Search

Background: The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery is contentious. In UK practice, surgical resection margin status is often used to classify patients into receiving adjuvant treatment. This study aimed to assess any survival benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with clear resection margins. Methods: This was a retrospective collaborative cohort study combining two prospectively collected UK institutional databases of patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity matched analyses were used to compare overall and recurrence-free survival according to the adjuvant treatment. Results: Of 374 patients with clear resection margins, 221 patients (59%) had no adjuvant treatment, 137 patients (37%) had adjuvant chemotherapy and 16 patients (4%) had adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. For patients who had received NAC (290, 76%), when adjuvant chemotherapy was compared to no adjuvant treatment, hazard ratios (HRs) favoured adjuvant chemotherapy but did not reach independent significance (overall survival [OS] HR 0.65 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.06; p.0.087). Responders to NAC (Mandard 1–3) were seemingly more likely to demonstrate a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.42 95% CI 0.15–1.11; p.1.081). Conclusions: Although no independent survival benefit was observed, the point estimates favoured adjuvant treatment, predominantly in patients with chemo-responsive tumours. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Importance Perioperative chemotherapy and surgery are a standard of care for operable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Anti-HER2 therapy improves survival in patients with advanced HER2-positive disease. The safety and feasibility of adding lapatinib to perioperative chemotherapy should be assessed. Objectives To assess the safety of adding lapatinib to epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX) chemotherapy and to establish a recommended dose regimen for a phase 3 trial. Design, Setting, and Participants Phase 2 randomized, open-label trial comparing standard ECX (sECX: 3 preoperative and 3 postoperative cycles of ECX with modified ECX plus lapatinib (mECX+L). This multicenter national trial was conducted in 29 centers in the United Kingdom in patients with histologically proven, HER2-positive, operable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Registration forERBB/HER2testing took place from February 25, 2013, to April 19, 2016, and randomization took place between May 24, 2013, and April 21, 2016. Data were analyzed May 10, 2017, to May 25, 2017. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 open-label to sECX (3 preoperative and 3 postoperative cycles of 50 mg/m2of intravenous epirubicin on day 1, 60 mg/m2intravenous cisplatin on day 1, 1250 mg/m2 of oral capecitabine on days 1 through 21) or mECX+L (ECX plus lapatinib days 1 through 21 in each cycle and as 6 maintenance doses). The first 10 patients in the mECX+L arm were treated with 1000 mg/m2of capecitabine and 1250 mg of lapatinib per day, after which preoperative toxic effects were reviewed according to predefined criteria to determine doses for subsequent patients. Main Outcomes and Measures Proportion of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 diarrhea with mECX+L. A rate of 20% or less was considered acceptable. No formal comparison between arms was planned. Results Between February 2013, and April 2016, 441 patients underwent central HER2 testing and 63 (14%) were classified as HER2 positive. Forty-six patients were randomized; 44 (24 sECX, 20 mECX+L) are included in this analysis. Two of the first 10 patients in the mECX+L arm reported preoperative grade 3 diarrhea; thus, no dose increase was made. The primary endpoint of preoperative grade 3 or 4 diarrhea rates were 0 of 24 in the sECX arm (0%) and 4 of 20 in the mECX+L arm (21%). One of 24 in the sECX arm and 3 of 20 in the mECX+L arm stopped preoperative treatment early, and for 4 of 19 in the mECX+L arm, lapatinib dose was reduced. Postoperative complication rates were similar in each arm. Conclusions and Relevance Administration of 1250 mg of lapatinib per day in combination with ECX chemotherapy was feasible with some increase in toxic effects, which did not compromise operative management. Trial Registration ISRCTN.org identifier:46020948; clinicaltrialsregister.eu identifier:2006-000811-12

Importance: Older and/or frail patients are underrepresented in landmark cancer trials. Tailored research is needed to address this evidence gap. Objective: The GO2 randomized clinical trial sought to optimize chemotherapy dosing in older and/or frail patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer, and explored baseline geriatric assessment (GA) as a tool for treatment decision-making. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, noninferiority, open-label randomized trial took place at oncology clinics in the United Kingdom with nurse-led geriatric health assessment. Patients were recruited for whom full-dose combination chemotherapy was considered unsuitable because of advanced age and/or frailty. Interventions: There were 2 randomizations that were performed: CHEMO-INTENSITY compared oxaliplatin/capecitabine at Level A (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2on day 1, capecitabine 625 mg/m 2twice daily on days 1-21, on a 21-day cycle), Level B (doses 0.8 times A), or Level C (doses 0.6 times A). Alternatively, if the patient and clinician agreed the indication for chemotherapy was uncertain, the patient could instead enter CHEMO-BSC, comparing Level C vs best supportive care. Main Outcomes and Measures: First, broad noninferiority of the lower doses vs reference (Level A) was assessed using a permissive boundary of 34 days reduction in progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio, HR = 1.34), selected as acceptable by a forum of patients and clinicians. Then, the patient experience was compared using Overall Treatment Utility (OTU), which combines efficacy, toxic effects, quality of life, and patient value/acceptability. For CHEMO-BSC, the main outcome measure was overall survival. Results: A total of 514 patients entered CHEMO-INTENSITY, of whom 385 (75%) were men and 299 (58%) were severely frail, with median age 76 years. Noninferior PFS was confirmed for Levels B vs A (HR = 1.09 [95% CI, 0.89-1.32]) and C vs A (HR = 1.10 [95% CI, 0.90-1.33]). Level C produced less toxic effects and better OTU than A or B. No subgroup benefited from higher doses: Level C produced better OTU even in younger or less frail patients. A total of 45 patients entered the CHEMO-BSC randomization: overall survival was nonsignificantly longer with chemotherapy: median 6.1 vs 3.0 months (HR = 0.69 [95% CI, 0.32-1.48], P =.34). In multivariate analysis in 522 patients with all variables available, baseline frailty, quality of life, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were independently associated with OTU, and can be combined in a model to estimate the probability of different outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: This phase 3 randomized clinical trial found that reduced-intensity chemotherapy provided a better patient experience without significantly compromising cancer control and should be considered for older and/or frail patients. Baseline geriatric assessment can help predict the utility of chemotherapy but did not identify a group benefiting from higher-dose treatment. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN44687907.

4006 Background: Many pts with aGOAC are elderly and/or frail. We previously compared epirubin/ oxaliplatin/ capecitabine (EOCap) vs OCap vs Cap in a pick-the-winner study and found OCap best. GO2 was designed to find the optimum dose of OCap and to explore the use of an objective baseline geriatric assessment to individualize doses for maximum Overall Treatment Utility (OTU), a composite of clinical benefit, tolerability, QL and patient value. Methods: Pts with aGOAC were eligible if unsuitable for full-dose EOCap due to age or frailty, but fit for OCap; GFR ≥ 30, bili 2d1, Cap 625 mg/m2bd d1-21, q21d), B (80% Level A doses) or C (60% Level A doses). Pts with GFR 30-50 ml/min or bili 1.5-2.0 xULN received 75% of the allocated dose of Cap. At 9 wks, pts were scored for OTU. Continuation thereafter was based on clinical judgement. Non-inferiority (vs A) was assessed using PFS censored at 12 months, with boundary HR 1.34 (based on discussion with pts and clinicians), needing 284 PFS events per 2-way comparison. Baseline fitness was assessed as predictive of OTU, overall and by interaction with dose level. Results: 514 pts were randomised, 2014-17, at 61 UK centres. Clinical trial information: 44687907. Non-inferiority of PFS is confirmed for Level B vs A (HR 1.09, CI 0.89-1.32) and for Level C vs A (HR 1.10, CI 0.90-1.33). Level C pts had less toxicity and better OTU outcomes than A or B. When analysed by baseline age, frailty and PS, Level C produced the best OTU even in younger, less frail and better PS patients; no group was identified who benefit more from the higher dose levels. Conclusions: This is the largest RCT to date specifically investigating frail and/or elderly aGOAC pts, and should guide future treatment. The lowest dose tested was non-inferior in terms of PFS and produced less toxicity and better overall treatment utility.[Table: see text]

4003 Background: Level A evidence supports use of CisGem as first-line chemotherapy for ABC; no robust evidence is available for second-line chemotherapy. Methods: Pts diagnosed with ABC with disease progression after prior CisGem were randomised (1:1) to either ASC+mFOLFOX or ASC. Randomisation was stratified by serum albumin levels ( < 35 vs ≥35 g/L), platinum sensitivity (determined from first-line CisGem) and disease extent (locally advanced vs metastatic). Pts with ECOG PS0-1, adequate haematological, renal and liver function, and adequate biliary drainage were eligible. Primary end-point was overall survival (OS) (multivariable Cox regression adjusted for stratification factors); sample size: 162 pts delivering 148 events were required (80% power; 5% two-sided alpha) for a hypothesised hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63. Assumed median survival for ASC was 4 months. Results: 162 pts (81 in each arm) were randomised (27 March ‘14 - 04 Jan ‘18); median age 65 yrs (range 26-84); sex: 80 (49%) male, 82 (51%) female; primary site: intrahepatic 72 (44%), extrahepatic 45 (28%), gallbladder 34 (21%) and ampullary 11 (7%). Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms except platinum sensitivity (ASC+mFOLFOX 27 pts (33%); ASC 34 pts (42%)). After 150 OS events, the adjusted HR was 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.97; p = 0.031; ASC+mFOLFOX vs ASC). Median OS (months (m)), 6m and 12m OS-rate (%) were 6.2m, 50.6% and 25.9% for the ASC+mFOLFOX and 5.3m, 35.5%, 11.4% for the ASC arm, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 48 (59%) and 32 (39%) pts in the ASC+mFOLFOX and ASC arm, respectively; these were balanced between arms except for fatigue and neutropenia (more frequent in ASC+mFOLFOX arm); data cleaning is ongoing. No chemotherapy-related deaths were reported. Conclusion: Survival with ASC was greater than assumed; ASC+mFOLFOX improved OS after progression to CisGem with a clinically meaningful increase in 6m and 12m OS rate. ASC+mFOLFOX should become standard of care in second-line for ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT01926236.

There is currently no standard salvage chemotherapy regimen in relapsed and refractory lymphoma. Gemcitabine is a novel nucleoside analogue, which acts synergistically with cisplatin both in vitro and in clinical studies. We evaluated the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) in 41 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The best-achieved response rate (RR) was 79% (95% CI 64–91), with a complete RR of 21%. In patients with chemo-resistant disease, the RR was 63%. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 17.1, 61.0 and 53.7% respectively. Only one patient had neutropenic sepsis and none of the patients suffered from haemorrhage. Grade 3 or 4 nonhaematological toxicity was minimal and stem cell mobilisation was not inhibited. GEM-P is an effective salvage regimen and its use prior to autologous stem cell transplant warrants further investigation.

We report a single institution phase II study of gemcitabine 1200 mg m(-2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1300 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma. Patients had a WHO performance status of 0, 1 or 2. Of the 21 enrolled patients, 19 had received prior immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. All had progressive disease at study entry. In all,19 patients had multiple sites of disease. The median duration of metastatic disease was 12.3 months (range 1.2-78.1 months). Three of the 19 evaluable patients achieved a partial response to treatment, with no complete responses, producing an objective overall response rate of 15.8% (95% CI, 3.4-39.6%). The median time to disease progression was 7.6 months, and median overall survival was 14.2 months. Treatment was reasonably well-tolerated, neutropenia being the most frequently observed grade 3 or 4 toxicity, occurring in 57% of patients. Other side effects were consistent with the established toxicity profile of the two drugs, including diarrhoea, palmar-plantar erythema, fatigue, nausea, vomiting and infection. This combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine has modest activity in immunotherapy-refractory metastatic renal carcinoma with manageable toxicity.

Phase II study of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with primary refractory or relapsed advanced oesophageal and gastric carcinoma Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in primary refractory or relapsed locally advanced or metastatic oesophagogastric (O-G) carcinoma. Patients and methods: Patients with documented progression on or within 3 months of chemotherapy were recruited between July 2000 and May 2002. Irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) was given with 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) bolus) and leucovorin (folinic acid) (125 mg/m(2)) followed by 5-FU (1200 mg/m(2) infusion over 48 h) every 2 weeks. Response confirmed by computed tomography was assessed at 12 and 24 weeks. Results: Thirty-eight of 40 registered patients (95%) were assessable. Median follow-up was 9.3 months and median age was 59.0 years. Thirty-three patients (86.8%) had metastatic disease and 37 patients (97.4%) had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval 15.4% to 45.9%) while an additional 34% had stable disease. Improvement in tumour-related symptoms included dysphagia 78.6%, reflux 60.0%, pain 54.5%, anorexia 64.3% and weight loss 72.7%. Grade 3/4 toxicities were anaemia 13.2%, neutropenia 26.4%, febrile neutropenia 5.2%, stomatitis 2.6%, nausea and vomiting 13.2% and diarrhoea 7.9%. Median failure- free survival was 3.7 months and median overall survival was 6.4 months. Conclusion: 5-FU/irinotecan is a valuable regimen for second-line treatment in 5-FU/platinum-resistant O-G carcinoma.

Lymphadenopathy is common, affecting patients of all ages. The current referral pattern for investigating patients with lymphadenopathy varies widely with no universally practised pathway. Our institution set up a lymph node diagnostic clinic (LNDC) accepting direct referrals from primary care physicians. Details of clinical presentation and investigations were recorded prospectively. Between December 1996 and July 2001, 550 patients were referred (M: 203; F:347). The median age was 40 years (range 14-90). The median time between initial referral and the first clinic visit was 6 days. Of 95 patients diagnosed to have malignant diseases, the median time from the first clinic visit to reaching malignant diagnosis was 15 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified five significant predictors for malignant nodes: male gender (risk ratio (RR)=2.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.63-4.56), increasing age (RR=1.05; 95% CI: 1.04-1.07), white ethnicity (RR=3.01; 95% CI: 1.19-7.6) and sites of lymph nodes: supraclavicular region (RR=3.72; 95% CI: 1.52-9.12) andor = 2 regions of lymph nodes (RR=6.41; 95% CI: 2.82-14.58). Ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology of palpable lymph nodes were performed in 154 and 289 patients, respectively. An accuracy of 97 and 84% was found, respectively. In conclusion, a multidisciplinary lymph node diagnostic clinic enables a rapid, concerted approach to a common medical problem and patients with malignant diseases were diagnosed in a timely fashion.

A multicentre phase II trial of primary chemotherapy with cisplatin and protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil followed by chemoradiation in patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus Background: We undertook a multicentre phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of primary chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for localised adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma of the oesophagus. Patients and methods: Chemotherapy comprised five 3-weekly cycles of cisplatin and protracted continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, with conformally planned radiotherapy commencing at the start of the fifth cycle. Results: The planned treatment programme was completed by 39 of 72 patients (54%), and a further 13% completed chemotherapy and proceeded to surgical oesophagectorny. Response rates to chemotherapy and to the entire treatment programme were 47% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34% to 60%] and 56% (CI 43% to 68%). The dysphagia score improved in 54% of patients. The median survival duration was 14.6 months with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 58.7% and 44.1%, respectively. Grade III/IV chemotherapy-related toxicity occurred in 38% of patients, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: This is a feasible and active treatment regimen providing palliative benefits for patients with poor-prognosis localised oesophageal cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of oxaliplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) in patients with advanced or relapsed 5-FU pretreated colorectal cancer. 38 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma with documented progression on or within 6 months following 5-FU or thymidylate synthase inhibitor containing chemotherapy were recruited between June 1997 and September 2000. Oxaliplatin (100 mg m−2) was given every 2 weeks and PVI 5-FU (300 mg m−2day−1) was administered. Median age of patients was 61 years. 17 patients had >2 sites of disease involvement. 10 had received 5-FU based adjuvant chemotherapy. 16 received oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU as second-line chemotherapy for advanced disease and 22 as third or subsequent lines. Median follow up was 6.1 months. The best achieved objective tumour response rate was 29% (11 partial responses 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15–46%). 20 patients (52.6%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 3.9 months. Even for patients who had previously received both 5-FU and irinotecan (n= 22), 27.3% had partial response with oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU. 37 patients had symptoms on entry into the study. 25 patients had pain, 10 had anorexia and 28 had lethargy. 64%, 70% and 17.9% had symptomatic improvement after treatment respectively. Grade 3–4 toxicities were anaemia 10.6%, neutropenia 2.6%, thrombocytopenia 5.2%, diarrhoea 18.9%, nausea and vomiting 2.7%, infection 5.4% and lethargy 37.8%. The median survival was 9.1 months. Probability of overall survival at 6 months was 58.4% (95% CI = 38.7–73.7%). The median failure-free survival was 4 months. Oxaliplatin and PVI 5FU is an active and well tolerated regimen in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced colorectal cancer. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign

Cytotoxic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer has undergone a period of dramatic development over the course of the last 5 years. Four distinct classes of drug with activity in this disease are now available, and the current challenge is to establish the best way to use these agents, either in sequence or in combination, for the benefit of patients. This review aims to summarize the data relating to the newer agents and to propose directions for future research. DRUGS TARGETING THYMIDYLATE SYNTHASE 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has established single-agent activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Its main intracellular target is thymidylate synthase, which is inhibited by the active metabolite of 5-FU, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate (FdUMP) (Figure 1). The lack of alternative agents until recent years has fuelled extensive research into the biochemical modulation of 5-FU and alternative methods of delivery, primarily based on continuous infusion of the drug. Many individual clinical trials have demonstrated enhanced response rates when 5-FU is co-administered with folinic acid (calcium leucovorin). However a significant survival benefit has been more difficult to establish. Indeed a meta-analysis of nine trials showed no survival advantage for folinic acidmodulated 5-FU over 5-FU alone (Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-Analysis Project, 1992). Similarly, continuous infusion of 5FU using a variety of different schedules also enhances response rates over bolus delivery. A meta-analysis of seven randomized trials addressing this question showed a small but statistically significant improvement in median survival for 5-FU infusion over 5-FU bolus (12.1 vs 11.3 months, P = 0.039). Haematological toxicity was also significantly less common with 5-FU infusion, underlining the improved therapeutic ratio provided by this approach (Meta-analysis Group In Cancer, 1998). Drawing on the experience gained with 5-FU infusion, two new avenues of drug development have been explored. The direct thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors are a group of rationally designed molecules that compete with folinic acid for binding to TS (Figure 1). Intracellular polyglutamation of some of these compounds leads to their retention within the cell, and hence prolonged inhibition of TS. Raltitrexed, the lead agent in this class, has been the subject of extensive clinical evaluation. Its efficacy at the established dose of 3 mg m −2

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of an antisense oligonucleotide targeting bcl-2 in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and to determine efficacy using clinical and biologic end points. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with Bcl-2–positive relapsed NHL received a 14-day subcutaneous infusion of G3139, an 18-mer phosphorothioate oligonucleotide complementary to the first six codons of the bcl-2 open reading frame. Plasma pharmacokinetics were measured by anion exchange high-performance liquid chromatography. Response was assessed by computed tomography. Changes in Bcl-2 expression were measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting of patients’ tumor samples. RESULTS: Eight cohorts of patients received doses between 4.6 and 195.8 mg/m2/d. No significant systemic toxicity was seen at doses up to 110.4 mg/m2/d. All patients displayed skin inflammation at the subcutaneous infusion site. Dose-limiting toxicities were thrombocytopenia, hypotension, fever, and asthenia. The maximum-tolerated dose was 147.2 mg/m2/d. Plasma levels of G3139 equivalent to the efficacious plasma concentration in in vivo models were produced with doses above 36.8 mg/m2/d. Plasma levels associated with dose-limiting toxicity were greater than 4 μg/mL. By standard criteria, there was one complete response, 2 minor responses, nine cases of stable disease, and nine cases of progressive disease. Bcl-2 protein was reduced in seven of 16 assessable patients. This reduction occurred in tumor cells derived from lymph nodes in two patients and from peripheral blood or bone marrow mononuclear cell populations in the remaining five patients. CONCLUSION: Bcl-2 antisense therapy is feasible and shows potential for antitumor activity in NHL. Downregulation of Bcl-2 protein suggests a specific antisense mechanism.

TPS5603Background: Clear-cell carcinoma (CCC) is an uncommon histotype of ovarian and a rare histotype of endometrial cancer. Prognosis for recurrent disease is poor and response rates to standard ...

Peri-operative chemotherapy and surgery is a standard treatment of localised oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma; however, the outcomes remain poor.ST03 is a multicentre, randomised, phase II/III study comparing peri-operative ECX with or without bevacizumab (ECX-B). The primary outcome measure of phase II (n = 200) was safety, specifically gastrointestinal (GI) perforation rates and cardiotoxicity.Two hundred patients were randomised between October 2007 and April 2010. Ninety-one/101 (90%) ECX and 86/99 (87%) ECX-B patients completed pre-operative chemotherapy; 7 ECX and 9 ECX-B patients stopped due to toxicity. Gastrointestinal perforations (3 ECX, 1 ECX-B), cardiac events (1 ECX, 4 ECX-B) and venous thromboembolic events (VTEs, 8 ECX, 7 ECX-B) were uncommon. Arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs, myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular accident) were more frequent with ECX-B (5 versus 1 with ECX). Delayed wound healing, anastomotic leaks and GI bleeding rates were similar. More asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) falls (≥15% and/or to50%) occurred with ECX-B (21.2% versus 11.1% with ECX). Clinically significant falls (≥10% to below lower limit of normal, LLN) occurred in (15.3%) and (8.9%) respectively, with no associated cardiac failure (median 22 months follow-up).Addition of bevacizumab to peri-operative ECX chemotherapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity and no negative impact on surgical outcomes.

Elderly patients are recommended to have a reduced starting dose (300 mg m(-2) once every 3 weeks) of irinotecan monotherapy. The aims of this analysis are to compare toxicity and survival according to age, performance status (PS), gender and prior radical pelvic radiotherapy (RT). The primary end points were overall survival and an irinotecan-specific toxicity composite end point (TCE) defined as the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, fever, infection or nausea and vomiting. Between 1997 and 2003, 339 eligible patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) progressing on or within 24 weeks of completing fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were prospectively registered in a multicentre randomised trial. All patients commenced irinotecan at 350 mg m(-2) once every 3 weeks. There were no differences in proportions of patients developing TCE by age (70 vsor =70 : 37.8 vs 45.8%; P=0.218), PS (0-1 vs 2 : 39.3 vs 41.5%; P=0.793) or prior RT (RT vs no RT : 45.1 vs 38.5%; P=0.377). Males experienced more toxicity than females (44.3 vs 32.6%; P=0.031), but this was not significant after controlling for other co-variates (P=0.06). Patients agedor =70 had similar objective responses (11.1 vs 9%; P=0.585) and survival (median 9.4 vs 9 months; log rank P=0.74) compared to younger patients. Elderly patients derive the same benefit without experiencing more toxicity with second-line irinotecan treatment for advanced CRC. Our data do not support the recommendation to reduce the starting dose for the elderly patients.

Purpose To identify baseline prognostic factors and assess whether pretreatment quality of life (QoL) predicts survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophago-gastric cancer. Patients and Methods Between 1992 and 2001, 1,080 patients were enrolled into three randomized, controlled trials assessing fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy. All patients were required to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core QoL questionnaire before random assignment. Results Of the 1,080 patients randomly assigned, 979 (91%) died. Four independent poor prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis: performance status ≥ 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; 99% CI, 1.25 to 1.98), liver metastases (HR, 1.41; 99%CI, 1.14 to 1.74), peritoneal metastases (HR, 1.33; 99%CI, 1.01 to 1.74) and alkaline phosphatase ≥ 100 U/L (HR, 1.41; 99% CI, 1.14 to 1.76). A prognostic index was constructed dividing patients into good (no risk factor), moderate (one or two risk factors) or poor (three or four risk factors) risk groups. One-year survival for good, moderate, and poor risk groups were 48.5%, 25.7%, and 11%, respectively, and the survival differences among these groups were highly significant (P < .00001). Compared with the good risk group, the moderate risk group had nearly twice the risk of death, and the poor risk group had 3.5-fold increased risk of death. Pretreatment physical (P = .003), role functioning (P < .001), and global QoL (P < .001) predicted survival. Conclusion Four poor prognostic factors were identified and a simple prognostic index was devised. Information from this analysis can be used to aid clinical decision-making, help individual patient risk stratification, and serve as benchmark for the planning for future phase III trials.

To examine whether weight loss at presentation influences outcome in patients who received chemotherapy for lung cancer or mesothelioma. Multivariate analysis of prospectively collected data 1994-2001. Data were available for age, gender, performance status, histology, stage, response, toxicity, progression-free and overall survival. The outcomes of patients with or without weight loss treated with chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC; n=290), stages III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n=418), or mesothelioma (n=72) were compared. Weight loss was reported by 59, 58 and 76% of patients with SCLC, NSCLC and mesothelioma, respectively. Patients with weight loss and NSCLC (P=0.003) or mesothelioma (P=0.05) more frequently failed to complete at least three cycles of chemotherapy. Anaemia as a toxicity occurred significantly more frequently in NSCLC patients with weight loss (P=0.0003). The incidence of other toxicities was not significantly affected by weight loss. NSCLC patients with weight loss had fewer symptomatic responses (P=0.001). Mesothelioma patients with weight loss had fewer symptomatic (P=0.03) and objective responses (P=0.05). Weight loss was an independent predictor of shorter overall survival for patients with SCLC (P=0.003, relative risk (RR)=1.5), NSCLC (P=0.009, RR=1.33) and mesothelioma (P=0.03, RR=1.92) and an independent predictor of progression-free survival in patients with SCLC (P=0.01, RR=1.43). In conclusion, weight loss as a symptom of lung cancer predicts for toxicity from treatment and shorter survival.

Intravascular lymphoma (IVL) is an extremely rare form of extra-nodal non-Hodgkins lymphoma characterised by the proliferation of neoplastic lymphocytes within the lumina of small arteries, veins and capillaries. The great majority of reported cases appear to be of B cell lineage. There is a wide variation in clinical presentation, and multiple organs are usually affected. We report a case of a 67-year-old man who presented with constitutional symptoms and neurological deficit and was diagnosed following bone-marrow trephine. His disease responded to polychemotherapy treatment but he died 15 months after diagnosis. This case in unusual in that it is generally felt that bone marrow is relatively spared until late in the disease and is often not clearly demonstrable histologically. In addition, this case supports the limited data that responses can be obtained following polychemotherapy treatment, although the prognosis remains generally poor.

After years of nihilism towards the use of chemotherapy for non small cell lung cancer in the UK it would appear that we have now reached the point where the use of chemotherapy to relieve symptoms, maintain quality of life, and prolong life, are now accepted for informed patients with good performance status willing to accept short-term toxicities. The use of the new agents vinorelbine, gemcitabine and paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin are all active regimens which offer small but real advantages over standard UK triple therapies (MVP, MIC) in terms of resource use, toxicity profiles and response rates. Overall survival could be increased by as much as 10% at one year on indirect comparisons. The use of docetaxel as second line therapy now offers lung cancer patients a second bite of the cherry, and should overall also prolong survival. It is only in embracing these small gains that we can currently make progress in the treatment of NSCLC. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 481–490. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600491 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK

4002 Background: ABCs exhibit increased VEGF expression, correlating with metastatic disease. Combining cediranib (which inhibits VEGFR1, 2 and 3 tyrosine kinase and VEGF-induced signaling in endot...

4067 Background: REAL3 evaluated EOC + P in advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. We previously reported that addition of P was associated with increased diarrhoea, skin rash and mucositis wit...

162 Background: Palliative chemotherapy for advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junctional (GEJ) carcinoma improves tumour related symptoms and overall survival compared to best supportive care alone. EOX has been established as one of the most effective regimens in randomised clinical trials, but produced significant toxicity. We wished to examine the tolerability of EOX in everyday practice. Methods: A retrospective search was conducted to identify patients with advanced gastric or GEJ cancer, treated at our institution with at least one cycle of first line palliative EOX between 2009 and 2012. Patient baseline characteristics, toxicities (graded according to CTCAEv.4), dose reductions, treatment interruptions and discontinuations were analysed. Results: We identified 60 patients, 83% were male, and the median age was 64 years (age range18-82 years). 85% had a baseline performance status (PS) of 1, 10% PS of 2 and 5% PS of 0. 75% had GEJ cancer and the remainder had gastric cancer. 82% were commenced on standard EOX (1250mg/m2 capecitabine, 130mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 50mg/m2). 80% of patients experienced grade 3 or worse toxicity. 27% discontinued treatment due to excessive toxicity and 37% due to progressive disease. Significant toxicities (at least grade 3) were: 28% neutropenia, 27% diarrhoea, 23% fatigue, 10% vomiting, 10% anaemia, 8% neutropenic sepsis, 8% nausea, 5% thrombocytopenia, 5% peripheral neuropathy, 3% mucositis and 3% chest pain. 47% of patients required a dose reduction of at least 1 drug. 66% of patients completed 3 cycles, 35% completed 6 cycles and 18% completed 8 cycles. The mean progression free survival for patients completing 8 cycles was 4.6 months. Conclusions: EOX improves tumour related symptoms and overall survival but the benefits are often short-lived and in some patients it is associated with unacceptable toxicity, given their limited life expectancy. More thought needs to be given to prophylactic measures and modification of the EOX regimen to improve tolerability without compromising efficacy.

91 Background: The REAL3 trial evaluated the addition of panitumumab (P) to epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (EOC) in advanced OGA. We previously reported that addition of panitumumab was not associated with improvement in survival endpoints. In this analysis we aimed to explore factors associated with OS in the REAL3 population. Methods: Analysis performed in ITT population (n=553). OS was evaluated in relation to the baseline characteristics displayed in the table below. Cox regression was used to obtain HRs and 95% CIs. Factors with p100 U/L. Results: Results of the univariate analysis are shown in the table below. In multi-variate analysis, the factors which remained statistically significant for OS were: PS (p=0.080): 1 vs 0 HR 1.24 (95% CI 0.99-1.57); 2 vs 0 HR 1.57 (95%CI 0.97-2.54) Disease extent (p=0.054): Met disease vs LA HR 1.42 (95% CI 0.99-2.02) Baseline global health score (p=0.005): Low vs high HR 1.52 (95% CI 1.16-2.00); middle vs high HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.11-1.89) Patients with an RMH Prognostic Index score of 0 (good prognosis) had median OS of 13.1 mo. This compared to 9.5 mo in patients with 1-2 adverse features (intermediate prognosis) (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.68; p=0.002) and 4.7 mo in patients with 3-4 adverse features (poor prognosis) (HR 4.02, 95% CI 1.96-8.22; p

We report the final results of a prospectively randomized study that compared the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and protracted venous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECF regimen) with the standard combination of 5-FU, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in previously untreated patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Between 1992 and 1995, 274 patients with adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma were randomized from eight oncology centres in the UK and analysed for response and survival. The overall response rate was 46% (95% confidence interval (CI), 37–55%) with ECF, and 21% (95% CI, 13–28%) with FAMTX (P = 0.00003). The median survival was 8.7 months with ECF and 6.1 months with FAMTX (P = 0.0005). The 2-year survival rates were 14% (95% CI, 8–20%) for the ECF arm, and 5% (95% CI, 2–10%) for the FAMTX arm (P = 0.03). Histologically complete surgical resection following chemotherapy was achieved in ten patients in the ECF arm (three pathological complete responses to chemotherapy) and three patients in the FAMTX arm (no pathological complete responses). The ECF regimen resulted in a response and survival advantage compared with FAMTX chemotherapy. The probability of long-term survival following surgical resection of residual disease is increased by this treatment. The high response rates seen with ECF support its use in the neoadjuvant setting. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

A number of new cytotoxic agents are currently being assessed for the treatment of gastro-intestinal cancers. Colorectal cancer has been successfully treated with several direct thymidylate synthase inhibitors, oral 5-fluorouracil analogues, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, alone and in combination regimens. Upper gastro-intestinal malignancies are also proving responsive to combinations including irinotecan and the taxanes. Pancreatic cancer, while remaining relatively chemoresistant, is proving treatable with the new direct thymidylate synthase inhibitors, docetaxel, and gemcitabine, improvements in quality of life being an important outcome. New strategies of treatment delivery are also proving beneficial. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is well tolerated for the treatment of gastric cancer and results in tumour downstaging. Randomized trials will show whether this translates into a survival advantage. Combination chemoradiation for oesophageal, pancreatic, and rectal cancers also appears to be an effective strategy. Biological therapies including hormonal manipulation, immunotherapy, angiogenesis inhibition, and gene-directed therapies are the subjects of intensive research at present, with many approaches being applied in early clinical trials. These have demonstrated the tolerability of many of these treatments with evidence for activity in some cases.

LBA4000 Background: EGFR overexpression occurs in 27-50% of esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (OGA), and correlates with poor prognosis. The REAL3 trial evaluated the addition of the anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab (P) to epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (EOC) in advanced OGA. Methods: Patients with untreated, metastatic or locally advanced OGA were randomised to EOC (E 50mg/m2, O 130mg/m2, C 1250mg/m2/day) or mEOC+P (E 50mg/m2, O 100mg/m2, C 1000mg/m2/day, P 9mg/kg). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), toxicity, and biomarker evaluation. Response was evaluated by RECIST after 4 and 8 cycles. Following IDMC review in October 2011 trial recruitment was halted and panitumumab withdrawn. Data for patients on treatment were censored at this timepoint. Results: 553 patients were recruited (EOC 275, mEOC+P 278), with median follow-up 5.0 and 5.2 months respectively. Median OS was 11.3 months with EOC compared to 8.8 months with mEOC+P (HR 1.37: 95% CI 1.07-1.76, p=0.013). Median PFS was 7.4 and 6.0 months respectively (HR 1.22: 95% CI 0.98-1.52, p=0.068), with RR being 42% compared to 46% (odds ratio 1.16: 95% CI 0.81-1.57, p=0.467). mEOC+P was associated with ↑ G3/4 diarrhoea (17% vs 11%), skin rash (14% vs 1%) and thrombotic events (12% vs 7%), but ↓ haem toxicity (>G3 neutropenia 14% vs 31%). In the mEOC+P arm, OS was significantly improved in patients with G1-3 rash (77%, n=209) on treatment compared to those without (23%, n=63); median OS 10.2 vs 4.3 months (p

Background: ABC-03 was a randomized phase II trial of cediranib (C; AZD2171) [inhibitor of VEGFR-1, -2 and -3 tyrosine kinase and VEGF-induced signaling] or placebo (P) in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine for pts with ABC. Changes in plasma biomarkers including angiogenic proteins and a marker of cell death (CK18) have not been reported in ABC.Methods: ELISA was performed for 15 angiogenesis or inflammatory-related proteins and CK18 in plasma of pts with repeated sampling during treatment and at disease progression. Tumor markers were also evaluated. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Cox model for baseline (BL) biomarkers and time-varying covariate Cox model (TVC) for biomarkers with serial measurements.Results: Plasma samples were available from 117 of 124 pts (59 in C arm, 58 in P). After adjusting for treatment and pt characteristics, higher BL VEGFR2 (p = 0.02), CK18 (p = 0.005), CEA (p < 0.001), CA19-9 (p = 0.03) and CA125 (p = 0.001) correlated with shorter OS, as did incremental increases in CK18 (HR 1.08, 95%CI 1.05-1.11, p < 0.001) and IL-6 (HR 1.02, 95%CI 1.00-1.03, p = 0.008) using TVC. There was evidence for interaction between treatment and BL CA19-9 and PDGFbb for OS: incremental increases in CA19-9 were associated with an increased risk of death (C: HR 1.44, 95%CI 1.16-1.80; P: HR 1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.05, p = 0.001) and higher values of PDGFbb were associated with a decreased risk of death with C (HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.68-1.00) and an increased risk of death with P (HR 1.15, 95%CI 0.99-1.34, p = 0.01). In TVC, there was evidence of interaction between treatment and VEGFA (p = 0.03), PDGFbb (p = 0.08), VEGFC (p = 0.06) and SDF1b (p = 0.06). Higher values of VEGFA were associated with increased risk of death with P (HR 1.31, 95%CI 1.06-1.62) but not with C (HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.86-1.15) (p = 0.03).Conclusions: High BL VEGFR2, CK18 and tumor markers are associated with a poor outcome in pts with ABC. Increasing levels of CA19-9 and PDGFbb from BL were associated with increased and decreased risk of death, respectively, in C-treated pts. Changes in VEGFA correlated with OS for pts on P but not C. These findings may inform future clinical trial stratification and design. Clinical trial information: NCT00939848