Search

IntroductionThe positive relationship between future orientation and prosocial tendency has been consistently reported. However, the possible mechanism has not been examined yet. Previous research revealed the positive relationship between future orientation and meaning in life, as well as between meaning in life and prosocial tendency. Hence, it is hypothesized that the two components of meaning in life (presence of meaning and search for meaning) possibly mediate the relationship between future orientation and prosocial tendency.MethodsDuring the first half of 2020, 430 Hong Kong youths aged 15–35 (male: 30.5%; female: 69.5%) were recruited to participate an online cross-sectional survey. The survey included three scales: (1) The Scale for Measuring Adult’s Prosocialness, (2) Consideration of Future Consequence Scale, and (3) Meaning in Life Questionnaire.ResultsThe key findings showed that: (1) females had higher level of prosocial tendency than males, and (2) significant partial mediating effects of both presence of meaning and search for meaning on the relationship between future orientation and prosocial tendency. Nevertheless, the multi-group mediation model did not show significant gender difference.DiscussionThese findings implied that future-oriented and meaning-focused interventions could possibly enhance youth’s sense of meaning in everyday life and foster their meaning searching tendency, which further strengthen the positive effect of their future orientation on prosocial tendency, even during life adversities.

Objectives: This was an observational study on cervical length and head perineum distance and the prediction of time of delivery. One-hundred and twenty-five nulliparous women with uncomplicated, term, singleton pregnancy were recruited when they presented to the labor ward with show or infrequent painful uterine contractions (less than three contractions in ten minutes on a 30 min cardiotocogram). Apart from digital vaginal examination to assess cervical length and dilatation, sonographic cervical length and head perineum distance were measured by two-dimensional ultrasound. We compared women who delivered within 72 h of presentation of labor symptoms, with women who did not. After excluding ten women whose labor was induced and delivered within 72 h of presentation, one hundred and fifteen women were included for final data analysis. Main findings: Forty-nine women (42.6%) delivered while sixty-six women (57.4%) remained undelivered at 72 h of presentation of symptoms of labor. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups on age, presence of show, contractions, fetal head station and presentation and mode of delivery. For the group who had delivered within 72 h of presentation of labor symptoms, the mean sonographic cervical length was 1.87 cm ± 0.62 cm, while the head perineum distance was 6.01 cm ± 1.15 cm. For the other group, the mean sonographic cervical length was 2.10 cm ± 0.83 cm; head perineum distance was 6.03 cm ± 1.18 cm. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for both sonographic cervical length (p = .90); and head perineum distance (p = .08). We also compared the cervical length measured by digital vaginal examination versus sonography. The median sonographic measurements were 1.47 cm, 2.11 cm and 2.79 cm at “1 cm,” “2 cm” and “3 cm” digital vaginal measurement, respectively. However, there was extensive overlap between digitally and sonographically measured cervical length. Prediction accuracy of cervical length and head perineum distance was poor. The area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0.433 for sonographic cervical length and 0.501 for HPD. Conclusion: Transperineal sonographical assessment of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor was not useful in predicting the time of delivery. However, it can be explored as an alternative assessment method when digital vaginal examination is not preferred. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]