Search

For many centuries, the issues of power, politics, and state have been widely discussed in scientific literature. Developing theories, philosophers proceeded from the side of hierarchical affiliation of power, which is confirmed in theological and biological concepts. Relevance of the presented article is conditioned by the fact that for the first time the French philosopher M. Foucault has offered innovative ideas of power concept from the social point of view. M. Foucault's works are of significant importance for modern researchers in various branches of science since he created a universal tool for the study of social relations. The objective of this study entails conducting a thorough examination of the development of his theory, as well as exploring diverse perspectives presented by scholars on this matter. The result of the research was a full-fledged analysis of the "power" category from the position of a comprehensive phenomenon, which penetrates the whole structure of the state, and not only selected organs or institutions. The main conclusion of the paper is that "power" is a complex social phenomenon that cannot be equated with categories such as "law", "discipline", "subordination", or "punishment". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extremism has an antilegal nature, that is, it denies consensus ways of solving social problems, giving preference to violent methods and methods of achieving various goals, in particular political ones. The spread of radical, intolerant leadership among young people and attempts to involve young people in extremist activities are especially dangerous. The novelty of the research is determined by the fact that the socio‐psychological characteristics inherent in a young person, his superficial and uncritical perception of social life, determine his appeal to protest‐activist methods of increasing his social status and role in public life, which are mostly spontaneous, spontaneous. The authors show that the affective, heightened emotional reactions of young people to social events are based not only on the intrapersonal but also on the irrational element. The propensity for extremist forms of political participation is determined both by the individual psychological characteristics of a young person and by the social conditions of his existence. The latter is based on a complex set of interrelated socioeconomic problems, socio‐political contradictions, socio‐cultural, and spiritual‐ideological factors. The practical significance of the study is determined by the possibility of preventing unlawful acts by young people and reducing the manifestation of extremist sentiments in society as a whole. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]