Search

Objective: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal conduit (RC) or bladder preservation (BP) with (chemo)radiotherapy for bladder cancer., Methods and Analysis: Patients with bladder cancer, stage cT1-T4, cN0-N1, M0 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months from curative treatment (RC or BP) and without disease were eligible for inclusion. Two HRQOL instruments were administered: Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) for bladder cancer-specific HRQOL and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The mean QOL scores across various domains and specific questions were compared between the two treatment groups using an independent t-test., Results: Out of the 104 enrolled patients, 56 underwent RC and 48 opted for BP, with 95 (91.3%) being male. The median time from treatment completion to QOL assessment was 22 months (IQR 10-56). The median age for the entire cohort was 62 years (IQR 55-68), 65.5 years (IQR 55-71) in BP and 59.5 years (IQR 55-66) in RC. There was no significant difference in mean BCI urinary and bowel scores in function or bother subdomains between the two groups. Overall, BCI sexual scores were low in both groups but significantly better after BP (BPmean 56.9, RCmean 41.5, p=0.01). Mean scores for sexual function subdomain were BPmean 38.4 and RCmean 25 (p=0.07) and for sexual bother were BPmean 81 RCmean 62 (p=0.02). The EORTC QLQ-C30 outcomes did not show a significant difference in either group., Conclusion: The BP group showed significantly better results in the sexual domain compared with the RC group. Both groups had good QOL in terms of urinary and bowel functions., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes of CT-based adaptive intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC followed by IC-ISBT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) in resource-constrained settings., Methods and Materials: LACC patients treated with adaptive brachytherapy techniques were analyzed to evaluate treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the log-rank test for univariate analysis., Results: Out of 141 eligible patients with LACC, 87 (61.7%) patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in referral hospitals, while 54 (38.3%) were treated at our center. We divided our cohort into two groups: poor EBRT responder group (n = 70 [49.6%]) where IC-ISBT was adapted to achieve optimum tumor doses and OAR optimization group 71 (50.4%) where IC-ISBT was performed to reduce OAR doses. Median HRCTV-D90 dose was 88 Gy (range 70-109 Gy) with median HRCTV volume 33cc (range 15-96). Median D2cc doses to OARs were 90 Gy (range 70-107), 71 Gy (range 55-105) and 70 Gy (range 47-90) to bladder, rectum and sigmoid, respectively. At median follow-up of 32 months, 3-year local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 83%, 75%, 64% and 72%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly better outcomes for OAR optimization compared to poor EBRT responders, with 3-year LC (95% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001), LRC (87.3% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001), DFS (79.2% vs. 49.4%, p < 0.001), and OS (86.2% vs. 57.4%, p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: In resource-constrained settings, implementation of Adaptive IC-ISBT is a viable alternative for optimizing OAR doses in LACC. However proactive approach employing IC-ISBT for tumor dose-escalation from first fraction of BT is warranted for improving LC in poor EBRT responders., (Copyright © 2024 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The systematic review by Saouli et al. investigates the role of radical prostatectomy (RP) in managing oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPCa) [1]. They analyzed the existing literature to assess the oncological and functional outcomes of RP for these patients. RP is feasible and has an acceptable risk of complications. However, the lack of consensus on the definitions of omPCa and the low-quality evidence of the available comparative and retrospective studies, RP in omPCa should not be recommended outside of clinical trials., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes of recurrent gynaecological cancers treated with reirradiation (reRT) using advanced brachytherapy (BT) technique., Methods and Materials: Seventy-six women who underwent reRT with BT for gynaecological cancers at our institute between January 2000 and December 2019 were analysed to determine patient, disease and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. Descriptive analysis was used for demographics, and the Kaplan Meir method was used for survival analysis., Results: Median age at recurrence was 55 years (Range: 35-73). Forty-three patients had recurrent cervical cancer with intact uterus, and 33 had recurrent vault/vaginal cancers post adjuvant RT. Eight patients received EBRT prior to BT (Range: 30-50Gy). Twenty-two patients (28.9%) received salvage chemotherapy before consideration of brachytherapy. Brachytherapy application was done using MUPIT in 38, Vienna applicator in 20, Syed Neblett in 8, central vaginal cylinder in 3, multicatheter intravaginal applicator in 2, tandem-ovoids in 4 and Houdek applicator in 1 patient. Median cumulative EQD2 for all courses of radiation was 108 Gy (IQR 92-123 Gy). At median follow up of 39 months, local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) at 2-years was 60%, 56.3%, and 72.9 respectively. Patients who had recurrences beyond 2 years had significantly better OS compared to early recurrences. Patients who received BT doses >40 Gy had a higher LC and PFS. Grade 3 to 4 late rectal toxicity was seen in 10 (13%), bladder toxicity in 6 (8%) and vaginal fibrosis in 24 (31%) patients., Conclusion: The use of advanced BT approach in reirradiation setting is a feasible and safe option in treatment of post-treatment recurrent cervical, endometrial, and vaginal cancers., (Copyright © 2023 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)