfaction with using aclidinium/formoterol across patients was high, as well as compliance to therapy.Conclusion: Aclidinium/formoterol provided significant benefits on the quality of life of COPD patients by reducing the morning, daytime and the night-time symptoms and symptom burden in GOLD Groups B–D, and activity impairment under real-life conditions in all GOLD ABCD groups.Keywords: COPD, dual-bronchodilation therapy, aclidinium/formoterol, daytime and night-time symptoms, GOLD ABCD classification

Background: Diagnostic work-up of pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a challenge. Methods: We retrospectively studied all patients referred for computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with suspicion of PE during a 12-month period (2018). The diagnostic accuracy of different D-dimer (Dd) cutoff thresholds for ruling out PE was evaluated. Furthermore, the association of Dd and red cell distribution width (RDW) with embolus location, CTPA findings, and patient outcome was recorded. Results: One thousand seventeen (n = 1017) patients were finally analyzed (mean age: 64.6 years (SD = 11.8), males: 549 (54%)). PE incidence was 18.7%. Central and bilateral embolism was present in 44.7% and 59.5%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for conventional and age-adjusted Dd cutoff was 98.2%, 7.9%, and 98.2%, 13.1%, respectively. A cutoff threshold (2.1 mg/L) with the best (64.4%) specificity was identified based on Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis. Moreover, a novel proposed Dd cutoff (0.74 mg/L) emerged with increased specificity (20.5%) and equal sensitivity (97%) compared to 0.5 mg/L, characterized by concurrent reduction (17.2%) in the number of performed CTPAs. Consolidation/atelectasis and unilateral pleural effusion were significantly associated with PE (p < 0.05, respectively). Patients with consolidation/atelectasis or intrapulmonary nodule(s)/mass on CTPA exhibited significantly greater median Dd values compared to patients without the aforementioned findings (2.34, (IQR 1.29–4.22) vs. 1.59, (IQR 0.81–2.96), and 2.39, (IQR 1.45–4.45) vs. 1.66, (IQR 0.84–3.12), p < 0.001, respectively). RDW was significantly greater in patients who died during hospitalization (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Age-adjusted Dd increased diagnostic accuracy of Dd testing without significantly decreasing the need for imaging. The proposed Dd value (0.74 mg/L) showed promise towards reducing considerably the need of CTPA. Multiple radiographic findings have been associated with increased Dd values in our study.

Background: Bronchiectasis is a heterogeneous, neglected disease with few multicentre studies exploring the causes, severity, microbiology, and treatment of the disease across Europe. This aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of bronchiectasis and compare between different European countries. Methods: EMBARC is an international clinical research network for bronchiectasis. We report on a multicentre, prospective, observational, non-interventional, cohort study (the EMBARC registry) conducted across 27 European countries and Israel. Comprehensive clinical data were collected from adult patients (aged ≥18 years) at baseline and annual follow-up visits using electronic case report form. Data from individual countries were grouped into four regions (the UK, northern and western Europe, southern Europe, and central and eastern Europe according to modified EU EuroVoc classification). Follow-up data were used to explore differences in exacerbation frequency between regions using a negative binomial regression model. Findings: Between Jan 12, 2015, and April 12, 2022, 16 963 individuals were enrolled. Median age was 67 years (IQR 57–74), 10 335 (60·9%) participants were female and 6628 (39·1%) were male. The most common cause of bronchiectasis in all 16 963 participants was post-infective disease in 3600 (21·2%); 6466 individuals (38·1%) were classified as idiopathic. Individuals with bronchiectasis experienced a median of two exacerbations (IQR 1–4) per year and 4483 (26·4%) patients had a hospitalisation for exacerbation in the previous year. When examining the percentage of all isolated bacteria, marked differences in microbiology were seen between countries, with a higher frequency of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and lower Haemophilus influenzae frequency in southern Europe, compared with higher H influenzae in the UK and northern and western Europe. Compared with other regions, patients in central and eastern Europe had more severe bronchiectasis measured by the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (51·3% vs 35·1% in the overall cohort) and more exacerbations leading to hospitalisations (57·9% vs 26·4% in the overall cohort). Overall, patients in central and eastern Europe had an increased frequency of exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1·12, 95% CI 1·01–1·25) and a higher frequency of exacerbations leading to hospitalisations (adjusted RR 1·71, 1·44–2·02) compared with patients in other regions. Treatment of bronchiectasis was highly heterogeneous between regions. Interpretation: Bronchiectasis shows important geographical variation in causes, microbiology, severity, and outcomes across Europe. Funding: European Union–European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations Innovative Medicines Initiative. Translations: For the Arabic, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Irish, Russian and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Introduction The coexistence of COPD and bronchiectasis seems to be common and associated with a worse prognosis than for either disease individually. However, no definition of this association exists to guide researchers and clinicians. Methods We conducted a Delphi survey involving expert pulmonologists and radiologists from Europe, Turkey and Israel in order to define the “COPD– [bronchiectasis] BE association”. A panel of 16 experts from EMBARC selected 35 statements for the survey after reviewing scientific literature. Invited participants, selected on the basis of expertise, geographical and sex distribution, were asked to express agreement on the statements. Consensus was defined as a score of ≥6 points (scale 0 to 9) in ≥70% of answers across two scoring rounds. Results 102 (72.3%) out of 141 invited experts participated in the first round. Their response rate in the second round was 81%. The final consensus definition of “COPD–BE association” was: “The coexistence of (1) specific radiological findings (abnormal bronchial dilatation, airways visible within 1 cm of pleura and/or lack of tapering sign in ≥1 pulmonary segment and in >1 lobe) with (2) an obstructive pattern on spirometry ([forced expiratory volume in 1 s] FEV1/[forced vital capacity] FVC, A group of experts from EMBARC has generated a consensus definition of COPD and bronchiectasis association based on the coexistence of radiological findings, bronchial obstruction, compatible symptoms and exposure to smoke or toxic agents (ROSE criteria) https://bit.ly/3g3cdld

The SAVE-MORE trial demonstrated that anakinra treatment in COVID-19 pneumonia with plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator (suPAR) levels of 6 ng/mL or more was associated with 0.36 odds for a worse outcome compared to placebo when expressed by the WHO-Clinical Progression Scale (CPS) at day 28. Herein, we report the results of subgroup analyses and long-term outcomes.This prospective, double-blind, randomised clinical trial, recruited patients with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, in need of hospitalisation, lower respiratory tract infection and plasma suPAR ≥6 ng/mL from 37 academic and community hospitals in Greece and Italy. Patients were 1:2 randomised to subcutaneous treatment with placebo or anakinra (100 mg) once daily for 10 days. Pre-defined subgroups of Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI), sex, age, level of suPAR, and time from symptom onset were analysed for the primary endpoint (overall comparison of distribution of frequencies of the scores from the WHO-CPS between treatments on day 28), by multivariable ordinal regression analysis in the intention to treat (ITT) population. This trial is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (2020-005828-11) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04680949).Patients were enrolled between 23 December 2020 and 31 March 2021; 189 patients in the placebo arm and 405 patients in the anakinra arm were the ITT population. Multivariable analysis showed that anakinra treatment was accompanied by significantly lower odds for worse outcome compared to placebo at day 28 for all studied subgroups (CCI ≥ 2, OR: 0.34, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.22-0.50; CCI2, OR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.68; suPAR9 ng/mL, OR: 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.66; suPAR 6-9 ng/mL, OR: 0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.52; patients ≥65 years, OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.66; and patients65 years, OR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.19-0.45). The benefit was uniform, irrespective of the time from start of symptoms until the start of the study drug. At days 60 and 90, anakinra treatment had odds of 0.40 (95% CI 0.28-0.57) and 0.46 (95% CI 0.32-0.67) respectively, for a worse outcome compared to placebo. The costs of general ward stay, ICU stay, and drugs were lower with anakinra treatment.Anakinra represents an important therapeutic tool in the management of COVID-19 that may be administered in all subgroups of patients; benefits are maintained until day 90.Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB.

In the present prospective multicentre observational study, we evaluated the potential role of blood eosinophils on the outcomes of patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations.Consecutive patients40 years with a previous COPD diagnosis were recruited. Blood eosinophils were measured on admission prior to the initiation of treatment and were evaluated in three groups (50, 50-149 and ≥150 cells/μL). Patients received standard care and were followed up for a year.A total of 388 patients were included (83.5% male, mean age 72 years). Patients with higher blood eosinophils had less dyspnoea (Borg scale), lower C-reactive protein (CRP) and higher PaOHigher blood eosinophils were associated with better outcomes in hospitalized COPD patients, further supporting their use as a prognostic biomarker.

Background and objectives: Administration of inhaled medication for asthma and COPD is often difficult and incorrect device use is associated with unfavorable outcomes. We aimed to evaluate device ...

Contains fulltext : 237989.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Anakinra might improve the prognosis of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 (ie, patients requiring oxygen supplementation but not yet receiving organ support). We aimed to assess the effect of anakinra treatment on mortality in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. METHODS: For this systematic review and individual patient-level meta-analysis, a systematic literature search was done on Dec 28, 2020, in Medline (PubMed), Cochrane, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases for randomised trials, comparative studies, and observational studies of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, comparing administration of anakinra with standard of care, or placebo, or both. The search was repeated on Jan 22, 2021. Individual patient-level data were requested from investigators and corresponding authors of eligible studies; if individual patient-level data were not available, published data were extracted from the original reports. The primary endpoint was mortality after 28 days and the secondary endpoint was safety (eg, the risk of secondary infections). This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020221491). FINDINGS: 209 articles were identified, of which 178 full-text articles fulfilled screening criteria and were assessed. Aggregate data on 1185 patients from nine studies were analysed, and individual patient-level data on 895 patients were provided from six of these studies. Eight studies were observational and one was a randomised controlled trial. Most studies used historical controls. In the individual patient-level meta-analysis, after adjusting for age, comorbidities, baseline ratio of the arterial partial oxygen pressure divided by the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO(2)/FiO(2)), C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations, and lymphopenia, mortality was significantly lower in patients treated with anakinra (38 [11%] of 342) than in those receiving standard of care with or without placebo (137 [25%] of 553; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·32 [95% CI 0·20-0·51]). The mortality benefit was similar across subgroups regardless of comorbidities (ie, diabetes), ferritin concentrations, or the baseline PaO(2)/FiO(2). In a subgroup analysis, anakinra was more effective in lowering mortality in patients with CRP concentrations higher than 100 mg/L (OR 0·28 [95% CI 0·17-0·47]). Anakinra showed a significant survival benefit when given without dexamethasone (OR 0·23 [95% CI 0·12-0·43]), but not with dexamethasone co-administration (0·72 [95% CI 0·37-1·41]). Anakinra was not associated with a significantly increased risk of secondary infections when compared with standard of care (OR 1·35 [95% CI 0·59-3·10]). INTERPRETATION: Anakinra could be a safe, anti-inflammatory treatment option to reduce the mortality risk in patients admitted to hospital with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in the presence of signs of hyperinflammation such as CRP concentrations higher than 100 mg/L. FUNDING: Sobi.

Case Presentation A 52-year-old man, current smoker with a 50 pack-year history, presented to our department with cough, yellow sputum, and localized right chest pain. Chest radiograph revealed a large mass in the right upper lobe. He denied the presence of fever, night sweats, or weight loss. He has a medical history of COPD and anxiety disorder. He was receiving long-acting beta agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists as a treatment for COPD and quetiapine 100 mg for anxiety disorder.

BACKGROUND: Accurate mediastinal staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for the determination of optimal treatment management. METHODS: This was a real-life prospective study enrolling 140 patients between December 2016 and August 2018. We aimed to determine the clinical utility of EBUS/EUS-b in mediastinal staging of patients with NSCLC in comparison with integrated PET/CT. Furthermore, SUV(max) cut-off value with the highest specificity/accuracy was evaluated. Subgroup analysis according to histological type was performed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients were eligible for analysis (mean age ± SD: 67.6±7.6, males 97). Three hundred different lymph node stations were sampled (272 through EBUS-TBNA and 28 through EUS-b FNA). Mean SUV(max) of all malignant lymph nodes was 7.46 (SD =5.54). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of EBUS/EUS-b for the identification of mediastinal malignant lymph nodes was 93.8%, 100%, 100%, and 93.4%, respectively. Accordingly, PET/CT yielded 92.2% sensitivity, 43.9% specificity, 64.8% PPV and 83.3% NPV. For adenocarcinoma (n=76) NPV were 86.2% with EBUS/EUS-b and 75% with PET/CT. NPV for squamous cell (n=46) was 100% with EBUS/EUS-b and 90.9% with PET/CT. EBUS/EUS-b staging yielded excellent agreement with final staging (97.5%, Tau 0.94, P

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common diseases worldwide. Although different guidelines regarding therapeutic algorithms exist, the most widely adopted approach is the one suggested by the Global Initiative in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease in which patients are stratified according to their dyspnea severity and their exacerbation history during the previous year. This combined assessment of COPD, which takes into consideration all aforementioned characteristics of COPD patients as well as the number of blood eosinophils, results in a proposed therapeutic algorithm which is complex and hard to memorize. This complexity is probable one of the causes that most health care professionals are not adherent to the guidelines when treating COPD patients. Here, we propose a simplified therapeutic algorithm for the treatment of COPD patients taking into consideration the current evidence on the use of bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids.

At the beginning of the pandemic, there have been considerable concerns regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and outcomes in patients with severe asthma treated with biologics.To prospectively observe a cohort of severe asthmatics treated with biologics for the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and disease severity during the COVID-19 pandemic.Physicians from centers treating patients with severe asthma all over Greece provided demographic and medical data regarding their patients treated with biologics. Physicians were also asked to follow up patients during the pandemic and to perform a polymerase chain reaction test in case of a suspected SARS-Cov-2 infection.Among the 591 severe asthmatics (63.5% female) included in the study, 219 (37.1%) were treated with omalizumab, 358 (60.6%) with mepolizumab, and 14 (2.4%) with benralizumab. In total, 26 patients (4.4%) had a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 9 (34.6%) of whom were admitted to the hospital because of severe COVID-19, and 1 required mechanical ventilation and died 19 days after admission. Of the 26 infected patients, 5 (19.2%) experienced asthma control deterioration, characterized as exacerbation that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids. The scheduled administration of the biological therapy was performed timely in all patients with the exception of 2, in whom it was postponed for 1 week according to their doctors' suggestion.Our study confirms that despite the initial concerns, SARS-CoV-2 infection is not more common in asthmatics treated with biologics compared with the general population, whereas the use of biologic treatments for severe asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic does not seem to be related to adverse outcomes from severe COVID-19.

Background/Aim: This study analyzed the characteristics of patients with COVID-19 with major events during the first days of hospitalization. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients admitted to two hospitals in Athens, Greece. The characteristics of patients with COVID-19 who suffered the primary endpoint (venous thromboembolic events, intubation, and death) during the first days of hospitalization were analyzed. Results: Among 95 patients included in the analysis, 21 presented with major adverse events during a median follow-up of 13 days. More than 50% of these patients presented with a major event during the first 3 days. Anticoagulation treatment was inversely associated with the cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint [hazard ratio=0.16 (95% confidence interval=0.06-0.47)]. Patients with major events were older, with lower baseline SatO(2), and higher number of Wells’ criteria and Charlson comorbidity index. Among these patients, those with hypertension were at higher risk for early occurrence of events (≤ first three days of hospitalization). Conclusion: Major adverse events may occur early in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with a high-risk profile. Anticoagulation treatment appears to reduce this risk and thus prompt thromboprophylaxis should be employed in these patients.

Despite that COPD remains one of the most common respiratory diseases worldwide, it can be managed effectively with certain treatments and, more importantly, be prevented by the early implementation of various measures. The pathology and pathophysiology of this disease continue to be studied, with new pharmacological and invasive therapies emerging. In this consensus paper, the Working Group of the Hellenic Thoracic Society aimed to consolidate the up-to-date information and new advances in the treatment of COPD. Local and international data on its prevalence are presented, with revised strategies on the diagnostic approach and the evaluation of risk assessment and disease severity classification. Emphasis is placed on the management and therapy of patients with COPD, covering both common principles, specialized modalities, and algorithms to distinguish between home care and the need for hospitalization. Although pharmacological treatment is commonly recognized in COPD, an integrative approach of pulmonary rehabilitation, physical activity, patient education, and self-assessment should be encountered for a comprehensive treatment, prevention of exacerbations, and increased quality of life in patients.

To the editorWe have recently proposed a simplified approach of pharmacological treatment of stable COPD that has been previously published in this journal [1]. The most widely adopted approach reg...

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a multifactorial clinical condition, characterized by chronic progressive (or worsening) respiratory symptoms, structural pulmonary abnormalities, and impaired lung function, and is often accompanied by multiple, clinically significant comorbid disorders. In 2017, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) issued a new report on COPD prevention, diagnosis and management, aiming at personalizing the maintenance therapeutic approach of the stable disease, based on the patients’ symptoms and history of exacerbations (ABCD assessment approach). Our objective was to evaluate the implementation of GOLD suggestions in everyday clinical practice in Greece. Methods This was a cross-sectional observational study. Sixty-five different variables (demographics, vital sign measurements, COPD-related medical history parameters, comorbidities, vaccination data, COPD severity based on spirometry measurements, COPD stage based on the ABCD assessment approach, COPD treatments) were collected from 3615 nation-wide COPD patients (Greece). Results The mean age at the time of initial COPD diagnosis was 63.8 (± 10.2). Almost 60% of the subjects were classified into group B, while the remaining patients were falling into groups A (18%) and D (21%), and only a small minority of patients belonged to Group C, according to the ABCD assessment approach. The compliance of respiratory physicians to the GOLD 2017 therapeutic suggestions is problematic, especially when it comes to COPD patients belonging to Group A. Conclusion Our data provide valuable information regarding the demographic and medical profile of COPD patients in Greece, the domains which the revised ABCD assessment approach may show some clinical significance on, and the necessity for medical practitioners dealing with COPD patients to adhere closer to international recommendations for the proper management of the disease.

Early recognition of risk and start of treatment may improve unfavorable outcome of COVID-19. In the SAVE-MORE double-blind randomized trial, 594 patients with pneumonia without respiratory dysfunction at risk as defined by plasma suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) ≥ 6 ng/ml were 1:2 randomized to subcutaneous placebo or 100 mg anakinra once daily for 10 days; 85.9% were co-administered dexamethasone. After 28 days, anakinra-treated patients were distributed to lower strata of the 11-point World Health Organization ordinal Clinical Progression Scale (WHO-CPS) (adjusted odds ratio-OR 0.36; 95%CI 0.26–0.50; P

Przerzuty do oskrzeli nowotworów rozwijających się poza klatką piersiową występują niezwykle rzadko. Najczęstszymi typami raka, które do nich prowadzą, są rak sutka, rak jelita grubego i rak nerkowokomórkowy. Przerzuty do oskrzeli stanowią zazwyczaj późny objaw innych typów nowotworu i ich rokowanie jest zazwyczaj złe—średnie przeżycie w większości przypadków wynosi 1–2 lata. Z powodu swojej unikatowości pozostają wyzwaniem dla lekarzy oceniających, czy są one pierwotnym guzem płuc, czy mają charakter wtórny. W niniejszym artykule przedstawiono przypadek młodego mężczyzny po usunięciu lewej nerki z powodu raka jasnokomórkowego, u którego po 7 latach pojawiły się przerzuty do oskrzeli, oraz podsumowano dostępne dane literaturowe. Autorzy odnoszą się ponadto do stosowania pętli diatermicznej jako metody leczenia tej jednostki chorobowej.