Search

Aim Methods Results Conclusion The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of childhood‐onset schizophrenia (COS) and early‐onset schizophrenia (EOS) during the first‐ episode psychosis and the stable period, to examine psychopharmacological treatment approaches, and to investigate potential predictive factors for prognosis.Demographic, clinical, and psychopharmacological therapy data for 31 patients diagnosed with COS and 66 with EOS were retrieved from the file records in this multicenter study. Symptom distribution and disease severity and course were evaluated twice, in the acute psychotic stage and in the latest stable phase, during follow‐up using the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) and clinical global impression (CGI) scales.A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups' CGI improvement rates and median last stable stage PANSS positive, negative, and general psychopathology symptom scores (p = .005, p = .031, p = .005, and p = .012, respectively). Premorbid neurodevelopmental disorder and obsessive‐compulsive disorder and comorbidities were more common in the COS group (p = .025 and p = .030, respectively), and treatment required greater multiple antipsychotic use in that group (p = .013). When the independent variables affecting the difference between pre‐ and post‐treatment PANSS scores were examined using linear regression analysis, the model established was found to be statistically significant (F = 5.393; p = .001), and the group variable (p = .024), initial disease severity (p = .001), and socioeconomic level (p = .022; p = .007) emerged as predictive factors for the disease course.Although early diagnosis and treatment is an important factor in improving prognosis in schizophrenia, more specific predictors for schizophrenia need to be identified. Additionally, preventive programs and pharmacological methods need to be developed in children with neurodevelopmental problems, particularly those from low socioeconomic status families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the peripheral expression of ADORA2A (Adenosine A2A receptor gene) in young subjects with autism spectrum disorder compared with healthy controls and its relationship with clinical characteristics., Method: This study included 93 children and adolescents with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder as the study group and 105 healthy age- and gender-matched controls. Blood samples were obtained from all participants, and a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed. Parent- and clinician-rated assessment instruments were used to assess and rate the severity of autism spectrum disorder and other emotional/behavioral problems., Results: The mean age of the study group was 9.06 ± 3.57 and 86% were male (n = 83), whereas the mean age of the control group was 9.22 ± 3.86 and 86.7% were male (n = 91). We have found a higher level of peripheral expression of ADORA2A in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder compared with healthy controls (fold change = 1.33, P  = .001). We also found a weak negative correlation with autism spectrum disorder severity ( r  = -0.216; P  = .038) and stereotyped behaviors ( r  = -0.207, P  = .046)., Conclusion: ADORA2A genes may have a role in the pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorder. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether peripheral expression of ADORA2A genes may be among the biomarkers for diagnosing or measuring the severity of autism spectrum disorder., (2023 authors.)