Search

Objectives: To evaluate the risk of liver fibrosis and associated factors with the non‐invasive fibrosis score‐4 (FIB‐4) index in patients with inflammatory arthritis using methotrexate (MTX). Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were followed up in the rheumatology outpatient clinic, who were on methotrexate only and for whom FIB‐4 index was could be calculated at methotrexate initiation and follow‐up were included. The FIB‐4 index was calculated according to the following formula: age (years) × AST(IU/L)/(platelet count(10 (9)/L) × √ALT(IU/L)). The patients' demographics, comorbidities, other treatments, cumulative MTX dose, and reasons for MTX cessation were assessed. For the multivariate analysis, possible factors associated with intermediate‐high risk FIB‐4 index at last visit were determined. Results: A total of 107 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 82 (76.6%) had RA and 25 (23.4%) had PsA. At the initiation of MTX, 24 (22.4%) patients had intermediate‐high risk FIB‐4 index. Comorbidities and the rate of ≥3–4 Charlson comorbidity index were more common in patients with intermediate‐high risk FIB‐4 index. A total of 37 (34.5%) patients had intermediate‐high risk FIB‐4 index at the last visit after median 3.6 (0.3–22.06) years follow‐up. The median cumulative MTX dose was 2550 mg (1050–13.991). Cumulative MTX dose [OR 1.18 (1.01–1.33), p =.03] and diabetes mellitus [OR 4.60 (1.74–12.50), p =.002] were associated factors with intermediate‐high risk FIB‐4 index. The concomitant use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was found to be a low‐risk factor for FIB‐4 index [OR 0.28 (0.10–0.78) p =.015]. Conclusion: The FIB‐4 index is a non‐invasive method that can be used in daily rheumatology practice for the evaluation and follow‐up of patients who will use methotrexate. Comorbidities and cumulative MTX dose seem to be related with the risk of liver fibrosis. Concomitant use of HCQ with MTX may reduce the risk of liver fibrosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study which investigated the risk for pulmonary hypertension (PH) in Behçet's disease patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Topics discussed include the clinical characteristics of Behçet's disease patients with BCS, the results of transthoracic echocardiogram, and possible causes of PH in Behçet's disease.

Objectives: We aimed to determine the choice of biologic/targeted synthetic disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (b/ts‐DMARDs), factors associated with the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and mortality in RA patients with CKD receiving b/ts‐DMARDs. Methods: Two thousand one hundred forty‐one RA (79.4% female) patients were included in the analysis from the HUR‐BIO prospective registry. Patients were divided into the CKD group and the non‐CKD group. Age and gender‐matched patients were selected from the non‐CKD group, and then three main groups were determined. CKD was staged according to the glomerular filtration rate criteria. The clinical characteristics of the patients, disease activities, treatment choices, drug retention rate, and mortality rates were compared between the groups. Results: CKD was detected in 90/2141 (4.2%) RA patients on b/ts‐DMARDs. Forty patients (2.3%) developed CKD during follow‐up after the initiation of b/ts‐DMARDs. In the CKD group, anti‐TNF agents were chosen as the first‐line b/ts‐DMARDs therapy in 64.4% of patients, with etanercept leading in 31 (34.4%) patients. In multivariate analysis, age at the start of treatment, DAS‐28‐ESR at last visit, amyloidosis, hypertension, and history of smoking were the factors associated with the development of CKD in RA patients receiving b/ts‐DMARDs. The mortality rate in RA‐CKD patients until the onset of the pandemic was 15.41 per 1000 patient years, whereas it was 85.9 per 1000 patient years after the pandemic. Conclusion: Comorbidities and control of disease activity are critical in the development of CKD in RA patients receiving b/ts‐DMARDs. While there was no significant difference in mortality rate between CKD and non‐CKD patients, the overall mortality rate increased after the COVID‐19 pandemic duration in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to investigate the effects of colchicine, an important anti-inflammatory agent, on cognitive functions in a geriatric population diagnosed with gout or osteoarthritis by comparing it to non-colchicine users. 138 geriatric patients (67 colchicine users and 71 non-users) were enrolled. Within comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), cognitive status assessment via Mini-Mental State Examination test (MMSE), Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screening test (Qmci), clock drowning test (CDT), and digit span tests were performed. Median age was 68 (65–72), and there were 82 female (59.4%) patients. The scores of CDT, Backward Digit Span Test, MMSE-Total, MMSE-Attention, MMSE-Motor Function, Qmci-Total Score, Qmci-Clock drawing, and Qmci-Logical Memory were significantly higher in the colchicine user group (p <.005), showing better cognitive function. Adjusted model analysis showed that colchicine usage is independently correlated with higher Qmci-Total Score and Qmci-Logical Memory Score (For Qmci total score β = 7.87 95%CI = 5.48–10.27, p = <0.0001, and for Qmci Logical memory score β = 3.52, 95%CI = 2.12–4.91, p = <0.0001). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study revealing that colchicine usage is associated with better cognitive performance in older adults. Further investigations with a prospective, larger-sampled and randomized design are needed to show the causal relationship between colchicine and cognition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Turkish Society for Rheumatology is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of SPORMETRE: The Journal of Physical Education & Sport Sciences / Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi is the property of SPORMETRE: The Journal of Physical Education & Sport Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been resulting in increased hospital occupancy rates. Rheumatic patients cannot still reach to hospitals, or they hesitate about going to a hospital even they are able to reach. We aimed to show the effect of the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the treatment of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis. Methods: Patients were divided into three groups as follows: pre-pandemic (Pre-p: starting on biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy for the first time within 6 months before March 11, 2020); post-pandemic A (Post-p A: starting on biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy for the first time within the first 6 months after March 11, 2020); post-pandemic B (Post-p B: starting on biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy for the first time within the second 6 months). Results: The number of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Post-p A and B groups decreased by 51% and 48%, respectively, as compared to the Pre-p group similar rates of reduction were also determined in the number of spondyloarthritis patients. The rates of tofacitinib and abatacept use increased in rheumatoid arthritis patients in Post-p period. Conclusion: The number of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis patients starting on biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the first time decreased during the first year of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Cumhuriyet Medical Journal is the property of Cumhuriyet Medical Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objectives: The Xerostomia Inventory (XI) was developed to assess the severity of dryness in patients with xerostomia. It has a long and a short form with three- and five-point Guttman-type response options. In this study, we aimed to translate the XI into Turkish, to assess the validity and reliability of both response options in patients with head & neck cancer (HNC) or Sjögren syndrome (SS), and to select the optimal version for Turkish patients. Patients and methods: Between January 2019 and June 2019, the XI was translated into Turkish (XI-T) and applied to patients aged ≥18 years with HNC and SS. All patients were applied two tests including both the three- and five-point options. The internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Content validity was based on expert opinion and patient reviews. Results: A total of 186 patients (109 males, 77 females; median age: 54 years; range, 19 to 78 years) answered the XI-T. The number of patients with HNC and SS was 143 (77%) and 43 (23%), respectively. Median XI-T score was 17 for the three-point, and 24 for the five-point option, respectively. Overall internal consistency was satisfactory for both options (α=0.81 and α=0.89, respectively). Overall test-retest reliability was satisfactory and ICCs ranged between 0.71 and 0.92 for the three-point, and 0.36 and 0.94 for the five-point option, respectively. Assessments based on expert opinions and patient reviews also favored the content validity of the scale. Conclusion: The XI-T with both three- and five-point options is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the presence and severity of dryness in patients with HNC and SS who experience xerostomia. The three-point option is more comprehensible and can be preferred over the five-point option in the Turkish population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Turkish Society for Rheumatology is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)