5 results on '"Kaderi T"'
Search Results
2. Progesterone in Addition to Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Treatment of Men Admitted to the Hospital with Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Randomised Control Phase 1 Trial
- Author
-
Narayanan D, Samuel H. Pepkowitz, James Mirocha, Tapson, Michael I. Lewis, Josephine Hwang, Sara Ghandehari, Catherine Bresee, Donald G. Stein, Ghandehari H, Yuri Matusov, Stephanie H Chang, Kaderi T, and Robert I Goodman
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Intention-to-treat analysis ,Randomization ,business.industry ,Disease ,Institutional review board ,law.invention ,Subcutaneous injection ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,Severity of illness ,Medicine ,Adverse effect ,business - Abstract
Background: Severity of illness and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is consistently lower in women than in men. While this outcome difference is not well understood, focus on sex as a biologic factor may suggest potential therapeutic intervention for this disease. We assessed whether adding progesterone, a steroid hormone with immune-modulatory properties, to standard of care, would improve clinical outcomes of hospitalized men with moderate to severe COVID-19. Method: We conducted a Phase 1, randomised, open-label, controlled trial at a large academic hospital in Los Angeles, CA, USA, of subcutaneous progesterone in men hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 and evidence of lower respiratory tract involvement. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using block randomization and a computer-generated randomization sequence, to receive standard of care (SOC) plus progesterone (100 mg subcutaneously twice daily for up to five days) or SOC alone. In addition to assessment of safety, the primary outcome was change in clinical status based on a 7-point ordinal scale noted at baseline compared to that on Day 7 of the trial. Control patients with significant clinical deterioration or absence of clinical improvement by Day 7 were permitted to cross over to receive progesterone therapy. Intention to treat analysis was performed and the patient’s last clinical assessment prior to receiving the study drug was imputed as the Day 7 assessment. Findings: Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study from April 27 to August 20, 2020; 22 were randomised to the control group and 20 to the progesterone group. Of the 20 patients in the progesterone group, two withdrew from the study prior to receiving progesterone and were excluded from analysis. There was an overall improvement in clinical status from baseline to Day 7 in patients in the progesterone group as compared to controls (95% CI: 0-2; P = 0·010). There were no serious adverse events attributable to progesterone. Interpretation: Progesterone at a dose of 100 mg, twice daily by subcutaneous injection in addition to standard of care may represent a safe and novel approach for the treatment in men with moderate to severe COVID-19. Trial Registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04365127. Funding Statement: The Institut Biochimique SA (IBSA, Lugano, Switzerland) Declaration of Interests: SG, YM, SP, TK, DN, JH, SC, RIG, JM, CB, ML, VT report grants and nonfinancial support from Institut Biochimique SA (IBSA, Lugano, Switzerland), during the conduct of the study; SG,SP report patent pending on method of use of progesterone agonist for treatment of COVID-19 VT reports grants from NIH/NIAID ACTT (ACTT 1-3), outside the submitted work. DS, HG declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the Cedars-Sinai Institutional Review Board (IRB).
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. (1417) - Cold Static Preservation at 10°C and Delirium Following Lung Transplant.
- Author
-
Kaderi, T., Yuen, A., Shitanishi, L., Barnes, D., Rampolla, R., and Zaffiri, L.
- Subjects
- *
LUNG transplantation , *DELIRIUM - Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Pearls & Oy-sters: Status Epilepticus and Cerebral Edema From Hyperammonemia Due to Disseminated Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma Species.
- Author
-
Bharath SP, Pang H, Kaderi T, Rampolla R, Chen T, Gezalian M, Lahiri S, Toossi S, and Ayodele M
- Subjects
- Humans, Ureaplasma, Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use, Mycoplasma, Brain Edema therapy, Brain Edema complications, Hyperammonemia complications, Hyperammonemia therapy, Status Epilepticus therapy, Status Epilepticus complications
- Abstract
Nonhepatic hyperammonemia syndrome is a rare cause of neurologic dysfunction and cerebral edema and has most commonly been reported in posttransplant patients. Only recently has opportunistic infection with Ureaplasma species and Mycoplasma hominis been found to be key to the pathogenesis. We describe the cases of 3 immunosuppressed patients who developed hyperammonemia syndrome with new-onset refractory status epilepticus and diffuse cerebral edema. PCR was positive for M hominis in 1 patient and Ureaplasma parvum in the other 2. Despite early diagnostic suspicion and aggressive management with empirical antibiotics, seizure control, hypertonic saline, and ammonia elimination, none of our patients survived this life-threatening infection. Nonhepatic hyperammonemia and new-onset seizures can be presenting features of disseminated Ureaplasma species and M hominis infections in posttransplant patients. Immunosuppression in the absence of organ transplantation is likely sufficient to trigger this entity, as was the case in our third patient. When suspected, empiric combination antibiotics should be used due to high likelihood of resistance. The diagnostic test of choice is PCR. Patients with hyperammonemia syndrome associated with these infections typically have a poor prognosis. Early recognition and aggressive multimodal interventions may be key to ameliorating the high mortality and severe neurologic sequelae from this entity., (© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Progesterone in Addition to Standard of Care vs Standard of Care Alone in the Treatment of Men Hospitalized With Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial.
- Author
-
Ghandehari S, Matusov Y, Pepkowitz S, Stein D, Kaderi T, Narayanan D, Hwang J, Chang S, Goodman R, Ghandehari H, Mirocha J, Bresee C, Tapson V, and Lewis M
- Subjects
- Clinical Protocols standards, Drug Monitoring, Humans, Hypoxia diagnosis, Hypoxia etiology, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy methods, Pilot Projects, Progestins administration & dosage, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, COVID-19 physiopathology, COVID-19 therapy, Progesterone administration & dosage, SARS-CoV-2 isolation & purification
- Abstract
Background: Severity of illness in COVID-19 is consistently lower in women. A focus on sex as a biological factor may suggest a potential therapeutic intervention for this disease. We assessed whether adding progesterone to standard of care (SOC) would improve clinical outcomes of hospitalized men with moderate to severe COVID-19., Research Question: Does short-term subcutaneous administration of progesterone safely improve clinical outcome in hypoxemic men hospitalized with COVID-19?, Study Design and Methods: We conducted a pilot, randomized, open-label, controlled trial of subcutaneous progesterone in men hospitalized with confirmed moderate to severe COVID-19. Patients were randomly assigned to receive SOC plus progesterone (100 mg subcutaneously twice daily for up to 5 days) or SOC alone. In addition to assessment of safety, the primary outcome was change in clinical status on day 7. Length of hospital stay and number of days on supplemental oxygen were key secondary outcomes., Results: Forty-two patients were enrolled from April 2020 to August 2020; 22 were randomized to the control group and 20 to the progesterone group. Two patients from the progesterone group withdrew from the study before receiving progesterone. There was a 1.5-point overall improvement in median clinical status score on a seven-point ordinal scale from baseline to day 7 in patients in the progesterone group as compared with control subjects (95% CI, 0.0-2.0; P = .024). There were no serious adverse events attributable to progesterone. Patients treated with progesterone required three fewer days of supplemental oxygen (median, 4.5 vs 7.5 days) and were hospitalized for 2.5 fewer days (median, 7.0 vs 9.5 days) as compared with control subjects., Interpretation: Progesterone at a dose of 100 mg, twice daily by subcutaneous injection in addition to SOC, may represent a safe and effective approach for treatment in hypoxemic men with moderate to severe COVID-19., Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04365127; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.