Search

The pharmacokinetics of a non-narcotic analgesic, DA-5018, were compared after single intravenous (i.v.), subcutaneous (s.c.), and oral administrations, and after multiple (seven consecutive days) s.c. administration to rats. After i.v. administration of DA-5018, 1, 2, and 5 mg kg-1, the pharmacokinetic parameters of DA-5018 were independent of the dose ranges studied. After oral administration of DA-5018, absorption of the drug from gastrointestinal (GI) tract was fast, but the extent of absolute bioavailability (F) was low; the values were 23.2, 23.0, and 27.3% for 2, 5, and 10 mg kg-1, respectively. After single s.c. administration of DA-5018, absorption of the drug from the injected site was fast and the extent of absorption was fairly good; the F values were 74.5 and 71.8% for 2 and 5 mg kg-1, respectively. The lower F values after oral administration of DA-5018 to rats could be due to degradation of the drug in rat GI tract and/or considerable first-pass effect. After i.v., oral, and s.c. administration of DA-5018, the drug had a strong affinity to the rat tissues studied as reflected in the greater-than-unity tissue to plasma ratio. After i.v., oral, and s.c. administration of the drug, the biliary and urinary excretion of unchanged DA-5018 were negligible. There was no significant difference in the pharmacokinetics or tissue distribution of DA-5018 between single and multiple s.c. administration of the drug, 5 mg kg-1, to rats, indicating that there could be no tissue accumulation of the drug after multiple s.c. administration of the drug to rats.

To predict the clinical usefulness of DA-125, a newly developed doxorubicin analog, we compared its antitumor activity against 20 different human cancer cell lines with that of doxorubicin using the MTT in vitro chemosensitivity test. We also measured and compared the cellular uptake of this drug and doxorubicin in two cancer cell lines and their doxorubicin-resistant sublines. In the MTT test, DA-125 showed lower IC50 values than doxorubicin for 14 of 20 cell lines. DA-125 was more potent than doxorubicin for hepatocellular cancer cells with high mdr 1 expression. Among cancer cells from the stomach and colon, DA-125 was more potent than doxorubicin in 12 of 14 cell lines. We also investigated the cross-resistance of this drug with doxorubicin using four doxorubicin-resistant cancer cell sublines. Except in one cell line, there was very low cross-resistance. Cellular drug-uptake experiments were performed for two gastric cancer cell lines and their doxorubicin-resistant sublines. In this experiment, DA-125 was found to be very rapidly and completely converted to its active metabolite, M1, in the culture media. After this conversion, M1 was incorporated into these cancer cells more rapidly and reached higher intracellular concentrations than doxorubicin, suggesting that DA-125 (as M1) could achieve earlier and higher levels of intracellular accumulation than doxorubicin in its target tissues from the bloodstream. As a possible alternative antineoplastic agent to doxorubicin, DA-125 awaits further evaluation for its antitumor activity and toxicity.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed for the determination of a new non-narcotic analgesic, DA-5018 (I), in rat plasma, urine and bile samples, using propranolol for plasma samples and protriptyline for urine and bile samples as internal standards. The method involved extraction followed by injection of 100 μl of the aqueous layer onto a C18 reversed-phase column. The mobile phases were 5 mM methanesulfonic acid with 10 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 2.5)-acetonitrile, 70:30 (v/v) for plasma samples and 75:25 (v/v) for urine and bile samples. The flow-rates were 1.0 ml/min for plasma samples and 1.2 ml/min for urine and bile samples. The column effluent was monitored by a fluorescence detector with an excitation wavelength of 270 nm and an emission wavelength of 330 nm. The retention time for I was 4.8 min in plasma samples and 10.0 min in urine and bile samples. The detection limits for I in rat plasma, urine and bile were 20, 100 and 100 ng/ml, respectively. There was no interference from endogenous substances.

The pharmacokinetics of M1, M2, M3, and/or M4 were compared after intravenous (iv) administration of DA-125 and/or ME2303 to mice (25 mg kg−1) and rats (5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg kg−1). The mean plasma concentrations of M1 were detected up to 8 h after iv administration of both DA-125 and ME2303 to mice, and were significantly higher for DA-125 than ME2303; this resulted in a considerably greater AUC (303 against 148 μg min mL−1) and a considerably slower CL of M1 (69·3 against 136 mL min−1 kg−1) after iv administration of DA-125. The MRT (371 against 189 min) and CLNR of M1 (68·7 against 136 mL min−1 kg−1) were considerably greater and slower, respectively, after iv administration of DA-125. The mean plasma concentrations of M2 were detected up to 8 and 4 h after iv administration of DA-125 and ME2303, respectively, to mice and were significantly higher for DA-125 than ME2303, resulting in a considerably greater AUC of M2 (148 against 27·1 μg min mL−1) after iv administration of DA-125. The mean plasma concentrations of M3, being the lowest among M1–M4, were detected only up to 15 min after iv administration of both DA-125 and ME2303 to mice, and were comparable after iv adminstration of DA-125 and ME2303 to mice. The mean plasma concentrations of M4 were detected up to 8 h after iv administration of both DA-125 and ME2303 to mice, and were higher after iv administration of DA-125 than ME2303, resulting in a considerably greater AUC of M4 (197 against 61·9 μg min mL−1) after iv administration of DA-125. Similar results on M1 and M2 were also obtained from rats: the mean plasma concentrations of both M1 and M2 were significantly higher after iv administration of DA-125, 10 mg kg−1, than after ME2303. The plasma concentrations of M1, M2, and M4, and hence their AUCs, were significantly higher after iv administration of DA-125, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg kg−1, to rats than after ME2303: the mean plasma concentrations of M2, approximately 0·1–0·4 μg mL−1, were maintained from 30 min to 8–10 h after iv administration of DA-125, 20, 30, and 40 mg kg−1, to rats; the plasma concentrations of M3 were the lowest among M1–M4 at all DA-125 doses; and those of M1 and M4 were maintained for a long period of time. However, after iv administration of M2, 5 mg kg−1, to rats, the mean plasma concentrations of M2 were detected up to 60 min with a mean terminal half-life of only 38·8 min, and the concentrations of M3 were negligible. After iv administration of M3, 5 mg kg−1, to rats, the mean plasma concentrations of M3 were detected up to 15 min; the plasma concentrations of M4, reaching their peak at 5 min, decayed more slowly and were higher than those of M3. The AUC of M4 after iv administration of M3, 5 mg kg−1, was comparable to that after iv administration of M4, 5 mg kg−1, to rats, suggesting that M4 is formed fast and almost completely from M3. M1 was not detected in plasma after iv administration of either M2 or M3 to rats. After iv administration of M4, 5 mg kg−1, to rats, the mean plasma concentrations of M4 decayed fast with a mean terminal half-life of 43·9 min and neither M2 nor M3 were detected in plasma. The following disposition mechanisms for M1, M2, M3, and M4 after iv administration of DA-125 to rats could be obtained from the above data: (i) the maintenance of plasma concentrations of M2 for a longer period of time after iv administration of DA-125 than those after iv administration of M2 could be due to the continuous formation of M2 from M1; (ii) the lowest plasma concentrations of M3 among M1–M4 after iv administration of DA-125 could be due to the fast and almost complete formation of M4 from M3 as soon as M3 is formed from M1, and not due to the fast renal excretion of unchanged M3; (iii) M4 was exclusively and continuously formed from M3 and the formation of M4 from M2 was negligible; and (iv) reversible metabolism among M1–M4 did not take place. The following results could also be obtained after iv administration of DA-125 or ME2303 to mice and rats: (i) the lower plasma concentrations of M1 after iv administration of ME2303 than of DA-125 could be due to the greater biliary excretion of unchanged ME2303 (approximately 30% of iv dose) than unchanged DA-125 and (ii) the lower plasma concentrations of M2 and M4 after iv administration of ME2303 than after DA-125 could be due to lower plasma concentrations of M1 and hence less formation of both M2 and M4 from M1. Liver showed the highest metabolic activity for M1 and a considerable amount of M1 was also metabolized in the kidney after 30 min incubation of 50 μg of DA-125 in 9000 g supernatant fraction of rat tissue homogenates. The mean amount of M1 remaining per gram of tissue, the total amount of M1 remaining in whole tissue, and the tissue to plasma ratio of M1 were significantly higher in the heart, lung, large intestine, and kidney at 15 min after iv administration of DA-125, 25 mg kg−1, to mice than after ME2303. M1, the active antineoplastic moiety of DA-125, had higher affinity for the lung after iv administration of DA-125 to mice than after ME2303, indicating that lung tumours could be subjected to a greater exposure to M1 after iv administration of DA-125 than ME2303. The 24 h biliary excretion of M1 was significantly greater after the iv administration of ME2303 than after DA-125 (344 against 79·3 μg). However, reversed results were obtained for M2 (267 against 467 μg). M3 and M4 were under the detection limit in the bile sample after iv administration of either DA-125 or ME2303.

It has been suggested that oxygen-derived free radicals play an important role in the pathophysiology of acute gastric ulceration induced by NSAIDs and ischemia-reperfusion. Taurine is hypothetized to exert its protective effect on NSAIDs-induced gastric injury by its antioxidant properties. Protective effect of taurine on indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal lesion and its protection mechanism were investigated. Intragastric administration of 25 mg/kg of indomethacin induced hemorrhagic lesions on the glandular stomach in rats. Pretreatment with 0.25 or 0.5 g/kg of taurine one day before or for 3 days significantly reduced the gastric lesion formation and inhibited the elevation of lipid peroxide level, in gastric mucosa. The luminol-dependent chemiluminescence of rat peritoneal neutrophils increased immediately after treatment of FMLP or indomethacin. Taurine (5–20 mM) inhibited chemiluminescence of neutrophils activated by FMLP. Human neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocytes) significantly adhered to the confluent monolayer of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) after coincubation with indomethacin. This neutrophil adhesion induced by indomethacin to HUVEC was prevented by taurine in a dose-dependent manner. These results indicate that the protective effect of taurine against NSAIDs-induced gastric mucosal injury is due to its antioxidant effect, which inhibits lipid peroxidation and neutrophil activation.

The pharmacokinetics of DA-125 were compared after intravenous (i.v.) administration of the drug, 10 mg kg-1, to control male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 9) and uranyl nitrate-induced acute renal failure (U-ARF, n = 12) rats, or male Sprague-Dawley rats fed on a 23% (control, n = 8) or a 5% (protein-calorie malnutrition, PCM, n = 9) protein diet. After i.v. administration of DA-125, almost 'constant' plasma concentrations of M1, M2, and M4 were maintained from 1-2 h to 8-10 h in all rat groups due to the continuous formation of M2 from M1 and M4 from M3. The plasma concentrations of M3 were the lowest among M1-M4 for all rat groups due to the rapid and almost complete conversion of M3 to M4 and other metabolite(s). The AUCt values of M1 (115 against 82.5 micrograms min mL-1), M2 (33.0 against 23.6 micrograms min mL-1), and M4 (26.3 against 15.1 micrograms min mL-1) were significantly higher in the U-ARF rats than in the control rats. The percentages of i.v. dose excreted in 24 h urine as M1 (under the detection limit against 0.316%), M2 (under the detection limit against 5.58%), and M4 (0.0174 against 0.719%)--expressed in terms of DA-125--were significantly lower in the U-ARF rats than in the control rats, and this could be due to the decreased kidney function in the U-ARF rats. However, the percentages of i.v. dose recovered from the GI tract at 24 h as M1 (0.0532% against under the detection limit), M3 (0.0286% against under the detection limit), and M4 (0.702% against 0.305%)--expressed in terms of DA-125--were significantly greater in the U-ARF rats than in the control rats. All U-ARF rats had ascites, but the concentrations of M1 (0.0320 micrograms mL-1), M2 (0.0265 micrograms mL-1), M3 (under the detection limit), and M4 (0.032 micrograms mL-1) in the ascites from one rat were almost negligible. The plasma concentrations and most of the pharmacokinetic parameters of M1, M2, and M4 were not significantly different between the PCM rats and their control rats.

The pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of M1-M4 were compared after intravenous (i.v.) administration of DA-125, 25 mg kg-1, to BDF1 mice (n = 5 at each sampling time) and subcutaneously implanted Lewis-lung-carcinoma-bearing BDF1 mice (n = 10 at each sampling time. The mean plasma concentrations of M1-M4 were not significantly different between the two groups of mice, and hence similar pharmacokinetic parameters for M1-M4 were obtained. The amount of M1 in the lung was significantly greater in the tumour-bearing mice than in the control mice, resulting in a greater AUAt in the tumour-bearing mice (18,600 against 8940 micrograms min g-1), and vice versa in the liver (962 against 3840 micrograms min g-1). However, the corresponding values for other tissues were comparable between the control and tumour-bearing mice. The amount of M1 was greatest in the lung for up to 2 h in the tumour-bearing mice. M2 was the predominant metabolite among M1-M4 excreted in 24 h urine by both groups of mice; 8.36 and 10.7% of the i.v. dose were excreted in 24 h urine as M2--expressed in terms of DA-125--by the control and tumour-bearing mice, respectively. The amount of M1 in the tumour mass reached a mean Cmax of 3.75 micrograms g-1 immediately after i.v. administration of DA-125 to the tumour-bearing mice, then declined very slowly to an amount that remained almost constant for up to 24 h. This suggested that M1 has high affinity for the subcutaneously implanted Lewis lung carcinoma. The antitumour activity, such as the increase in life span (ILS) and tumour growth inhibition (TGI) of DA-125, 6-48 mg kg-1, and adriamycin (ADM), 3-18 mg kg-1, were also compared in subcutaneously implanted Lewis-lung-carcinoma-bearing BDF1 mice after four weekly i.v. administration of the drugs on days 1,8,15, and 22 following tumour implantation. More than three out of six mice survived as tumour-free for longer than 70 d at a DA-125 dose range of 6-24 mg kg-1, but there were no tumour-free mice at any dose of ADM. Assuming ILS values higher than 30% to be effective, DA-125 doses ranging from 6 to 24 mg kg-1 were effective in increasing the life span, which ADM does only within the dose range of 6-12 mg kg-1.

The pharmacokinetics of DA-125 or its active metabolite, M1 (FT-ADM), an adriamycin analog containing fluorine were compared after intravenous (i.v.) administration of DA-125 or M1 in rats. DA-125, 20 mg kg−1 was dissolved in 1 mM lactic acid/0.9% NaCl solution (treatment I) or 100% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, treatment II), and M1, 20 mgkg was dissolved in 100% DMSO (treatment III) due to its poor water solubility. The plasma concentrations of DA-125 and M1, and the pharmacokinetic parameters of DA-125, such as terminal half-life (t12, 1.64 vs 2.07 min), mean residence time (MRT, 1.52 vs 2.60 min), total body clearance (CL, 165 vs 186 ml min−1 kg−1) and apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss, 254 vs 411 ml kg−1), and of M1 (based on plasma data up to 1 h), such as (t12 (30.2 vs 38.7 min), MRT (19.1 vs 31.6 min), CL (187 vs 189 ml min−1 kg−1) and Vdss(2670vs 5700 ml kg−1were similar between treatments I and II, indicating that the effect of 100% DMSO on the pharmacokinetics of DA-125 or M1 seemed to be negligible, if any. The plasma concentrations of M1, and the pharmacokinetic parameters of M1 (based on plasma data up to 8 h when the dose of M1, 20 mg kg−1 was normalized to the dose of DA-125, 20 mg kg−1), such as (t12 (255 vs 221 min), MRT (269 vs 235 min), CL (103 vs 112 ml min−1 kg−1) and Vdss (28 500 vs 26300 ml kg−1) were also similar between treatments II and III. The above results indicate that DA-125 is rapidly hydrolyzed to M1 after i.v. administration of DA-125. Therefore, the estimation of the pharmacokinetic parameters of M1 after i.v. administra- tion of DA-125 appeared not to cause any differences, if any when compared with the values after i.v. dose of M1. The rapid hydrolysis of DA-125 to M1 was demonstrated during an in vitro study; the (t12 values of hydrolysis of DA-125 were 1.97, 1.72, 0.54 and 0.54 min in the plasma from mouse, rat, dog and human, respectively, when the plasma containing DA-125 was incubated in a shaking water bath kept at 37°C and at a rate of 300 rpm.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed for the determination of a new carbapenem, DA-1131 (I), in human plasma and urine and in rat blood and tissue homogenates. The method involved deproteinization of the biological samples with 1 volume each of 0.04 M Ba(OH)2 and ZnSO4 aqueous solution. A 50-microliters aliquot of the supernatant was injected onto a C18 reversed-phase column. The mobile phase employed was 0.015 M KH2PO4-acetonitrile (9:1, v/v) with a pH of 5.0. The flow-rate was 0.8 ml/min. The column effluent was monitored by a ultraviolet detector at 300 nm. The retention time of I was 8.0 min. The detection limits of I in human plasma and urine were 0.1 and 0.5 micrograms/ml, respectively. The coefficients of variation of the assay were generally low (below 8.39%) for human plasma and urine, and rat blood and tissue homogenates. No interferences from endogenous substances were observed.

It has been suggested that oxygen-derived free radicals play an important role in the pathophysiology of acute gastric ulceration induced by NSAIDs and ischemia-reperfusion. Taurine is hypothetized to exert its protective effect on NSAIDs-induced gastric injury by its antioxidant properties. Protective effect of taurine on indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal lesion and its protection mechanism were investigated. Intragastric administration of 25 mg/kg of indomethacin induced hemorrhagic lesions on the glandular stomach in rats. Pretreatment with 0.25 or 0.5 g/kg of taurine one day before or for 3 days significantly reduced the gastric lesion formation and inhibited the elevation of lipid peroxide level, in gastric mucosa. The luminol-dependent chemiluminescence of rat peritoneal neutrophils increased immediately after treatment of FMLP or indomethacin. Taurine (5–20 mM) inhibited chemiluminescence of neutrophils activated by FMLP. Human neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocytes) significantly adhered to the confluent monolayer of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) after coincubation with indomethacin. This neutrophil adhesion induced by indomethacin to HUVEC was prevented by taurine in a dose-dependent manner. These results indicate that the protective effect of taurine against NSAIDs-induced gastric mucosal injury is due to its antioxidant effect, which inhibits lipid peroxidation and neutrophil activation.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed for the simultaneous determination of a new anthracycline, DA-125 (I), and its metabolites (M1, M2, M3, and M4) in rat plasma and urine using fluorescein as an internal standard. Compound I, a prodrug of M1, is a beta-alanine derivative of M1, and only M1 shows antineoplastic activity. The method involved extraction or deproteinization followed by injection of 80-100 microliters of the aqueous layer or supernatant onto a C18 reversed-phase column. The mobile phases were 1% acetic acid-isopropyl alcohol-methanol (70:20:10, v/v) or 5 mM of ion-pairing chromatography reagent (IPC B8)-isopropyl alcohol-methanol (70:20:10, v/v) for the extraction or deproteinization methods, respectively. The flow-rate was 1.5 ml/min for both methods. The column effluent was monitored by a fluorescence detector with excitation wavelength of 488 nm and emission wavelength of 556 nm. The detection limits for M1, M2, M3, and M4 in rat plasma and urine were 50 ng/ml for all compounds using the extraction method, and 100, 50, 50, 50, and 50 ng/ml for I, M1, M2, M3 and M4 in rat plasma respectively, using the deproteinization method. No interferences from endogenous substances, adriamycin or daunorubicin were found.