Search

Autologous breast reconstruction using muscle-sparing free flaps are becoming increasingly popular, although microvascular free flap reconstruction has been utilised for autologous breast reconstructions for >20 years. This innovative microsurgical technique involves meticulous dissection of artery-vein bundle (perforators) responsible for perfusion of the subcutaneous fat and skin of the flap; however, due to unpredictable anatomical variations, preoperative imaging of the donor site to select appropriate perforators has become routine. Preoperative imaging also reduces operating time and enhances the surgeon's confidence in choosing the appropriate donor site for harvesting flaps. Although computed tomography angiography has been widely used for preoperative imaging, concerns over excessive exposure to ionising radiation and poor iodinated contrast agent enhancement of the intramuscular perforator course has made magnetic resonance angiography, the first choice imaging modality in our centre. Magnetic resonance angiography with specific post-processing of the images has established itself as a reliable method for mapping tiny perforator vessels. Multiple donor sites can be imaged in a single setting without concern for ionising radiation exposure. This provides anatomical information of more reconstruction donor site options, so that a surgeon can design a flap of tissue centralised around the best perforator, as well as a back-up perforator, and even a back-up flap option located on a different region of the body. This information is especially helpful in patients with a history of scar tissue from previous surgeries, where the primary choice perforator is found to be damaged or unsuitable intraoperatively. In addition, chest magnetic resonance angiography evaluates recipient site blood vessel suitability including vessel diameters, course, and branching patterns. In this article we provide a broad overview of various skin flaps, clinical indications, advantages and disadvantages of each of these flaps, basic imaging technique, along with advanced sequences for visualising tiny arteries in the groin and in the chest. Post-processing techniques, structure of the report and how automation of the reporting system improves workflow is described. We also describe applications of magnetic resonance angiography in postoperative imaging.

Background Selection of a vascular pedicle for autologous breast reconstruction is time consuming and depends on visual evaluation during the surgery. Preoperative imaging of donor site for mapping the perforator artery anatomy greatly improves the efficiency of perforator selection and significantly reduces the operative time. In this article, we present our experience with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for perforator vessel mapping including MRA technique and interpretation. Methods We have performed over 400 MRA examinations from August 2008 to August 2013 at our institution for preoperative imaging of donor site for mapping the perforator vessel anatomy. Using our optimized imaging protocol with blood pool magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents, multiple donor sites can be imaged in a single MRA examination. Following imaging using the postprocessing and reporting tool, we estimated incidence of commonly used perforators for autologous breast reconstruction. Results In our practice, anterior abdominal wall tissue is the most commonly used donor site for perforator flap breast reconstruction and deep inferior epigastric artery perforators are the most commonly used vascular pedicle. A thigh flap, based on the profunda femoral artery perforator has become the second most used flap at our institution. In addition, MRA imaging also showed evidence of metastatic disease in 4% of our patient subset. Conclusion Our MRA technique allows the surgeons to confidently assess multiple donor sites for the best perforator and flap design. In conclusion, a well-performed MRA with specific postprocessing provides an accurate method for mapping perforator vessel, at the same time avoiding ionizing radiation.

Lymphedema is a chronic and progressive condition that occurs after cancer treatment. Autologous lymph node transplant, or microsurgical vascularized lymph node transfer (ALNT), is a surgical treatment option that brings vascularized vascular endothelial growth factor-C-producing tissue into the operated field to promote lymphangiogenesis and bridge the distal obstructed lymphatic system with the proximal lymphatic system. Operative techniques for upper- and lower-extremity ALNT are described with 3 donor lymph node flaps (inguinal, thoracic, cervical). Surgical technique is described for the combination of ALNT with abdominal flaps and nonabdominal flaps. Imaging showing restoration of lymphatic drainage after ALNT is shown.

With technological advances in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), spatial resolution of 1-mm perforating vessels can reliably be visualized and accurately located in reference to patients' anatomic landmarks without exposing patients to ionizing radiation or iodinated contrast, resulting in optimal perforator selection, improved flap design, and increased surgical efficiency. As their experience with MRA in breast reconstruction has increased, the authors have made changes to their MRA protocol that allow imaging of the vasculature in multiple donor sites (buttock, abdomen, and upper thigh) in one study. This article provides details of this experience with multiple donor site contrast-enhanced MRA.

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for preoperative mapping of rectus and gluteal muscle perforating arteries prior to autologous flap breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods Preoperative MRA on 25 consecutive patients undergoing perforator artery-based autologous breast reconstruction was performed at 1.5 T using 3D liver accelerate volume acquisition (LAVA) of abdominal or gluteal regions acquired during injection of 20 mL of gadobenate dimeglumine with bolus timing optimized using MR fluoroscopy or SmartPrep. Perforator artery size and coordinates relative to umbilicus or top of gluteal crease on 3D MRA were compared to findings at surgery. Reconstructed breast volume estimates from MRA were also compared to weights at harvesting. Results In all, 132 perforator arteries were found at surgery to be located within 1 cm of the coordinates measured on MRA and were surgically verified to be suitable for flap perfusion. Surgery verified the arterial course and caliber through the rectus and gluteal muscles visualized on MRA in 48 of 49 arteries. Volume rendering of 3D MRA predicted a breast reconstruction volume with a mean difference of 47 g compared to measurements at harvesting. Conclusion MRA accurately maps rectus and gluteal muscle perforator arteries for preoperative planning of autologous flaps for breast reconstruction. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:1176–1184. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Preoperative imaging is essential for abdominal perforator flap breast reconstruction because it allows for preoperative perforator selection, resulting in improved operative efficiency and flap design. The benefits of visualizing the vasculature preoperatively also extend to gluteal artery perforator flaps. Initially, our practice used computed tomography angiography (CTA) to image the gluteal vessels. However, with advances in magnetic resonance imaging angiography (MRA), perforating vessels of 1-mm diameter can reliably be visualized without exposing patients to ionizing radiation or iodinated intravenous contrast. In our original MRA protocol to image abdominal flaps, we found the accuracy of MRA compared favorably with CTA. With our increased experience with MRA, we decided to use MRA to image gluteal flaps. Technical changes were made to the MRA protocol to improve image quality and extend the field of view. Using our new MRA protocol, we can image the vasculature of the buttock, abdomen, and upper thigh in one study. We have found that the spatial resolution of MRA is sufficient to accurately map gluteal perforating vessels, as well as provide information on vessel caliber and course. This article details our experience with preoperative imaging for gluteal perforator flap breast reconstruction.

The tremendous variability of the inferior epigastric arterial system makes accurate imaging of the vasculature of the anterior abdominal wall an essential component of optimal perforator selection. Preoperative imaging of the abdominal vasculature allows for preoperative perforator selection, resulting in improved operative efficiency and flap design. Abdominal wall perforators of 1-mm diameter can be reliably visualized without exposing patients to ionizing radiation or iodinated intravenous contrast through advances in magnetic resonance imaging angiography (MRA). In this study, MRA imaging was performed on 31 patients who underwent 50 abdominal flaps. For each flap, the location, relative to the umbilicus, of the three largest perforators on both the left and right sides of the abdomen was determined with MRA. Vessel diameter and anatomic course were also evaluated. Postoperatively, a survey was completed by the surgeon to assess the accuracy of the MRA with respect to the intraoperative findings. All perforators visualized on MRA were found at surgery (0% false-positive). In 2 of 50 flaps, the surgeon transferred a flap based upon a vessel not visualized on the MRA (4% false-negative). This article details our experience with MRA as a reliable preoperative imaging technique for abdominal perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Purpose: To compare image quality including the number of perforators visualized, vessel contrast ratios, and vessel sharpness with blood pool and extracellular contrast agents in abdominal perforator flap magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Materials and Methods: Preoperative perforator flap MRA was performed prone on 64 consecutive patients undergoing breast reconstruction (32 receiving 20 mL gadobenate dimeglumine and 32 receiving 10 mL gadofosveset trisodium) on transverse 3D fat-suppressed spoiled gradient echo images using high spatial resolution. Image quality was assessed qualitatively on a 4-point scale. On a computer workstation the number of perforators visualized was counted, arterial, venous, muscle, fat, and abdominal perforator signal intensities were measured to calculate signal intensity and contrast ratios, and vessel sharpness was evaluated. Results: The qualitative image quality score was higher for gadofosveset (2.7) than gadobenate (2.0) and CTA (2.0). The mean number of perforators visualized with gadofosveset was 6.8 on right and 10.4 on left compared to 4.6 on right and 6.6 on left for gadobenate (P < 0.0001). The artery-to-fat contrast ratio was comparable, suggesting the difference was not related to magnitude of enhancement. Perforator-to-muscle contrast ratio was greater for gadofosveset, 2.3, compared to gadobenate 1.5 (P = 0.002). Vessel sharpness was also greater for gadofosveset (P = 0.006). Conclusion: Perforator MRA image quality including number of perforators visualized, perforator-to-muscle contrast, and vessel sharpness is higher with gadofosveset trisodium compared with gadobenate dimeglumine. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:711-716. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) free flap represents an alternative technique for autogenous breast reconstruction in patients with insufficient abdominal donor tissue. Historically, patients underwent a staged approach for bilateral breast reconstruction with the IGAP because it is technically demanding and can be time consuming. The bilateral simulta- neous IGAP can be performed effectively with 2 microsurgeons operating together. This is a retrospective study of 22 patients (44 flaps) who under- went bilateral breast reconstruction with bilateral IGAP flaps in one opera- tion between January 2005 and December 2007. The following parameters were evaluated and compared to our published data with unilateral IGAP flap reconstruction: operating time, blood loss, flap weight, hospital length of stay, and perioperative complications. A follow-up patient survey was also conducted to gauge patient's satisfaction with the donor site and procedure. The flap survival rate was 100%. Complications included 1 patient with 1 flap with partial fat necrosis, 2 patients who required reoperation for venous congestion, 1 patient with a hematoma, 2 patients with delayed buttock wound healing, 2 patients requiring resuturing for buttock wound dehiscence, and 1 patient with resolved paresthesias. The majority of patients were satisfied with the procedure and donor site. In this study, we detail our experience with the inferior gluteal region as a reliable source of donor tissue and the simultaneous bilateral IGAP flap as an efficient method of breast reconstruction. (Ann Plast Surg 2009;63: 249-254)