Search

Transgenes that improve quantitative traits have traditionally been evaluated in one or a few genetic backgrounds across multiple environments. However, testing across multiple genetic backgrounds can be equally important to accurately quantify the value of a transgene for breeding objectives. Creating near-isogenic lines across a wide germplasm space is costly and time consuming, which renders it impractical during early stages of testing. In this experiment, we evaluate three approaches to sample the genetic space while concurrently testing across environments. We created both transgenic and non-transgenic doubled haploid lines, F2:3lines, and bulk F3families to determine if all methods resulted in similar estimation of transgene value and to identify the number of yield trial plots from each method necessary to obtain a stable estimate of the transgene value. With one exception, the three methods consistently estimated a similar effect of the transgene. We suggest that bulked F3lines topcrossed to a tester inbred is the most effective method to estimate the value of a transgene across both genetic space and environments.

Transgenes have been successfully commercialized for qualitatively inherited insect and herbicide resistance traits that show similar effects across genetic backgrounds. However, for quantitative traits like yield, genetic background may affect the measured transgene value. In this paper, we evaluated whether different genetic backgrounds impact the estimated value of a transgene for grain yield, ear height, and anthesis-silking interval for maize by developing isogenic pairs of lines with and without a transgene and testing them in hybrid combination with non-transgenic lines from a complementary heterotic group across eleven environments in the USA. Over all hybrid combinations, the transgene increased yield by 0.2 Mg ha−1. Across multiple non-transgenic lines of the opposing heterotic group, the transgene effect within a line pair ranged from an increase of 0.8 Mg ha−1for the NSS4 and SS7 transgenic lines to a reduction of 0.3 Mg ha−1for the NSS5 transgenic line when compared to their non-transgenic isoline. Transgenic hybrids were often taller than non-transgenic hybrids (P