1. Research Trends and Impact Factor on PubMed Among General Medicine Physicians in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Bibliometric Analysis
- Author
-
Watari T, Nakano Y, Gupta A, Kakehi M, Tokonami A, and Tokuda Y
- Subjects
general medicine ,academic generalist ,research productivity ,research trend ,impact factor ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Takashi Watari,1– 3 Yasuhisa Nakano,4 Ashwin Gupta,2,3 Minami Kakehi,4 Ayuko Tokonami,4 Yasuharu Tokuda5 1General Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Shimane, Japan; 2Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 3Medicine Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 4Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan; 5Muribushi Okinawa Clinical Training Center, Urasoe, Okinawa, JapanCorrespondence: Takashi Watari, Shimane University Hospital, General Medicine Center, 89-1, Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan, Tel +81-853-20-2005, Fax +81-853-20-2375, Email wataritari@gmail.comBackground: Japan created a specialty system for general medicine in 2018. However, Japanese academic generalists’ contribution to research remains unclear. This study examines the popularity of Japanese general medicine research, the characteristics of journal publications, annual trends, and the characteristics/differences among publications in journals with an impact factor (IF).Methods: This bibliometric analysis extracted international, English-language, journal articles published on PubMed between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Analysis included articles with either the first, second, or last author in general medicine. We classified articles according to publication or article type and field of research. We obtained standard descriptive statistics for each publication type. Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare nominal variables. For continuous variables, t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used, as appropriate.Results: Of the 2372 articles analyzed, original articles were most common (56.3%), followed by case reports (30.1%), reviews (7.63%), and letters/others (5.9%). Publication volume increased 2.64-fold annually over 5 years. Clinical research (60.5%) was most common among original articles, followed by basic experimental research (17.5%) and public health/epidemiology (12.7%). Medical quality and safety (4.1%), medical and clinical education (3.1%), and health services (1.42%) received comparatively little attention. Eighty percent of articles were published in journals with IF; however, these journals rarely published case reports. Among original articles, the likelihood of publishing in journals with IF was high for basic laboratory medicine articles with higher IF (median IF 3.83, OR 1.71, 95% CI 2.20– 5.95, p=0.044) and lower for clinical education research with the lowest IF (median IF 1.83, OR 0.56, 95% CI 01.8– 0.75, p< 0.001).Discussion: General medicine physicians’ international research output is increasing in Japan; however, research achievements have not been generalized, but rather much influenced by clinical subspecialty backgrounds. This will likely continue unless an academic generalist discipline is established.Keywords: general medicine, academic generalist, research productivity, research trend, impact factor
- Published
- 2022