Search

Background: The purpose of the present study was to describe the CT imaging findings of normal incisive canals and incisive canal cysts and propose cut-off values to differentiate between them., Methods: A total of 220 normal subjects and 40 patients with incisive canal cysts on multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) were retrospectively analyzed. The shapes, sizes, anatomic variations, Hounsfield scale values, and so on of maxillary incisive canals and the sizes and Hounsfield scale values of maxillary incisive canal cysts were analyzed., Results: A significant difference in sizes of maxillary incisive canals in normal subjects was found between males and females. The sizes of maxillary incisive canals were significantly wider during aging, but shapes, anatomic variations, and Hounsfield scale values in the maxillary incisive canals were not significantly different with aging. A significant difference in sizes but not Hounsfield scale values was found between normal maxillary incisive canals and maxillary incisive canal cysts. Based on a cut-off of over 6 mm in the width of incisive canals, maxillary incisive canal cysts could not be appropriately diagnosed for subjects over 60 years of age. Over 60 years of age, maxillary incisive canal cysts could be appropriately diagnosed based on a cut-off of over 7.1 mm in width of incisive canals. When maxillary incisive canals of the hourglass types were seen on sagittal sections, significantly more patients had maxillary incisive canal cysts than other types., Conclusion: In coincidentally diagnosing asymptomatic incisive canal cysts on imaging, we should apply different cut-offs for the size of the maxillary incisive canal for patients over and under 60 years of age. Specifically, the cut-offs for the long axis of maxillary incisive canal cysts were 7.1 mm for patients over 60 years of age and 6.0 mm for those under 60 years of age. In addition, we should pay attention to wider canals with hourglass shapes as indicative of cystic change of maxillary incisive canals.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of ranulas. In addition, to elucidate DWI findings and ADC values of other representative masses in and around the floor of the mouth., Study Design: DWI findings and ADC values in 35 patients with ranulas and 33 patients with other masses were retrospectively reviewed with a central focus on cystic masses or lesions that may have cyst-like components in and around the floor of the mouth based on the diagnosis of each respective disease., Results: Ranulas were all well-defined, homogeneous masses with high signal intensity on DWI. The mean ± standard deviation ADC value of the 35 ranulas was 2.59 ± 0.31 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s. There was a significant difference in ADC values between simple and plunging ranulas. On DWI, most other masses were heterogeneous, and most ADC values, except those for thyroglossal duct cysts, hemangiomas, and pleomorphic adenomas, were significantly lower than those for ranulas., Conclusions: The characteristic DWI and ADC findings of ranulas can be determined accurately, and these data can be significantly useful in the differential diagnosis of many kinds of diseases in and around the oral floor., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A Stafne bone defect is a static bone depression in the mandible that is commonly observed in cortical bone near the mandibular angle. We herein present a rare case in which static bone depressions attached to the three major salivary glands were observed on panoramic radiography and computed tomography (CT). The three static bone depressions in the mandible were visualized on a panoramic radiograph and CT as oval radiolucent masses in a 68-year-old man. The CT numbers in the bone depressions ranged from 10 to 50 HU, and they were close to those of the respective salivary glands. Based on the CT numbers, the areas in the bone depressions were determined to be a normal parotid gland, sublingual gland, and submandibular gland. The patient underwent a follow-up examination and did not request further consultation.