Search

Background Longer-term humoral responses to 2-dose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines remain incompletely characterized in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH), as do initial responses to a third dose. Methods We measured antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein receptor-binding domain, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) displacement, and viral neutralization against wild-type and Omicron strains up to 6 months after 2-dose vaccination, and 1 month after the third dose, in 99 PLWH receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy and 152 controls. Results Although humoral responses naturally decline after 2-dose vaccination, we found no evidence of lower antibody concentrations or faster rates of antibody decline in PLWH compared with controls after accounting for sociodemographic, health, and vaccine-related factors. We also found no evidence of poorer viral neutralization in PLWH after 2 doses, nor evidence that a low nadir CD4+ T-cell count compromised responses. Post–third-dose humoral responses substantially exceeded post–second-dose levels, though Omicron-specific responses were consistently weaker than responses against wild-type virus. Nevertheless, post–third-dose responses in PLWH were comparable to or higher than controls. An mRNA-1273 third dose was the strongest consistent correlate of higher post–third-dose responses. Conclusion PLWH receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy mount strong antibody responses after 2- and 3-dose COVID-19 vaccination. Results underscore the immune benefits of third doses in light of Omicron.

BackgroundLimited data exist regarding longer-term antibody responses following three-dose COVID-19 vaccination, and the impact of a first SARS-CoV-2 infection during this time, in people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART). We quantified wild-type-(WT), Omicron BA.1- and Omicron BA.5-specific responses up to six months post-third dose in 64 PLWH and 117 controls who remained COVID-19-naive or experienced their first SARS-CoV-2 infection during this time.DesignLongitudinal observational cohort.MethodsWe quantified WT- and Omicron-specific Anti-Spike receptor-binding domain IgG concentrations, ACE2 displacement activities and live virus neutralization at one, three and six months post-third vaccine dose.ResultsThird doses boosted all antibody measures above two-dose levels, but BA.1-specific responses remained significantly lower than WT-specific ones, with BA.5-specific responses lower still. Serum IgG concentrations declined at similar rates in COVID-19-naive PLWH and controls post-third dose (median WT- and BA.1-specific half-lives were between 66-74 days for both groups). Antibody function also declined significantly yet comparably between groups: six months post-third dose, BA.1-specific neutralization was undetectable in >80% of COVID-19 naive PLWH and >90% of controls. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted antibody concentrations and function significantly above vaccine-induced levels in both PLWH and controls, though BA.5-specific neutralization remained significantly poorer than BA.1 even post-breakthrough.ConclusionsFollowing three-dose COVID-19 vaccination, antibody response durability in PLWH receiving ART is comparable to controls. PLWH also mounted strong responses to breakthrough infection. Due to temporal response declines however, COVID-19-naive individuals, regardless of HIV status, would benefit from a fourth dose within 6 months of their third.

BackgroundLonger-term humoral responses to two-dose COVID-19 vaccines remain incompletely characterized in people living with HIV (PLWH), as do initial responses to a third dose.MethodsWe measured antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain, ACE2 displacement and viral neutralization against wild-type and Omicron strains up to six months following two-dose vaccination, and one month following the third dose, in 99 PLWH receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy, and 152 controls.ResultsThough humoral responses naturally decline following two-dose vaccination, we found no evidence of lower antibody concentrations nor faster rates of antibody decline in PLWH compared to controls after accounting for sociodemographic, health and vaccine-related factors. We also found no evidence of poorer viral neutralization in PLWH after two doses, nor evidence that a low nadir CD4+ T-cell count compromised responses. Post-third-dose humoral responses substantially exceeded post-second-dose levels, though anti-Omicron responses were consistently weaker than against wild-type.Nevertheless, post-third-dose responses in PLWH were comparable to or higher than controls. An mRNA-1273 third dose was the strongest consistent correlate of higher post-third-dose responses.ConclusionPLWH receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy mount strong antibody responses after two- and three-dose COVID-19 vaccination. Results underscore the immune benefits of third doses in light of Omicron.

To characterize the annual prevalence of antiretroviral/nonantiretroviral drug interactions in relation to antiretroviral therapy (ART)-prescribing patterns, and to describe drug interaction-related ART changes.This cohort study included ART-treated adults in British Columbia, Canada between 01 January 2010 and 31 December 2016. Medication dispensing records were abstracted from a population-based, linked administrative-health dataset and used to identify antiretroviral-comedication drug interactions ('caution'/'avoid' drug interactions in HIV-focused drug interaction checkers). We identified temporal trends in annual drug interaction prevalence and quantified the association between taking higher drug interaction-risk ART and receiving nonrecommended antiretroviral-comedication combinations using Poisson regression models, modified for binary outcomes and correlated data. Clinician-reported, drug interaction-related ART changes and associated adverse events were abstracted from an HIV drug treatment registry and summarized descriptively.Among 8571 ART-treated adults who received nonantiretroviral comedications, prevalence of having any drug interaction or receiving nonrecommended drug combination(s) significantly declined from 85 to 71% and 5.6 to 3.2%, respectively, between 2010 and 2016 ( P 0.001). This paralleled a shift from higher drug interaction-risk ART (e.g. ritonavir/cobicistat-boosted protease inhibitors) to lower drug interaction-risk ART (e.g. unboosted integrase inhibitors). Risk of receiving a nonrecommended antiretroviral-comedication combination was greater for persons taking higher vs. lower drug interaction-risk ART [adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 3.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.24-4.35]. Boosted antiretroviral-inhaled corticosteroid drug interactions accounted for the most commonly dispensed, nonrecommended drug combinations, and the most commonly reported drug interaction-related adverse events (adrenal insufficiency).The prevalence of antiretroviral-comedication drug interactions is declining as ART shifts towards antiretrovirals with lower drug interaction potential but nonrecommended drug combinations remain a concern. Healthcare providers should screen for drug interactions whenever drugs are prescribed or dispensed.

Humoral responses to COVID-19 vaccines in people living with HIV (PLWH) remain incompletely understood. We measured circulating antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, ACE2 displacement and live viral neutralization activities one month following the first and second COVID-19 vaccine doses in 100 adult PLWH and 152 controls. All PLWH were receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy, with median CD4+ T-cell counts of 710 (IQR 525-935) cells/mm3. Nadir CD4+ T-cell counts ranged as low as 3. After adjustment for sociodemographic, health and vaccine-related variables, HIV infection was significantly associated with 0.2 log10 lower anti-RBD antibody concentrations (p=0.03) and ∼11% lower ACE2 displacement activity (p=0.02), but not lower viral neutralization (p=0.1) after one vaccine dose. Following two doses however, HIV was no longer significantly associated with the magnitude of any response measured. Rather, older age, a higher burden of chronic health conditions, and having received two ChAdOx1 doses (versus a heterologous or dual mRNA vaccine regimen) were independently associated with lower responses. After two vaccine doses, no significant correlation was observed between the most recent or nadir CD4+ T-cell counts and vaccine responses in PLWH. These results suggest that PLWH with well-controlled viral loads on antiretroviral therapy and CD4+ T-cell counts in a healthy range will generally not require a third COVID-19 vaccine dose as part of their initial immunization series, though other factors such as older age, co-morbidities, vaccine regimen type, and durability of vaccine responses will influence when this group may benefit from additional doses. Further studies of PLWH who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment and/or who have low CD4+ T-cell counts are needed.

Public health measures designed to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission led to reduced access to care and prevention services for people living with or at risk of acquiring HIV, particularly during the initial introduction of extensive restrictions. This reduction in access may have contributed to increases in HIV transmission not outweighed by decreases in transmission occurring as a result of reduced contact rates promoted by the same public health measures.We synthesize available province-wide HIV data in British Columbia, Canada, together with public mobility data to phylogenetically investigate the early impacts of SARS-CoV-2 on HIV transmission. Cluster growth, coalescent branching events and lineage-level diversification rates were assessed in "pre-lockdown" (January 22-March 21, 2020), "lockdown" (March 22-May 20, 2020) and "post-lockdown" (May 21-July 19, 2020) to facilitate comparison of transmission trends across key populations.Results reveal increased HIV transmission in a limited number of clusters in association with reduced access to health services during the initial introduction of SARS-CoV-2-related restrictions. In particular, clusters associated with people who inject drugs (PWID) show rapid growth, extensive branching events in phylogenetic trees during and following the lockdown period, and elevated median change in individuals' viral diversification rates during lockdown compared to clusters associated with men who have sex with men (MSM), consistent with increased transmission rates between PWID.Increased vigilance and innovative targeted solutions are critical to offset potential negative impacts of SARS-CoV-2 or future pandemic-related restrictions on HIV epidemic dynamics.Funding sources include Genome Canada and Genome BC, the Public Health Agency of Canada, the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Coronavirus Rapid Response Programme. Student funding includes a NSERC CREATE scholarship and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research graduate fellowship.

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at risk for sexually-transmitted hepatitis C (HCV). Evidence for HCV infection in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use in North America is limited. We sought to characterize baseline HCV prevalence and incidence in MSM receiving PrEP in British Columbia (BC), Canada.We followed individuals in the BC PrEP program from January 2018 to August 2019. We evaluated baseline prevalence and incident seroconversions (newly positive HCV antibody). A multivariable logistic regression model was performed in MSM for factors associated with HCV prevalence at enrollment, including reported prior sexually transmitted infection (STI), HIV Incidence Risk Index for MSM score, PrEP use because of a partner living with HIV, and location of residence.The median age of the cohort was 33 years, 98.3% male, with 3058 person years (PY) of follow-up. Baseline HCV prevalence was 0.82% (31/3907 MSM enrollees) and HCV incidence (n = 3) was 0.15 per 100 PY (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.45). In multivariable analysis, initiating PrEP because of a partner living with HIV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.02; 95% CI 1.87-13.47) and prior STI (aOR 2.34; 95% CI 1.04-5.24) were associated with positive HCV status.Baseline HCV prevalence and incidence was low amongst MSM in a population-based PrEP program in BC, Canada. HCV was associated with bridging from populations living with HIV and evidence of a reported prior STI as a PrEP indicator condition amongst MSM. PrEP initiation may be an opportunity for linkage to HCV screening and treatment.

Background In British Columbia, antiretrovirals are distributed at no cost to patients via a publicly funded program, using generic formulations if available. A generic efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir DF (EFV-FTC-TDF) combination pill became available in April 2018. The authors compared EFV untimed drug levels in subjects switching from brand to generic EFV-FTC-TDF. Methods Archived plasma HIV viral load samples were identified for consenting participants who switched from brand to generic EFV-FTC-TDF; 3 preswitch and 2-3 postswitch samples, collected ≥1 month apart were assessed for each subject. "Untimed" EFV concentrations with unknown dosing and collection time were assessed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Participants' mean, minimum, and maximum EFV levels were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Participants with EFV levels in the range associated with lower risks of virologic failure and central nervous system toxicity (1000-4000 ng/mL), preswitch and postswitch, were enumerated. Results EFV levels were assessed in 297 preswitch and 249 postswitch samples from 99 participants, having exposure to brand and generic EFV for a median of 103 (Q1-Q3: 87-116) and 10.3 (Q1-Q3: 8.9-11.7) months, respectively. The final brand sample was collected at a median of 98 days preswitch; the first generic sample was collected at a median of 133 days postswitch. No significant differences were observed in participant mean EFV levels before (median 1968 ng/mL; Q1-Q3: 1534-2878 ng/mL) and after (median 1987 ng/mL; Q1-Q3: 1521-2834 ng/mL) switch (P = 0.85). Eighty participants had mean EFV levels within the 1000-4000 ng/mL range on the brand drug, of which 74 remained within this range postswitch. Conclusions There were no statistically significant differences between untimed EFV levels in patients switching from the brand to generic EFV combination pill. Given the long elimination half-life of EFV, untimed drug levels may be a convenient way to estimate product bioequivalence.

Background We examined trends and determinants of unsuppressed VL among PLWH stratified on the basis of HIV exposure category over 10 years in BC, Canada. Methods The analysis included all PLWH in BC from 04/2005 to 03/2016 identified in the provincial STOP-HIV database. This database includes: positive HIV test results, antiretroviral therapy (ART) dispensing information, laboratory data, physician billing data, hospital discharge abstracts and vital statistics linkages. For each year, individuals were classified as having an unsuppressed VL if they: 1) were newly diagnosed; 2) had any VL ≥200 copies/mL measure; or 3) did not have a VL measured. We examined factors associated with unsuppressed VL using generalized estimating equations to build a multivariable logistic regression model. Results Among 9778 PLWH in BC during the study period, 80.7% were male and the median age at diagnosis was 37 years. Among those with HIV exposure information, 49.0% were men who have sex with men(MSM), 33.6% were people who use injection drugs(PWID), 16.0% had only heterosexual exposures and 1.4% had other exposures. 16.4% had missing exposure information. The proportion of those with unsuppressed VL decreased from 66.5% in 2005 to 24.5% in 2015 (p Conclusion Across BC, the proportion of PLWH with unsuppressed VL fell markedly between 2005 - 2015 from 66% to 25%. However, PWID and those with heterosexual exposures require additional supports to maximize the benefits of ART. Disclosure No significant relationships.

Objectives To describe and compare integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for raltegravir, elvitegravir-cobicistat, and dolutegravir. Design Population-based, retrospective cohort. Methods Antiretroviral-experienced and naive persons at least 19 years old were included if they received their first prescription for raltegravir, elvitegravir-cobicistat, or dolutegravir in British Columbia, Canada, in 2012-2014, and were followed for 2 years until 31 December 2016. The primary outcome was an ADR resulting in INSTI discontinuation. ADR rates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by Poisson method. Cox proportional-hazards regression estimated the hazard ratio for ADR-related INSTI discontinuation, adjusted for confounders. ADR symptoms were compared across INSTIs. Results There were 1344 persons contributing 1464 person-INSTI exposures. The cohort was predominantly male (79%) and antiretroviral therapy-experienced (85%). ADR events and unadjusted ADR rates (95% CI) per 100 person-years were raltegravir 24 of 551 (4.4%), 2.91 (1.95, 4.35); elvitegravir-cobicistat 38 of 394 (9.6%), 5.94 (4.32, 8.16); and dolutegravir 27 of 519 (5.2%), 2.96 (2.03, 4.31). The ADR rate for elvitegravir-cobicistat was double that of dolutegravir (adjusted hazard ratio 2.24, 95% CI 1.13, 4.44), but not significantly different for either dolutegravir or elvitegravir versus raltegravir. Elvitegravir-cobicistat-treated persons had a significantly higher proportion of gastrointestinal and general (fatigue, malaise) ADRs. Neuropsychiatric ADRs were more frequent with dolutegravir, but not significantly different between INSTIs. Among those switching between INSTIs, there was no apparent relationship between experiencing an ADR to one INSTI and subsequent intolerance to another. Conclusions This study affirms INSTIs are well tolerated during routine clinical use. Consideration of differences in side effect profiles can inform antiretroviral therapy individualization.

Objectives To estimate the incidence of and risk factors for emergent resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) and nucleoside(-tide) reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) in HIV-1-infected adults receiving an INSTI and two NRTIs. Design Retrospective cohort study. Methods Persons aged at least 19 years were included if they received their first prescription for raltegravir, elvitegravir or dolutegravir in British Columbia, Canada in 2012-2014 and were followed to 31 December 2015. Emergent resistance was defined as new mutations conferring intermediate-high level NRTI or INSTI resistance (score ≥30, Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Algorithm v.7.0.1). First-year resistance rates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated for 'any' (INSTI or NRTI) resistance using Poisson regression. The relationship between any emergent resistance and explanatory variables was modeled by Cox proportional hazards. Results There were 270 raltegravir, 323 elvitegravir and 392 dolutegravir-treated persons who were predominantly male (77%), antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced (81%), with low prevalence of preexisting drug resistance (16%). INSTI and NRTI resistance emerged in both ART-experienced and ART-naive persons (including dolutegravir-treated ART-naive), with no statistically significant differences in 'any' resistance rates (95% CI) between INSTIs: raltegravir 3.80 (1.90, 7.60), elvitegravir 2.37 (1.06, 5.27) and dolutegravir 1.48 (0.62, 3.55)/100 person-years. The strongest factors associated with emergent resistance were CD4 less than 200 cells/μl, adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) 10.46 (4.67, 23.41) and less than 80% adherence to the INSTI regimen hazard ratio 2.52 (1.11, 5.71). Conclusion Incident drug resistance rates were low with 'real-world' use of INSTI-based regimens. However, incomplete ART adherence and low CD4 cell count were associated with increased resistance rates regardless of which INSTI was prescribed. Provide adherence support and monitor for drug resistance.

This study evaluated treatment satisfaction, gastrointestinal tolerability, depressive symptoms and alterations in laboratory parameters before and after switching from ritonavir capsule to tablet formulation.HIV+ adults switching from ritonavir capsules to tablets were eligible for the study. The HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ), Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and CES-D Depression inventory were self-administered before, and 3-4 months after switching. Results of laboratory tests within three months of each questionnaire were collected. A subset underwent plasma drug level sampling. Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used for comparison of continuous variables and McNemar's test for dichotomised data.Most of the 71 participants were Caucasian men, median age 51 years. Participants were taking ritonavir in combination with either atazanavir (n=48 [67.6%]), darunavir (n=18 [25.4%]), fosamprenavir (n=3 [4.2%]) or saquinavir (n=2 [2.8%]). In general after the switch to tablets, participants reported improved treatment satisfaction (median [interquartile range] HIVTSQ score 53/60 [48, 58] after vs 49/60 [45, 54] before, p0.001), fewer gastrointestinal symptoms (GSRS score 4/45 [1, 9] vs 5/45 [3,13], p0.001) and had higher HDL cholesterol (1.22 mmol/L [1.07, 1.45] vs 1.09 mmol/L [0.90,1.32], p = 0.003) and lower total cholesterol/HDL ratio (3.82 [3.05, 4.40] vs 4.23 [3.45, 4.84], p0.001). There were no significant changes in plasma viral load, CD4 counts, depression scores, or atazanavir or ritonavir trough levels.Results of this study suggest that the newer tablet formulation of ritonavir is better tolerated and has fewer gastrointestinal side effects than the older capsule formulation.

A patient's understanding and use of healthcare information can affect their decisions regarding treatment. Better patient understanding about HIV resistance may improve adherence to therapy, decrease population viral load and extend the use of first-line HIV therapies. We examined knowledge of developing HIV resistance and explored treatment outcomes in a cohort of HIV+ persons on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The longitudinal investigations into supportive and ancillary health services (LISA) cohort is a prospective study of HIV+ persons on HAART. A comprehensive interviewer-administrated survey collected socio-demographic variables. Drug resistance knowledge was determined using a three-part definition. Clinical markers were collected through linkage with the Drug Treatment Program (DTP) at the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's Exact Test and continuous variables using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Proportional odds logistic regression was performed for the adjusted multivariable analysis. Of 457 LISA participants, less than 4% completely defined HIV resistance and 20% reported that they had not discussed resistance with their physician. Overall, 61% of the cohort isor=95% adherent based on prescription refills. Owing to small numbers pooling was preformed for analyses. The model showed that being younger (OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99), having greater than high school education (OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.07-2.51), discussing medication with physicians (OR=3.67, 95% CI: 1.76-7.64), having high provider trust (OR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03), and receiving one-to-one counseling by a pharmacist (OR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.41-3.24) are predictive of a complete or partial definition of HIV resistance. The probability of completely defining HIV resistance increased from 15.8 to 63.9% if respondents had discussed HIV medication with both a physician and a pharmacist. Although the understanding of HIV resistance showed no differences in treatment outcomes in this cohort, overall adherence and complete understanding of HIV resistance were low. If patient understanding could be improved through discussions with physicians and pharmacists, potential exists to enhance overall adherence and treatment outcomes.

Background Nevirapine 400 mg extended release tablets (nevirapine-XR) are a once-daily alternative to nevirapine 200 mg immediate release tablets (nevirapine-IR). Study objectives were to describe the effectiveness and tolerability of nevirapine-XR in clinical practice and, for patients who switched from once daily 2x200 mg nevirapine-IR to nevirapine-XR, compare virological suppression and plasma nevirapine concentrations during each treatment period. Methods HIV-1-infected adults entered the study cohort if they initiated nevirapine-XR in British Columbia (BC) Canada between 1 April 2012 and 30 September 2012 and were followed until 30 September 2013. Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted from the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS databases. Patients who switched from once daily nevirapine-IR to nevirapine-XR were monitored for 6 months pre- and post-switch with comparison of virological suppression (McNeamer's test) and median random plasma nevirapine concentrations (Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test) in each period. Results The 536 nevirapine-XR-treated patients were 96% male, median (IQR) age 49.9 (44.0–56.9) years. Median follow-up was 15.6 (14.7–16.5) months, with 474/536 (88%) maintaining virological suppression. Emergent drug resistance developed in 5/536 (1%), adverse drug reactions in 17/536 (3%) and, although 31/536 (6%) reported ‘whole’ tablets in their stools, this was not associated with adverse outcomes. Among the 305 patients who switched from nevirapine-IR to nevirapine-XR, median (IQR) random plasma nevirapine concentration was higher during nevirapine-IR 5,000 (3,690–6,090) ng/ml than nevirapine-XR 3,930 (3,050–5,150) ng/ml ( PConclusions This post-marketing study affirms the effectiveness and tolerability of nevirapine-XR as an alternative to nevirapine-IR in adults.

of results Six patients switched from tenofovir to entecavir in 2007. All patients were male with a median age of 49 yrs (IQR 46–58 yrs) and a median CD4 count of 500 cells/mm3 (IQR 253–658 cells/mm3). All patients were hepatitis Be antigen positive, and had undetectable HBV viral loads while on tenofovir therapy prior to initiation of entecavir. 5/6 patients had prior HBV DNA samples available for genotypic testing; 100% revealed evidence of baseline lamivudine resistance (presence of L180 M + M204 V) but no evidence of entecavir-associated resistance mutations. Patients were treated with entecavir 1 mg daily or renallyadjusted equivalent. Lamivudine was maintained within the antiretroviral regimen of 5/6 patients. All patients experienced HBV rebound on entecavir. Median time to HBV virologic rebound was 2 months (range 1–11 months), and the median HBV DNA viral load at rebound was 226,012 copies/mL (IQR 6,771–492,237 copies/mL). Only one patient experienced a rise in ALT (to 143 IU/mL) at the time of initial HBV rebound. All patients maintained HIV virologic suppression during the substitution period and at the time of HBV rebound.