Search

Soft pneumatic actuators used in robotic rehabilitation gloves are classified into two types: whole-finger actuators with air chambers that cover the entire finger and modular actuators with chambers only above the finger joints. Most existing prototypes provide enough finger flexion support, but insufficient independent thumb abduction or opposition support. Even the latest modular soft actuator realized thumb abduction with a sacrifice of range of motion (RoM). Moreover, the advantages and disadvantages of using the two types of soft actuators for thumb assistance have not been made clear. Without an efficient thumb assist, patients' options for hand function rehabilitation are very limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to design a modular actuator (M-ACT) that could support multiple degrees of freedom, compare it with a whole-finger type of thumb actuator with three inner chambers (3C-ACT) in terms of the RoM, force output of thumb flexion, and abduction, and use an enhanced Kapandji test to measure both the kinematic aspect of the thumb (Kapandji score) and thumb-tip pinch force. Our results indicated superior single-DoF support capability of the M-ACT and superior multi-DoF support capability of the 3C-ACT. The use of the 3C-ACT as the thumb actuator and the M-ACT as the four-finger actuator may be the optimal solution for the soft robotic glove. This study will aid in the progression of soft robotic gloves for hand rehabilitation towards real rehabilitation practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soft pneumatic actuators used in robotic rehabilitation gloves are classified into two types: whole-finger actuators with air chambers that cover the entire finger and modular actuators with chambers only above the finger joints. Most existing prototypes provide enough finger flexion support, but insufficient independent thumb abduction or opposition support. Even the latest modular soft actuator realized thumb abduction with a sacrifice of range of motion (RoM). Moreover, the advantages and disadvantages of using the two types of soft actuators for thumb assistance have not been made clear. Without an efficient thumb assist, patients’ options for hand function rehabilitation are very limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to design a modular actuator (M-ACT) that could support multiple degrees of freedom, compare it with a whole-finger type of thumb actuator with three inner chambers (3C-ACT) in terms of the RoM, force output of thumb flexion, and abduction, and use an enhanced Kapandji test to measure both the kinematic aspect of the thumb (Kapandji score) and thumb-tip pinch force. Our results indicated superior single-DoF support capability of the M-ACT and superior multi-DoF support capability of the 3C-ACT. The use of the 3C-ACT as the thumb actuator and the M-ACT as the four-finger actuator may be the optimal solution for the soft robotic glove. This study will aid in the progression of soft robotic gloves for hand rehabilitation towards real rehabilitation practice.

Stroke is one of the major reasons which affect the human hand functionality and lead to disability. Different repetitive exercises are used to regain the hand functionality which involves robotic exoskeleton. Soft pneumatic actuators are one of the good alternatives to rigid and fixed exoskeletons for rehabilitation. This paper presents soft robotic gloves fabricated with two different lowcost silicones which can be used in daily living activities and rehabilitation purpose. Soft robotic gloves are light weight and compact. These robotic gloves utilize the pneumatic pressure to flex and extend the human hand. Soft robotic gloves were tested on a healthy object for grasping and rehabilitation ability. Results showed that robotic glove was able to grasping and do the Kapandji test. This work presents an important step toward low cost efficient soft robotic devices for rehabilitation of stroke patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]