Search

ABSTRACT Present day submarine canyons are active conduits for the transfer of large volumes of sediment, carbon and pollutants from continents to oceans. However, the evolution of submarine canyons over geological timescales remains poorly understood due to their erosional nature and low preservation potential. The Late Cretaceous Punta Baja Formation represents a well‐preserved submarine canyon‐fill that evolved on a tectonically‐active ocean‐facing margin. Exposures provide kilometre‐scale continuous strike and dip sections of the 120 m thick and 1.2 km wide feature. An inherited tectonic fabric influenced the location and orientation of canyon incision into fluvial bedrock. The stratigraphic evolution of the Punta Baja submarine canyon is reconstructed from incision to fill, which shows that it remained an active sediment conduit throughout the time represented by the preserved fill. The depositional architecture of the north–south oriented erosionally confined canyon‐fill is asymmetrical, with sub‐vertically stacked channel‐fills to the west, and an overbank confined by the canyon margin to the east. Sedimentary process interactions led to depositional patterns that are considered distinct to submarine canyon fills. Dynamic topography generated by mass‐wasting processes captured sediment and drove knickpoint development, an autogenic mechanism that modifies sediment delivery to the ocean floor. Widespread upstream dipping surfaces in channel‐fills are interpreted as the stratigraphic expression of upstream migrating supercritical‐flow bedforms, which played an important role in sediment storage and transport in the canyon. The steep relief and internal topography of canyons leads to complicated and characteristic confined overbank flow behaviour and depositional patterns. This study provides insight into how processes that are observed in modern canyons are selectively preserved through the lifetime of the canyon and construct or destroy stratigraphy on geological timescales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The shelf‐slope margin is a geomorphic zone with a change in gradient between subaqueous shelves and slopes, which extends towards the submarine basin‐floor. It is important because it partitions distinct sedimentary and biogenic processes between the shallow and deep‐water realms. The initiation of a shelf‐slope profile from pre‐existing conditions, and the evolution of shelf margins in space and time has been the focus of numerous studies, particularly from seismic data sets on passive margins, although markedly less‐so from active tectonic settings. This study documents the initiation and evolution of a shelf‐slope margin in the well‐studied Eocene Aínsa Basin (Spanish Pyrenees) through the segmentation of a mixed carbonate‐siliciclastic ramp via contractional tectonics and differential subsidence. The basinward propagation of a series of thrusts through the ramp allowed the maintenance of shallow‐water, predominantly carbonate sedimentation on their uplifted hanging wall anticlines. Conversely, the deepened foot wall synclines became muddy slope environments, and their axes became the main loci of siliciclastic turbidity current bypass and deposition. The deflection of turbidity currents around uplifted areas towards the synclinal lows allowed for the continuation of carbonate production at the bathymetric highs, which kept pace with subsidence. The interface between shallow‐ and deep‐water sedimentation (i.e. the shelf‐slope margin) was an erosional and composite submarine scarp surface generated by several phases of large‐scale mass wasting of the aggrading shelf carbonates, and healing by onlap of slope turbidites against the scarp. Continued thrust propagation and basin deepening led to the progressive headward degradation of the surfaces, resulting in an apparent retrogradation of the shelf‐slope margin and onlapping slope deposits. This model for the tectonically controlled conversion of a submarine ramp into a shelf‐slope profile contrasts with conventional models that consider shelf‐slope margins to be inherently progradational after initiation. This study also challenges the notion that large‐scale degradational surfaces and thick successions of submarine landslides are inherently diagnostic of canyons and their fill. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mixed grain‐size bedforms comprise alternating sand‐rich and poorly sorted mud‐rich laminae and bands. These bedforms have been identified in distal submarine settings formed underneath unidirectional flows. This study documents mixed grain‐size bedforms in a proximal submarine slope setting formed beneath both unidirectional and combined flows. Core and outcrop data with well‐constrained palaeogeographical context are used to describe two types of mixed grain‐size bedform. Type A bedforms comprise mud‐rich current ripples and low‐amplitude bed‐waves with alternating concave and planar sandstone–mudstone foresets that pass into mud‐rich troughs, and aggradational sinusoidal laminasets. Type B bedforms consist of sandstone–mudstone laminasets that comprise rounded, biconvex ripples with sigmoidal‐shaped foresets and swale and hummock‐like laminasets and banded sets. These bedforms occur in channel‐margin, internal‐levée and external‐levée, intraslope and disconnected lobe environments, and represent 27 to 63% by stratigraphic thickness of the studied successions. They are interpreted as deposits of clay‐rich transitional flows, whose depositional style is governed by the balance of cohesive and turbulent forces, and the rate of flow deceleration. Type B bedforms are further interpreted as combined transitional flow deposits, resulting from flow deflection and ponding processes by seabed topography. Upward and lateral transitions between different bedforms create distinct bedform sequences, demonstrating progressive spatio‐temporal transformations in flow properties and their topographic interactions. By using a well‐constrained palaeogeographical setting, mixed grain‐size bedforms are shown to be situated close to sites of erosion into muddy substrates, abrupt losses in confinement, and/or changes in slope gradient. These bedforms demonstrate that flow transformation and transitional flow behaviour are not restricted to distal submarine settings. Furthermore, mixed grain‐size bedforms are not a diagnostic criterion for bottom currents, because such flows cannot account for the high mud content in laminasets, or the interlamination of sand and mud. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Early Jurassic Los Molles Formation in the Neuquén Basin of western Argentina is a rare example of well‐exposed syn‐rift to post‐rift stratigraphy. In the Chachil Graben, the onset of the early post‐rift stage is marked by drowning of a carbonate system and the development of two deep‐marine intraslope lobe complexes. This field‐based study in the Chachil Graben involved field mapping and correlating eleven stratigraphic logs, and petrographic analysis to document how grain size and texture within intraslope lobe sandstones change from the lobe centre to their frontal pinch‐out. Eight different bed‐scale facies are identified and inferred to be formed by turbulent (turbidites; Type A and B beds), transient turbulent–laminar (transitional flow deposits; Type C, D, E and F beds), laminar gravity flows (debrites; Type G) and post‐depositional clastic injections (injectites; Type H beds). Fifteen lobes form two stacked lobe complexes that show stratigraphic evolution from a lower argillaceous sandstone‐dominated lobe complex, built by transitional flow deposits, to an upper coarser‐grained, sandier lobe complex largely constructed by turbidites. Petrographic analysis quantified sandstone mineralogy, matrix content, grain size and sorting, revealing that both lobe complexes are volcanic arc‐sourced. This study proposes that the differences in the character of the two lobe complexes are due to maturation of sediment transport routes through progressive healing of the intraslope relief, with a concomitant decrease in substrate erosion and flow bulking. Also proposed here is a model for intraslope lobe complex development that accounts for the impact of flow‐confinement on flow behaviour and transformation induced by the inherited topography. Bed type distribution suggests that high‐density flows terminate more abruptly against confining slopes and produce greater depositional variability than lower‐density flows. This integrated petrographic, architectural and sedimentary process model provides new insights into how post‐rift intraslope lobe systems may act as hydrocarbon reservoirs, aquifers and carbon storage sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]