Search

Many patients in the favorable International Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) Data Base Consortium group (F-MRC) may have a relatively indolent disease course. Surveillance and delay of systemic therapy could be an option in this specific population. However, the question whether this delay could alter patients' outcome remains unanswered. Our objective was to determine if delaying first-line treatment influences the survival of F-MRC patients.We performed a retrospective multicenter national study involving the French Network for Research on Kidney Cancer UroCCR (NCT03293563). We included treatment naive F-MRC patients. We compared the overall survival of patients with immediate medical treatment (IMT) (started less than 3 months after metastatic diagnosis) to those with delayed medical treatment (DMT).We included 90 patients treated between 2009 and 2018. The median time before occurrence of metastases from diagnosis was 28 (12-137) months. The two groups (IMT vs. DMT) were comparable for follow-up, age, sarcomatoid feature, number, and localization of metastatic sites and ECOG performance status. IMT was given in 25 (27.8 %) patients. Local treatment of metastasis (LTM) was performed in 47 (52%) patients. Patients with DMT had more LTM (63% vs. 24%, P = .001). Among patients with DMT (n = 65); 27 (41%) received a systemic treatment and median systemic treatment-free survival was 39 months (95% CI, 26.3-51.6). Median overall survival from metastasis disease diagnosis was 55 months (95% CI, 42.4-67.5) in the IMT group and 88 months (95%CI, 64-111.9) in the DMT group (P = .028). In multivariable analysis LTM was the only prognostic factor associated to survival improvement (HR: 0.33; P = .024).Selected Patients with F-MRC may safely undergo DMT. LTM positively impacted survival in this population and should be considered whenever possible. Prospective trial with a larger population is needed to confirm these results.

In the current era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the role and optimal timing of a nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remain unknown.To assess the oncological outcomes of patients who responded to ICI-based treatments and were subsequently treated with a delayed nephrectomy.This national retrospective evaluation included 30 patients with mRCC who underwent a nephrectomy after a complete response (CR) or a major partial response (80%) to ICI treatment at metastatic sites.Partial or radical nephrectomy after a favorable response to ICI treatment.Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and potential discontinuation of systemic treatment were assessed.ICI-based treatments included ipilimumab-nivolumab (40%), ICI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (10%), and nivolumab (50%). A delayed nephrectomy was performed after a median ICI treatment duration of 10 mo. In 19 cases (63.3%), surgeons faced difficulties due to adhesions or inflammatory changes. A complete pathological response was observed in 16.7% of patients. After a median follow-up of 19.5 mo after nephrectomy, 76.7% of patients achieved DFS. At 1 yr, 66.7% of patients were free from systemic treatment. The PFS and OS rates were, respectively, 96.7% and 100% at 1 yr, and 78.3% and 86.1% at 2 yr. Patients with a CR at metastatic sites had a better prognosis than those with a major partial response, in terms of DFS (p = 0.022) and PFS (p = 0.014).Despite potentially challenging surgery, a delayed nephrectomy for patients who responded to ICI treatment provided promising oncological outcomes, and the majority of patients could discontinue systemic treatment.In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcome in patients who responded well to immunotherapy, and subsequently underwent kidney ablation surgery. Three-quarters of patients experienced no recurrence, and in most cases, medical treatment could be discontinued.

The prognostic impact of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) morphotype remains unclear in patients who undergo partial nephrectomy (PN). Our objective was to determine the risk factors for recurrence after PN, including RCC morphotype.Patients with RCC who had undergone PN were extracted from the prospective, national French database, UroCCR. Patients with genetic predisposition, bilateral or multiple tumours, and those who had undergone secondary totalization were excluded. Primary endpoint was 5-year, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Risk factors for recurrence were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis.Overall, 2,767 patients were included (70% male; median age: 61 years [interquartile range (IQR) 51-69]). Most (71.5%) of the PN procedures were robot-assisted. Overall, 2,573 (93.0%) patients were recurrence free, and 74 died (2.7%). Five-year RFS was 84.9% (IQR 82.4-87.4). A significant difference in RFS was observed between RCC morphotypes (p0.001). Surgical margins (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-3.2], p0.01), pT stage1 (HR = 2.6 [95% CI: 1.8-3.7], p0.01]) and Fuhrmann grade2 (HR = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4-2.6], p0.001) were risk factors for recurrence, whereas chromophobe subtype was a protective factor (HR = 0.08 [95% CI: 0.01-0.6], p = 0.02). Five-year OS was 94.0% [92.4-95.7], and there were no significant differences between RCC subgroups (p = 0.06). The main study limitation was its design (multicentre national database), which may be responsible for declarative bias.Chromophobe morphotype was significantly associated with better RFS in RCC patients who underwent PN. Conversely, pT stage, Fuhrman group and positive surgical margins were risk factors for recurrence.

The management of solitary kidney tumors is a surgical challenge, requiring irreproachable results on both oncological and functional outcomes. The goal of our study was to compare the perioperative results of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to open surgery in this indication.We led a multicentric study based on the prospectively maintained French national database UroCCR. Patients who underwent partial nephrectomy on a solitary kidney between 1988 and 2020 were included. Clinical and pathological data were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome of the study was the analysis of the variation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated according to MDRD at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months depending on the chosen surgical approach. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of Trifecta success, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stay.In total, 150 patients were included; 68 (45%) in the RAPN group and 82 (55%) in the open surgery group. The two groups were comparable for all data. The variation of eGFR at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months was comparable without any significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.45). Trifecta was achieved in 40% of the patients in the RAPN group and 33% in the open group (p = 0.42). A significant difference was observed for the length of stay, 5 days for the robot group versus 9 days for the open surgery group (p 0.0001).In our study, the surgical approach did not modify functional results and we noted a significant decrease in hospital stay and complications in the RAPN group. RAPN is a safe and efficient method for management of kidney tumors in solitary kidneys.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is a key feature in clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs) that impacts outcomes such as aggressiveness, response to treatments, or recurrence. In particular, it may explain tumor relapse after surgery in clinically low-risk patients who did not benefit from adjuvant therapy. Recently, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful tool to unravel expression ITH (eITH) and might enable better assessment of clinical outcomes in ccRCC. OBJECTIVE: To explore eITH in ccRCC with a focus on malignant cells (MCs) and assess its relevance to improve prognosis for low-risk patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed scRNA-seq on tumor samples from five untreated ccRCC patients ranging from pT1a to pT3b. Data were complemented with a published dataset composed of pairs of matched normal and ccRCC samples. INTERVENTION: Radical or partial nephrectomy on untreated ccRCC patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Viability and cell type proportions were determined by flow cytometry. Following scRNA-seq, a functional analysis was performed and tumor progression trajectories were inferred. A deconvolution approach was applied on an external cohort, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated with respect to the prevalence of malignant clusters. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We analyzed 54 812 cells and identified 35 cell subpopulations. The eITH analysis revealed that each tumor contained various degrees of clonal diversity. The transcriptomic signatures of MCs in one particularly heterogeneous sample were used to design a deconvolution-based strategy that allowed the risk stratification of 310 low-risk ccRCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: We described eITH in ccRCCs, and used this information to establish significant cell population-based prognostic signatures and better discriminate ccRCC patients. This approach has the potential to improve the stratification of clinically low-risk patients and their therapeutic management. PATIENT SUMMARY: We sequenced the RNA content of individual cell subpopulations composed of clear cell renal cell carcinomas and identified specific malignant cells the genetic information of which can be used to predict tumor progression.

Background Salvage treatment for local recurrence after prior partial nephrectomy (PN) or local tumor ablation (LTA) for kidney cancer is, as of yet, poorly investigated. Objective To classify the treatments and standardize the nomenclature of salvage robot-assisted renal surgery, to describe the surgical technique for each scenario, and to investigate complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes. Design, setting, and participants Sixty-seven patients underwent salvage robot-assisted renal surgery from October 2010 to December 2020 at nine tertiary referral centers. Surgical procedure Salvage robot-assisted renal surgery classified according to treatment type as salvage robot-assisted partial or radical nephrectomy (sRAPN or sRARN) and according to previous primary treatment (PN or LTA). Measurements Postoperative complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes were assessed. Results and limitations A total of 32 and 35 patients underwent salvage robotic surgery following PN and LTA, respectively. After prior PN, two patients underwent sRAPN, while ten underwent sRARN for a metachronous recurrence in the same kidney. No intra- or perioperative complication occurred. For local recurrence in the resection bed, six patients underwent sRAPN, while 14 underwent sRARN. For sRAPN, the intraoperative complication rate was 33%; there was no postoperative complication. For sRARN, there was no intraoperative complication and the postoperative complication rate was 7%. At 3 yr, the local recurrence-free rates were 64% and 82% for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively, while the 3-yr metastasis-free rates were 80% and 79%, respectively. At 33 mo, the median estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were 57 and 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively. After prior LTA, 35 patients underwent sRAPN and no patient underwent sRARN. There was no intraoperative complication; the overall postoperative complications rate was 20%. No local recurrence occurred. The 3-yr metastasis-free rate was 90%. At 43 mo, the median eGFR was 38 ml/min/1.73 m2. The main limitations are the relatively small population and the noncomparative design of the study. Conclusions Salvage robot-assisted surgery has a safe complication profile in the hands of experienced surgeons at high-volume institutions, but the risk of local recurrence in this setting is non-negligible. Patient summary Patients with local recurrence after partial nephrectomy or local tumor ablation should be aware that further treatment with robot-assisted surgery is not associated with a worrisome complication profile, but also that they are at risk of further recurrence.

Resume Le carcinome renal a stroma leiomyomateux (CRSL) est une entite histopathologique rare et encore peu decrite. Nous rapportons ici un cas unique presentant des zones en metaplasie osseuse, survenu chez un homme de 31 ans recemment diagnostique d’une sclerose tubereuse de Bourneville (STB) avec mutation TSC2. Une nephrectomie partielle a ete realisee. Microscopiquement, la composante epitheliale est d’architecture papillaire et alveolaire, avec des cellules au cytoplasme clair a eosinophile, et des noyaux en position basale. Elle est entouree d’un abondant stroma musculaire lisse avec une metaplasie osseuse focale. Les cellules tumorales expriment l’anhydrase carbonique (CAIX), les cytokeratines CK7 et CK20, et le CD10, sans expression de TFE3. Cette entite emergente a la particularite d’etre fortement associee a la STB, justifiant son depistage.

Background The CARMENA trial in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) demonstrated that treatment with sunitinib alone was noninferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by sunitinib (nephrectomy⬜sunitinib). Objective The objective of this study was to provide updated overall survival (OS) outcomes of CARMENA and assess whether some subgroups may still benefit from upfront CN. Design, setting, and participants CARMENA was a phase III trial in 450 patients with mRCC enrolled from 2009 to 2017. Intervention Patients in the intention-to-treat population received nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (standard of care [SOC]; n = 226) or sunitinib alone (n = 224). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary endpoint was OS, assessed using an updated data cut-off (October 2018; median OS event-free follow-up, 36.6 mo). Patients were reclassified by risk using International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. Results and limitations Sunitinib alone was noninferior to nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.79⬜1.19; p = 0.8) and demonstrated longer median OS (19.8 mo vs 15.6 mo, respectively). For patients with two or more IMDC risk factors, OS was significantly longer with sunitinib alone than with nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (31.2 mo vs 17.6 mo, respectively; HR, 0.65; p = 0.03). For patients with one IMDC risk factor, OS was longer for nephrectomy⬜sunitinib versus sunitinib alone although not significantly (31.4 mo vs 25.2 mo; HR, 1.30; p = 0.2). The post hoc nature of the subgroup analyses may limit their interpretation. Conclusions Sunitinib alone was noninferior compared with nephrectomy⬜sunitinib, suggesting that CN should not be considered SOC in patients with mRCC requiring systemic treatment. Certain subgroups, including patients with one IMDC risk factor, may still benefit from upfront CN. Patient summary We assessed the survival of patients with metastatic kidney cancer in a clinical trial. Patients treated with sunitinib on its own had the same survival as patients who had surgery before sunitinib treatment. We conclude that surgery may not be necessary for some patients with metastatic kidney cancer.

International audience; CONTEXT: The advent of immune check inhibitors (ICIs) has tremendously changed the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), adding an unseen substantial overall survival benefit. These agents could be administered alone or in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies. So far, treatment allocation is based only on clinical stratification risk models. OBJECTIVE: Herein, we aimed to report the different molecular classifications reported in the first-line treatment of mRCC and discuss the awaited clinical implications in terms of treatment selection. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Medline database as well as European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conference proceedings were searched to identify biomarker studies. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials that included patients treated in the first line of mRCC setting, patients treated with anti-VEGF therapies or ICIs, biological modeling, and available survival outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Four classification models were identified with subsequent clinical implications: Beuselinck model (34 gene signatures), IMmotion150, Hakimi, and JAVELIN 101 model. Tumor profiling shows distinct outcomes when treated with one or other combination. Patients are clustered into two gene signatures: angiogenic and proinflammatory (as per JAVELIN). The first is more likely to respond to therapy that includes anti-VEGF agents, while the best outcomes are obtained with an ICI combination with the second. CONCLUSIONS: The findings presented here were mostly derived from ancillary registered studies of new drugs in the setting of mRCC. Further validation is needed, which sets new paradigms for investigation in clinical research based on tumor biology for treatment allocation and not only on clinical stratification tools. PATIENT SUMMARY: First-line treatment of metastatic kidney includes immunotherapy alone or in combination with antiangiogenic therapy. However, clinical practice demonstrated that the "one treatment fits all" strategy might not be the best approach. In fact, recent studies showed that the addition of immunotherapy agents will not benefit all patients equally, and some still respond either equally to or better than anti-vascular endothelial growth factor alone. This review revealed biomarker modeling that impacts treatment selection. Recent tumor profiling into "angiogenic signature" more sensitive to angiogenic agents versus "immune signature" more likely to achieve the best response with immunotherapy should be validated. Tumor biology features might be more powerful than clinical classification for a tailored treatment approach.

International audience; Aims First described in 2014, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with TFEB amplification (6p21) is a rare molecular subgroup whose diagnosis is challenging. The prognosis and therapeutic implications remain unclear. Methods We report here the clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and genetic features of nine novel cases. The pathological and immunohistochemical features were centrally reviewed by expert uropathologists. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) confirmed the diagnosis and comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) was performed to determine quantitative genomic alterations. We also performed an exhaustive review of the literature and compiled our data. Results TFEB-amplified RCC were locally advanced, with initial lymph node involvement in one case and liver metastasis in another case. They were high-grade eosinophilic tumours with papillary/pseudopapillary architecture, frequent positivity for melanocytic markers, and frequent PDL1 expression. FISH demonstrated high-level TFEB amplification in six cases. One case showed concomitant TFEB translocation. CGH analysis identified complex alterations with frequent losses of 1p, 2q, 3p, 6p, and frequent 6p and 8q gains. VEGFA coamplification was identified in all cases with a lower level than TFEB. The prognosis was poor, with five patients having lymph node or distant metastases. Conclusion TFEB-amplified RCC is a rare molecular subgroup with variable morphology whose diagnosis is confirmed by FISH analysis. The complex alterations identified by CGH are consistent with an aggressive clinical behaviour. The coamplification of VEGFA and the expression of PDL1 could suggest a potential benefit from antiangiogenics and targeted immunotherapy in combination for these aggressive tumours.

Objective: To investigate whether pT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) should be followed differently after partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) based on a retrospective analysis of a multicentre database (RECUR). Subjects: A retrospective study was conducted in 3380 patients treated for nonmetastatic RCC between January 2006 and December 2011 across 15 centres from 10 countries, as part of the RECUR database project. For patients with pT1 clear-cell RCC, patterns of recurrence were compared between RN and PN according to recurrence site. Univariate and multivariate models were used to evaluate the association between surgical approach and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Results: From the database 1995 patients were identified as low-risk patients (pT1, pN0, pNx), of whom 1055 (52.9%) underwent PN. On multivariate analysis, features associated with worse RFS included tumour size (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–1.39; P < 0.001), nuclear grade (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.73–3.08; P < 0.001), tumour necrosis (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.03–2.3; P = 0.037), vascular invasion (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3–4.4; P = 0.005) and positive surgical margins (HR 4.4, 95% CI 2.3–8.5; P < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis of CSM revealed that the survival of patients with recurrence after PN was significantly better than those with recurrence after RN (P = 0.02). While the above-mentioned risk factors were associated with prognosis, type of surgery alone was not an independent prognostic variable for RFS nor CSM. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study. Conclusion: Our results showed that follow-up protocols should not rely solely on stage and type of primary surgery. An optimized regimen should also include validated risk factors rather than type of surgery alone to select the best imaging method and to avoid unnecessary imaging. A follow-up of more than 3 years should be considered in patients with pT1 tumours after RN. A novel follow-up strategy is proposed. (Less)

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a difficult procedure with risk of significant perioperative complications. The objective was to evaluate the impact of preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance with 3D model reconstructions on perioperative outcomes of RAPN. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent RAPN for kidney tumor by three high-volume expert surgeons from academic centers. Clinical data were collected prospectively after written consent into the French kidney cancer network database UroCCR (CNIL-DR 2013-206; NCT03293563). Our cohort was divided into two groups: 3D-Image guided RAPN group (3D-IGRAPN) and control group. A propensity score according to age, pre-operative renal function and RENAL tumor complexity score was used. Both surgical techniques were compared in terms of perioperative outcomes. The initial study cohort included 230 3D-IGRAPN and 415 control RAPN. Before propensity-score matching, patients in the 3D-IGRAPN group had a larger tumor (4.3 cm vs. 3.5 cm, P

To assess the oncological outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with tumor thrombus and identify predictive factors of recurrence.Multi-institutional study that included patients with cT3-4N0-1M0 RCC with tumoral thrombus identified in the prospective UroCCR database (CNIL DR 2013-206; NCT03293563). pT3a without involvement of the renal vein were excluded. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy and a thrombectomy of the renal vein ± inferior vena cava ± right atrium. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Thirty-two patients who had adjuvant therapies (tyrosine kinase inhibitors or mTOR inhibitor) were compared to control group (surveillance) in a propensity score-matched 1:1 sub-analysis RESULTS: A total of 432 patients were included: 70.4% pT3a, 20.1% pT3b, 4.2% pT3c and 5.3% pT4. Tumor characteristics were: 90.7% clear cell RCC, 13.9% pN1, and 87.1% high Fuhrman grade. 173 patients (40%) had disease recurrence, and median RFS was 37.3 months (95% CI, 26.4-46.7). In a multivariate analysis (Cox model), predictive factors of recurrence were: pT4 (HR 2.66; 95% CI, 1.42-4.99; p = 0.002), pN1 (HR 2.53; 95% CI, 1.46-4.39; p 0.001), tumor necrosis (HR 2.92; 95% CI, 1.85-4.62; p 0.001), tumor size 10 cm (HR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.08-2.24; p = 0.018). Adjuvant therapy was a protective factor of cancer recurrence (HR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.66; p = 0.002). Propensity score-matched sub-analysis of adjuvant vs control (surveillance) confirmed adjuvant treatment as a protective factor of cancer recurrence (Log rank p = 0.015).In this contemporary multi-institutional cohort of RCC + tumor thrombus, we reported higher recurrence rate shortly after surgical excision and demonstrated an oncological benefit of adjuvant treatment.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of complete transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBTs) before radical cystectomy on pathological and oncological outcomes of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and high-risk non-MIBC. Materials and Methods: The charts of all patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in 2 academic departments of urology between 1996 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the completeness of the last endoscopic resection before radical cystectomy: macroscopically complete transurethral resection (complete) or macroscopically incomplete transurethral resection (incomplete). The primary end point was the recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary end points included cancer-specific survival (CSS) and rates of pT0 and downstaging. Results: Out of 486 patients included for analysis, the TURBT immediately preceding radical cystectomy was considered macroscopically complete in 253 patients (52.1%) and incomplete in 233 patients (47.9%). In multivariate analysis, macroscopically complete TURBT was the strongest predictor of both pT0 disease (OR = 3.1; p = 0.02) and downstaging (OR = 7.1; p < 0.0001). After a median follow-up of 41 months, macroscopically complete TURBT was associated with better RFS (5-year RFS: 57 vs. 37%; p < 0.0001) and CSS (5-year CSS: 70.8 vs. 54.5%; p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis adjusting for multifocality, weight of endoscopic resection specimen, cT4 stage on preoperative imaging, interval between endoscopic resection and radical cystectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pT stage, and associated carcinoma in situ, macroscopically complete endoscopic resection remained the main predictor of better RFS (HR = 0.4; p = 0.0003) and the only preoperative factor associated with CSS (HR = 0.5; p = 0.01). Conclusion: A macroscopically complete TURBT immediately preceding radical cystectomy may improve pathological and oncological outcomes in patients with MIBC and high-risk MIBC.

To compare the perioperative and functional outcomes between 180_W XPS GreenLight photoselective vaporization (PVP) and 532-nm GreenLight laser enucleation of the prostate (GreenLEP) in the surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained international database of patients managed with GreenLight laser surgery (PVP or GreenLEP) was performed. To adjust for potential baseline confounders, propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare the perioperative and functional outcomes between the groups. A total of 2,420 patients were included. 1,491 (61.6%) underwent PVP and 929 (38.4%) underwent GreenLEP. Before PSM analysis, patients in the vaporization group were older (p

OBJECTIVE To propose recommendations for the management of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) of the renal transplant. METHOD Following a systematic approach, a review of the literature (Medline) was conducted by the CTAFU to evaluate prevalence, diagnosis and management of RCC arousing in the renal transplant. References were assessed according to a predefined process to propose recommendations with levels of evidence. RESULTS Renal cell carcinomas of the renal transplant affect approximately 0.2% of recipients. Mostly asymptomatic, these tumors are mainly diagnosed on a routine imaging of the renal transplant. Predominant pathology is clear cell carcinomas but papillary carcinomas are more frequent than in general population (up to 40-50%). RCC of the renal transplant is often localized, of low stage and low grade. According to tumor characteristics and renal function, preferred treatment is radical (transplantectomy) or nephron sparing through partial nephrectomy (open or minimally invasive approach) or thermoablation after percutaneous biopsy. Although no robust data support a switch of immunosuppressive regimen, some authors suggest to favor the use of mTOR inhibitors. CTAFU does not recommend a mandatory waiting time after transplantectomy for RCC in candidates for a subsequent renal tranplantation when tumor stage

Resume Objectif Le but du Comite de transplantation de l’association francaise d’urologie est de proposer des recommandations pour la prise en charge du carcinome a cellules renales du rein natif (CCRN) chez le receveur d’un transplant renal et du carcinome a cellules renales (CCR) du patient malade renal chronique terminal (MRCT) candidat a une transplantation renale (TR). Methode Une revue d’approche systematique de la litterature (Medline) a ete conduite par le CTAFU concernant l’epidemiologie, le diagnostic et le traitement du CCRN chez le receveur d’un transplant renal et du CCR chez le MRCT en evaluant les references et leur niveau de preuve. Resultats L’incidence standardisee du CCR chez le MRCT est 4,5 fois superieure a la population generale. Le CCRN concernerait 1 a 3 % des patients transplantes avec un risque 10 a 15 fois plus eleve que la population generale. Ce risque est majore en cas de maladie renale multi-kystique acquise. Les differentes series s’accordent sur l’interet d’une imagerie annuelle de l’appareil urinaire natif par echographie. Le traitement du CCR chez le MRCT et du CCRN chez le transplante renale repose sur une prise en charge chirurgicale par nephrectomie elargie par voie ouverte ou cœlioscopie. La surveillance est une option valide pour les tumeurs kystiques ou de petite taille. La prise en charge des formes localisees ne necessite aucune modification dans le traitement de fond immunosuppresseur sauf pour les patients sous inhibiteurs de mTOR compte tenu des donnees montrant un taux plus eleve de complications chirurgicales. Le CTAFU ne recommande pas de delai de carence apres traitement d’un CCR localise chez un patient MRCT et candidat a une transplantation renale si la tumeur est de stade Conclusion Ces recommandations francaises doivent contribuer a ameliorer la prise en charge du CCRN chez le patient transplante renal et CCR chez le candidat a une transplantation renale en integrant les objectifs oncologiques dans le contexte de transplantation renale.

Introduction The optimal management of the urethra in patients planned for radical cystectomy (RC) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the impact of urethrectomy on perioperative and oncological outcomes in patients treated with RC for non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Materials and methods We assessed the retrospective data from patients treated with RC for UCB of five European University Hospitals. Associations of urethrectomy with progression-free (PFS), cancer-free (CSS), and overall (OS) survivals were assessed in univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. We performed a subgroup analysis in patients at high risk for urethral recurrence (UR) (urethral invasion and/or bladder neck invasion and/or multifocality and/or prostatic urethra involvement). Results A total of 887 non-metastatic UCB patients were included. Among them, 146 patients underwent urethrectomy at the time of RC. Urethrectomy was performed more often in patients with urethral invasion, T3/4 tumor stage, CIS, positive frozen section analysis of the urethra, and those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, underwent robotic RC, and/or received an ileal conduit urinary diversion (all p p = 0.17), CSS (HR 0.93, p = 0.67), or OS (HR 1.08, p = 0.58). In the subgroup of 276 patients at high risk for UR, urethrectomy at the time of RC decreased the risk of progression (HR 0.58, p = 0.04). Conclusion In our study, urethrectomy at the time of RC seems to benefit only patients at high risk for UR. Adequate risk assessment of UCB patients’ history may allow for better clinical decision-making and patient counseling.

International audience; Background: We previously reported a 35-gene expression classifier identifying four clear-cell renal cell carcinoma groups (ccrcc1 to ccrcc4) with different tumour microenvironments and sensitivities to sunitinib in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Efficacy profiles might differ with nivolumab and nivolumab-ipilimumab. We therefore aimed to evaluate treatment efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab, nivolumab-ipilimumab, and VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) in patients according to tumour molecular groups.Methods: This biomarker-driven, open-label, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial included patients from 15 university hospitals or expert cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had previously untreated metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of varying sizes to receive either nivolumab or nivolumab-ipilimumab (ccrcc1 and ccrcc4 groups), or either a VEGFR-TKI or nivolumab-ipilimumab (ccrcc2 and ccrcc3 groups). Patients assigned to nivolumab-ipilimumab received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by intravenous nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Patients assigned to nivolumab received intravenous nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Patients assigned to VEGFR-TKIs received oral sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks every 6 weeks) or oral pazopanib (800 mg daily continuously). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the population who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02960906, and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2016-003099-28, and is closed to enrolment.Findings: Between June 28, 2017, and July 18, 2019, 303 patients were screened for eligibility, 202 of whom were randomly assigned to treatment (61 to nivolumab, 101 to nivolumab-ipilimumab, 40 to a VEGFR-TKI). In the nivolumab group, two patients were excluded due to a serious adverse event before the first study dose and one patient was excluded from analyses due to incorrect diagnosis. Median follow-up was 18·0 months (IQR 17·6-18·4). In the ccrcc1 group, objective responses were seen in 12 (29%; 95% CI 16-45) of 42 patients with nivolumab and 16 (39%; 24-55) of 41 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (odds ratio [OR] 0·63 [95% CI 0·25-1·56]). In the ccrcc4 group, objective responses were seen in seven (44%; 95% CI 20-70) of 16 patients with nivolumab and nine (50% 26-74) of 18 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (OR 0·78 [95% CI 0·20-3·01]). In the ccrcc2 group, objective responses were seen in 18 (50%; 95% CI 33-67) of 36 patients with a VEGFR-TKI and 19 (51%; 34-68) of 37 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (OR 0·95 [95% CI 0·38-2·37]). In the ccrcc3 group, no objective responses were seen in the four patients who received a VEGFR-TKI, and in one (20%; 95% CI 1-72) of five patients who received nivolumab-ipilimumab. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were hepatic failure and lipase increase (two [3%] of 58 for both) with nivolumab, lipase increase and hepatobiliary disorders (six [6%] of 101 for both) with nivolumab-ipilimumab, and hypertension (six [15%] of 40) with a VEGFR-TKI. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (3%) patients in the nivolumab group, 38 (38%) in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group, and ten (25%) patients in the VEGFR-TKI group. Three deaths were treatment-related: one due to fulminant hepatitis with nivolumab-ipilimumab, one death from heart failure with sunitinib, and one due to thrombotic microangiopathy with sunitinib.Interpretation: We demonstrate the feasibility and positive effect of a prospective patient selection based on tumour molecular phenotype to choose the most efficacious treatment between nivolumab with or without ipilimumab and a VEGFR-TKI in the first-line treatment of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.