Search

Fractures of the patella account for about 1% of all skeletal injuries and can lead to profound impairment due to its crucial function in the extensor mechanism of the knee. Diagnosis is based on the injury mechanism, physical examination and radiological findings. While the clinical diagnosis is often distinct, there are numerous treatment options available. The type of treatment as well as the optimum timing of surgical intervention depends on the underlying fracture type, the associated soft tissue damage, patient factors (i.e. age, bone quality, activity level and compliance) and the stability of the extensor mechanism. Regardless of the treatment method an early rehabilitation is recommended in order to avoid contractures of the knee joint capsule and cartilage degeneration. For non-displaced and dislocated non-comminuted transverse patellar fractures (2-part) modified anterior tension band wiring is the treatment of choice and can be combined – due to its biomechanical superiority – with cannulated screw fixation. In severe comminuted fractures, open reduction and fixation with small fragment screws or new angular stable plates for anatomic restoration of the retropatellar surface and extension mechanism results in best outcome. Additional circular cerclage wiring using either typical metal cerclage wires or resorbable PDS/non-resorbable FiberWires increases fixation stability and decreases risk for re-dislocation. Distal avulsion fractures should be fixed with small fragment screws and should be protected by a transtibial McLaughlin cerclage. Partial or complete patellectomy should be regarded only as a very rare salvage operation due to its severe functional impairment.

Background: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture from its tibial insertion is a rare condition. Despite the further technical advent in refixation of avulsion fractures, the reported failure rate of current approaches remains high and the optimal surgical technique has not been elucidated yet.The purpose of the current study is to present an all-inside arthroscopic reconstruction technique for bony tibial avulsion fractures of the PCL and initial clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients underwent a thorough clinical and radiological examination of both knees at 3, 6, 12, 18, and if possible also at 24 months.Clinical evaluation included subjective and objective IKDC 2000, Lysholm score, and KOOS score. Radiographic imaging studies included CT scans for assessment of osseous integration and anatomic reduction of the bony avulsion. In addition to that posterior stress radiographs of both knees using the Telos device (Arthrex, Naples, USA) were conducted to measure posterior tibial translation.Results: A total of four patients (1 female, 3 male; ø 38 (± 18) years), who underwent arthroscopic refixation of a PCL avulsion fracture using the Tight Rope device were enrolled in this study. Mean follow up was 22 [18–24] months. The mean subjective IKDC was 72.6% (± 9.9%). Regarding the objective IKDC three patients accounted for grade A, one patient for grade C. The Lysholm score yielded 82 (± 6.9) points. The KOOS score reached 75% (± 13%; symptoms 76%, pain 81%, function 76%, sports 66%, QoL 64%).All patients showed complete osseous integration and anatomic reduction of the bony avulsion. The mean posterior tibial translation at final follow up was 2.8 [0–7] mm. Conclusions: All-arthroscopic treatment of tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament provides satisfactory clinical results in a preliminary patient cohort. It is a reproducible technique, which minimizes soft tissue damage and obviates a second surgery for hardware removal. Further clinical studies with larger patient cohorts and a control group are needed to further confirm these preliminary results.

Background: After posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR), functional deficits at the knee can persist. It remains unclear if neighboring joints compensate for the knee during demanding activities of daily living. Purpose: To assess long-term alterations in lower limb mechanics in patients after PCLR. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 28 patients who had undergone single-bundle unilateral isolated or combined PCLR performed stair navigation, squat, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit tasks at 8.2 ± 2.2 years after surgery. Motion capture and force plates were used to collect kinematic and kinetic data. Then, 3-dimensional hip, knee, and ankle kinematic data of the reconstructed limb were compared with those of the contralateral limb using statistical parametric mapping. Results: Side-to-side differences at the knee were primarily found during upward-driven movements at 8 years after surgery. The reconstructed knee exhibited lower internal rotation during the initial loading phase of stair ascent versus the contralateral knee (P =.005). During the sit-to-stand task, higher flexion angles during the midcycle (P =.017) and lower external rotation angles (P =.049) were found in the reconstructed knee; sagittal knee (P =.001) and hip (P =.016) moments were lower in the reconstructed limb than the contralateral limb. In downward-driven movements, side-to-side differences were minimal at the knee but prominent at the ankle and hip: during stair descent, the reconstructed ankle exhibited lower dorsiflexion and lower external rotation during the midcycle versus the contralateral ankle (P =.006 and P =.040, respectively). Frontal hip moments in the reconstructed limb were higher than those in the contralateral limb during the stand-to-sit task (P =.010); during squats, sagittal hip angles in the reconstructed limb were higher than those in the contralateral limb (P <.001). Conclusion: Patients after PCLR exhibited compensations at the hip and ankle during downward-driven movements, such as stair descent, squats, and stand-to-sit. Conversely, residual long-term side-to-side differences at the knee were detected during upward-driven movements such as stair ascent and sit-to-stand. Clinical Relevance: After PCLR, side-to-side differences in biomechanical function were activity-dependent and occurred either at the knee or neighboring joints. When referring to the contralateral limb to assess knee function in the reconstructed limb, concentric, upward-driven movements should be prioritized. Compensations at the hip and ankle during downward-driven movements lead to biases in long-term functional assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Clinical reports on meniscal scaffolds seem promising, albeit relatively paucity exists regarding their biomechanical behavior. The aim of the study is to delineate the impact of differing suture materials and the type as well as the temperature of the irrigation fluid on the pull-out strength of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold (Actifit®).Materials and Methods: 128 specimens were utilized with horizontal sutures and uniaxial load-to-failure testing was performed. We compared two different suture materials-polydioxanone (PDS) and non-absorbable, braided polyester sutures (NABP)-as well as two common irrigation fluids-lactated Ringer's and electrolyte-free, hypotonic Mannitol-Sorbitol. All specimens were further evaluated according to two different temperatures [room temperature (20 °C) and near-core body temperature (37 °C)].Results: Mean load-to-failure was 53.3 ± 6.5 N. There was no significant difference between the NABP and the PDS group. Ringer group showed a significantly higher load-to-failure compared to Purisole (P = .0002). This was equivalent for both PDS (P = .0008) and NABP sutures (P = .0008). Significantly higher failure loads could be established for the 37° group (P = .041); yet, this difference was neither confirmed for the PDS or in in the NABP subgroup. Only the subgroup using Purisole at 37° showed significantly higher failure loads compared to 20° (P = .017).Conclusions: This study underlines the potential to improve pull-out strength during implantation of an Actifit® scaffold by alteration of the type of irrigation fluid. Lactated Ringer solution provided the highest construct stability in regard to load-to-failure testing and should be considered whenever implantation of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold is conducted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To analyze outcome differences after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in male and female patients., Methods: A prospective database of 234 PCL reconstructions (53 female and 181 male patients) with either isolated or combined procedures was analyzed. Patients were followed up for a mean of 62 months (range, 34 to 110 months) by use of stress radiography and the International Knee Documentation Committee score. We included 32 female patients for a matched-group analysis and compared them with 32 matching male patients. Matching parameters were number/type of reconstructed ligaments, revision/primary surgery, autograft/allograft use, preoperative tibial displacement, time interval from injury to surgery, follow-up interval, and age., Results: There was no preoperative difference in posterior stress radiographs (12.9 ± 3.0 mm in female patients and 13.2 ± 2.3 mm in male patients). After surgery, both groups showed a significant reduction in posterior displacement (6.0 ± 2.5 mm [54% reduction] in female patients and 7.8 ± 2.2 mm [40% reduction] in male patients). There was a significant greater reduction of posterior laxity in female patients. International Knee Documentation Committee scoring showed a significant improvement in both groups., Conclusions: We found in this specific patient series a superior reduction of posterior tibial laxity in female patients compared with male patients, indicating that possible gender-related differences exist after PCL surgery., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study using prospective data., (Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)