Search

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation on the motor points over muscle belly, i.e., motor point stimulation (MPS), is widely used in clinical settings, however it is not fully understood how MPS recruits motor nerves. Here we investigated the recruitment pattern of the motor nerve and twitch force during MPS and compared to the recruitment during peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS).Ten healthy individuals participated in this study. Using MPS on the soleus muscle and PNS on the tibial nerve, a single pulse stimulation was applied with various stimulation intensities from subthreshold to the maximum intensity. We measured the evoked potentials in the lower leg muscles and twitch force. Between MPS and PNS, we compared the recruitment curves of M-waves and the dynamics of twitch force such as duration from force onset to peak (time-to-peak).The maximum M-wave was not different between MPS and PNS in the soleus muscle, while it was much smaller in MPS than in PNS in the other lower leg muscles. This reflected the smaller twitch force of plantarflexion in MPS than PNS. In addition, the slope of the recruitment curve for the soleus M-wave was smaller in MPS than PNS.Therefore, unlike PNS, MPS can efficiently and selectively recruit motor nerves of the target muscle and gradually increase the recruitment of the motor nerve.

The F-wave is a motor response elicited via the antidromic firings of motor nerves by the electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves, which reflects the motoneuron pool excitability. However, the F-wave generally has low robustness i.e., low persistence and small amplitude. We recently found that motor point stimulation (MPS), which provides the muscle belly with electrical stimulation, shows different neural responses compared to nerve stimulation, e.g., MPS elicits F-waves more robustly than nerve stimulation. Here, we investigated whether F-waves induced by MPS can identify changes in motoneuron pool excitability during handgrip and motor imagery. Twelve participants participated in the present study. We applied MPS on their soleus muscle and recorded F-waves during eyes-open (EO), eyes-closed (EC), handgrip (HG), and motor imagery (MI) conditions. In the EO and EC conditions, participants relaxed with their eyes open and closed, respectively. In the HG, participants matched the handgrip force level to 30% of the maximum voluntary force with visual feedback. In the MI, they performed kinesthetic MI of plantarflexion at the maximal strength with closed eyes. In the HG and MI, the amplitudes of the F-waves induced by MPS were increased compared with those in the EO and EC, respectively. These results indicate that the motoneuron pool excitability was facilitated during the HG and MI conditions, consistent with findings in previous studies. Our findings suggest that F-waves elicited by MPS can be a good tool in human neurophysiology to assess the motoneuron pool excitability during cognitive and motor tasks.

Previous findings indicate that co-contractions of plantarflexors and dorsiflexors during quiet standing increase the ankle mechanical joint stiffness, resulting in increased postural sway. Balance impairments in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) may be due to co-contractions like in other individuals with reduced balance ability. Here we investigated the effect of co-contraction between plantar- and dorsiflexors on postural balance in individuals with iSCI (iSCI-group) and able-bodied individuals (AB-group). Thirteen able-bodied individuals and 13 individuals with iSCI were asked to perform quiet standing with their eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC). Kinetics and electromyograms from the tibialis anterior (TA), soleus and medial gastrocnemius were collected bilaterally. The iSCI-group exhibited more co-contractions than the AB-group (EO: 0.208% vs. 75.163%, p = 0.004; EC: 1.767% vs. 92.373%, p = 0.016). Furthermore, postural sway was larger during co-contractions than during no co-contraction in the iSCI-group (EO: 1.405 cm/s

The F-wave is a motor response induced by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves via the antidromic firing of motor nerves, which reflects the motoneuron excitability. To induce F-waves, transcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is used, which activates nerve branches via transcutaneous electrodes over the nerve branches. An alternative method to activate peripheral nerves, that is, motor point stimulation (MPS), which delivers electrical stimulation over the muscle belly, has not been used to induce F-waves. In our previous studies, we observed that MPS induced F-wave-like responses, that is, motor responses at the latency of F-waves at a supramaximal stimulation. Here, we further investigated the F-wave-like responses induced by MPS in comparison with PNS in the soleus muscle. Thirteen individuals participated in this study. We applied MPS and PNS on the participant's left soleus muscle. Using a monopolar double-pulse stimulation, the amplitude of the second H-reflex induced by PNS decreased, whereas the amplitude of the motor response at the F-wave latency induced by MPS did not decrease. These results suggest that the motor response at the F-wave latency induced by MPS was not an H-reflex but an F-wave. We also found that the F-wave induced by MPS had a greater amplitude and higher persistence and caused less pain when compared with the F-waves induced using PNS. We conclude that MPS evokes antidromic firing inducing F-waves more consistently compared with PNS.

OBJECTIVE The study objective was to assess the feasibility of stimulating the lower trapezius (LT), the upper trapezius (UT) and serratus anterior (SA) muscles along with anterior or middle deltoid, using surface functional electrical stimulation (FES). The secondary aim was to understand the effects of LT, UT, and SA stimulation on maximum arm reach achieved in shoulder flexion and abduction. DESIGN Single arm interventional study. SETTING Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital. PARTICIPANTS Ten healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION Participants completed 10 trials for each of the 3 conditions in flexion and abduction, i.e. (1) Active voluntary flexion or abduction, (2) FES for anterior deltoid for flexion or middle deltoid for abduction, and (3) FES for LT, UT, and SA along with anterior deltoid for flexion or middle deltoid for abduction. OUTCOME MEASURES Maximum arm reach and percent angle relative to the voluntary movement were computed from motion capture data for each condition. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the maximum reach between two FES conditions. RESULTS The study results showed that all three interscapular muscles can be stimulated using surface FES. Maximum reach in abduction was greater for FES of middle deltoid along with the interscapular muscles (51.77° ± 17.54°) compared to FES for middle deltoid alone (43.76° ± 15.32°; Z = -2.701, P = 0.007). Maximum reach in flexion for FES of anterior deltoid, along with interscapular muscles, was similar to that during FES of anterior deltoid alone. CONCLUSION Interscapular muscles can be stimulated using surface FES devices and should be engaged during rehabilitation as appropriate.

Previous findings indicate that co-contractions of plantarflexors and dorsiflexors during quiet standing increase the ankle mechanical joint stiffness, resulting in increased postural sway. Balance impairments in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) may be due to co-contractions like in other individuals with reduced balance ability. Here we investigated the effect of co-contraction between plantar- and dorsiflexors on postural balance in individuals with iSCI (iSCI-group) and able-bodied individuals (AB-group). Thirteen able-bodied individuals and 13 individuals with iSCI were asked to perform quiet standing with their eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC). Kinetics and electromyograms from the tibialis anterior (TA), soleus and medial gastrocnemius were collected bilaterally. The iSCI-group exhibited more co-contractions than the AB-group (EO: 0.208% vs. 75.163%, p = 0.004; EC: 1.767% vs. 92.373%, p = 0.016). Furthermore, postural sway was larger during co-contractions than during no co-contraction in the iSCI-group (EO: 1.405 cm/s2 vs. 0.867 cm/s2, p = 0.023; EC: 1.831 cm/s2 vs. 1.179 cm/s2, p = 0.030), but no differences were found for the AB-group (EO: 0.393 cm/s2 vs. 0.499 cm/s2, p = 1.00; EC: 0.686 cm/s2 vs. 0.654 cm/s2, p = 1.00). To investigate the mechanism, we performed a computational simulation study using an inverted pendulum model and linear controllers. An increase of mechanical stiffness in the simulated iSCI-group resulted in increased postural sway (EO: 2.520 cm/s2 vs. 1.174 cm/s2, p 2 vs. 1.836 cm/s2, p 2 vs. 0.658 cm/s2, p = 1.00; EC: 0.943 cm/s2 vs. 0.926 cm/s2, p = 0.190). Thus, we demonstrated that co-contractions may be a compensatory strategy for individuals with iSCI to accommodate for decreased motor function, but co-contractions may result in increased ankle mechanical joint stiffness and consequently postural sway.

Plantarflexors such as the soleus (SOL) and medial gastrocnemius (MG) play key roles in controlling bipedal stance; however, how the central nervous system controls the activation levels of these plantarflexors is not well understood. Here we investigated how the central nervous system controls the plantarflexors’ activation level during quiet standing in a cosine tuning manner where the maximal activation is achieved in a preferred direction (PD). Furthermore, we investigated how spinal cord injury affects these plantarflexors’ activations. Thirteen healthy adults (AB) and thirteen individuals with chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) performed quiet standing trials. Their body kinematics and kinetics as well as electromyography signals from the MG and SOL were recorded. In the AB group, we found that the plantarflexors followed the cosine tuning manner during quiet standing. That is, MG was most active when the ratio of plantarflexion torque to knee extension torque was ~2:-3, whereas SOL was most active when the ratio was ~2:1. This suggests that the SOL muscle, despite being a monoarticular muscle, is sensitive to both ankle plantarflexion and knee extension during quiet standing. The difference in the PDs accounts for the phasic activity of MG and for the tonic activity of SOL. Unlike the AB group, the MG’s activity was similar to the SOL’s activity in the iSCI group, and the SOL PDs were similar to those in the AB group. This result suggests that chronic iSCI affects the control strategy, i.e., cosine tuning, for MG, which may affect standing balance in individuals with iSCI. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Soleus muscle shows a tonic activity whereas medial gastrocnemius muscle shows a phasic activity during quiet standing. Cosine tuning and their preferred direction account for the different muscle activation patterns between these two muscles. In individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury, the preferred direction of gastrocnemius medial head is affected, which may result in their deteriorated standing balance.

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE To describe the dynamic fluctuation of truncal shift parameters during quiet standing in healthy young individuals using biomechanical analyses. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Coronal decompensation (CD) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) are the key radiographic parameters to assess static truncal stability, with the known cut-off value of 4 cm for SVA in determining severity of spinal deformity. These values are obtained at a specific moment during quiet standing, when the posture innately changes. Thus, unassessed truncal sway could potentially compromise the reliability of these measurements. METHODS Previously obtained biomechanical data with 11 male, healthy participants aged 16 to 29 were used to quantify the dynamic sway of standing posture. The participants were instructed to quietly stand with surface reflective markers for 130 seconds. The midpoint of bilateral acromia was used as a surrogate for C7 vertebral body. The time series of coronal and sagittal shifts of C7 to sacrum were measured as quasi-coronal decompensation (CD) and quasi-sagittal vertical axis (SVA) to simulate CD and SVA on radiographs. A force platform was also used to measure the center of pressure (COP) displacement. RESULTS The group averages of the dynamic sway range were 20.2 ± 4.1 mm (range: 15.1-28.6) in the sagittal plane (quasi-SVA) and 9.8 ± 3.2 mm (range: 5.5-15.2) in the coronal plane (quasi-CD). There were significant correlations between quasi-CD sway and medial-lateral COP velocity (Pearson r = 0.65, P = 0.03), as well as between quasi-SVA sway and COP sway area (r = 0.65, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION Given the considerable fluctuation of quasi-SVA and quasi-CD during quiet standing, the reliability of radiographic measurement using CD and SVA at a specific moment can be substantially compromised. The assessment based on the currently proposed cut-off values should be interpreted with caution, and repeat examinations are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.

Many postural control studies employ a single-mass inverted pendulum model (IPM) to represent the body during standing. However, it is not known to what degree and for what conditions the model's kinematic assumptions are valid.Our first objective was to quantify the IPM error, corresponding to a distance change between the ankle joint and center of mass (COM) during unrestricted, natural, unperturbed standing. A second objective was to quantify the error of having the ankle joint angle represent the COM angle.Eleven young participants completed five standing conditions: quiet standing with eyes open (EO) and closed (EC), voluntarily swaying forward (VSf) and backward (VSb), and freely moving (FR). The modified Helen-Hayes marker model was used to capture the body kinematics.The COM distance changed0.1% during EO and EC,0.25% during VSf and VSb, and1.5% during FR. The ankle angle moderately and positively correlated with the COM angle for EO, EC, and VSf, indicating that temporal features of the ankle angle moderately represent those of the COM angle. However, a considerable offset between the two existed, which needs to be considered when estimating the COM angle using the ankle angle. For VSb and FR, the correlation coefficients were low and/or negative, suggesting that a large error would result from using the ankle angle as an estimate of the COM angle.Insights from this study will be critical for deciding when to use the IPM in postural control research and for interpreting associated results.