Search

A kinematic coupling relationship exists between foot joints during gait. In individuals with hallux valgus, forefoot or hallux kinematics may be affected by adjacent or nonadjacent joint motion. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the foot joint coordination pattern and variability during gait in young females with hallux valgus.Twenty-five young females with hallux valgus and 25 healthy young females without hallux valgus were enrolled. Reflective markers were attached according to a multisegment foot model. Kinematic data were obtained using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Joint angles between distal and proximal segments were calculated using analysis software. Foot joint coordination pattern and variability were assessed using a vector-coding technique.Individuals with hallux valgus had a larger rearfoot relative to shank eversion and forefoot relative to midfoot dorsiflexion during terminal stance and pre-swing compared with those without hallux valgus. There were no significant differences in coordination patterns, but the consistency of coordination between the rearfoot relative to shank motion in the frontal plane and forefoot relative to midfoot motion in the sagittal plane during terminal stance was greater in the hallux valgus group than in the control group.The soft tissue composing the first ray might suffer from more severe stress due to the large motion that occurred with low variability in individuals with hallux valgus. This finding may suggest that the altered kinematics and coordination variability in foot joints are related to hallux valgus biomechanical etiology.

Background The high prevalence and severe consequences of antenatal and postnatal depression makes their prevention critical. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analysis have shown the effects of psychological interventions on perinatal depression in individuals at risk. However, none have focused explicitly on universal prevention in the antenatal period. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the effects of antenatal psychological interventions on perinatal depression, specifically focusing on universal prevention. Methods Four electronic databases, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, PubMed, and PsycINFO, were used to search for published randomized controlled trials from inception to January 28, 2019. Twelve investigators conducted the first screening from title and abstract, individually, and then NY and ZN performed full-text review one by one. For the meta-analysis, a random effect model was conducted by using Review Manager 5.3 for Windows. Subgroup analyses were also conducted for studies that employed a cognitive behavioral (CB) based approach. Results A total of 13,026 studies were initially searched. After removing duplicates, 9,919 studies were screened, and finally 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed a significant effect of antenatal psychological intervention on both antenatal and postnatal depression (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.44, SMD = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.66) with moderate to high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 61%, p = 0.01; I2 = 84%, p Limitations Limitations include a language bias, as we included only studies published in English, and that the assessment of antenatal and postnatal depression using different methods caused high heterogeneity across studies. Conclusions Psychological intervention in an antenatal period could be effective for universal prevention of both antenatal and postnatal depression. However, the results were still inconclusive due to relatively low methodological quality in the included studies. The evidence from more well-designed trials is needed in future studies.