Search

Background and purpose Early pharmacological support for post-stroke neurorehabilitation has seen an abundance of mixed results from clinical trials, leaving practitioners at a loss regarding the best options to improve patient outcomes. The objective of this evidence-based guideline is to support clinical decision-making of healthcare professionals involved in the recovery of stroke survivors. Methods This guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched (from database inception to June 2018, inclusive) to identify studies on pharmacological interventions for stroke rehabilitation initiated in the first 7 days (inclusive) after stroke, which were delivered together with neurorehabilitation. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on identified interventions to address results from breaking studies (from end of search to February 2020). Results Upon manually screening 17,969 unique database entries (of 57,001 original query results), interventions underwent meta-analysis. Cerebrolysin (30 ml/day, intravenous, minimum 10 days) and citalopram (20 mg/day, oral) are recommended for clinical use for early neurorehabilitation after acute ischaemic stroke. The remaining interventions identified by our systematic search are not recommended for clinical use: amphetamine (5, 10 mg/day, oral), citalopram (10 mg/day, oral), dextroamphetamine (10 mg/day, oral), Di-Huang-Yi-Zhi (2 × 18 g/day, oral), fluoxetine (20 mg/day, oral), lithium (2 × 300 mg/day, oral), MLC601(3 × 400 mg/day, oral), phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor PF-03049423 (6 mg/day, oral). No recommendation 'for' or 'against' is provided for selegiline (5 mg/day, oral). Issues with safety and tolerability were identified for amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, fluoxetine and lithium. Conclusions This guideline provides information for clinicians regarding existing pharmacological support in interventions for neurorecovery after acute ischaemic stroke. Updates to this material will potentially elucidate existing conundrums, improve current recommendations, and hopefully expand therapeutic options for stroke survivors.

Currently, very little is known about the holistic outcome of patients recovering from coma. The aim of this retrospective exploratory study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients recovering from coma after care in an acute neurorehabilitation unit with particular focus on their biopsychosocial and spiritual needs in the post-acute phase of recovery. We included 12 patients and evaluated clinical outcome evolution by comparing standard neurobehavioral scores from patient files measured in the acute and post-acute phases. We assessed patient needs using the Quality of Life after Brain Injury scale (QOLIBRI) and classified self-reported complaints mentioned in patient files according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (ICF). Mean patient evolution was a Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale (LCF)-r increase of 3.33 levels (range = 2); a Disability Rating Scale score (DRS) of −3.27 points (SD = 3.78); a Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) scale score of 1.83 (range = 5); and a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) median = 0 (Interquartile range = 1). Main patient complaints concerned mental functioning (n = 7), sensory functioning and pain (n = 6), neuromusculoskeletal and movement problems (n = 5), and major life areas (n = 5). To conclude, a significant handicap that affects their daily life was present in the post-acute phase in most patients. Complaints involved biopsychosocial and spiritual elements. The neurobehavioral scale results do not necessarily correlate with the subjective representations patients had of their condition.

Bedside assessment of consciousness and awareness after a severe brain injury might be hampered by confounding clinical factors (i.e., pitfalls) interfering with the production of behavioral or motor responses to external stimuli. Despite the use of validated clinical scales, a high misdiagnosis rate is indeed observed. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 49 patients with severe brain injury admitted to an acute neuro-rehabilitation program. Patients’ behavior was assessed using the Motor Behavior Tool and Coma Recovery Scale Revised. All patients underwent systematic assessment for pitfalls including polyneuropathy and/or myopathy and/or myelopathy, major cranial nerve palsies, non-convulsive status epilepticus, aphasia (expressive or comprehensive), cortical blindness, thalamic involvement and frontal akinetic syndrome. A high prevalence (75%) of pitfalls potentially interfering with sensory afference (polyneuropathy, myopathy, myelopathy, and sensory aphasia), motor efference (polyneuropathy, myopathy, motor aphasia, and frontal akinetic syndrome), and intrinsic brain activity (thalamic involvement and epilepsy) was found. Nonetheless, the motor behavior tool identified residual cognition (i.e. a cognitive motor dissociation condition) regardless of the presence of these pitfalls in 70% of the patients diagnosed as unresponsive using the Coma Recovery Scale Revised. On one hand, pitfalls might contribute to misdiagnosis. On the other, it could be argued that they are clues for diagnosing cognitive motor dissociation rather than true disorders of consciousness given their prominent effect on the sensory–motor input–output balance.

Background: In stroke patients, early complications such as swallowing disorders (SD) and bronchopneumonia (BP) are frequent and may worsen outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of SD in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and the risk of BP, as well as to identify factors associated with these conditions. Methods: We retrospectively studied all AISs over a 12-month period in a single-center registry. We determined the frequency of SD in the first 7 days and of BP over the entire hospital stay. Associations of SD and BP with patient characteristics, stroke features, dental status, and presence of a feeding tube were analyzed in multivariate analyses. Results: In the 340 consecutive patients, the overall frequency of SD and BP was 23.8% and 11.5%, respectively. The multivariate analyses showed significant associations of SD with NIHSS scores >4, involvement of the medulla oblongata and wearing a dental prosthesis (area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) of 76%). BP was significantly associated with NIHSS scores >4, male sex, bilateral cerebral lesions, the presence of SD, and the use of an enteral feeding tube (AUC 84%). In unadjusted analysis, unfavorable 12-month outcome and mortality were increased in the presence of SD. Conclusion: In AIS, SD and BP are associated with stroke severity and localization and wearing a dental prosthesis increases the risk of SD. Given that patients with SD have an increased risk of poor outcome and mortality, high-risk patients warrant early interventions, including more randomized trials.

Disorders of consciousness (DOC) are a common consequence of severe brain injuries, and clinical evaluation is critical to provide a correct diagnosis and prognosis. The revised Motor Behavior Tool (MBT-r) is a clinical complementary tool aiming to identify subtle motor behaviors that might reflect residual cognition in DOC. In this prospective study including 30 DOC patients in the early stage after brain injury, we show that the revised MBT-r has an excellent inter-rater agreement and has the ability to identify a subgroup of patients, underestimated by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, showing residual cognition and a subsequent recovery of consciousness. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:443-447.

The majority of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) present mild to moderate illness and recover without hospitalization. Nevertheless, 5 % of cases require hospitalization in the intensive care unit, with 15 % of them showing severe central and peripheral nervous system manifestations. These patients should be considered high risk patients and their management must include prevention of a potential accompanying cascade of negative factors. In order to optimize care, it is essential that signs of neurological damage are searched for as early as in intensive care so that appropriate neurorehabilitation can be started immediately and continued in a specific unit for patients with neurological sequelae at post-acute and outpatient phases.La majorité des patients atteints par la maladie due au coronavirus 2019 (Covid-19) présente une évolution plutôt favorable. Cependant 5 % nécessitent une hospitalisation aux soins intensifs, dont 15 % présentent des atteintes sévères des systèmes nerveux central et périphérique. Ces patients doivent être considérés comme des personnes à haut risque de développer des séquelles graves et leur plan de traitement doit nécessairement impliquer la prévention d’une potentielle cascade de facteurs négatifs concomitants. Afin d’optimiser une telle prise en charge, il est primordial que les premiers signes d’atteintes neurologiques soient détectés dès les soins intensifs et qu’une neurorééducation puisse être débutée précocement et poursuivie dans une filière de patients neuro-lésés en phase postaiguë, puis en ambulatoire.

An accurate evaluation and detection of awareness after a severe brain injury is crucial to a patient’s diagnosis, therapy, and end-of-life decisions. Misdiagnosis is frequent as behavior-based assessments often overlook subtle signs of consciousness. This study aimed to identify brain MRI characteristics of patients with residual consciousness after a severe brain injury and to develop a simple MRI-based scoring system according to the findings. We retrieved data from 128 patients and split them into a development or validation set. Structural brain MRIs were qualitatively assessed for lesions in 18 brain regions. We used logistic regression and support vector machine algorithms to first identify the most relevant brain regions predicting a patient’s outcome in the development set. We next built a diagnostic MRI-based score and estimated its optimal diagnostic cut-off point. The classifiers were then tested on the validation set and their performance compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Relevant brain regions predicting negative outcome highly overlapped between both classifiers and included the left mesencephalon, right basal ganglia, right thalamus, right parietal cortex, and left frontal cortex. The support vector machine classifier showed higher accuracy (0.93, 95% CI: 0.81 - 0.96) and specificity (0.97, 95% CI: 0.85 - 1) than logistic regression (accuracy: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.73 – 0.95; specificity: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75 - 0.97), but equal sensitivity (0.67, 95% CI: 0.24 - 0.94 and 0.22 - 0.96, respectively) for distinguishing patients with and without residual consciousness. The novel MRI-based score assessing brain lesions in patients with disorders of consciousness accurately detects patients with residual consciousness. It could complement valuably behavioral evaluation as it is time-efficient and requires only conventional MRI.

Along with the propagation of COVID-19, emerging evidence reveals significant neurological manifestations in severely infected COVID-19 patients. Among these patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), behavioral unresponsiveness may occur frequently, yet, there are still only a few cases reported and with rare descriptions of their motor behavior after pathological awakening. Several hypotheses regarding central lesions in these patients are conceivable. Here, we describe two acute SARS-CoV-2- infected patients who developed neurological symptoms evoking the condition of clinical cognitive motor dissociation (CMD). This diagnosis could be confirmed first by clinical observation of a dissociation between preserved cognitive abilities and lack of initial motor interaction and second, by performing 18F- FDG PET imaging. Accurate diagnosis led to an appropriate neuro-rehabilitation regimen with long-term neuro-rehabilitation leading to an improved outcome for both patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (CoViD-19) pandemic is strongly impacting all domains of our healthcare systems, including rehabilitation. In Italy, the first hit European country, medical activities were postponed to allow shifting of staff and facilities to intensive care, with neurorehabilitation limited to time-dependent diseases, 1 including CoViD-19 complications. 2,3 Hospital access to people with chronic neurodegenerative conditions such as multiple sclerosis, movement disorders or dementia, more at risks of serious consequences from the infection, 4 has been postponed. Patients also seek less for hospital care, with over 50% reduced stroke admissions as from an Italian survey, 5 possibly in fear of being infected or denied to see their families after being hospitalized. This situation can be bearable only for a short time, as any initial freezing reaction to a danger.

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) proposed the current diagnostic description of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) for the distinct and complex chronic pain condition in 1994. Since this classification, studies on the syndrome have led to a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, epidemiology and therapeutic approaches. F. Luthi of SUVA Care reviewed CRPS in detail in 2014 and 2019 issues of the Revue médicale suisse. The purpose of this article is to provide an update of results on the neural mechanisms involved in this syndrome and how this helps management of CRPS, in particular bringing awareness to physicians of all specialties of the first symptoms with practical advice for investigations and treatment.Le syndrome douloureux régional complexe (SDRC) a été défini en 1994 par l’International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). Depuis cette définition, les études concernant ce syndrome ont permis une meilleure compréhension quant aux mécanismes physiopathologiques sous-jacents, à l’épidémiologie et aux approches thérapeutiques. Le SDRC a déjà été bien décrit dans deux numéros de la

Spasticity is a common sign of central nervous system lesions and its management is difficult because it is usually associated with other symptoms of upper motoneuron syndrome (paresis, spastic dystonia, contractures, …). We propose an interprofessional evaluation, which demonstrates that a standardized evaluation, a common approach and a gait analysis improve the therapeutic decision.La spasticité est très fréquente après une lésion du système nerveux central, et sa prise en charge demeure difficile, car elle se combine avec d’autres symptômes caractéristiques du syndrome du motoneurone supérieur (parésie, dystonie spastique, contractures…). Afin de faciliter le choix thérapeutique, nous présentons le modèle d’une évaluation interprofessionnelle, qui démontre qu’une évaluation standardisée, une approche commune et une analyse de la marche permettent une meilleure prise en charge thérapeutique.

One part of the population of neurolesioned patients is the transition of young patients with neurodisabilities to adult life. To guarantee favourable social and professional reinsertion is a major challenge, requiring inter-professional care. For this reason, in 2006 the CHUV, Lausanne created a transition-consultation framework with neuro-paediatricians and adult neurologists specialised in neuro-rehabilitation linked to a Swiss pilot social and professional reinsertion project collaborating with the invalidity insurance. As a model of the follow up of neurolesioned patients, this article reports the results of the reinsertion project that aims to bring awareness to the general practitioner of an inter-disciplinary care method adaptable to individuals. The holistic service saves time and improves the rate of successful reinsertion of young adults into social and professional life.Les jeunes en transition de l’enfance à l’âge adulte présentant une maladie neurodéveloppementale sont une population spécialement vulnérable. Le suivi de leurs problèmes de santé et leur insertion socioprofessionnelle représentent un véritable défi. Au CHUV, à Lausanne, une consultation de transition entre les neurorééducateurs pédiatriques et adultes a été créée en 2006 ainsi qu’un projet pilote suisse de réinsertion socioprofessionnelle en collaboration avec l’Office de l’assurance invalidité pour le canton de Vaud. Le résultat de ce projet pilote, qui peut être utilisé comme modèle pour tous les patients neurolésés, est rapporté ici avec comme objectif d’informer le médecin traitant et de lui permettre d’utiliser les outils de cette prestation holistique afin d’optimiser la durée et la qualité de la réinsertion.

New studies confirm the possibility of late thrombolysis. Meta-analyses have confirmed that CGRP inhibitors are efficacious for migraines. Cladribine is a new oral treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) is a new clinical entity accounting for cognitive decline in old patients. The timing of levodopa introduction has no effect on the long-term course of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Hypophosphatemia helps distinguish between seizures and syncopes in the emergency department. A second course of intravenous immunoglobulins provides no benefit for severe Guillain Barre syndrome. Outdoor therapy improves clinical scales in patients with disorder of consciousness. Ultrasound guided lumbar puncture improves the yield of the procedure.De nouvelles études confirment la possibilité de thrombolyse tardive. Les méta-analyses confirment l’effet bénéfique des inhibiteurs du CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) pour la migraine. La cladribine est un nouveau traitement oral pour la sclérose en plaque de type poussée-rémission. L’encéphalopathie à TDP-43 à prédominance limbique est une nouvelle entité en lien avec des troubles cognitifs de la personne âgée. Le délai d’introduction de la lévodopa n’a pas d’influence sur l’évolution à long terme de la maladie de Parkinson. L’hypophosphatémie aide à différencier les crises d’épilepsie des syncopes. Une deuxième cure d’immunoglobulines n’apporte pas de bénéfice dans le traitement du syndrome de Guillain-Barré. Les patients avec troubles de l’état de conscience bénéficient des thérapies à l’air libre. L’ultrason améliore le rendement de la ponction lombaire.

Objective To investigate the functional and cognitive outcomes during early intensive neurorehabilitation and to compare the recovery patterns of patients presenting with cognitive motor dissociation (CMD), disorders of consciousness (DOC) and non-DOC. Methods We conducted a single center observational cohort study of 141 patients with severe acquired brain injury, consecutively admitted to an acute neurorehabilitation unit. We divided patients into three groups according to initial neurobehavioral diagnosis at admission using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) and the Motor Behavior Tool (MBT): potential clinical CMD, [N = 105]; DOC [N = 19]; non-DOC [N = 17]). Functional and cognitive outcomes were assessed at admission and discharge using the Glasgow Outcome Scale, the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index, the Disability Rating Scale, the Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning, the Functional Ambulation Classification Scale and the modified Rankin Scale. Confirmed recovery of conscious awareness was based on CRS-R criteria. Results CMD patients were significantly associated with better functional outcomes and potential for improvement than DOC. Furthermore, outcomes of CMD patients did not differ significantly from those of non-DOC. Using the CRS-R scale only; approximatively 30% of CMD patients did not recover consciousness at discharge. Interpretation Our findings support the fact that patients presenting with CMD condition constitute a separate category, with different potential for improvement and functional outcomes than patients suffering from DOC. This reinforces the need for CMD to be urgently recognized, as it may directly affect patient care, influencing life-or-death decisions.

WOS: 000515065900001, PubMed: 32090418, Background and purpose Patients with acquired brain injury and acute or prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC) are challenging. Evidence to support diagnostic decisions on coma and other DoC is limited but accumulating. This guideline provides the state-of-the-art evidence regarding the diagnosis of DoC, summarizing data from bedside examination techniques, functional neuroimaging and electroencephalography (EEG). Methods Sixteen members of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Scientific Panel on Coma and Chronic Disorders of Consciousness, representing 10 European countries, reviewed the scientific evidence for the evaluation of coma and other DoC using standard bibliographic measures. Recommendations followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The guideline was endorsed by the EAN. Results Besides a comprehensive neurological examination, the following suggestions are made: probe for voluntary eye movements using a mirror; repeat clinical assessments in the subacute and chronic setting, using the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised; use the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score instead of the Glasgow Coma Scale in the acute setting; obtain clinical standard EEG; search for sleep patterns on EEG, particularly rapid eye movement sleep and slow-wave sleep; and, whenever feasible, consider positron emission tomography, resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), active fMRI or EEG paradigms and quantitative analysis of high-density EEG to complement behavioral assessment in patients without command following at the bedside. Conclusions Standardized clinical evaluation, EEG-based techniques and functional neuroimaging should be integrated for multimodal evaluation of patients with DoC. The state of consciousness should be classified according to the highest level revealed by any of these three approaches.

Objective: To assess the economic impact of introducing the Swiss Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG)-financing system on the Acute Neurorehabilitation Unit (ANRU) of a University hospital in 2012 and to discuss the implications in 2020.Methods: A retrospective study using monocentric patient cohort and collecting anonymized data of consecutive patients admitted to the ANRU in 2012 and 2013. The characteristics, DRG A43Z, costs and revenues were retrieved from the hospital accounting system and allowed a comparison between the 2012 and 2013 groups of patients.Results: Forty-seven patients were included over the assessment period. In 2012, of the 23 patients admitted, 20 were coded A43Z, while in 2013, out of the 24 admissions, only eight had that specific code (p < .01). The average length of stay (LOS) increased from 45.5 days in 2012 to 49.5 days in 2013. Similarly, the average cost per patient increased by Swiss Franc (CHF) 19,994 over the two years, from CHF 183,634 in 2012 to CHF 194,629 in 2013. Finally, the average reimbursement per patient diminished by CHF 11,392, from CHF 193,153 in 2012 to CHF 181,760 in 2013.Conclusions: The negative impact on the cost–revenue balance is linked to both the increased cost of a longer stay and the decreased revenue due to less patients being coded A43Z. This study highlights the difficulties to justify funding of the complex care needed and to properly reflect patient burden in medico-administrative documents. Certainly, there is a need for a concerted effort to identify the services and resources needed within the DRG-system to guarantee the optimal management of acute neurorehabilitation.

Dear Editor, We would like to report a well-documented case of diagnostic dyspraxia as a consequence of a ruptured distal anterior cerebral artery (DACA) aneurysm. Radiological findings on tractography permit a better understanding of the physiopathology and anatomo-clinical correlations between diagnostic dyspraxia and intracranial hemorrhage secondary to a DACA aneurysm rupture. A right-handed patient presented with brutal onset of left temporal headache. Clinical examination revealed a Glasgow Coma Scale of 14 with a right crural hemiparesis. The cerebral CT scan showed a subarachnoid hemorrhage Fisher grade IV (Fig. 1a), with the majority of the blood in the pericallosal cistern. The angio-CT demonstrated a right A2 aneurysm at the pericallosal—callosomarginal junction; this was treated immediately by urgent endovascular coiling with no periprocedural complications. On day 1, the patient complained about the feeling of oppositional behavior from his non-dominant hand against his dominant hand. The left hand-dissociative movements were triggered by voluntary activities of his right hand: when we asked the patient to take an object with his right hand, his left hand seized the object before the right hand had time to reach it. The patient never doubted that the left hand was part of his own body, and he had no left/right hand confusion, but he felt that his left hand had its own will. No frontal release signs such as grasping or perseverance were observed. Neuropsychological testing showed language difficulties and clinical signs of callosal disconnection (bilateral taping disturbance, interdigital transfer difficulties, left tactile extinction) associated with executive dysfunction. In the subacute phase, T2and DWI-weightedMRI images showed involvement of the body and splenium of the corpus callosum with residual blood in the pericallosal cistern (Fig. 1b). The tractographic analysis confirmed the interhemispheric disconnection at the posterior third of the corpus callosum with a complete interruption of the commissural fibers (Fig. 1c, d). The patient underwent a specialized rehabilitation and had a good recovery with a complete return to autonomous daily life activities. DACA aneurysms account for about 3 to 7 % of intracranial aneurysms, most of which commonly arise at the bifurcation of the pericallosal and calloso-marginal arteries [3]. Ruptured DACA aneurysms are smaller than in other sites and are associated with more frequent intracerebral hematomas [4]. The Alien Hand Syndrome (AHS) was first described by Goldstein as a variety of clinical conditions whose common characteristic is the uncontrolled behavior or the feeling of strangeness of one extremity, most frequently involving the left hand [1, 2]. The common classification distinguishes between the posterior, or sensory form, of AHS and the anterior, or motor form, of this condition. To explain inconsistencies such as the phenomenon of diagonistic dyspraxia, Aboitiz (2003) proposed the distinction of five classes of AHS with peculiar clinical manifestations and specific anatomical substrates [1]. G. Cossu (*) :M. Messerer : R. T. Daniel Departement des Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurochirurgie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Universite de Medecine et Biologie de Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 44, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland e-mail: giulia.cossu@chuv.ch

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify and compare the needs of families of patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) in acute care and rehabilitation settings. DESIGN: A descriptive exploratory study was conducted. METHODS: Data were collected in the acute care setting and in the rehabilitation setting during meetings with families (n = 54) of patients with ABI using the Family Needs Questionnaire. FINDINGS: In both settings, families identified obtaining information about ABI or the patients' health as the most important need, followed by support from health professionals. CONCLUSION: For families, accessing information about the disease situation was important regardless of patients being in the acute care or rehabilitation phase. To provide tailored care for these families, it is important to assess information needs systematically already in the acute phase of hospitalization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A paradigm shift is desirable to include families in care, identify their needs, and support them in a more tailored way.

Background Neurosensory stimulation is effective in enhancing the recovery process of severely brain-injured patients with disorders of consciousness. Multisensory environments are found in nature, recognized as beneficial to many medical conditions. Recent advances detected covert cognition in patients behaviorally categorized as un- or minimally responsive; a state described as cognitive motor dissociation (CMD). Objective To determine effectiveness of a neurosensory stimulation approach enhanced by outdoor therapy, in the early phases of recovery in patients presenting with CMD. Methods A prospective non-randomized crossover study was performed. A two-phase neurosensory procedure combined identical individually goal assessed indoor and outdoor protocols. All sessions were video-recorded and observations rated offline. The frequency of volitional behavior was measured using a behavioral grid. Results Fifteen patients participated in this study. The outdoor group patients had statistically significant higher number of intentional behaviors than the indoor group on seven features of the grid. Additionally, for all items assessed, total amount of behaviors in the outdoor condition where higher than those in the indoor condition. Conclusions Although preliminary, this study provides robust evidence supporting the effectiveness and appropriateness of an outdoor neurosensory intervention in patients with covert cognition, to improve adaptive goal-oriented behavior. This may be a step towards helping to restore functional interactive communication.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the latest challenges addressed by neurorehabilitation initiated very early after the brain damage, such as dealing with disorders of consciousness in terms of diagnosis, prognosis and rehabilitative treatment, or determining best timing for first rehabilitative intervention, best therapeutic approaches and best modalities. RECENT FINDINGS: Early management of patients with severe brain damage requires a multidisciplinary rehabilitative approach that encompasses clinical skills in various fields, standard therapies, and assistive technologies.Despite a high rate of misdiagnosis and poor outcome prediction in disorders of consciousness, the observation of subtle motor signs may be a promising way to reach accurate diagnosis and better outcome prediction. Neurosensory stimulation remains the current treatment to promote emergence from disorders of consciousness.Early timing of neurological rehabilitation is definitively efficient, but a safety period should be respected. Some standard therapies and assistive technologies have demonstrated explicit evidence in neurological recovery and high treatment dose is needed to emphasize the therapeutic effect, but several controversies persist in treatment evidence. SUMMARY: Current advancements have provided growing evidence for early neurorehabilitation, which should be definitively applied, but further studies are explicitly needed to diminish persistent controversies in the field.

Disorders of consciousness (DOC) are a common consequence of severe brain injuries, and clinical evaluation is critical to provide a correct diagnosis and prognosis. The revised Motor Behavior Tool (MBT-r) is a clinical complementary tool aiming to identify subtle motor behaviors that might reflect residual cognition in DOC. In this prospective study including 30 DOC patients in the early stage after brain injury, we show that the revised MBT-r has an excellent inter-rater agreement and has the ability to identify a subgroup of patients, underestimated by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, showing residual cognition and a subsequent recovery of consciousness. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:443-447.

To investigate whether a motor attempt EEG paradigm coupled with functional electrical stimulation can detect command following and, therefore, signs of conscious awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness, we recorded nine patients admitted to acute rehabilitation after a brain lesion. We extracted peak classification accuracy and peak session discriminant power (PSDP) and we assessed their correlation to the established coma recovery scale revised (CRS-R) and the agreement with diagnosis based on the novel motor behavior tool (MBT). Only PSDP correlated significantly with CRS-R and it also outperformed peak accuracy regarding the MBT. We conclude that PSDP might be more suitable than accuracy to complement CRS-R and MBT in evaluating ambiguous cases and in detecting cognitive motor dissociation.

Study design Clinical measurement. Purpose The test-retest reliability of maximal grip strength measurements (MGSM) is examined in subjects for 12 weeks post-stroke together with maximal grip strength recovery and the maximal-grip and upper-extremity strength measurements' relationship with capacity and performance test scores. Methods A Jamar dynamometer and the Motricity Index (MI) were used for strength measurements. The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory and ABILHAND questionnaire for evaluating capacities and performances. Results MGSM were reliable (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients = 0.97–0.99, Minimal Detectable Differences = 2.73–4.68 kg). Among the 34 participants, 47% did not have a measurable grip strength one week post-stroke but 50% of these recovered some strength within the first eight weeks. The MGSM and MI scores were correlated with scores of tests of capacity and performance (Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficients = 0.69–0.94). Conclusions MGSM are reliable in the first weeks after a stroke. Level of evidence N/A.

Background Bilateral ptosis is a very interesting clinical challenge for doctors because of the multiple possible localizations of a lesion which can lead to this neurological sign. Objectives Through this case report, we aim to determine the difference between an apraxia of lid opening (ALO) with difficulty in initiating the act of lid elevation, in spite of adequate understanding, motor control and cranial nerve pathways, and a bilateral ptosis with a lesion in the oculomotor nucleus or blepharospasm. Methods The case report of a 50-year-old patient presenting bilateral ptosis and multiple ischemic lesions in the brainstem and bilateral frontal lobe lesions after the emergency removal of a large frontal tumor. Results Our patient had an ALO according to the neurological follow-up and showed the ability, after a few weeks, of initiating the act of opening her eyes with her hand. The ophthalmic evaluation confirmed that in her case the ALO was associated with a nuclear lesion of the oculomotor nerve secondary to a midbrain lesion. Conclusion Our case report confirms multiple differential diagnoses in bilateral ptosis and the importance of clinical examination in spite of good neurological imaging.

Background : in a neurosurgery unit, nurses selected the Critical Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) based on evidence to assess pain in brain-injured patients. However, months after implementation, nursing managers have observed an underutilization.Objectives : support a care team to overcome the pitfalls encountered during the implementation of the CPOT scale for brain-injured patients in neurosurgery unit.Methods : the Lescarbeau, Payette and St-Arnaud's Integrated Model of Consultation was selected. In addition to a scientific literature review, self-administered questionnaire and three interview guides were developed to gather the views of caregivers.Results : the process allowed to identify pitfalls at level of interprofessional collaboration CPOT scale and implementation processes. Improving interprofessional collaboration and adaptation of CPOT scale for brain-injured patients were withholding action priorities.Discussion : a rigorous methodology, the mutual recognition of clinical skills and the development of relationship of trust are prerequisites for the success of clinical innovation.Conclusion : the Integrated Intervention Model is a methodology of choice allowing to take into consideration both evidence and preferences of all actors at every step of the process led to informed choices and priorities setting for a successful implementation.