Search

The oral sensory perception of medicines is an important quality attribute that can influence adherence to medication. A systematic review identified studies reporting both in vitro and in vivo data on the mouthfeel of solid oral dosage forms. Fifty-six studies were identified and included in the analysis. Orodispersible tablets were the most commonly studied formulation (32/56 studies). In vivo studies were typically conducted using untrained healthy adult volunteers, where sample sizes ranged from 3 to 75 participants. Only eight studies reported a numeric correlation between the in vitro and in vivo data presented. In this review, we highlight opportunities for the development of a standardised approach to the assessment of mouthfeel to enable the development of optimised oral pharmaceutical products.

The patient's sensory experience when taking an oral medicine is important in the assessment of its palatability, and acceptability. The aim of this study was to develop tools useful for standardisation of sensory assessment of coated tablets: a lexicon and a sensory wheel. Two randomised, double-blind sensory assessments were performed involving 83 and 52 heathy adult volunteers and two sets of coated tablets. By adapting the principles used by food sciences, a free-text description of conventional, bitter-tasting or tasteless, coated tablets was performed. In the first assessment, volunteers described the sensory attributes of the first set of tablets. The attributes collected were then validated using a second set of tablets in a separate study with different volunteers. The appropriateness and semantics of each sensory attribute was analysed. Twenty attributes most relevant for assessment of coated tablets were selected for the lexicon and associated with explicit definitions. A collection of all attributes that could possibly be triggered by coated tablets were organised in the form of a sensory wheel. This study provides a valuable insight into the sensory experience while taking a coated tablet and presents tools which can accelerate the development of palatable medicines.

The popularity of multiparticulate formulations (MPs) as a paediatric dosage form continues to increase. MPs comprise of multiple small units that are easy-to-swallow. Currently, MPs are commonly manufactured into unit doses that are either swallowed whole or opened prior to administration. While this is an acceptable approach, dosing is envisioned to be optimised with a &ldquo, standard&rdquo, paediatric device which can better harness the flexible dosing potential of MPs. We evaluated a novel oral syringe (SympfinyTM, HS Design, Morristown, NJ, USA) that is being developed as a tool to dispense and administer MPs to children. Forty children, 4&ndash, 12 years old, received 0.5, 1.2, and 2.0 mL doses of placebo MPs using the oral syringe with spring water or a drink of choice to complete sample intake. Acceptability was recorded as those able to completely swallow the dose and participants also rated dose acceptability on a 5-point scale. The ability to completely swallow the dose decreased as dose volume increased, the smallest dose was completely swallowed by 87.5% (35/40) children, and 69.4% (27/39) of children confirmed their willingness to take the sample as a daily medicine. Larger doses, 1.2 and 2.0 mL, gave values of 55% and 57.5% for the doses completely swallowed and 58.8% and 51.72% for willingness to take the sample as a daily medicine, respectively. Use of a drink of choice showed no increase in swallowability as compared with water. The novel oral syringe being developed is an appropriate device for dispensing doses flexibly and administering neutral tasting MPs directly to the mouth in the lower dose range without the need for a co-administration vehicle in children aged 4&ndash, 12 years.

There is great interest in demonstrating acceptability of solid oral formulations in paediatric populations. This study investigated the acceptability of small, 7.5 mm, bitter-flavoured, coated tablets in healthy children and adults. A randomised, double-blind acceptability test was performed involving 101 children (4–12 years) and 52 adults (18–75 years). Acceptability was measured by participants as sensory assessment of taste, mouthfeel and hedonic perception, and by researcher observations of ability to swallow the tablet and negative facial expressions. Additionally, the taste-masking effect of film coatings was assessed based on the intensity of bitterness perception. At least one tablet was voluntarily swallowed by 35.7% of 4–6-year olds, 74% of 7–12-year olds and 98% of adults. The bitterness of the tablet did not affect participants’ ability to swallow it. The sensory properties determined whether the tablet was acceptable. The following factors: low bitterness, high smoothness, high slipperiness and pleasant aftertaste had a positive impact on overall palatability in both populations. The paediatric scores during sensory evaluation of tablets differed from adults, showing lower acceptability. This study demonstrates the multifactorial nature of palatability of tablets and highlights that adults’ palatability evaluation cannot be directly translated to a paediatric population.

This research aimed at developing ODFs containing an antipsychotic drug - aripiprazole (ARP). ARP, as a BCS II class molecule, requires enhancing its water solubility prior to formulating. Therefore, a solid dispersion of ARP - Poloxamer® 407 was prepared by ball milling, then incorporated into the films. It was found that co-processing led to an over 100-fold increase in drug solubility in comparison with pure drug. Moreover, ODFs with solid dispersion showed faster drug release (95% below 15 min) and disintegration (30 s), compared with raw ARP films. These results are believed to be due to the solubilization effect of poloxamer and enhanced wettability of the film. Films containing solid dispersions were found to possess smoother film surfaces and favorable mechanical properties - flexibility and strength. The ODF formulations, prepared by a casting method, were based on three different polymers (Kollicoat® IR, Kollicoat® Protect or PVA). It was found that not only the form of the incorporated drug, but also the type of film-forming polymer had an impact on the analyzed parameters. The use of PVA was beneficial in the film formulation with aripiprazole in comparison to other tested film-forming polymers.

Acceptability of medicines is critical for effective pharmacotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the oral sensory properties of tablet coatings to determine how mouthfeel can improve acceptability. A randomised double-blind study was performed in 84 adult volunteers (51% ≥55 years). Each participant received 4 placebo tablets (3 coated and 1 uncoated) to evaluate (i) ease of swallowing and (ii) palatability. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were used to capture sensory parameters. Acceptability was assessed using the following parameters: ease of swallowing; amount of water taken with the tablet; rank order of preference; roughness; adhesiveness and slipperiness. Ease of swallowing was determined to be the most sensitive measure of acceptance. The best coating was the one that was reported to be the most slippery and smooth. The presence of a coating improved ease of swallowing, mouthfeel and overall palatability. This study demonstrates that slippery coatings improve acceptability of tablets. The study also demonstrates the value of VAS to measure the sensory attributes of coated tablets.