Search

Context Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major source of morbidity and mortality globally. COPD can be effectively managed in primary care settings. However, current studies investigating lived experiences of COPD patients raise important concerns about experiences within healthcare settings and interactions with healthcare professionals. Objectives We aimed to synthesise findings from peer-reviewed qualitative studies published in academic journals describing health care experiences of patients living with COPD in primary and community health care settings. Study Design and Setting The methodology followed the seven steps for meta-ethnography described by Noblit and Hare (1988). Databases including Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Ovid Emcare, CINAHL Plus and Sociological Abstracts were searched for peer-reviewed qualitative studies. These were uploaded to COVIDENCETM to support selection and appraisal of studies. Intensity sampling was used to select the final set of studies for inclusion and data extraction. A 'line-of-argument' synthesis and deductive and inductive analysis was used to identify key themes. Population studied Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) seeking care in primary care, outpatient, or community pulmonary rehabilitation settings. Intervention/Instrument N/A Outcome Measures N/A Results The initial search identified 5870 papers. Following screening and assessment of full text, data from 23 studies were included for analysis. Metaphors and key concepts of papers were explored within the context of six domains of the patient experience. Additional inductive coding revealed healthcare experiences were shaped by emotion, identity and vulnerability and are clearly vital perspectives of the healthcare experiences of adults with COPD. Expected Outcomes The synthesis is completed. The literature showed that experiences of this group often fell short of what was expected and needed by patients with COPD. Adopting strategies to improve experiences of care in the community can be expected to improve self-management and contribute to improved health outcomes and quality of life., Presenters Sanduni Madawala, Chris Barton, PhD, BSc, MSc, Karthika Kasiviswanathan, MBBS, MPH, Christian Osadnik, PhD, BPhysio(Hons), [...]

Background: Studies investigating lived experiences of patients with COPD raise important concerns about interactions with healthcare professionals. Patients often describe feelings of guilt and shame associated with their COPD and may experience stigma and poor patient experience of care. The aims and objectives of the present study were to systematically scope and synthesise findings from peer-reviewed qualitative studies describing healthcare experiences of patients living with COPD across community care settings., Methods: A meta-ethnography was undertaken. Database searches were performed in Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Ovid Emcare, CINAHL Plus and Sociological Abstracts. Eligible qualitative studies were included. Study screening and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. A "line-of-argument" synthesis and deductive and inductive analysis was used to identify key themes, where the deductive element aligned to Wong and Haggerty's six key dimensions of patient experiences., Results: Data from 23 studies were included. Experiences and their meaning to patients were explored within the context of six domains of patient experience including access, interpersonal communication, continuity and coordination, comprehensiveness and trust. Inductive coding revealed emotion, stigma, identity and vulnerability shaped healthcare experiences of adults with COPD., Implications: Experiences often fell short of what was expected and needed in community settings. Adopting strategies to improve experiences of care in the community can be expected to improve self-management and contribute to improved health outcomes and quality of life. These strategies should take account of vulnerability, stigma and emotions such as guilt and blame that are potent affective drivers of the experience of care for patients with COPD., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors have no relevant conflict of interests to declare., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)