1. Comparison of clinical outcome between endoscopic and postauricular incision microscopic type-1 tympanoplasty
- Author
-
Yuanxu Ma, Kaixu Xu, Ming Hu, Peng Lin, Wei Wang, and Yonglan Zhang
- Subjects
Male ,Microsurgery ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Tympanic Membrane ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Chronic otitis ,Otoscopy ,03 medical and health sciences ,Tympanoplasty ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,030223 otorhinolaryngology ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Surgery ,Otitis Media ,Treatment Outcome ,Otorhinolaryngology ,Postauricular incision ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Chronic Disease ,Female ,business ,Ear Auricle ,Follow-Up Studies ,Forecasting - Abstract
Microscopic type-1 tympanoplasty (T1T) is a classical method for the treatment of chronic otitis media. However, it has its limitations. The development of otoendoscopy provided a new method for T1T.To investigate the difference between endoscopic T1T and microscopic T1T.Seventy-four patients who underwent T1T were evaluated retrospectively. About 52 cases underwent endoscopic T1T, and 22 cases accepted microscopic T1T. Parameters including operative duration, incision size, graft site, duration of postoperative hospitalization, visual analog scale (VAS) score, complications, hearing improvement, and expenses were compared.Operative duration of endoscopic T1T (47.0 ± 8.2 min) was shorter than microscopic T1T (58.0 ± 9.3 min) (Endoscopic T1T is a minimally invasive surgery with similar graft success rate, comparable hearing improvement, fast recovery, low cost, and high patient satisfaction compared to microscopic T1T.
- Published
- 2020