Search

Summary Background Dracunculiasis (also known as Guinea worm disease), caused by the Dracunculus medinensis nematode, is progressing towards eradication, with a reduction in cases from 3·5 million cases in the mid-1980s to only 54 human cases at the end of 2019. Most cases now occur in Chad. On April 19, 2019, a 19-year-old woman presented with D medinensis in an area within the Salamat region of Chad, where the disease had not been previously reported. We aimed to investigate the connection between this case and others detected locally and elsewhere in Chad using a combination of epidemiological and genetic approaches. Methods In this cross-sectional field study, we conducted household case searches and informal group interviews in the Bogam, Liwi, and Tarh villages in Chad. All community members including children were eligible for participation in the outbreak investigation. Adult female D medinensis associated with this outbreak were collected for genetic analysis (18 from humans and two from dogs). Four mitochondrial genes and 22 nuclear microsatellite markers were used to assess relatedness of worms associated with the outbreak in comparison with other worms from elsewhere in Chad. Findings Between April 12 and Sept 6, 2019, we identified 22 human cases and two canine cases of dracunculiasis associated with 15 households. Six (40%) of the 15 affected households had multiple human or canine cases within the household. Most cases of dracunculiasis in people were from three villages in Salamat (21 [95%] of 22 cases), but one case was detected nearly 400 km away in Sarh city (outside the Salamat region). All people with dracunculiasis reported a history of consuming fish and unfiltered water. Worms associated with this outbreak were genetically similar and shared the same maternal lineage. Interpretation Molecular epidemiological results suggest a point-source outbreak that originated from a single female D medinensis, rather than newly identified sustained local transmission. The failure of the surveillance system to detect the suspected canine infection in 2018 highlights the challenge of canine D medinensis detection, particularly in areas under passive surveillance. Human movement can also contribute to dracunculiasis spread over long distances. Funding The Carter Center.

The global Guinea worm eradication program represents one of the great public health success stories of our time. Since the program’s inception in 1980, the number of annual human cases has reduced by 99.9%, from an estimated 3.5 million cases in 21 countries1 to only 54 cases in three countries at the end of 2019.2,3 Causing significant disability and pain, Guinea worm infection occurs through the ingestion of freshwater copepods (small water crustaceans) infected with stage 3 Dracunculus medinensis larvae. After approximately 10–14 months, a blister forms (usually on a lower limb) where the pregnant adult female Guinea worm ruptures the skin.4 Upon detection of a possible Guinea worm case, patients are transported to health centers where they receive care. The worm is extracted via “controlled immersion,” in which the wound is submerged in a water-filled container to induce worm emergence without the risk of contaminating public water sources.5 Guinea worm is a disease of poverty, primarily impacting people in remote areas who do not have access to safe water for drinking and are forced to drink from stagnant water sources such as ponds, pools, and unprotected open wells that may contain infected copepods.5 The seasonality of disease incidence varies geographically owing to the timing of precipitation patterns and abundance of stagnant water sources.5 For example, in the Sahel (Mali, Niger, Chad), cases historically peaked in the months May through October when stagnant water sources are most abundant. Young adults (15–45 years of age) are most likely to be infected with D. medinensis, although persons of all ages can develop infection.5 Guinea worm cases have historically been equally distributed among men and women, though some exceptions have been noted.5 Occupation is an important risk factor; farmers and persons who fetch drinking water are commonly infected.5 In some countries (i.e., Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso), certain ethnic groups are at higher risk of infection because of seasonal migration across long distances and, in some cases, the seasonal search for water or pasture for cattle.5 Conventional thought about Guinea worm transmission ecology was challenged in 2012 when canine cases were first reported in Chad in significant numbers,6 spurring new research on transmission dynamics. Today, Chad is the epicenter of D. medinensis transmission, reporting 88% of human cases (N = 48) and virtually all canine cases (99%, N = 1,927) worldwide in 2019.2,3,7 Recent case-control studies conducted in Chad have shown that water sources associated with increased risk for Guinea worm include lagoons, ponds, and untreated water from hand-dug wells.8,9 No associations have been observed to date between human Guinea worm and consumption of fish and frogs,9 which has been demonstrated in dogs.10 This is could be because humans are less likely than dogs to consume uncooked small fish/fingerlings and frogs, which can serve as transport or paratenic hosts.11,12 Over five years have passed since Eberhard et al.6 first described the unusual epidemiological patterns in Chad, noting that human cases are sporadic and rare in comparison with canine cases, with no apparent association with common water sources and no clustering by village. Since that time, the number of canine cases has generally increased steadily as surveillance expanded,2,3,13 whereas human cases have remained generally constant and at low numbers.2,3 Here, we use additional surveillance data to determine whether those epidemiologic patterns persist and to characterize in greater depth human Guinea worm in Chad, with the broader goal of furthering our understanding D. medinensis transmission and epidemiology.

Dracunculus medinensis (Guinea worm [GW]), a zoonotic nematode targeted for eradication, has been managed using interventions aimed at humans; however, increases in domestic dog GW infections highlight the need for novel approaches. We conducted two clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of subcutaneously injected flubendazole (FBZ) as a treatment of GW infection. The first trial was conducted administering FBZ to experimentally infected ferrets; the second trial involved administering FBZ or a placebo to domestic dogs in the Republic of Tchad (Chad). We found contrasting results between the two trials. When adult gravid female GW were recovered from ferrets treated with FBZ, larvae presented in poor condition, with low to no motility, and an inability to infect copepods. Histopathology results indicated a disruption to morulae development within uteri of worms from treated animals. Results from the trial in Chadian dogs failed to indicate significant treatment of or prevention against GW infection. However, the difference in treatment intervals (1 month for ferrets and 6 months for dogs) or the timing of treatment (ferrets were treated later in the GW life-cycle than dogs) could explain different responses to the subcutaneous FBZ injections. Both trials provided valuable data guiding the use of FBZ in future trials (such as decreasing treatment intervals or increasing the dose of FBZ in dogs to increase exposure), and highlighted important lessons learned during the implementation of a field-based, double-blinded randomized control trial in Chadian dogs.

Background Guinea worm is a debilitating parasitic infection targeted for eradication. Annual human cases have dropped from approximately 3,500,000 in 1986 to 54 in 2019. Recent identification of canine cases in Chad threatens progress, and therefore detection, prevention, and containment of canine cases is a priority. We investigated associations between disease knowledge, community engagement, and canine cases in Chad to identify opportunities to improve active surveillance. Methods We surveyed 627 respondents (villagers, local leaders, community volunteers, and supervisors) across 45 villages under active surveillance. Descriptive statistics were analyzed by respondent category. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess the effects of volunteer visit frequency on villager knowledge. Results Knowledge increased with respondents’ associations with the Guinea worm program. Household visit frequency by community volunteers was uneven: 53.0% of villagers reported visits at least twice weekly and 21.4% of villagers reported never being visited. Villagers visited by a volunteer at least twice weekly had better knowledge of Guinea worm symptoms (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.04–2.79) and could name more prevention strategies (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.32–3.15) than villagers visited less frequently. The primary motivation to report was to facilitate care-seeking for people with Guinea worm. Knowledge of animal “containment” to prevent contamination of water, knowledge of rewards for reporting animal cases, and ability to name any reasons to report Guinea worm were each positively correlated with village canine case counts. Conclusions Community volunteers play crucial roles in educating their neighbors about Guinea worm and facilitating surveillance. Additional training and more attentive management of volunteers and supervisors could increase visit frequency and further amplify their impact. Emphasizing links between animal and human cases, the importance of animal containment, and animal rewards might improve surveillance and canine case detection. The surveillance system should be evaluated routinely to expand generalizability of data and monitor changes over time., Author summary Guinea worm eradication depends on detecting people and animals with the disease in order to prevent transmission. The situation in Chad is especially urgent because the number of domestic dogs with Guinea worm has been rapidly increasing in the past five years, and now represents the vast majority of Guinea worm cases globally. The global Guinea Worm Eradication Program, the Chad Guinea Worm Eradication Program, and the Chad Ministry of Public Health requested an investigation to evaluate the associations between Guinea worm knowledge, community engagement, and case detection and to investigate how the active surveillance system could be improved to more effectively detect and contain every Guinea worm case. We surveyed 627 people across 45 villages in Chad. We found that Chad’s system for monitoring Guinea worm operates unevenly, with some villagers receiving frequent visits by community volunteers and other villagers reporting never being visited. Villagers visited by a community volunteer at least twice per week had much better knowledge of Guinea worm symptoms and prevention, compared with villagers visited less frequently. Community volunteers are instrumental to Guinea worm eradication efforts in Chad because they transmit key educational messages that facilitate disease detection. More efforts should be made to increase volunteer accountability and to provide volunteers and their supervisors with targeted, high quality training.

Background: Guinea worm is on the verge of eradication, with a 99.9% reduction in cases since the mid-1980s. Most cases now occur Chad. On April 19, 2019, a 19-year-old woman presented with a Guinea worm in Salamat Region, Chad, an area where the disease had not been previously reported. Methods: We conducted a field investigation including household case searches and informal group interviews. Four mitochondrial genes and 22 nuclear microsatellite markers were used to assess relatedness of worms associated with the outbreak in comparison with other worms from elsewhere in Chad. Findings: We identified 22 human cases and 2 canine cases. Most human case-patients were from three villages in Salamat, but one case-patient was detected nearly 400km away in Sarh city. All case-patients reported a history of consuming fish and unfiltered water. Community members recalled a dog in 2018 with a Guinea worm-like infection (undetected by the surveillance system) that could have been the source of water contamination that ultimately seeded the 2019 outbreak. Worms associated with this outbreak were genetically similar and shared the same maternal lineage. Interpretation: Molecular epidemiologic results suggested a point-source outbreak that originated from a single female Guinea worm, rather than newly identified sustained local transmission. The unusually long 147-day duration of this outbreaks suggests the possible involvement of a paratenic host. This outbreak affected both humans and dogs, illustrating the importance of prevention and control of Guinea worm in dogs as a continued focus for eradication efforts. Funding: The Carter Center. Declaration of Interest: None to declare Ethical Approval: Approval for this analysis was granted by the Chad Ministry of Public Health (MOPH), and a non-research determination was granted by the delegated authority at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Investigation methods employed are a part of routine outbreak response protocols as defined by the Chad Guinea Worm Eradication Program (CGWEP, which is a part of the MOPH).