Search

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy is now a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemo) or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (I-N)-based therapy is superior for patients with NSCLC with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49 % has not been evaluated., Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included NSCLC patients with a TPS score of 1-49 %, who began first-line chemotherapy. Propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust for various confounders and evaluate treatment efficacy., Results: A total of 401 patients were enrolled, of whom 308 received ICI-chemo and 93 received I-N-based therapy. The median OS was 21.0 months in the ICI-chemo group and 20.0 months in the I-N-based therapy group. After propensity score matching, there was no difference in OS or PFS between the ICI-chemo group and the I-N-based therapy group (OS: hazard ratios (HR), 0.83; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.26, PFS: HR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.52-1.00). Among PD-L1 TPS 25-49 %, there was a tendency for OS to be favorable for the ICI-chemo group (OS: HR, 0.30; 95 % CI, 0.09-0.85). Treatment discontinuation occurred for 26.2 % of the patients in the ICI-chemo group and 41.9 % in the I-N-based therapy group., Conclusions: Among PD-L1 TPS 1-49 %, there was no significant difference in survival outcomes between the ICI-chemo group and the I-N-based therapy group. Based on the results of a subgroup analysis, ICI-chemo may be superior for treating NSCLC with a TPS of 25-49 %., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Tanaka reported receiving lecture fees from AstraZeneca K.K, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan Inc., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., and Bristol-Meyers Squibb. Dr. Makiguchi reported receiving honoraria from Asahi KASEI, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, Inc., AstraZeneca K.K, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Teijin Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., and LTD. Dr. Tozuka reported receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Dr. Kawashima reported receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca K.K, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Hakko-Kirin, and Life Technologies Japan Ltd. Dr. Koyama reported receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca K.K. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Dr. Tambo reported receiving honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Taiho Pharmaceutical, MSD K.K, and the Daiichi Sankyo Company. Dr. Ogusu reported receiving speakers’ bureau from MSD K.K, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Dr. Hasegawa reported receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca K.K, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Eli Lilly, and Merck. Dr. Miyauchi reported receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Taiho Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Hakko-Kirin, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Amgen, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Nippon Kayaku, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., and Sysmex. He received advisory roles from Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan Inc., Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Merck outside of the submitted work. Dr. Sakatani reported receiving speakers’ bureau from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, MSD K.K, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Tsuchiya-Kawano reported receiving speakers’ bureau from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., MSD K.K, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., and Kyowa Hakko-Kirin. Dr. Nishio reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer Japan Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Taiho Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, Inc., MSD K.K, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Nippon Kayaku, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Merck, Janssen, Amgen, Eisai, and Daiichi-Sankyo. He received research funding from Pfizer Japan Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, MSD K.K, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Merck, Janssen, and Amgen, outside of the submitted work. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The effect of dual immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy on untreated brain metastases derived from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has remained unclear., Methods: This multicenter single-arm phase 2 study enrolled patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC and at least one brain metastasis ≥ 5 mm in size that had not been previously treated. Patients received nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy (two cycles), followed by nivolumab-ipilimumab alone. The primary endpoint of the study was intracranial response rate as determined by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for brain metastases of ≥ 5 mm as target lesions., Results: A total of 30 patients from 18 institutions was enrolled in this study. The median age was 66.5 years (range, 47-83 years), and 26 patients (87 %) had a non-squamous cell carcinoma histology. The median size of all target brain lesions was 8.4 mm, with a range of 5-39 mm. The intracranial response rate assessed by modified RECIST was 50.0 % (95 % CI, 33.2-66.8 %), with the rate of complete response being 20.0 %, and the study met its primary endpoint. The systemic response rate was 53.3 % (95 % CI, 36.1-69.8 %), and responses for intracranial and extracranial lesions were generally consistent. The median intracranial progression-free survival was 8.1 months, and both the median intracranial duration of response and time to brain radiotherapy were not reached., Conclusion: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy showed promising intracranial activity in NSCLC patients with untreated brain metastases., Trial Registration: jRCT071210019., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Y Tsuchiya-Kawano has received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Kyowa hakko Kirin, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Y Shiraishi has received grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical as well as personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Kyowa Kirin outside the submitted work. K Tanaka has received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. M Tachihara has received grants from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Eli Lilly as well as personal fees from Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, and Janssen Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. T Okamoto has received grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Eli Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb as well as personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Eli Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. I Okamoto has received grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Eli Lilly, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, and AbbVie; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and AbbVie; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prognosis of patients with lung cancer and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) caused by carcinomatous pleurisy is poor. Chemical pleurodesis is commonly performed clinically, however, often has a high failure rate. Furthermore, prolonged sustained drainage and delayed introduction of systemic chemotherapy could increase the risk of worsening the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, both systemic and local treatments are crucial to control MPE. Ramucirumab, an antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, is expected to be effective for treatment of MPE. However, there are no data supporting this hypothesis. Herein, we performed a prospective phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in NSCLC patients with MPE., Methods: A single-arm phase II study was conducted to elucidate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel as a combined treatment for patients NSCLC and MPE previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the MPE control proportion at eight weeks after protocol treatment initiation. The secondary endpoints of the study were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), one-year survival rate, overall survival (OS), and toxicity profile., Results: Between September 2019 and March 2022, 15 patients were enrolled. The pleural effusion control proportion at eight weeks was 100% [90% confidence interval (CI): 84.0-100%, and 95% CI: 78.4-100%], and the primary endpoint of this study was met. The ORR was 6.7% (95% CI: 0.2-32.0%), the median PFS was 6.3 months (95% CI: 1.9-6.9), and the median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI: 3.2-16.5). No Grade 5 or unexpected adverse events were observed., Conclusions: Ramucirumab plus docetaxel is a promising and safe treatment option for previously treated patients with NSCLC and MPE, showing a high pleural effusion control rate., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-24-508/coif). S.T. reports research funding from Eli Lilly Japan KK to Nagasaki University Hospital. H.M. reports honoraria for lectures from Eli Lilly Japan KK and Sanofi KK. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several patients treated with osimertinib experience progressive disease. The aim was to clarify the mechanisms underlying resistance to osimertinib., Methods: ELUCIDATOR: A multi-centre, prospective, observational study involved chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving osimertinib. Mutations in cancer-associated genes, detected via ultrasensitive next-generation sequencing of circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid samples, were collected at baseline and after progressive disease detection. These paired plasma samples were compared., Results: Of 188 patients enrolled (May 2019-January 2021), 178 (119 females [67 %]) median age 74 years, were included. Patients, n = 95 (53 %) had epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletion mutations. Among 115 patients with progressive disease, circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid levels of 85 patients were analysed. MET amplification (n = 4), TP53 mutations (n = 4), PIK3CA mutations (n = 3), BRINP3 mutation (n = 2), BRAF mutation (n = 2), APC mutation (n = 1), RET mutation (n = 1) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) resistance mutation, and C797S (n = 1) were detected. Patients with baseline TP53 mutations, with MET or EGFR amplification had shorter progression-free (PFS) and overall survival. Patients with PIK3CA mutations tended to shorter PFS., Conclusion: MET amplification and PIK3CA mutation mechanisms underly resistance to osimertinib in patients. Patients with coexisting mutations or amplifications at baseline had shorter PFS and overall survival., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: For patients treated with osimertinib as first-line therapy, there have been no studies comparing both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to performance status (PS). Furthermore, no studies have examined differences in baseline genetic abnormalities between patients with poor and good PS. Therefore, we aimed to investigate differences in baseline genetic abnormalities and treatment effects between patients with poor and good PS who received osimertinib as the primary treatment., Patients and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the ELUCIDATOR study, which is a multi-center prospective observational study in Japan that assessed mechanisms underlying resistance to osimertinib as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations., Results: There were 153 and 25 patients in the good and poor PS groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant between-group differences in PFS (hazards ratio [HR]: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.72, p = 0.946). Multivariate analysis of OS revealed that poor PS was a poor prognostic factor (HR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.43-4.73, p = 0.003). Regarding baseline genetic abnormalities, there was a significant increase in APC-positive cases (20.0% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.009) and a trend toward more CTNNB1-positive cases in the poor PS group than in the good PS group (14.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.062)., Conclusion: There was no between-group difference in PFS, although OS was significantly inferior in the poor PS group. Additionally, there was a significant increase in APC-positive cases and a trend toward more CTNNB1-positive cases in the poor PS group., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Evidence for use of second-line immunosuppressants for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is inadequate. Therefore, a multicenter analysis should assess the efficacy of second-line immunosuppressants for severe irAEs associated with different malignant diseases., Methods: This descriptive study aims to investigate the effects of second-line immunosuppressants on corticosteroid-refractory irAEs in patients with lung cancer. We analyzed the effects of second-line immunosuppressants on underlying lung cancer and associated adverse effects., Results: Our study included 4589 patients who had received immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, with 73 patients (1.6%) developing irAEs requiring second-line immunosuppressants. The most commonly observed irAE was pneumonitis (26 patients), followed by hepatobiliary disorders (15 patients) and enteritis (14 patients). We found a confirmed response rate of 42.3% for pneumonitis, which was lower than the response rates of 86.7% for hepatobiliary disorders and 92.9% for enteritis. The time from the start of corticosteroid therapy to the addition of a second-line immunosuppressant correlated significantly with the resolution of irAE to Grade 1 (correlation coefficients of r = 0.701, p < 0.005). The median progression-free survival and duration of response of underlying lung cancer from second-line immunosuppressant administration were 2.1 and 3.0 months, respectively. Of the patients with irAE, 27.4% developed infections and 5.5% might die due to infection., Conclusion: Second-line immunosuppressant response was confirmed in 72.2% of irAEs in patients with lung cancer, with lower response rates observed in irAE pneumonitis compared to other irAEs., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Combined treatment using anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody (anti-PD-L1) and platinum-etoposide is the current standard first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the best treatment for relapsed ES-SCLC after the first-line treatment remains unclear. There are some approved chemotherapeutic agents that can be used against ES-SCLC, and treatment with irinotecan is well established as both a monotherapy and a combined therapy, in combination with platinum. Therefore, we conduct a phase II study with irinotecan in the second- or later-line setting for patients with ES-SCLC who have been previously treated with combined treatment., Methods: Our study will enroll total 30 patients who are diagnosed with ES-SCLC and have experienced disease progression after the combined treatment. Patients will receive irinotecan on days 1, 8, and 15, which will be repeated every 4 weeks. Doses of irinotecan (100/80/60 mg/m 2 ) will be determined according to the type of UGT1A1 gene polymorphism, and the treatment will be discontinued following disease progression, intolerance, withdrawal of patient consent, and based on the investigator's decision. The primary endpoint of the study is the response rate, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety., Discussion: Since the present first-line treatment has been changed to the combined treatment, the second- or later-line treatment should be re-evaluated for patients with relapsed SCLC. Irinotecan is a major chemotherapeutic agent used for SCLC. This study demonstrates and re-evaluates the clinical benefits of irinotecan after combined treatment with anti-PD-L1 and platinum-etoposide for patients with ES-SCLC., Registration Details: This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (no. jRCT s071210090) on November 4, 2021., (© 2023 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Dacomitinib significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations. However, dacomitinib often causes skin toxicities, resulting in treatment discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate a prophylactic strategy for skin toxicity induced by dacomitinib., Methods: We performed a single-arm, prospective, open-label, multi-institutional phase II trial for comprehensive skin toxicity prophylaxis. Patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations were enrolled and received dacomitinib with comprehensive prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of skin toxicity (Grade ≥2) in the initial 8 weeks., Results: In total, 41 Japanese patients participated between May 2019 and April 2021 from 14 institutions (median age 70 years; range: 32-83 years), 20 were male, and 36 had a performance status of 0-1. Nineteen patients had exon 19 deletions and L858R mutation. More than 90% of patients were perfectly compliant with prophylactic minocycline administration. Skin toxicities (Grade ≥2) occurred in 43.9% of patients (90% confidence interval [CI], 31.2%-56.7%). The most frequent skin toxicity was acneiform rash in 11 patients (26.8%), followed by paronychia in five patients (12.2%). Due to skin toxicities, eight patients (19.5%) received reduced doses of dacomitinib. The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.0-8.6 months) and median OS was 21.6 months (95% CI, 17.0 months-not reached)., Conclusion: Although the prophylactic strategy was ineffective, the adherence to prophylactic medication was quite good. Patient education regarding prophylaxis is important and can lead to improved treatment continuity., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Under the strict quarantine policy imposed to combat the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic in Japan, the prevalence of respiratory infections by viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has been largely unknown. However, such information on viral circulation is important in order to develop better management policies that are based on scientific data. Here, we retrospectively investigated respiratory virus infections in individuals who visited a community hospital with respiratory symptoms between June of 2020 and September of 2021 with the use of the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1. Virus was detected in 65 out of a total of 328 subjects, with SARS-CoV-2 (67.7%), rhino/enterovirus (18.5%), and parainfluenza virus 3 (7.7%) accounting for most of the infections. No influenza virus or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections were detected. The monthly cases of rhino/enterovirus infection were highest from winter to spring, with this temporal pattern differing from that of SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 was detected more frequently ( P < 0.001) in subjects with cough (31/104 cases, 29.8%) than in those without cough (13/224 cases, 5.8%), suggesting that cough might contribute to the prediction of COVID-19. Our findings also suggest that testing for rhino/enterovirus and parainfluenza virus 3, in addition to SARS-CoV-2, may be important for the rigorous diagnosis of respiratory virus infections. IMPORTANCE Influenza virus, RSV, adenovirus, and rhino/enterovirus were the major respiratory viruses before COVID-19 pandemic. Circulating respiratory viruses may have been affected by our strong quarantine policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. We checked the circulating respiratory viruses from our outpatients by using a multiplex PCR kit that had recently been released. SARS-CoV-2 was the most frequently detected virus, and it was followed by rhino/enterovirus and parainfluenza virus 3. No influenza virus or RSV infections were detected during our study period, suggesting that influenza virus and RSV became almost extinct. COVID-19 cases frequently experienced cough, and this frequency was statistically significantly higher than that observed in the cases without SARS-CoV-2 detection. The cough can be an indicator of COVID-19.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are key drugs in systemic therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have recently been incorporated into neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for surgical resection. Currently, ICI combinations with cytotoxic agents are frequently used in clinical practice, although several ICI clinical trials have failed to produce long-term clinical benefits. Unfortunately, clinical benefit is moderate and limited considering physical and financial burden. Therefore, selecting appropriate patients and regimens for ICI therapy is important, and biomarkers are necessary for their selection. Tumor PD-L1 expression is universally used as a biomarker; however, PD-L1 assays show low analytical validity and reproducibility due to the visual-scoring system by pathologists. Recent tumor immunology studies explore that neoantigens derived from somatic mutations and the collaboration between T and B cells efficiently elicit antitumor responses. This suggests that high tumor mutational burden and T-cell infiltration are predictive biomarkers. However, B cells producing antibody (Ab) remain poorly understood and analyzed as biomarkers. We found that NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 of cancer-testis antigen frequently elicit spontaneous humoral and cellular immune responses in NSCLC. Serum Ab against these antigens were detected in approximately 25% of NSCLC patients and predicted ICI monotherapy responses. In addition, the Ab levels were decreased with tumor shrinkage after ICI therapy. Thus, NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 Ab are potentially biomarkers predicting and monitoring response to ICI therapy. For clinical applications, a fully-automated assay system measuring the Ab was developed. Here, we review current ICI therapy, tumor immunology, and biomarkers in NSCLC, and discuss the applicability of the serum biomarkers NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 Ab., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The Department of Immuno-Oncology (Dr. Oka) is endowed to Kawasaki Medical School by Pole Star Co., Ltd., which does not influence the work reported in this paper. Sakaeda K, Sakai Y, Atarashi Y, Irino Y, and Sato T are employees of Sysmex Corporation. The other authors declare no financial competing interests related to this study., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal lung disease implicated as an independent risk factor for lung cancer. However, optimal treatment for advanced lung cancer with IPF remains to be established. We performed a randomised phase 3 trial (J-SONIC) to assess the efficacy and safety of nintedanib plus chemotherapy (experimental arm) compared with chemotherapy alone (standard-of-care arm) for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with IPF., Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with IPF were allocated to receive carboplatin (area under the curve of 6 on day 1) plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) (100 mg·m -2 on days 1, 8 and 15) every 3 weeks with or without nintedanib (150 mg twice daily, daily). The primary end-point was exacerbation-free survival (EFS)., Results: Between May 2017 and February 2020, 243 patients were enrolled. Median EFS was 14.6 months in the nintedanib plus chemotherapy group and 11.8 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 90% CI 0.67-1.17; p=0.24), whereas median progression-free survival was 6.2 and 5.5 months, respectively (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92). Overall survival was improved by nintedanib in patients with nonsquamous histology (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.93) and in those at GAP (gender-age-physiology) stage I (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.98). Seven (2.9%) out of 240 patients experienced acute exacerbation during study treatment., Conclusions: The primary end-point of the study was not met. However, carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel was found to be effective and tolerable in advanced NSCLC patients with IPF. Moreover, nintedanib in combination with such chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with nonsquamous histology., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: K. Otsubo has received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, ONO Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck and Thermo Fisher Scientific. H. Kenmotsu has received grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca and Loxo Oncology; and honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, ONO Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Kirin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Y. Minegishi has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, ONO Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical and Chugai Pharmaceutical. H. Horinouchi has received grants from MSD, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ONO Pharmaceutical, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Genomic Health, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Roche and Novartis; honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD, Eli Lilly, ONO Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Roche, Kyowa Kirin and Novartis; and fees for membership of an advisory board from Roche, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Roche, ONO Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb and MSD. T. Kato received grants from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, ONO Pharmaceutical, Pfizer and Regeneron; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim; fees for membership of an advisory board from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Merck, Amgen, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Novartis and Nippon Kayaku; and fees for membership of an independent data monitoring committee from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda and ONO Pharmaceutical. E. Ichihara has received grants from Eli Lilly and MSD; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, ONO Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda and Chugai Pharmaceutical. M. Kondo has received consulting fees from Takeda; and honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, ONO Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb and MSD. S. Atagi has received grants from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, ONO Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck and Roche; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, ONO Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical, MSD, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, Novartis and Thermo Fisher Scientific. M. Tamiya has received grants and honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Ikeda has received grants from AstraZeneca and Chugai Pharmaceutical; and honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, ONO Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Taiho Pharmaceutical. H. Hayashi has received reports grants from AstraZeneca, Astellas, MSD, ONO Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Takeda, Taiho Pharmaceutical, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, inVentiv Health Japan, ICON Japan, Gritsone Oncology, Parexel, Kissei Pharmaceutical, EPS Corporation, Syneos Health, Pfizer R&D Japan, A2 Healthcare, IQVIA, EP-CRSU, Eisai, CMIC Shift Zero, Kyowa Kirin, Bayer Yakuhin, EPS and Otsuka Pharmaceutical; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Shanghai Haihe Biopharm, Takeda and Merck; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Kyorin, Merck, Ltd, MSD, Novartis, ONO Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical and Takeda. Y. Kimura has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Y. Kondoh has received honoraria from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Shionogi, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Kyorin, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma and Novartis; and fees for membership of a data safety monitoring board or an advisory board from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Shionogi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Healios, Chugai Pharmaceutical and Taiho Pharmaceutical. M. Kusumoto has received grants from Canon medical systems; and honoraria from AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo. N. Yamamoto has received honoraria from MSD, AstraZeneca, ONO Pharmaceutical, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Nippon Kayaku, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical and Merck; and fees for membership of a data safety monitoring board or an advisory board from MSD, AstraZeneca, ONO Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Life Technologies Japan, Nippon Kayaku, Amgen, Guardant Health and Janssen. K. Nakagawa has received grants from Takeda, Taiho Pharmaceutical, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, ICON, Parexel, Kissei Pharmaceutical, EPS, Syneos Health, Pfizer R&D Japan, A2 Healthcare, IQVIA, Eisai, CMIC Shift Zero, Kyowa Kirin, Bayer Yakuhin, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, PRA Health Sciences, Covance, Medical Research Support, Sanofi, PPD-SNBL, Japan Clinical Research Operations, Sysmex, Mochida Pharmaceutical and GlaxoSmithKline; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Roche, MSD, Eli Lilly, Nippon Kayaku, ONO Pharmaceutical, Astellas, Bayer Yakuhin, Merck, Nanzando, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Kyowa Kirin, Medical Mobile Communications, Yomiuri Telecasting Corporation, Nikkei Business Publications, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medicus Shuppan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CareNet, Amgen, Medical Review, Yodosha, 3H Clinical Trial, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical, Nichi-Iko Pharmaceutical and Kyorin; and payment for expert testimony from Astellas, Takeda, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Kyorin and ONO Pharmaceutical. Y. Nakanishi has received grants from ONO Pharmaceutical; and honoraria from MSD, ONO Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim. I. Okamoto has received grants from AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, ONO Pharmaceutical, MSD, Eli Lilly, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Pfizer and AbbVie; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb and AbbVie; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, ONO Pharmaceutical, MSD, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Chugai Pharmaceutical and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Background: Etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) combined with concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) is the standard treatment strategy for unresectable limited-disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which has remained unchanged for over two decades. Based on a previous study that confirmed the non-inferiority of amrubicin (AMR) plus cisplatin (AP) when compared with EP for extensive-disease (ED) SCLC, we have previously conducted a phase I study assessing AP with concurrent TRT (2 Gy/time, once daily, 50 Gy in total) for LD-SCLC therapy. Our findings revealed that AP with concurrent TRT could prolong overall survival to 39.5 months with manageable toxicities. Therefore, we plan to conduct a phase I study to investigate and determine the effect of AP combined with AHTRT, recommended dose (RD), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of AP in patients with LD-SCLC., Methods: Treatment-naive patients with LD-SCLC, age between 20 and 75 years, who had a performance status of 0 or 1 and adequate organ functions will be enrolled. For chemotherapy, cisplatin 60 mg/m 2 /day (day 1) and AMR (day 1 to 3) will be administered with AHTRT (1.5 Gy/time, twice daily, 45 Gy in total). The initial AMR dose is set to 25 mg/m 2 /day. RD and MTD will be determined by evaluating toxicities., Discussion: Based on our previous study, the initial dose of AMR 25 mg/m 2 is expected to be tolerated and acceptable. Here, we aim to determine whether treatment with AP and concurrent AHTRT would be an optimal choice with manageable toxicities for LD-SCLC., (© 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy is a key regimen, especially for small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, it can cause severe myelosuppression., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the real-world incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) among patients treated with single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy for thoracic malignancies., Patients and Methods: The medical records of consecutive patients with thoracic malignancies, including SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who were treated with single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy in cycle 1 between January 2010 and March 2020, were retrospectively analyzed., Results: One hundred and fifty-six patients from four institutions were enrolled. Their characteristics were as follows: median age (range): 68 (32-86); male/female: 126/30; performance status (0/1/2): 9/108/39; SCLC/NSCLC/others: 111/30/15; and prior treatment (0/1/2/3-): 1/96/31/28. One hundred and thirty-four (86%) and 97 (62%) patients experienced grade 3/4 and grade 4 neutropenia, respectively. One hundred and twelve patients (72%) required therapeutic G-CSF treatment, and 47 (30%) developed FN. Prophylactic PEG-G-CSF was not used in cycle 1 in any case. The median overall survival of the patients with FN was significantly shorter than that of the patients without FN (7.2 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.025)., Conclusions: The real-world incidence rate of FN among patients with thoracic malignancies that were treated with single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy was 30%. It is suggested that prophylactic G-CSF should be administered during the practical use of single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy for patients who have already received chemotherapy.

Background: S-1 and pemetrexed (PEM) are key treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the mechanism of anticancer activity of S-1 and PEM is similar. Cross-resistance between S-1 and PEM is of concern. This exploratory study was designed to evaluate the treatment effect of S-1 following PEM-containing treatment., Methods: This retrospective study included patients with advanced (c-stage III or IV, UICC seventh edition) or recurrent NSCLC who received S-1 monotherapy following the failure of previous PEM-containing chemotherapy at six hospitals in Japan. The primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 53 NSCLC patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Forty-six patients had adenocarcinoma (88.7%) and no patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-one patients (58.5%) received the standard S-1 regimen and 18 patients (34.0%) received the modified S-1 regimen. ORR was 1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00%-10.1%). Median TTF, PFS, and OS were 65, 84, and 385 days, respectively., Conclusions: Although there were several limitations in this study, the ORR of S-1 after PEM in patients with nonsquamous (non-SQ) NSCLC was low compared to the historical control. One of the options in the future might be to avoid S-1 treatment in PEM-treated patients who need tumor shrinkage., (© 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: EGFR mutations are good predictive markers of efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), but whether comprehensive genomic analysis beyond EGFR itself with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) adds further predictive or prognostic value has not been clarified., Methods: Patients with NSCLC who progressed after treatment with EGFR-TKI, and with EGFR T790 M detected by an approved companion diagnostic test (cobas ® ), were treated with osimertinib. Plasma samples were collected before and after treatment. Retrospective comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of ctDNA was performed with Guardant360 ® . Correlation between relevant mutations in ctDNA prior to treatment and clinical outcomes, as well as mechanisms of acquired resistance, were analyzed., Results: Among 147 patients tested, 57 patients received osimertinib, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 58%. NGS was successful in 54 of 55 available banked plasma samples; EGFR driver mutations were detected in 43 (80%) and T790 M in 32 (59%). The ORR differed significantly depending on the ratio (T790 M allele fraction [AF])/(sum of variant AF) in ctDNA (p = 0.044). The total number of alterations detected in plasma by NGS was higher in early resistance patients (p = 0.025). T790 M was lost in 32% of patients (6 out of 19) after acquired resistance to osimertinib. One patient with RB1 deletion and copy number gains of EGFR, PIK3CA, and MYC in addition to T790 M, showed rapid progression due to suspected small cell transformation., Conclusions: NGS of ctDNA could be a promising method for predicting osimertinib efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR T790 M., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) primarily localizes to the nucleus and is passively released into the extracellular milieu by necrotic or damaged cells, or is secreted by monocytes and macrophages. Extracellular NPM1 acts as a potent inflammatory stimulator by promoting cytokine production [e.g., tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)], which suggests that NPM1 acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern. However, the receptor of NPM1 is unknown. Evidence indicates that DAMPs, which include high mobility group box 1 and histones, may bind Toll-like receptors (TLRs). In the present study, it was shown that NPM1 signaling was mediated via the TLR4 pathway, which suggests that TLR4 is an NPM1 receptor. TLR4 binds myeloid differentiation protein-2 (MD-2), which is essential for intracellular signaling. Furthermore, the TLR4 antagonist, LPS- Rhodobacter sphaeroides (an MD-2 antagonist) and TAK-242 (a TLR4 signaling inhibitor) significantly inhibited NPM1-induced TNF-α production by differentiated THP-1 cells as well as reducing ERK1/2 activation. Far-western blot analysis revealed that NPM1 directly bound MD-2. Thus, the results of the present study provide compelling evidence that TLR4 binds NPM1, and it is hypothesized that inhibiting NPM1 activity may serve as a novel strategy for treating TLR4-related diseases., (Copyright: © Nakatomi et al.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are used for treating EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and osimertinib is effective in cases that acquired T790M mutations after treatment with the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, no study has evaluated its safety and efficacy in older patients. This phase II trial (jRCTs071180002) evaluated osimertinib in T790M mutation-positive Japanese patients who were ≥75 years old and had experienced relapse or progression after previous EGFR-TKI treatment. Our previous report that enrolled 36 patients showed the overall response rate (58.3%) and disease control rate (97.2%), while this report describes the results for the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety analyses. The median PFS was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9-17.5), and the median OS was 22.0 months (95% CI: 16.0 months-not reached). The most frequent adverse events were anemia/hypoalbuminemia (27 patients, 75.0%), thrombocytopenia (21 patients, 58.3%), and paronychia/anorexia/diarrhea/neutropenia (15 patients, 41.7%). Pneumonitis was observed in four patients (11.1%), including two patients (5.6%) with Grade 3-4 pneumonitis. These results suggest that osimertinib was relatively safe and effective for non-small cell lung cancer that acquired T790M mutations after previous EGFR-TKI treatment, even among patients who were ≥75 years old., Competing Interests: K. Takayama received grants from Chugai-Roche Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. and personal fees from AstraZeneca Co., MSD-Merck Co., Eli Lilly Co., Boehringer-Ingelheim Co., Daiichi Sankyo Co. and Chugai-Roche Co. outside of the submitted work. K. Yoshimura received personal fees from AstraZeneca Co. and Chugai-Roche Co. outside of the submitted work. T. Ishizuka received grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim Co., Bayer Co, MSD Co., Astellas Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Pfizer Co., Eli Lilly Co, Novartis Pharma K.K., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co and personal fees from AstraZeneca Co., Boehringer-Ingelheim Co., Novartis Pharma Co., and GlaxoSmithKline Co. outside of the submitted work. M. Fukuda received grants from AstraZeneca Co. and Eli Lilly Co. outside of the submitted work. M. Fujita received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca Co. T. Yokoyama received personal fees from AstraZeneca Co., MSD-Merck Co., Eli Lilly Co., Boehringer-Ingelheim Co., Chugai-Roche Co. outside of the submitted work. J. Uchino received grants from Eli Lilly Japan K.K. and AstraZeneca Co. that are outside of the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Background and Objective: Pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) in lung cancer patients is considered a risk factor for anti-cancer drug-induced pneumonia; however, a method for evaluating ILD, including mild cases, has not yet been established. We aimed to elucidate whether the quantitative high-resolution computed tomography fibrosis score (HFS) is correlated with the risk of anti-cancer drug-induced pneumonia in lung cancer patients, even in those with mild pre-existing ILD., Methods: The retrospective single-institute study cohort comprised 214 lung cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy between April 2013 and March 2016. The HFS quantitatively evaluated the grade of pre-existing ILD. We extracted data regarding age, sex, smoking history, and coexisting factors that could affect the incidence of anti-cancer drug-induced pneumonia. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the effects of the HFS and other factors on the risk of anti-cancer drug-induced pneumonia., Results: Pre-existing ILD was detected in 61 (29%) of 214 patients, while honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis were observed in only 15 (7.0%) and 10 (4.7%) patients, respectively. Anti-cancer drug-induced pneumonia developed in 19 (8.9%) patients. The risk of anti-cancer drug-induced pneumonia increased in proportion to the HFS (hazard ratio, 1.16 per point; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.22; p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: The quantitative HFS was correlated with the risk of developing anti-cancer drug-induced pneumonia in lung cancer patients, even in the absence of honeycombing or traction bronchiectasis. The quantitative HFS may lead to better management of lung cancer patients with pre-existing ILD., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Introduction: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy has been shown to be effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE); however, there are no data to suggest that ramucirumab has the same effects., Methods: We therefore decided to conduct a phase II study of ramucirumab plus docetaxel for NSCLC patients with MPE. The MPE control rate at eight weeks after the start of treatment will be the primary endpoint, and the objective response rate, progression-free survival, one-year survival rate, overall survival, and toxicity profile will be secondary endpoints., Discussion: A previous study indicated that administering chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab was effective at controlling pleural effusion in patients with NSCLC with carcinomatous pleurisy. It is expected that ramucirumab will have a similar effect to the same group., (© 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of liquid biopsy for prediction of the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and for assessment of the changes in genetic alterations during such treatment., Methods: Plasma samples were prospectively collected from non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR-activating mutations during EGFR-TKI treatment until disease progression and were analyzed for such mutations with droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and for other somatic alterations with next-generation sequencing., Results: One hundred patients, including 87 who were EGFR-TKI naïve, were enrolled. Median progression-free survival was significantly shorter for EGFR-TKI-naïve patients with EGFR-activating mutations detected in plasma at baseline than for those without them (7.9 vs 19.0 months; P < .001), with the values being significantly longer for initially positive patients who became negative for these mutations at 12 or 24 weeks than for those who remained positive. An increase in the number of alleles positive for EGFR-activating mutations in plasma during treatment was associated with disease progression, with a hazard ratio of 4.72 (95% CI, 2.07-10.79; P < .001) for EGFR-TKI-naïve patients showing an increase within 36 weeks. For 55 patients with available samples, the total number of somatic alterations (other than activating mutations or T790M of EGFR) in plasma was higher at disease progression than at baseline (33 vs 19; P = 0.04)., Conclusion: Liquid biopsy shows potential for prediction of EGFR-TKI efficacy and elucidation of clonal tumor evolution during targeted therapy., (© 2019 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Amrubicin and cisplatin is one of the active regimens used to treat patients with extensive-disease (ED)-small cell lung cancer (SCLC), whereas combined therapy involving chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is the standard treatment for limited-disease (LD)-SCLC., Purpose: This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of amrubicin and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for LD-SCLC., Patients and Methods: Patients that fulfilled the following eligibility criteria were enrolled: being aged ≤ 75 years and chemotherapy-naïve and having a performance status (PS) of 0-1, LD-SCLC, and adequate organ function. The patients received escalating doses of amrubicin on days 1, 2, and 3, and a fixed 60-mg/m 2 dose of cisplatin on day 1. Four cycles of chemotherapy were administered, with each cycle lasting 4 weeks. TRT involving 2 Gy/day, once daily, commenced on day 2 of the first cycle of chemotherapy. The initial dose of amrubicin was 20 mg/m 2 (level 1), and the dose was escalated to 25 mg/m 2 (level 2) and then 30 mg/m 2 (level 3)., Results: Eight patients from three institutions were enrolled at three dose levels. The patients' characteristics were as follows: male/female: 3/5; median age (range): 68.5 (60-73); PS 0/1: 4/4; stage IIIA/IIIB disease: 3/5. Both level 3 patients experienced DLT (grade 4 neutropenia and/or leukopenia lasting > 4 days). Level 3 was defined as the MTD, and level 2 was recommended as the dose for this regimen. Seven patients exhibited partial responses, and 1 displayed progressive disease (response rate: 88%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival periods were 11.1 and 39.5 months, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred., Conclusions: When this regimen was combined with TRT for LD-SCLC, the MTD was 30 mg/m 2 for amrubicin and 60 mg/m 2 for cisplatin. In addition, neutropenia and leukopenia were DLT, and doses of 25 mg/m 2 for amrubicin and 60 mg/m 2 for cisplatin are recommended for this regimen.

Background: The first-line treatment for squamous cell lung cancer (SCC) has not necessarily been established; however, our previous exploratory study suggested that the combination of nedaplatin and amrubicin would be a promising treatment approach for patients with SCC. Therefore, a phase II study of this chemotherapeutic combination was designed to evaluate its efficacy and safety for treatment-naïve patients with advanced SCC., Methods: A total of 21 treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent SCC were enrolled from six institutions. Nedaplatin (100 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 and amrubicin (25 mg/m 2 ) on days 1-3 were administered intravenously every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and drug toxicities., Results: Partial response was observed in seven of 21 cases (ORR, 33.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5-52.2). Disease control rate, which includes stable disease, was 71.4%. Median OS and PFS was 14.6 and 4.1 months, respectively. This regimen did not cause any treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 neutropenia developed in 8 of 21 cases (38.1%); however, febrile neutropenia developed in only 9.5% of the cases. Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal or neuromuscular toxicities were not observed., Conclusion: The efficacy of the combination of nedaplatin and amrubicin was comparable to that of other conventional chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment-naïve patients with advanced SCC, and no severe gastrointestinal or neuromuscular toxicities were observed. This combination therapy may be an alternative treatment approach, particularly in patients who cannot tolerate gastrointestinal or neuromuscular toxicities., (© 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Although some meteorological factor are likely to contribute to the onset of hemoptysis, few studies have investigated this issue, with none conducted in the Asia-Pacific region. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the associations of meteorological factors with the occurrence of hemoptysis. Differences in the frequency of hemoptysis among several calendar variables were also assessed., Methods: A total of 47 hemoptysis patients aged ≥ 20 years undergoing bronchial artery embolization in Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers from January 2012 to December 2017 were included in the study. All hemoptysis events were assembled in a single time series, and the proportion of hemoptysis days was 2.1%. The associations of meteorological variables with hemoptysis days were estimated as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals by using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. The frequency of hemoptysis days was compared among several calendar variables using a chi-square test., Results: Mean relative humidity was negatively associated with hemoptysis (P for trend = 0.02). The inverse association remained significant when only the hemoptysis events with no infectious lung diseases were used (P for trend=0.02). No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of hemoptysis among seasons, months, or other calendar variables (all P ≥ 0.21)., Conclusions: Lower relative humidity was a significant risk factor for the development of hemoptysis. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for increases in hemoptysis events on days with low ambient humidity., (Copyright © 2019 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Lessons Learned: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 85% of lung cancer in elderly patients.In the present study performed in the 36 elderly subjects with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive NSCLC, osimertinib 80 mg demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the objective response rate, which was comparable to those in the nonelderly population.Osimertinib appears to be an effective and safe treatment option in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation; further research in larger scale is warranted., Background: Previous findings suggest the possibility of relatively safe use of osimertinib for patients with T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with few serious adverse events for the elderly in comparison with conventional endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and with an antitumor effect., Methods: This phase II study was performed to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for elderly patients aged ≥75 years with ineffective prior EGFR TKI treatment or with recurrence in T790M EGFR TKI resistance mutation-positive NSCLC., Results: A total of 36 patients were included in the analyses. Among the 36 subjects, 63.9% were female, with mean age of 79.9 years. The objective response rate (ORR) was 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.2%-72.9%), demonstrating statistically significant efficacy of osimertinib ( p = .0017). The median duration of response (DOR) was 27.9 weeks (95% CI, 21.1-82.0). Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were 2.8% and 55.6%, respectively. Disease control rate (DCR) was 97.2%. A waterfall plot revealed that 33 (91.6%) subjects exhibited tumor shrinkage during treatment, including 12 of 14 subjects who had stable disease (SD). All adverse events were not reason for discontinuation of the study drug., Conclusion: Osimertinib may be an effective and safe treatment option in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation., (© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.)

Background: We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a non-platinum triplet regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expected to be platinum-resistant., Methods: Patients were diagnosed with NSCLC using endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath as a core biopsy. RNA was immediately isolated from unfixed biopsy specimens, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR assays were performed to determine ERCC1 messenger RNA expression. Patients with advanced, untreated NSCLC showing high ERCC1 levels (ΔCt ≧ 6.5) were assigned a non-platinum triplet regimen of irinotecan and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR)., Results: A total of 141 untreated patients were evaluated and 30 patients were entered into this phase II trial. The ORR was 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.2-82.7) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 215 days. Grade 4 thrombosis occurred in one patient, but other toxicities were mild and controllable. Fifty-six patients were treated with platinum-containing regimens and 24 patients responded (ORR 42.8%, 95% CI 29.7-56.7). Twenty-nine of these patients had high ERCC1 levels, of which 6 patients responded; 27 patients had low ERCC1 levels, 18 patients responded (P = 0.0053 by Fisher's exact test)., Conclusion: The triplet combination might be effective for patients with advanced, untreated NSCLC overexpressing ERCC1. ERCC1 messenger RNA levels may be a predictive factor for response to platinum-containing regimens., (© 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Although several studies have suggested that primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) might occur in clusters, only a few studies have found seasonal variations in PSP occurrence. Some meteorological parameters might be related to the occurrence of PSP occurrence, however, the effects of weather variations on the onset of PSP are still controversial., Methods: We examined seasonal differences in the occurrence of PSP and the meteorological risk factors for PSP. All PSP patients aged <40 years who were admitted to Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers from April 2007 through March 2013 were included in the study., Results: The incidence rates of PSP were 16.7 and 2.1 per 100,000 person-years in men and women, respectively. The frequency of PSP days among months and seasons was significantly different with a peak in September and autumn. Daily changes in maximum wind speed had positive associations with PSP days [crude OR =1.11 (95% CI: 1.02-1.21) per 1 m/s, P=0.02; multivariable-adjusted OR =1.11 (95% CI: 1.00-1.23) per 1 m/s, P=0.05]., Conclusions: PSP tends to cluster seasonally. Increased wind speed may play a role in the development of PSP., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

When pathogenic stresses are recognized by innate immune cells, inflammasomes are assembled and caspase-1 is activated, resulting in the conversion of pro-IL-18 into mature IL-18. Because natural killer (NK) cells express IL-18 receptors, IL-18 may play roles in immune functions of NK cells. In the present study, we examined the effect of IL-18 on NK cells derived from lung cancer patients and healthy adult volunteers. When peripheral blood NK cells were stimulated with IL-2, the cells formed clusters beginning on day 5-6 and proliferated thereafter, in which the number of NK cells increased by 10-fold in 10 days. When IL-18 was added, cell clusters were observed as early as on day 4 and NK cells proliferated vigorously. On day 10, the expansion rate was 56-fold on average, showing that IL-18 promoted the expansion of NK cells. It was also notable that IL-18 enhanced the expression of CD80, CD86, HLA-DR and HLA-DQ on NK cells, suggesting that IL-18 conferred NK cells an APC-like phenotype. When cellular cytotoxicity was determined, APC-like NK cells efficiently killed tumor cells and anti-tumor activity was augmented by the addition of tumor antigen-specific mAbs. In addition, IFN-γ was produced by APC-like NK cells in response to tumor cells, and the cytokine production was further enhanced by mAbs. Taken together, IL-18 not only promoted the expansion of NK cells, but also changed the phenotype of NK cells. IL-2/IL-18-induced NK cells might, therefore, serve as a bridge between innate immunity and adaptive immunity and be useful for cancer immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: YT is a co-inventor of Japanese Patent 2014-73475 on the development of a non-radioactive cellular cytotoxicity assay using a precursor of a novel Eu chelate-forming compound. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of gene polymorphisms, including UGT1A1*7, *27, and *29, on the safety of irinotecan therapy., Methods: The eligibility criteria were: lung cancer patients scheduled to undergo irinotecan therapy, aged ≥ 20 years, with a performance status of 0-2. Thirty-one patients were enrolled and their blood was collected and used to examine the frequency of UGT1A1*6, *7, *27, *28, and *29 polymorphisms and the concentrations of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G after irinotecan therapy., Results: The patients' characteristics were as follows: male/female 25/6, median age 71 years (range 55-84), stage IIB/IIIA/IIIB/IV 2/6/11/12, and adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma/small cell carcinoma/other 14/10/3/4, respectively. The -/-, *6/-, *7/-, *27/-, *28/-, and *29/- UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms were observed in 10 (32%), 10 (32%), 2 (6%), 2 (6%), 7 (23%), and 0 (0%) cases, respectively. The UGT1A1*27 polymorphism occurred separately from the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism. The lowest leukocyte counts of the patients with the UGT1A1*27 and UGT1A1*6 gene polymorphisms were lower than those observed in the wild-type patients. SN-38 tended to remain in the blood for a prolonged period after the infusion of irinotecan in patients with UGT1A1*27 or UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms. No severe myelotoxicity was seen in the patients with UGT1A1*7., Conclusion: UGT1A1*27 can occur separately from UGT1A1*28 and is related to leukopenia during irinotecan treatment. UGT1A1*7 is less relevant to irinotecan-induced toxicities, and UGT1A1*29 seems to have little clinical impact., (© 2017 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, it is disputed whether this treatment is suitable for patients aged ≥75. This study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pemetrexed for use in concurrent radiotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced non-squamous NSCLC., Methods: The eligibility criteria were as follows: aged ≥75 with inoperable stage IIIA or IIIB non-squamous NSCLC, no history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, a performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. The patients were scheduled to receive pemetrexed on days 1, 22, 43, and 64 with concurrent once daily thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy). The initial pemetrexed dose was 400 (level 1), and it was planned to increase the dose to 500 mg/m 2 (level 2)., Results: Two patients were enrolled in this trial. In the first case, the patient suffered prolonged leukocytopenia, and treatment was discontinued on day 35. In the second case, febrile neutropenia occurred on day 32, and the patient developed drug-induced pneumonitis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Both patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities; therefore, the level 1 dose was considered to be the MTD., Conclusions: During combined treatment with pemetrexed and concurrent radiotherapy, a pemetrexed dose of 400 mg/m 2 was the MTD; we did not set up a phase II study. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy might be too toxic for elderly patients aged ≥75 with locally advanced NSCLC., (© 2017 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Purpose: The relationship between plasma concentration and antitumor activity of gefitinib was assessed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations., Patients and Methods: Plasma trough levels of gefitinib were measured on days 2 (D2) and 8 (D8) by high-performance liquid chromatography in 31 patients. Plasma concentrations of gefitinib were also measured 10 h after the first administration in 21 of these patients to calculate the elimination half-life of gefitinib., Results: The median trough levels were: 197 ng/ml 10 h from the first administration of gefitinib; 113 ng/ml on D2; and 358 ng/ml on D8. The median D8/D2 ratio was 2.709, and the median elimination half-life was 15.7 h. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 273 days, and the median overall survival (OS) was 933 days. A high D8/D2 ratio was significantly correlated with better PFS, though the plasma trough levels on D2 and D8 were not significantly related to PFS. The elimination half-life was not a significant factor for PFS, but it was significantly correlated with high-grade adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly correlated with OS., Conclusions: A high D8/D2 ratio, but not elimination half-life, might be a predictor of better PFS in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations treated with gefitinib. On the other hand, long elimination half-life was related to high-grade adverse events in these patients. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN000001066.

Background: This study was undertaken to analyze the characteristics of fever after cancer chemotherapy in order to reduce unnecessary medical care., Methods: Retrospectively, 1016 consecutive cycles of cancer chemotherapy were analyzed. Fever was defined as a temperature of ≥ 37.5 °C lasting for 1 h. Age, sex, tumor histology, the treatment regimen, the timing of fever onset, the number of days for which the fever persisted, the cause of the fever, the presence or absence of radiotherapy, and the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were examined., Results: The patients included 748 males and 268 females (median age = 68, range = 29-88), of whom 949, 52, and 15 were suffering from lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma, and other diseases, respectively. Fever was observed in 367 cycles (36 %), including 280 cycles (37 %) involving males and 87 cycles (32 %) involving females. Fever occurred most commonly in the first cycles and was higher than later cycles (41 vs. 30 %, p < 0.001). Fever occurred most frequently on posttreatment days 4 (8 %), 3 (7 %), and 12 (7 %), and the distribution of fever episodes exhibited two peaks on posttreatment days 3 and 4 and 10-14. Fever on posttreatment days 3 and 4 was most commonly observed in patients treated with gemcitabine (20 %) or docetaxel (18 %). The causes of fever included infection (47 %; including febrile neutropenia [24 %]), adverse drug effects (24 %), unknown causes (19 %), and tumors (7 %). Radiotherapy led to a significant increase in the frequency of fever (46 vs. 34 %, p < 0.001). Thirty-three percent of patients received G-CSF, and the incidence ratios of fever in patients who received G-CSF were higher than those who did not receive G-CSF (44 vs. 31 %, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The febrile episodes that occurred on posttreatment days 3 and 4 were considered to represent adverse drug reactions after cancer chemotherapy. Physicians should be aware of this feature of chemotherapy-associated fever and avoid unnecessary examination and treatments including prescribing antibiotics.

Background: S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, is active in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on S-1 for elderly patients with NSCLC are insufficient., Methods: Eligibility criteria were no prior chemotherapy, stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, performance status 0-1, age >70 years, and adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal functions. Patients received S-1 (40 mg/m(2) twice a day) for 28 consecutive days. This schedule was repeated every 6 weeks. The primary end point was the tumor response rate., Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled and 31 patients were evaluable for response. The patients' median age was 80 years (range: 71-88). The response rate was 22.6% (95% CI: 11-38). Neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 6, 6, 10, 3, and 3%, respectively., Conclusions: In elderly patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC, S-1 appears to be well tolerated and demonstrates encouraging activity., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Amrubicin is active in the treatment of extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), and carboplatin is an analogue of cisplatin with less non-hematological toxicity., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of amrubicin and carboplatin combination chemotherapy for previously untreated patients with ED-SCLC., Patients and Methods: Eligibility criteria were chemotherapy-naïve ED-SCLC patients, performance status 0-1, age ≤75, and adequate hematological, hepatic and renal function. Based on the phase I study, the patients received amrubicin 35 mg/m(2) i.v. infusion on days 1, 2, and 3, and carboplatin AUC 5 i.v. infusion on day 1. Four cycles of chemotherapy were repeated every 3 weeks., Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 34 patients were eligible and assessable for response, toxicity, and survival. Patients' characteristics were as follows: male/female = 26/8; performance status 0/1 = 4/30; median age (range) = 64 (41-75); stage IV = 34. Evaluation of responses was 6 complete response, 21 partial response, and 7 stable disease (response rate 79.4 %, 95 % CI 63.6-88.5 %). Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 59, 82, and 26 %, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths or pneumonitis. Three patients experienced hypotension as an amrubicin infusion reaction. The median progression-free survival time was 6.5 months. The median overall survival time and 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 15.6 months, and 63, 28, and 7 %, respectively., Conclusions: Amrubicin and carboplatin were effective and tolerable as chemotherapy for previously untreated patients with ED-SCLC. Further investigation of amrubicin and carboplatin is warranted.

It is widely recognized that the risk of secondary neoplasms increases as childhood cancer survivors progress through adulthood. These are mainly hematological malignancies, and recurrent chromosome translocations are commonly detected in such cases. On the other hand, while secondary epithelial malignancies have sometimes been reported, chromosome translocations in these epithelial malignancies have not. A 33-year-old man who had been diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and treated with chemotherapy almost 20 years earlier was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma. After chromosomal rearrangement of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene was detected in this adenocarcinoma, he responded to treatment with crizotinib. It was therefore concluded that this echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene-anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene-positive lung adenocarcinoma was a secondary epithelial malignancy., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

A phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with amrubicin and nedaplatin for patients with untreated, advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was conducted. Amrubicin was given on days 1-3, with nedaplatin given on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. In the phase I trial, the initial amrubicin dose of 25 mg/m(2) was escalated in 5-mg/m(2) increments until the maximum tolerated dose was reached, with the dose of nedaplatin fixed at 100 mg/m(2). In the phase II trial, the primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), assuming 20% for a standard therapy and 40% for a target therapy (α = 0.05 and β = 0.20), and the estimated required total number of patients was 35. In the phase I study, nedaplatin 100 mg/m(2) and amrubicin 25 mg/m(2) was recommended. In the phase II study, 17 out of 35 patients achieved a partial response, and the ORR was 48.6%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3 anemia and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 62.9, 11.4 and 11.4% of cycles, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 5 cycles (3.9%) and all cases were manageable. The recommended dose of this combination is well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations are predictive of the success of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer. As with other solid tumors, lung cancer is thought to be the result of an accumulation of genetic alterations after exposure to carcinogens. The aim of the present study was to clarify the relationship between multistep carcinogenesis and the accumulation of EGFR mutations., Patients and Methods: The intratumor heterogeneity of EGFR mutations was analyzed in 38 patients with resected mixed-type lung adenocarcinoma according to histological patterns, and the clinical features of the patients harboring intratumor heterogeneity of EGFR mutations were evaluated., Results: Intratumor heterogeneity of EGFR mutations was detected in 9 of 38 tumors. EGFR mutations were more common in the bronchioloalveolar (lepidic) carcinoma pattern than in the papillary and acinar patterns, although this difference was not significant. However, there was a significant correlation between intratumor heterogeneity of EGFR mutations and smoking history (P < .043)., Conclusion: Intratumor heterogeneity of EGFR mutations correlates with the distribution of histological subtype in mixed type adenocarcinoma and is associated with smoking history., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although pemetrexed/cisplatin (P-C) is a standard treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (Nsq-NSCLC), neither its efficacy nor the effects of potential differences between driver mutations, such as the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, have been thoroughly examined., Patients and Methods: A single-arm phase II study of P-C was conducted in Japanese patients with chemo-naïve advanced Nsq-NSCLC. Patients received four cycles of pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) combined with cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) on day 1 every three weeks. The primary end-point was the response rate (RR) and the secondary end-points were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 50 patients were analyzed (males, 68%; adenocarcinoma, 80%). The RR was 44.0%. The median PFS and OS were 4.3 months and 22.2 months, respectively. Toxicities were mild, and no new toxicity profiles were identified. Among the 39 out of 50 samples, six (15.4%) presented ALK translocation and nine (23.1%) presented EGFR mutations; of the remaining patients, 24 (61.5%) were wild-type for both ALK and EGFR. Objective response was observed in two out of six patients with ALK translocations, six out of nine with EGFR mutations, and in 11 (45.8%) wild-type patients., Conclusion: The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin was effective and safe in Japanese patients with Nsq-NSCLC. We did not observe obvious differences in the efficacy of P-C between patients with ALK translocation or EGFR mutation and those with wild-type genotype.