Search

Temporally consistent individual differences in behavior impact many ecological processes. We simultaneously examined the effects of individual variation in prey activity level, covering behavior, and body size on prey survival with predators using an urchin-lobster system. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that slow-moving purple sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) and urchins who deploy extensive substrate (pebbles and stones) covering behavior will out-survive active urchins that deploy little to no covering behavior when pitted against a predator, the California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus). We evaluated this hypothesis by first confirming whether individual urchins exhibit temporally consistent differences in activity level and covering behavior, which they did. Next, we placed groups of four urchins in mesocosms with single lobster and monitored urchin survival for 108 hours. High activity level was negatively associated with survival, whereas urchin size and covering behavior independently did not influence survival. The negative effect of urchin activity level on urchin survival was strong for smaller urchins and weaker for large urchins. Taken together, these results suggest that purple urchin activity level and size jointly determine their susceptibility to predation by lobsters. This is potentially of great interest, because predation by recovering lobster populations could alter the stability of kelp forests by culling specific phenotypes, like foraging phenotypes, from urchin populations.

Temporally consistent individual differences in behavior impact many ecological processes. We simultaneously examined the effects of individual variation in prey activity level, covering behavior, and body size on prey survival with predators using an urchin-lobster system. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that slow-moving purple sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) and urchins who deploy extensive substrate (pebbles and stones) covering behavior will out-survive active urchins that deploy little to no covering behavior when pitted against a predator, the California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus). We evaluated this hypothesis by first confirming whether individual urchins exhibit temporally consistent differences in activity level and covering behavior, which they did. Next, we placed groups of four urchins in mesocosms with single lobster and monitored urchin survival for 108 hours. High activity level was negatively associated with survival, whereas urchin size and covering behavior independently did not influence survival. The negative effect of urchin activity level on urchin survival was strong for smaller urchins and weaker for large urchins. Taken together, these results suggest that purple urchin activity level and size jointly determine their susceptibility to predation by lobsters. This is potentially of great interest, because predation by recovering lobster populations could alter the stability of kelp forests by culling specific phenotypes, like foraging phenotypes, from urchin populations.

Division of labor (DOL) is a pattern of work organization where individual group members specialize on different tasks. DOL is argued to have been instrumental for the success of eusocial insects, where it scales positively with group size both within and across species. Here we evaluate whether DOL scales positively with group size in a society of cooperative breeders (social spiders) and whether this pattern is impacted by the behavioral composition of the group. To do this we engineered experimental colonies of contrasting group sizes and behavioral compositions and tracked individuals participation in two colony maintenance tasks: prey capture and web construction. As with some eusocial insects, we found that larger groups exhibited DOL metrics up to 10-times greater than smaller groups, conveying that individuals specialize on particular tasks more in larger colonies. This scalar relationship did not differ by a groups behavioral composition, though groups composed of only bold spiders exhibited reduced DOL relative to all-shy or mixed groups. We also found that per capita participation in prey capture, but not web construction, decreased as a function of group size. This suggests that individuals in larger groups may save energy by reducing their involvement in some tasks. Together, our results convey that similar scalar relationships between DOL and group size can emerge both inside and outside the eusocial insects. Thus, theory developed for understanding DOL in eusocial societies may inform our understanding of group function in a larger swath of animal social diversity than is broadly appreciated.SignificanceStatementDivision of labor (DOL) has been a major area of research in the eusocial insects for decades, and is argues to underlie their ecological success. Only recently have other social arthropods, such as social spiders, been considered for studies concerning DOL. Given their smaller colony sizes, and absence of morphological castes, DOL was not thought to be an important facet of spider societies. However, we found that spider societies do indeed exhibit high degrees of DOL that is positively correlated to colony size, as seen in many eusocial insects. These findings suggest that the scalar relationship between group size and social organization seen in social insects is likely generalizable to a larger diversity of social taxa, and that cooperative breeders can show levels of division of labor equaling or exceeding those of eusocial systems evaluated to date.

Collective personalities refer to temporally consistent behavioral differences between distinct social groups. This phenomenon is a ubiquitous and key feature of social groups in nature, as virtually every study conducted to date has documented repeatable between-group differences in collective behavior, and has revealed ongoing selection on these traits in both the laboratory and field environments. Five years ago, foundational reviews by Bengston and Jandt pioneered this topic and delimited the present knowledge on collective personality. Here, we update these reviews by summarizing the recent works conducted in the field’s most prominent model systems: social spiders and eusocial insects. After presenting how these recent works helped scientists to better understand the determinants of collective personality, we used a trait-by-trait format to compare and contrast the results and thematic trends obtained in these taxa on 10 major aspects of collective personality: division of labor, foraging, exploration, boldness, defensive behavior, aggressiveness, decision-making, cognition, learning, and nest construction. We then discuss why similarities and dissimilarities in these results open the door to applying numerous theories developed in evolutionary behavioral ecology for individual traits (e.g., life history theory, game theory, optimal foraging theory) at the colony level, and close by providing examples of unexamined questions in this field that are ripe for new inquiries. We conclude that collective personality, as a framework, has the potential to improve our general understanding of how selection acts on intraspecific variation in collective phenotypes that are of key importance across arthropod societies and beyond.