Search

Innovation is defined as the introduction of something new, whether an idea, method or device. In this article, we describe the most important and innovative concepts and techniques that have advanced patient care within modern surgical subspecialties. We performed a systematic literature review and consulted academic subspecialty experts to evaluate recent changes in practice. The identified innovations included reduced blood loss and improved training in hepatobiliary surgery, total mesorectal excision and neoadjuvant therapies in colorectal surgery, prosthetic mesh in outpatient surgery, sentinel lymph node theory in surgical oncology, endovascular and wire-based skills in vascular and cardiovascular surgery, and the acceptance of abnormal anatomy through damage-control procedures in trauma and critical care. The common denominator among all subspecialties is an improvement in patient care manifested as a decrease in morbidity and mortality. Surgeons must continue to pursue innovative thinking, technological advances, improved training and systematic research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present the case of a 32-year-old woman with high-grade right pulmonary artery stenosis secondary to fibrous mediastinitis. The patient was managed with balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Only 15 cases of this nature have been reported in the literature, and this is one of the first to be managed with endovascular stent placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with diabetes and diffuse infrageniculate arterial disease who present with chronic limb-threatening ischemia require an exact anatomical plan for revascularization. Advanced pedal duplex can be used to define possible routes for revascularization. In addition, pedal acceleration time (PAT) can predict the success or failure of both medical and surgical interventions., Methods: A retrospective review of patients who were referred to our group for unilateral limb-threatening ischemia with isolated infrageniculate disease was conducted. Pedal duplex and PAT at the base of the wound was performed before and 1 week after intervention. The primary endpoint was limb salvage at 1 year. Revascularization was defined as direct or indirect based on the angiosome concept., Results: Fifty-four patients meeting inclusion criteria presented over a 5-year period (toe wound, n = 42; heel wound, n = 8; both, n = 4). At 1 year, 10 (18.5%) had required below-knee amputation, whereas the remainder had healed/improved. Limb salvage was predicted by absence of ongoing smoking, absence of dialysis, and postprocedural PAT (class I/II). Limb salvage did not correlate with direct versus indirect revascularization., Conclusions: Advanced lower-extremity duplex in conjunction with determining PAT at the area of concern is a useful technique for mapping the vasculature and identifying targets for revascularization in patients with diffuse infrageniculate disease. Target artery revascularization to the wound bed resulting in a PAT less than 180 msec is predictive of limb salvage, regardless of whether perfusion is direct or indirect.

Introduction: To analyze our experience to quantify potential need for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA)., Methods: Retrospective review of patients over a three-year period who presented as a trauma with hemorrhagic shock. Patients were divided into two groups: REBOA Candidate vs. Non-candidates. Injuries, outcomes, and interventions were compared., Results: Of 7643 trauma activations, only 37 (0.44%) fit inclusion criteria, of which 16 met criteria for candidacy for potential REBOA placement. The groups did not differ in terms of injury severity, physiology, age, timing of intervention, nor massive transfusion. Survival was linked to TRISS (p = 0.01) and Emergency Room Thoracotomy (p = 0.002). Of Candidates, 8 (50%) had injuries that could have benefited from REBOA, while 7 (44%) had injuries that could be associated with potential harm., Discussion: The volume of patients who would potentially benefit from REBOA appears to be small and does not appear to support system wide adoption in the studied region., Level of Evidence: IV., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest to report for this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Arterial duplex ultrasound (DUS) and ankle-brachial indices (ABIs) are accepted methods for assessing lower limb arterial perfusion. However, in a significant number of diabetic patients, medial wall calcification often precludes an ABI measurement. Direct, noninvasive duplex imaging of the pedal arch in the setting of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has not been well evaluated. Although plantar arch interrogation is new to vascular ultrasound, imaging the plantar arteries appears to be a reliable angiographic technique for critical limb ischemia. We sought to define the utility of Plantar Acceleration Time as a surrogate for ABIs., Methods: Patients undergoing DUS including Plantar Acceleration Time for suspicion of PAD were retrospectively reviewed in a prospective database over a 1-year period. Two hundred fifty nondiabetic patients (499 limbs) with documented ABI were studied. Plantar Acceleration Time was calculated (milliseconds [msec]) in each limb in the lateral plantar artery. Statistical analyses were performed using linear regression and analysis of variance testing using Microsoft Excel database (version 2016; Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA). Patients were then grouped into 4 classes based on their clinical symptoms and ABI. Plantar Acceleration Time was similarly grouped into 4 distinct classes and correlated with the clinical and ABI classes., Results: Plantar Acceleration Time correlated significantly with ABI (P < 0.001). There were significant differences in Plantar Acceleration Times between each class based on ABI and clinical presentation (P < 0.001 for each): Class 1 Plantar Acceleration Times 89.9 ± 15.5 msec; Class 2, 152.3 ± 28.4 msec; Class 3, 209.8 ± 25.5 msec, and Class 4, 270.2 ± 35.3 msec., Conclusions: Plantar Acceleration Time demonstrates a high correlation with ABI in patients with compressible arteries. Based on our results we propose the following categories of Plantar Acceleration Time, which appear to correlate with both clinical and ABI findings. ABI of 0.90-1.3 correlates with a Plantar Acceleration Time of 0-120 msec, ABI of 0.69-0.89 correlates with a Plantar Acceleration Time of 121-180 msec, ABI of 0.40-0.68 correlates with a Plantar Acceleration Time of 181-224 msec, and an ABI of 0.00-0.39 correlates with a Plantar Acceleration Time of greater than 225 msec. Further studies are ongoing to confirm whether Plantar Acceleration Time may be a suitable substitute to ABIs in patients with noncompressible arteries that preclude meaningful ABIs and gives more information regarding targeted angiosome perfusion to the foot., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Traumatic Rib Cage Hernias (TRCH) requiring operative repair are rare and there is currently no literature to guiding surgical management., Methods: Perioperative review of TRCH over 32 years. Five operative grades were developed based on extent of tissue/bone damage, size, and location., Results: Twenty-four patients (20 blunt, 4 penetrating) underwent operative repair. Lung was the herniated organ in 88% with a median of 4 rib fractures and average size of 60.25 cm. Types of operation were well clustered by assigned TRCH grade. The majority required mesh (75%) and/or rib plating (79%). Complex tissue flap reconstruction was required in 10%. Full range-of-motion was maintained in 88% with79% returning to pre-injury activity levels. Five patients had continued pain at final follow up (mean = 7months)., Conclusion: The size and degree of injury has important implications in the optimal surgical management of TRCHs. These operative grades effectively direct surgical care for these rare and complex injuries., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The management of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) has evolved radically in the last decade with changes in the processes of care and the introduction of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). These changes have wrought improved outcome, but the direct effect of TEVAR on outcome remains in question as previous studies have lacked vigorous risk adjustment and long-term follow-up. To address these knowledge gaps, we compared the outcomes of TEVAR, open surgical repair, and nonoperative management for BTAI., Methods: Eight verified trauma centers recruited from the Western Trauma Association Multicenter Study Group retrospectively studied all patients with BTAI admitted between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2016. Data included demographics, comorbidities, admitting physiology, injury severity, in-hospital care, and outcome., Results: We studied 316 patients with BTAI; 57 (18.0%) were in extremis and died before treatment. Of the 259 treated surgically, TEVAR was performed in 176 (68.0%), open in 28 (10.8%), hybrid in 4 (1.5%), and nonoperative in 51 (19.7%). Thoracic endovascular aortic repair and open repair groups had similar Injury Severity Scale score, chest Abbreviated Injury Scale score, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, and probability of survival, but differed in median age (open: 28 [interquartile range {IQR}, 19-51]; TEVAR: 46 [IQR, 28-60]; p < 0.007), zone of aortic injury (p < 0.001), and grade of aortic injury (open: 6 [IQR, 4-6]; TEVAR: 2 [IQR, 2-4]; p < 0.001). The overall in-hospital mortality was 6.6% (TEVAR: 5.7%, open: 10.7%, nonoperative: 3.9%; p = 0.535). Of the 240 patients who survived to discharge, two died (one at 9 months and one at 8 years); both were managed with TEVAR, but the deaths were unrelated to the aortic procedure. Stent graft surveillance computed tomography scans were not obtained in 37.6%., Conclusions: The mortality of BTAI continues to decrease. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair, when anatomically suitable, should be the treatment of choice. Open repair remains necessary for more proximal injuries. Process improvement in computed tomography imaging in follow-up of TEVAR is warranted., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Background  Surgery for lung abscess is a challenging task. Timing and indications for surgery are not well established. Identification of predictors of outcome could help to clarify the role of surgery. Methods  Patients who underwent major thoracic surgery for infectious lung abscess were identified at six centers for general thoracic surgery in Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Study period was 2000 to 2016. Results  There were 91 patients. Pulmonary sepsis (48), pleural empyema (43), persistent air leakage (25), acute renal failure (12), and respiratory failure with mechanical ventilation (25) were already preoperatively present. The mean Charlson index of comorbidity was 3.0 (median: 2.0; interquartile range: 3). Procedures were segmentectomy (18), lobectomy (58), and pneumonectomy (15). The 30-day mortality following surgery was 13/91.Preoperative sepsis (odds ratio [OR]: 13.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86-610.53; p  < 0.01), preoperative persistent air leak (OR: 13.46, 95% CI: 3.00-85.37, p  < 0.01), respiratory failure (OR: 5.60; 95% CI: 1.41-24.84; p  < 0.01), acute renal failure (OR: 6.15 ; 95% CI: 1.24-29.56 ; p  = 0.01), and Charlson index of comorbidity ≥ 3 (OR: 7.19 ; 95% CI: 1.43-71.21 ; p  < 0.01) are associated with higher mortality, whereas age > 70 years ( p  = 0.46) and the extent of pulmonary resection (segmentectomy, lobectomy, pneumonectomy) have no significant influence on mortality. Patients with fatal outcome have significantly higher Charlson index of comorbidity ( p  < 0.01). Conclusions  Delayed referral for surgery is common. Significant predictors for fatal outcome are pulmonary sepsis, septic complications (air leak, pleural empyema), septic organ failure (respiratory, acute renal failure), and preexisting comorbidity (Charlson index of comorbidity ≥ 3). The extent of surgical resection shows no significant influence., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: None., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

This is a recommended management algorithm from the Western Trauma Association addressing the management of adult patients with rib fractures. Because there is a paucity of published prospective randomized clinical trials that have generated Class I data, these recommendations are based primarily on published observational studies and expert opinion of Western Trauma Association members. The algorithm and accompanying comments represent a safe and sensible approach that can be followed at most trauma centers. We recognize that there will be patient, personnel, institutional, and situational factors that may warrant or require deviation from the recommended algorithm. We encourage institutions to use this as a guideline to develop their own local protocols.