Search

PurposeAmplifications of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKS) are therapeutic targets in multiple tumor types (e.g. HER2 in breast cancer), and amplification of the chromosome 4 segment harboring the three RTKs KIT, PDGFRA, and KDR (4q12amp) may be similarly targetable. The presence of 4q12amp has been sporadically reported in small tumor specific series but a large-scale analysis is lacking. We assess the pan-cancer landscape of 4q12amp and provide early clinical support for the feasibility of targeting this amplicon.Experimental designTumor specimens from 132,872 patients with advanced cancer were assayed with hybrid capture based comprehensive genomic profiling which assays 186-315 genes for all classes of genomic alterations, including amplifications. Baseline demographic data were abstracted, and presence of 4q12amp was defined as 6 or more copies of KIT/KDR/PDGFRA. Concurrent alterations and treatment outcomes with matched therapies were explored in a subset of cases.ResultsOverall 0.65% of cases harbored 4q12amp at a median copy number of 10 (range 6-344). Among cancers with >100 cases in this series, glioblastomas, angiosarcomas, and osteosarcomas were enriched for 4q12amp at 4.7%, 4.8%, and 6.4%, respectively (all p < 0.001), giving an overall sarcoma (n = 6,885) incidence of 1.9%. Among 99 pulmonary adenocarcinoma cases harboring 4q12amp, 50 (50%) lacked any other known driver of NSLCC. Four index cases plus a previously reported case on treatment with empirical TKIs monotherapy had stable disease on average exceeding 20 months.ConclusionWe define 4q12amp as a significant event across the pan-cancer landscape, comparable to known pan-cancer targets such as NTRK and microsatellite instability, with notable enrichment in several cancers such as osteosarcoma where standard treatment is limited. The responses to available TKIs observed in index cases strongly suggest 4q12amp is a druggable oncogenic target across cancers that warrants a focused drug development strategy.Implications for practiceCoamplification of the receptor tyrosine kinases (rtks) KIT/KDR/PDGFRA (4q12amp) is present broadly across cancers (0.65%), with enrichment in osteosarcoma and gliomas. Evidence for this amplicon having an oncogenic role is the mutual exclusivity of 4q12amp to other known drivers in 50% of pulmonary adenocarcinoma cases. Furthermore, preliminary clinical evidence for driver status comes from four index cases of patients empirically treated with commercially available tyrosine kinase inhibitors with activity against KIT/KDR/PDGFRA who had stable disease for 20 months on average. The sum of these lines of evidence suggests further clinical and preclinical investigation of 4q12amp is warranted as the possible basis for a pan-cancer drug development strategy.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in the second-line (2L) or later-line (LL) treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-life setting in Türkiye. This study was designed as a national, multi-center, retrospective study. The study population was evaluated in two groups for the line of nivolumab therapy: those receiving nivolumab in the 2L (Group 2L) and third-line (3L) or LL (Group 3L/LL). Efficacy was evaluated based on one-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Safety was evaluated based on treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and nivolumab discontinuation rate. Of 244 patients, 52.9% were in Group 2L and 47.1% were in Group 3L/LL. Demographic and clinical characteristics did not differ between the groups. In Group 2L and Group 3L/LL, one-year OS and PFS rates were 60.8% and 61.4% (p = 0.592) and 31.2% and 21.3% (p = 0.078), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 34.7% in Group 2L and 27.3% in Group 3L/LL (p = 0.262). The percentage of patients reporting at least one AE in Groups 2L and 3L/LL was 34.9% and 43.5%, respectively (p = 0.169). Fatigue was the most common (16.4%) treatment-related AE in each group. The groups were comparable regarding the AE frequency. Nivolumab was discontinued in 61 patients in Group 2L and 53 patients in Group 3L/LL, with the most common reason being disease progression (57.4% and 66.0%, respectively). Nivolumab is safe and effective in the 2L or 3L/LL treatment of locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC and associated with acceptable AEs in real-life setting. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer (around 85% of all lung cancers). Patients with NSCLC are usually diagnosed at advanced or metastatic stages. When cancer cells spread to other areas from where they first formed, it is called metastatic cancer. Surgery may not be a treatment option for such patients. Currently, immunotherapeutic agents are used in the treatment of NSCLC. Nivolumab is one of the approved immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC, who have failed after receiving chemotherapy. Our study explored the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in real-life setting in Türkiye. Nivolumab effectiveness was evaluated by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. OS indicates the proportion of patients who are still alive at a given time after diagnosis or treatment initiation. PFS refers to "the length of time during and after cancer treatment that a person lives with the disease but does not get worse." In the present study, one-year OS for 244 patients who received nivolumab was 61.1% and one-year PFS was 26.4%. Nivolumab safety was evaluated based on the frequency of adverse events observed during nivolumab therapy. Of the patients 38.9% had at least one side effect, with fatigue being the most common (16.4%). Our results support the earlier studies and showed that nivolumab was a safe and effective agent and is associated with acceptable side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The optimal management of relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors remains unsettled. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as salvage therapy in patients who progressed after at least one line of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively reported the results of 133 patients who underwent HDCT and ASCT as salvage therapy from 2016 to 2021. Patients received 3 cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfomide and cisplatin (TIP) regimen as induction and 1 cycle of carboplatin 700 mg/m2 on days 1–3 plus etoposide 750 mg/m2 on days 1–3, followed by ASCT. Demographic and clinicopathological features of patients, the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) risk group at diagnosis, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels before HDCT, treatment-related complications and survival outcomes were recorded. Results: The median age of the patients was 31 (range 18–62). The median follow-up was 31.1 months (95% CI, 28.9–33.3 months). During the median follow-up period, 74 of the 133 patients were still alive, and 63 of these were in complete remission. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25.8 months (95% CI, 8.1–43.4 months). The 2-year PFS rate was 50.3% and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 60.8%. Variables that remained statistically significant in multivariable analysis and were associated with poor prognosis were mediastinal primary tumor location, presence of brain metastases, and higher AFP and HCG levels at baseline. Conclusion: One course of HDCT and ASCT after induction with TIP is an effective and feasible treatment option for salvage treatment of relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors, with cure rates of up to 60%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

According to current evidence, testing for germline BRCA pathogenic variants in newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) patients has the potential to reduce the burden of the disease through targeted therapies and secondary prevention. A personalized approach to testing can lead to improved individual outcomes for patients. Despite the proven clinical utility and therapeutic impact of BRCA1/2 tests in shaping therapy for metastatic BC, awareness and access to these tests are limited in many developing countries, including Türkiye. This limitation impacts the healthcare economy as delayed or missed interventions can lead to increased long-term costs. The limited access is mainly due to fear of stigmatization among patients, country-specific legislation and costs, a lack of awareness, vagueness surrounding the tests and access restrictions. This review offers a perspective for policymakers and healthcare providers in Türkiye to establish pathways that integrate the patient experience into comprehensive care pathways and national cancer control plans. Recent studies show that testing for a specific gene change in people newly diagnosed with breast cancer can help reduce the impact the disease has on their life as they can be given special treatments. When tests are tailored to each person, they can get better results. However, in many countries, including Türkiye, not many people know about or can get these tests. This is because of concerns about being judged, rules in the country, the cost, confusion about the tests and limited access. Not having these tests can make healthcare more expensive in the long run. This article suggests ways for Türkiye's leaders and health workers to make these tests a regular part of cancer care and planning. Gene testing in new breast cancer patients can reduce disease impact with tailored treatments. Yet, many in countries like Türkiye lack access due to various barriers. Let's integrate these tests into national care plans! #BreastCancer #GeneTesting [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were relatively slow in rare tumors. Therefore, we conducted a multi-center study evaluating the efficacy of ICI monotherapy and the combination of ICIs with chemotherapy (CT) in patients with advanced rare tumors. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 93 patients treated with ICIs for NCI-defined rare tumors from the 12 cancer centers in Turkey. The primary endpoints were the overall response (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: The cohort's median age was 56, and 53.8% of the patients were male. The most frequent diagnosis was sarcoma (29%), and 81.7% of the patients were previously treated with at least one line of systemic therapy in the advanced stage. The ORR and DCR were 36.8% and 63.2%, respectively. The germ cell tumors had the lowest ORR (0%), while the Merkel cell carcinoma had the highest ORR to ICIs (57.1%). Patients treated with ICI+ICI or ICI plus chemotherapy combinations had higher ORR (55.2% vs. 27.6%, p=0.012) and DCR (82.8% vs. 53.4%, p=0.008). The median OS was 13.47 (95% CI: 7.79–19.15) months, and the six and 12- month survival rates were 71% and 52%. The median duration of response was 16.59months, and the 12-month progression-free survival rate was 66% in responders. The median time-to-treatment failure was 5.06months (95% CI: 3.42– 6.71). Three patients had high-grade irAEs with ICIs (grade 3 colitis, grade 3 gastritis, and grade 3 encephalitis in one patient each). Conclusion: We observed over 30% ORR and a 13-month median OS in patients with rare cancers treated with ICI monotherapy or ICI plus CT combinations. The response rates to ICIs or ICIs plus CT significantly varied across different tumor types. Responding patients had over 2 years of survival, highlighting a need for further trials with ICIs for patients with rare tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Inflammatory indexes are shown to have clinical significance in cancer. We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of a novel scale index as combined inflammatory index (CII) including leukocyte/lymphocyte ratio(LLR) & prognostic nutritional index(PNI) in nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma(NLPHL) comparing them with well-known prognostic factors. Methods: 101 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Cut-offs were 3.9 for LLR and 53.5 for PNI by ROC analyses. A novel scale-index ('combined inflammatory index-CII') was obtained by the combination of LLR and PNI. Results: There was a moderate negative correlation between PNI and LLR (r=-0,66). In univariate analyses, advanced stage, bone marrow infiltration(BMI), B symptoms, lymphocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, higher LLR(=3.9) and lower PNI(=53.5) were found to be significant prognostic factors. In multivariate analyses, LLR, PNI and CII were found to be independent significant risk factors for PFS while the models were standardized by age, stage, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, B symptoms & bulky disease. Conclusion: Prognostic score examining LLR and PNI besides other clinical parameters showed that patients in high risk group (higher LLR and lower PNI) had shortest PFS. In conclusion, a scoring system combining LLR and PNI is a novel scoring system in NLPHL.Combined inflammatory index-CII can be used as a prognostic factor in NLPHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Neuroendocrine neoplasms(NENs) originate from the diffuse neuroendocrine cell system and constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors exhibiting diverse clinical and biological characteristics. NENs include well‑differentiated neuroendocrine tumors(NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). In the present study, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with NET to evaluate clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcomes. Material and Methods: Data from 153 patients diagnosed with NET who were treated and followed up at three tertiary care centers from November 2002 to June 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinicopathological and prognostic factors, treatment modalities and survival data were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess survival data and comparisons were performed using the logrank test. Results: Median age (IQR) was 53 (18–80) years. 85.6% of the patients had gastro‑entero‑pancreatic (GEP)‑NET. The primary tumor was resected in 95 patients (62.1%) and metastasectomy were performed in 22 patients (14.4%). Seventy‑eight patients received systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Patients were followed up for a median of 22 (IQR = 33.8) months. The estimated one‑year and three‑year survival rate was 89.8% and 74.4%, respectively. Median progression‑free survival (PFS) were 10.1, 8.5, and 4.2 months after first‑, second‑ and third‑line therapy, respectively. Conclusion: The number of systemic treatment options and diagnostic tools for NETs has significantly improved in the last few years. NET classification, which treatment will be more appropriate for which group of patients, the molecular basis of this disease and the development of treatment strategies are open‑ended questions that still need to be investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To aim to show the survival outcomes of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) therapy and the characteristics of treatment-related hematological side effects in patients with relapsed/refractory bone sarcomas (BSs) and soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). Methods: Patients who were treated at the Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane School of Medicine between January 2017 and June 2021 were included. Post-ICE progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) rates and treatment-related hematological side effects were determined. Results: Fifty-six adult patients were included (thirty-four of them BSs). PFS was determined as 6.7 ± 4.4 months and 7.1±3.6 months for STSs and BSs, respectively. OS was 11.4±5.6 monhts and 12.6±7.1 for STSs and BSs, respectively. PFS and OS were not found to be better between groups (p=0.84 and p=0.517, respectively). The median OS and PFS after ICE protocol in patients with two or less systemic chemotherapy lines were significantly higher than those who received three or more lines (7.85±1.66 vs 3.74 ±2.89, p=0.001 and 13.80±8.45 vs 6.73, p=0.001). Conclusion: In addition to its contribution for all patients, ICE may contribute to longer survival, especially in patients receiving ≤2 lines of systemic chemotherapy [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]